I should vote for Hillary ......

[Spider]

http://d.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/uc/20070810/lcrmlu070810.gif

[SoCalBronco]

I shudder at the thought of her behind that desk.

God.

[Spider]

I tell ya one thing , next time someone like Cheney goes on a power trip , people wont cheer him on .........

[TheDave]

I shudder at the thought of her behind that desk.

God.


I can't imagine it would be any worse than the present situation... then again you never know ;)

[Bronco Bob]

I can't imagine it would be any worse than the present situation... then again you never know ;)

Or if it were Giuliani sitting behind the desk.

[Atlas]

I have been very impressed with her campaign. I'm still going for Biden but he ain't going anywhere. I would definately go for a Hillary/Biden ticket. I think he is so knowledgable and has so much experience and is a no nonsense guy. He would be a great VP running mate for whoever gets the democratic nomination.

[Atlas]

Or if it were Giuliani sitting behind the desk.

I would vote for Giuliani over any other republican. He is prochoice has been married 3 times and doesn't have the far-right shoved up his ass.

I would never vote for him, but if only repubicans were running he would be my choice.....whatever that means.

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

I can't imagine it would be any worse than the present situation... then again you never know ;)

Bingo. :yep:

[c_lazy_r]

I shudder at the thought of her behind that desk.

God.

I'm with you on that.

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

Hillary: the right's choice?

Is hell freezing over? One might think so after reading recent comments from editors at National Review and the Weekly Standard, America's leading conservative magazines. Over the last 15 years, both magazines seldom have passed up an opportunity to excoriate Hillary Rodham Clinton as some kind of crypto-communist.

No more. Today, Sen. Clinton is rapidly becoming not merely acceptable to many right-wingers but possibly even their candidate of choice.

Clinton's unwillingness to pander to her own party's base on Iraq has won her grudging respect from another unlikely source as well: William Kristol, editor of the Weekly Standard. On Aug. 7, he was quoted in the Washington Post saying that compared with Sen. Barack Obama, who is trying to energize the left to raise his falling poll numbers, she is looking quite presidential.

"Obama," Kristol said, "is becoming the antiwar candidate, and Hillary Clinton is becoming the responsible Democrat who could become commander in chief in a post-9/11 world."

On economics, Clinton seemed likely to be a rerun of her husband's administration: fiscally conservative, free-trade-oriented, pragmatic. She confirmed my conclusion in a May 29 speech on economic policy. In it, Clinton said, "There is no greater force for economic growth than free markets." That's about as good as any conservative can hope for from a Democrat.

Clinton's voting record also shows that she is far from the most liberal member of the Senate. According to the National Journal, she ranked 32nd last year, with a rating of 70.2 (100 being perfectly liberal). Obama, by contrast, was significantly more liberal, with a rating of 86.

http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/opinion/la-oe-bartlett10aug10,1,6990869.story

[broncos_mtnman]

“We’re going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.”

-Hillary Clinton

Oh yeah, she's just what we need. :rofl:

[broncos_mtnman]

http://ibdeditorials.com/IMAGES/CARTOONS/toon031907.gif

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

Yep - want to know why the repugs lost their majorities in both houses?

Look no further than Kerry and Hillary: There's your culprits!