PDA

View Full Version : Graham wants to catch, too


dragondawg
08-08-2007, 04:22 AM
Tight end aims to to escape blocking shadow in Denver
By Jeff Legwold, Rocky Mountain News

ENGLEWOOD - There is no circled date, no Post-It note, gold star or anything else to mark the occasion.

So, sure, Daniel Graham can flip through the pages of his NFL career calendar, but he can't find the date. He just knows there was one. The date, exactly, when the New England Patriots decided he was far more a blocker than a receiver.

"I just don't think you'd take a blocking tight end in the first round," Graham said. "And I don't think when they took me in the first round (in 2002) they thought I was a blocking tight end. I just don't. But I think they believed I did (blocking) well, so that's all they wanted me to do.

"Oh, yeah, they said it - they said, 'You're a blocking tight end.' That's it. There was no mystery there."

Which is why Graham, a Thomas Jefferson High graduate who played at Colorado, finds himself back in his hometown, having crossed the greener financial pastures of free agency to find an offense that expects a little more from him.

"And he's impressive," Broncos quarterback Jay Cutler said. "We got what we wanted out of him, a great blocker, better-than-average receiver. I think people kind of downplayed that part of his game, but he has really stepped that part of it up. . . . He's been on championship teams, he can bring a lot to what we do.

"I would think he's glad to be here."

The wins came in piles in New England, a total that included two Super Bowl championships, but Graham caught fewer than 22 passes in three of his seasons with the Patriots and never more than 38.

In the early going of training camp, though, Graham has been everything the Broncos had hoped he could be. He has been fluid in the passing game and devastating as a blocker in the run game.

"No surprise there," Broncos coach Mike Shanahan said. "He's exactly what we saw on the tape."

Still, in March, when Graham eventually turned away strong overtures from the Seattle Seahawks to sign a five-year, $30 million deal to play for the Broncos, the decision turned out to be a family affair.

"There was a lot to think about," Graham said. "Change is like that, though. You have to look at everything. Part of me didn't want to move, but that's the business you're in. That's free agency. So you look at everything around the opportunities to see what's best for you."

And there are those in the league, personnel executives and players alike, who openly have wondered if playing professional football in your hometown can turn out to be too big of a distraction.

Before the draft, it can be something scouts mark down as a concern if they believe a player's circle of friends and family could be a problem.

But football, even professional football, certainly is not a riddle for Graham's family.

Graham's father, Tom, was a Broncos linebacker for three seasons (1972 to 1974). Graham's twin, Josh, played for North Carolina. And his older brother played for Colorado State.

"So, initially, it was kind of a strange thing, just getting ready to move," Graham said. "I'd been in New England five years and enjoyed being there - I mean, my father never played in the playoffs, and my first three years in the league I went to two Super Bowls and I get two rings - and you do want to make sure wherever you go is the best thing because your career is kind of a narrow window.

"But in the end, being around my family, with what the team had on the field, was the big thing, especially my little girl."

Graham said the prospect of being so close to his 2-year-old daughter, Jaida, ultimately tipped the scales all the way toward returning to Denver.

He also has narrowed the avalanche of potential ticket requests by leasing a suite at Invesco Field at Mile High for game days.

"So that's a limited number of seats per game right there," Graham said with a laugh. "That's it, so I think really that will keep the distractions to a minimum. Everybody knows 20 is probably as high as I go, so maybe I can have a lottery or something.

"But everyone's excited - my brothers and sisters, my nieces and nephews. And I'm excited to show them all of my skills. The Patriots, they just wanted to use one of my skills, not the other one. I think the Broncos believe I have both. I think so, too."

Looking for more

Broncos tight end Daniel Graham believes he has more to offer in a passing game than the Patriots thought.

Year Rec. Yds. Avg. TDs

2002 15 150 10.0 1

2003 38 409 10.8 4

2004 30 364 12.1 7

2005 16 235 14.7 3

2006 21 235 11.2 2

http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/nfl/article/0,2777,DRMN_23918_5663689,00.html

DukeWoody
08-08-2007, 05:01 AM
Graham is gonna be a PURE BEAST!!!for us this year...8')

HEAV
08-08-2007, 09:13 AM
Graham is gonna be a PURE BEAST!!!for us this year...8')


Just as long as he catches the ball (meaning hold on to it).

