PDA

View Full Version : Zone Blocking article


elsid13
08-08-2007, 05:36 PM
There are not spefically about Denver but they provide a nice layman report on zone blocking


http://www.boston.com/sports/football/patriots/articles/2007/08/05/getting_a_read_on_the_situation/

Getting a read on the situation
Patriots likely to utilize more zone schemes

They sound like the unsuccessful result of a word jumble, anagrams gone awry -- on, play-side gap, second level. However, they are a rushing Rosetta stone, the key to deciphering one of the most effective run-blocking schemes in football, zone blocking.

The Patriots have both zone- and man-blocking plays in their offense, but this season fans could be seeing more zone plays. Running back Laurence Maroney, who is being counted upon to carry the load as a feature back following the departure of Corey Dillon, excelled in a zone-blocking scheme at the University of Minnesota. In his final season with the Golden Gophers, Maroney rushed for a school-record 1,464 yards. To maximize Maroney's potential, New England could zone in more often.

All teams have some form of zone blocking in their playbook, according to Boston College coach Jeff Jagodzinski, who ran the scheme in the NFL as the Green Bay Packers' offensive coordinator last year and as offensive line coach with the Atlanta Falcons in 2005. The Falcons and Denver Broncos are pure zone-blocking teams.

There are major differences between man and zone blocking, according to former Patriots guard John Hannah. The Hall of Famer, who never played in a zone scheme, said when he played, the blocking scheme gave the running back a choice of one or two holes on a play. In zone blocking, the hole could emerge anywhere along the line, which alters the way linemen block.

GRAPHIC: How zone blocking works

"[Zone blocking] is more the back is kind of sliding along and he's looking and he could go anywhere," said Hannah. "You're still getting into [the defender] and still pushing him, but you're not so much trying to drive him as staying into him and cutting him off. It's a whole different approach."

Jagodzinski, who in Atlanta worked with zone-blocking savant Alex Gibbs, the architect of Denver's scheme, said the primary advantage of zone blocking is the ability to create double-teams.

That's where "on, play-side gap, second level" comes in. They are the buzzwords for zone blocking, a three-rule progression for offensive linemen to follow.

"On" refers to the first responsibility of the lineman, which is to see if there is a defender lined up directly in front of him. If there is, this is his first block.

"Play-side gap" -- If there is not a defender lined up directly across the line of scrimmage from the lineman, his instructions are to block in the direction the play is going, double-teaming a defender on his play-side shoulder.

"Second level" -- Sometimes this is called "linebacker" because that's who most often is blocked at this point. While double-teaming a defender at the line of scrimmage, the linemen will keep their eyes on the next level of defenders, usually linebackers. One lineman will break off the double-team and block the linebacker.

"You've got to read the defense," said Patriots left guard Logan Mankins. "You don't know who you're going to end up on. In man, you know who you're going to end up on before the play starts."

The running back doesn't know where he'll end up, either. However, he must choose one hole decisively. Dance in the hole and you'll be ushered to the sideline.

"The back only has one cut," said Jagodzinski. "He's allowed to make one cut and then he has to get vertical and go get 4 yards. But 4 yards turns into 44 yards if you're patient."

The zone scheme slows defenders, forcing them to remain disciplined or risk overpursuit. "It's hard for the defense to read because it gives you so many cutback lanes that the defense really doesn't know where it's going," said Maroney.

The same principle makes zone-blocked plays effective in the use of the play-action pass.

When executed properly, zone blocking is difficult to defend. The Falcons have led the NFL in rushing each of the last three seasons and the Broncos have had six backs (Terrell Davis, Olandis Gary, Mike Anderson, Clinton Portis, Reuben Droughns, and Tatum Bell) rush for more than 1,000 yards since 1998. The redoubtable running play that is the backbone of the Indianapolis Colts' rushing attack, the stretch play, is another example of zone blocking.

So, why don't more teams use it?

While zone blocking is potent, it's also difficult to master. It requires athletic, agile linemen who can secure two blocks in a short period. It also demands communication and coordination among the linemen. If one leaves too early for a double-team or both leave a defender to double-team a linebacker, the running back is likely picking turf out of his facemask.

Fortunately, the Patriots have both athleticism and experience on the line. Outside of right tackle, the team has had the same players in the same spots for three years now -- Matt Light (left tackle), Mankins (left guard), Dan Koppen (center), and Stephen Neal (right guard).

"We've played enough plays together where we know what to expect from each other," said Mankins.

Still, Jagodzinski said the most successful zone-blocking teams are the ones that do it full time.

"You have to make a commitment to it," he said. "It's not something you dabble in a little bit here and there, in my opinion. If you want to be good at it, you have to major in it."

Neal said people shouldn't get caught up in whether the team is man blocking or zone blocking. "The game has evolved so much it's not as easy as just man or zone," said Neal. "Everything has elements of zone and man."

Jagodzinski agreed. He said regardless of the blocking scheme, the desired result is the same.

"It's just a different technique," said Jagodzinski. "Blocking is blocking."

