View Full Version : Afc West Standings
maven
09-22-2007, 08:47 PM
Denver Broncos 2-0
San Diego Chargers 1-1
Oakland Raiders 0-2
Kansas City Chiefs 0-2
Look at those sorry ass teams at the bottom. Oh it feels good. Real good!
Hilarious!
maven
09-22-2007, 08:51 PM
Oakland scores 41, but whoops gives up 59
KC, even worse! A paltry 13 points scored, but 40 points allowed! Gooooonther please save us crappy Chiefs!
TheChamp24
09-22-2007, 08:54 PM
And I love how the Chief fans try to spin it around where they are actually a playoff team that can win 9-10 wins this year.
And apparentally Raider fans think they can take the division too...
maven
09-22-2007, 08:57 PM
And I love how the Chief fans try to spin it around where they are actually a playoff team that can win 9-10 wins this year.
Oh, but we started 0-2 last year & made the playoffs via the back door. We're just like last year, we'll turn it around.
:spit:
broncofan2438
09-22-2007, 09:14 PM
Those standings look good, but our scores dont. Denver needs to make big plays and start whomping on the opponents.
Pseudofool
09-22-2007, 09:20 PM
The loss to the Chargers is nice, but beyond that the standings mean a whole lot of nothing at this point. While I'd like the division, I'd much rather have a dominant team with some playoff longevity whether we come in as a wildcard or with homefield advantage.
broncofan2438
09-22-2007, 10:20 PM
The loss to the Chargers is nice, but beyond that the standings mean a whole lot of nothing at this point. While I'd like the division, I'd much rather have a dominant team with some playoff longevity whether we come in as a wildcard or with homefield advantage.
True, they definately need to be a team that other teams are scared to play. We really have not shown anything, and have got some breaks in the division to make us look like the more dominant team.
Bronx33
09-22-2007, 10:23 PM
And I love how the Chief fans try to spin it around where they are actually a playoff team that can win 9-10 wins this year.
And apparentally Raider fans think they can take the division too...
Speaking of raider fans? i haven't seen any since last week you would think they would still be talking smack since officially they don't have a losing record Hilarious! . Hmmmmm they must not have much faith i guess (go fiqure) you really can't blame the gun shy bastards.
Kaylore
09-22-2007, 10:39 PM
堪薩斯 市 What is this and why does it suck?
TheChamp24
09-22-2007, 10:44 PM
I think its hilarious Raider fans keep saying they won last week. lol
And seriously, why do people care if we beat someone by 40 or 3? I'll take wins no matter what the case.
Bronx33
09-22-2007, 11:10 PM
堪薩斯 市 What is this and why does it suck?
It means Kansas City... :clown:
i like the standings, especially since i live in the heart of chef country.
the Broncos need to start finishing drives and get TDs instead of FG attempts.
Odysseus
09-23-2007, 12:43 AM
Those standings look good, but our scores dont. Denver needs to make big plays and start whomping on the opponents.
If the Broncos start getting inside the 20 Jay will just start walking the ball in.
All summer long I've been listening to Chiefs and Raiders walking around with a "quiet confidence" and now they are just quiet.
A couple of more weeks of this and you can sing them both a lullybye. :thumbs:
maven
09-23-2007, 01:07 AM
The loss to the Chargers is nice, but beyond that the standings mean a whole lot of nothing at this point. While I'd like the division, I'd much rather have a dominant team with some playoff longevity whether we come in as a wildcard or with homefield advantage.
If the standings meant a whole lot of nothing to this point, would the mane or any bronco board be the same?
Two weeks into the season, if the Broncos were 0-2 the site would possibly implode.
We're 2-0 and leading the AFC West. Be happy we're not the lowly Chiefs or Raiders! Denver is leading the AFC West & 2-0 vs the AFC. Feels great doesn't it!
Odysseus
09-23-2007, 02:27 AM
STOLEN FROM DEUCEOFCLUB SIGNATURE!!!!!!
AFC West, Wall of Shame.
Last playoff win:
Broncos: 01/14/2006
Raiders: 01/19/2003
Chargers: 01/15/1995
Chiefs: 01/16/1994
BWA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!! Broncos NEED to get deep into the playsoff this year just to scare the crap out of everybody. They should actually do it because our division has gotten soft. This really puts Charger smack in perspective. Getting there and winning there...two different things.
Oh yeah.....
If we don't lose any games in the post season we will win the Superbowl.
smalltowngrll
09-23-2007, 02:45 AM
One game at a time! I love the standings now, but lets get through the jags tomorrow. ;D Then, when Diego, Chiefs and Raiders lose again...we can rub it in! ;)
Cito Pelon
09-23-2007, 04:44 AM
The loss to the Chargers is nice, but beyond that the standings mean a whole lot of nothing at this point. While I'd like the division, I'd much rather have a dominant team with some playoff longevity whether we come in as a wildcard or with homefield advantage.
I like Titles, I like Title banners hanging at Mile High. I want all three Title Banners hanging at Mile High - Division, Conference, League. A Conference Title and a League Title banner are fine with me, but I don't have a problem with Title banners period. That means you at least competed at the Big Table. Denver hasn't done that but one time in the past 8 years, the worst stretch since 1976. That sucks. I'm not happy with that paucity of Titles.
400HZ
09-23-2007, 09:37 AM
I like Titles, I like Title banners hanging at Mile High. I want all three Title Banners hanging at Mile High - Division, Conference, League. A Conference Title and a League Title banner are fine with me, but I don't have a problem with Title banners period. That means you at least competed at the Big Table. Denver hasn't done that but one time in the past 8 years, the worst stretch since 1976. That sucks. I'm not happy with that paucity of Titles.
The division and conference has been so fuggin competitive lately that it's really difficult to anybody to dominate for a long stretch of time.