He as been label a butter fingers over the years.

Still I feel he will have a modest role in pass catching. He is here to help the line.

Willynowei
08-08-2007, 09:15 AM
He's not going to get more than he did w/ the Pats, here in Denver.

If anything, he'll get less balls.

Odysseus
08-08-2007, 09:18 AM
Either the Broncos are going to do something on offense or they just like collecting offensive players from successful offenses (Colts, Patriots, etc.)

I wonder if we could Phillip Rivers to backup Cutler?

theAPAOps5
08-08-2007, 09:32 AM
He was on the FAN this morning. He said anything over his career best will make him happy in passing. He also eluded to what Khan has been saying in that the offense hasn't clicked yet and they absolutely have to in order to play with the potential they have. He said Cutler has the ability to be a great QB and has to continue the hard work necessary to get there. They asked about the way the Patriots and Denver organizations are ran and he said they are very different. They asked about his choice to come here and said that it was difficult to decide but ultimately he has his little girl here in Denver and that was one of the reasons that pushed Denver to the top.

theAPAOps5
08-08-2007, 09:34 AM
Just as long as he catches the ball (meaning hold on to it).

He as been label a butter fingers over the years.

Still I feel he will have a modest role in pass catching. He is here to help the line.

I have never heard that about him ever. The only time I have heard about his drops is this year in camp. He is far from butter fingers.

sonsofkraftybob
08-08-2007, 12:08 PM
Just as long as he catches the ball (meaning hold on to it).

He as been label a butter fingers over the years.

Still I feel he will have a modest role in pass catching. He is here to help the line.

True. We called him butterfingers all the time LOL!

he's a good player, but there is a reason we used him to block and then drafted Watson, Thomas and others.

The kid can't catch.

Drek
08-08-2007, 12:35 PM
True. We called him butterfingers all the time LOL!

he's a good player, but there is a reason we used him to block and then drafted Watson, Thomas and others.

The kid can't catch.

He can't catch?

More like he had some inconsistencies his first few years, catching the tough ones and dropping the easy ones too regularly. The last few years though he's become much more reliable and is a very good power runner with the ball in his hands.

Graham is going to be a very valuable piece of this offense. We haven't had a legitimate middle field target since Eddie Mac hung 'em up and he wasn't physically well suited to the role (too thin) he just had balls the size of Saturn. Graham is a legitimate power target between the hash marks where he's going to create first downs with regularity for us. At the same time he's an amazing blocker. Thats a rare combination of skills that Shanahan and Cutler are going to really appreciate.

The biggest compliment Graham got this off-season wasn't the 5 year, $30M contract we signed him to, it was the $4M+ a year offer the Pats made him. A team that has refused to open up the checkbook and give long term deals to a dozen of their more hyped, numerically successful, players did just that when it looked like Graham was going to test the FA waters. That was before he even got offers from the Seahawks or Broncos. Pioli and Belichick know how valuable a player Graham is, don't mistake their multiple TE selections in the last few years as an indictment against him.

baja
08-08-2007, 12:54 PM
He was on the FAN this morning. He said anything over his career best will make him happy in passing. He also eluded to what Khan has been saying in that the offense hasn't clicked yet and they absolutely have to in order to play with the potential they have. He said Cutler has the ability to be a great QB and has to continue the hard work necessary to get there. <b> They asked about the way the Patriots and Denver organizations are ran and he said they are very different. </b> They asked about his choice to come here and said that it was difficult to decide but ultimately he has his little girl here in Denver and that was one of the reasons that pushed Denver to the top.

I wonder in what ways they are different

theAPAOps5
08-08-2007, 01:36 PM
I wonder in what ways they are different

He didn't go into detail. The answer kind of lead into how he has played against Denver so many times and how Denver owned them.

sixtimeseight
08-08-2007, 01:37 PM
True. We called him butterfingers all the time LOL!

he's a good player, but there is a reason we used him to block and then drafted Watson, Thomas and others.

The kid can't catch.


Dan Graham was the leading receiver on the 2001 Buffs squad that won the Big XII and should have been in the national championship game. Just because New England was too dumb to use him as a receiver doesn't mean he can't catch.