Christopher L. Gasper can be reached at cgasper@globe.com

elsid13
08-08-2007, 05:37 PM
http://cache.boston.com/bonzai-fba/Globe_Graphic/2007/08/05/1186329481_8559.gif

footstepsfrom#27
08-08-2007, 06:23 PM
Zone blocking presents a double edged dilemna; on the one hand you get the built in advantage of being able to draft from an entirely different talent pool than the one the rest of the NFL is searching through, so you can find top talent deep in the draft (Nalen) or even after the draft (Lepsis). You also get the advantage of running a system teams only see once or twice a year. Since most NFL teams aren't looking for 295 pound O-line guys, you get your pick of the litter on draft day even if you wait past the 3rd round. On the negative side, smaller offensive linemen are going to struggle in pass protection against much bigger defenders. This is what worries me with Jay...he's mobile but he's not Plummer in that respect. If you have a smaller line you need a more mobile QB. Hamilton worries me the most...he seems to get rag dolled in pass protection. This is why I've been suggesting that we use Graham in an H-back role where he can slide off the line back to the FB spot and be there as a last line of defense for Jay. With a franchise QB once again we might need to re-evaluate whether we should be committing ourselves to a system that perpetuates problems in pass protection.

The key to our offense for the next 12+ years is Cutler...should we remain with a blocking scheme that might not suit his talents as well as they did Plummers?

elsid13
08-08-2007, 06:35 PM
The zone blocking scheme seem to work pretty darn good for older less mobile Elway - why shouldn't it work for Cutler.

The scheme will work as long as we run the ball effectively, the key is to make the defense defend both the pass and run vs letting them pin thier ears backs and go get the QB.

SonOfLe-loLang
08-08-2007, 06:55 PM
Yeah, i was just gonna say that. It'll suit cutler fine. Cutler's problem last year was holding on to the ball too long. Perhaps the line didnt do an amazing job last year protecting him, he still needed to get the ball out quicker. Plus, Cutler has good mobility. i think he ran a 4.6 at the combine and apparently is moving well in the pocket in camp (right Kaylore?) I think he'll be fine. I think where the scheme (smaller linemen) effects us most is on the goalline, when we often have to rely on our smaller line getting a good push. There is less space to manuver with more defensive guys at the line. That's why it might be nice to see a Montrae Holland come in during goalline situations.

footstepsfrom#27
08-08-2007, 07:27 PM
The zone blocking scheme seem to work pretty darn good for older less mobile Elway - why shouldn't it work for Cutler.

The scheme will work as long as we run the ball effectively, the key is to make the defense defend both the pass and run vs letting them pin thier ears backs and go get the QB.
Our talent level on the O-line in '97-'98 was probably the best in NFL...3 pro bowl caliber players on that line. Even so...go back and look and you can see that pass protection sometimes suffered as a result of their size. It goes without saying that if you run the ball effectively your passing game is helped considerably.

elsid13
08-08-2007, 07:38 PM
Our talent level on the O-line in '97-'98 was probably the best in NFL...3 pro bowl caliber players on that line. Even so...go back and look and you can see that pass protection sometimes suffered as a result of their size. It goes without saying that if you run the ball effectively your passing game is helped considerably.

Everything is trade off and each scheme has it own advantages and disadvantages. Denver gets more "good" running the zone blocking then anything else- it ensure the rushing attacking is effective which result in more time for QBs. Beside Cutler is mobile enough to get away from trouble, that one of the reason Shanahan liked him as QB coming out.

Most people don't realize that when Shanahan say he needs a mobile QB it isn't a guy that run around like Vick or Plummer, it a guy that move around in the pocket away from pressure and buy time to throw the ball to dump off or away.

footstepsfrom#27
08-08-2007, 07:51 PM
Everything is trade off and each scheme has it own advantages and disadvantages. Denver gets more "good" running the zone blocking then anything else- it ensure the rushing attacking is effective which result in more time for QBs. Beside Cutler is mobile enough to get away from trouble, that one of the reason Shanahan liked him as QB coming out.

Most people don't realize that when Shanahan say he needs a mobile QB it isn't a guy that run around like Vick or Plummer, it a guy that move around in the pocket away from pressure and buy time to throw the ball to dump off or away.
Agree on the idea that the zone system offers some advantages and disadvantages...but when you're QB is Greise, Frerotte, Brister or Plummer I think you're less concerned than when it's Elway or Cutler. If you own a Pinto, park it on the street...stick the BMW in the garage...is my philosophy.

elsid13
08-08-2007, 07:56 PM
Agree on the idea that the zone system offers some advantages and disadvantages...but when you're QB is Greise, Frerotte, Brister or Plummer I think you're less concerned than when it's Elway or Cutler. If you own a Pinto, park it on the street...stick the BMW in the garage...is my philosophy.

There is no difference in those guys, if they are your starting QB, you don't want them hurt. The best way to protect a QB is to have a strong running game and the zone blocking ensure that happens.