Spider
08-12-2007, 11:33 AM
<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/EYI7JXGqd0o"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/EYI7JXGqd0o" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>
Spider
08-12-2007, 11:39 AM
Added: July 21, 2007
From: punkie999
+++FORWARD THIS VIDEO TO EVERYONE YOU... +++FORWARD THIS VIDEO TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW - NOW!!!+++
This, my friends, is the ultimate clip regarding WMD lies - the clip we have all been waiting for. All the lies of George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Condoleezza Rice, Colin Powell compiled together, brilliantly done, with some great "extra" material.
Thanks a lot to my friend Sally from California for bringing this clip to my attention!
Make sure that at the next elections this bunch of liars gets thrown out of the White House - forever and ever.
This clip was created by:
http://www.puppetgov.com
+++STAND UP, WE ARE NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANY MORE!!!+++
NOTE: You have watched this clip, and you are STILL not convinced that Bush did anything wrong? Then you should read about the already infamous, top-secret "DOWNING STREET MEMO" - exposing that the West knew very well that Saddam was NOT a threat and that the war was ILLEGAL.
Links:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Downing_...
Excerpt from the Downing Street Memo (about the Cabinet meeting on 23rd July 2002):
"It seemed clear that Bush had made up his mind to take military action, even if the timing was not yet decided. But the case was thin. Saddam was not threatening his neighbours, and his WMD capability was less than that of Libya, North Korea or Iran. We should work up a plan for an ultimatum to Saddam to allow back in the UN weapons inspectors. This would also help with the legal justification for the use of force.
The Attorney-General said that the desire for regime change was not a legal base for military action. There were three possible legal bases: self-defence, humanitarian intervention, or UNSC authorisation. The first and second could not be the base in this case. Relying on UNSCR 1205 of three years ago would be difficult. The situation might of course change." (more) (less)
Category News & Politics