Garcia Bronco
08-08-2007, 01:38 PM
He's not going to get more than he did w/ the Pats, here in Denver.

If anything, he'll get less balls.

How do you figure that?

HEAV
08-08-2007, 02:43 PM
I have never heard that about him ever. The only time I have heard about his drops is this year in camp. He is far from butter fingers.


Well then you need to talk to a Pats fan. He's had drops his entire career in NE.


I'm not hating on the guy, just saying if he wants to be a key part of the passing game he will have to earn Jay's trust and hold on to the balls that come his way.

theAPAOps5
08-08-2007, 03:51 PM
Well then you need to talk to a Pats fan. He's had drops his entire career in NE.


I'm not hating on the guy, just saying if he wants to be a key part of the passing game he will have to earn Jay's trust and hold on to the balls that come his way.

Yeah I went digging and they do say that. I am sure he won't be the feature receiving TE but he is still a valuable piece to the puzzle.

DukeWoody
08-08-2007, 04:24 PM
I wonder in what ways they are different

Graham may not have expanded on his "very different" answer on the show,but you can bet Coach Shanahan knows exactly what the 411 is with what he meant...

Im sure if there are any addvantages in some the things the Pats do,Shanny would make adjustments and incorporate these ideals into his daily doings of buisness or activity...

You do anything to get the edge on the other guy,and if it means you borrow some their good ideals and mesh them with your own to gain an advantage,then kudos to the team thats open minded and willing to make changes...

dragondawg
08-08-2007, 04:41 PM
i wonder how would compare the broncos organizations to the pats

JanaŽ
08-08-2007, 10:28 PM
I'm excited to see what he can do for us this year.. it's gonna be a great season.

broncofan2438
08-08-2007, 10:38 PM
Looks like he could be a Tony Gonzo

skunk
08-08-2007, 10:39 PM
i wonder how would compare the broncos organizations to the pats

beep beep dragondawg quote without article beep substance no but beep beep

Kaylore
08-08-2007, 10:52 PM
i wonder how would compare the broncos organizations to the pats

:saywhat:

bcbronc
08-08-2007, 11:14 PM
I think much of Graham's pass-catching success will come off the play action. his blocking ability should force LBs to be extra aggressive against the run, allowing him to slip through to the next level. lucky for him, the play action is a staple in our offense.

but I just don't see him as the type of player that will make plays when he's the focus of the defense. the best thing for him will be if Scheffler (or nate jackson) can make some plays and stretch the middle of the field (and get the DCs attention), allowing Graham to work 1-on-1 underneath. unless that happens, I don't expect Graham to be a huge contributor in the passing game (save play action).

I'll be very surprised if he catches more than 40 balls this year. for me it's going to be more when he makes those catches rather than how many catches he makes.

Kaylore
08-08-2007, 11:24 PM
I think much of Graham's pass-catching success will come off the play action. his blocking ability should force LBs to be extra aggressive against the run, allowing him to slip through to the next level. lucky for him, the play action is a staple in our offense.

but I just don't see him as the type of player that will make plays when he's the focus of the defense. the best thing for him will be if Scheffler (or nate jackson) can make some plays and stretch the middle of the field (and get the DCs attention), allowing Graham to work 1-on-1 underneath. unless that happens, I don't expect Graham to be a huge contributor in the passing game (save play action).

I'll be very surprised if he catches more than 40 balls this year. for me it's going to be more when he makes those catches rather than how many catches he makes.
I totally agree. Good post.

Bronco Yoda
08-08-2007, 11:37 PM
hmmm... asked a Pats friend of mine about him. He said he couldn't catch as well. Thats his rep anyway...

sonsofkraftybob
08-09-2007, 01:50 PM
Dan Graham was the leading receiver on the 2001 Buffs squad that won the Big XII and should have been in the national championship game. Just because New England was too dumb to use him as a receiver doesn't mean he can't catch.

I didn't base my post on the "just because NE was too dumb" argument...

I based it on the infinite times I yelled "I can't believe he dropped the F'n pass" argument.

Seeing is believing bro.....I believe....you will see.

sixtimeseight
08-09-2007, 04:39 PM
I saw him dominate for 2 seasons when I was up at CU and make some incredibly difficult catches. I'll believe that he's a good receiver until I see otherwise.