PDA

View Full Version : With moves, Broncos usher in Jim Bates era


dragondawg
05-02-2007, 03:19 AM
By Mike Klis
Denver Post Staff Writer

There is grunting in the weight room and puffs during sprints.

Otherwise, all is quiet at Dove Valley.

The draft is finished, which means Broncos coach Mike Shanahan essentially is finished with his offseason project attempting to transform a 9-7 team in 2006 to a Super Bowl appearance in 2007.

Now that the most eventful offseason in the team's 47-year history has ended, what is there to make of the 2007 Broncos?

They have an offense built around quarterback Jay Cutler and a defense built by coach Jim Bates.

Although Cutler has but five games of NFL experience, it became evident the offense needed to best utilize his strong, downfield arm. The Broncos now have a bigger offensive line, one of the league's best blocking tight ends in Daniel Graham and a top running back in Travis Henry.

"When they pick out an area where they feel they need to get better, they attack it hard," said Tony Dungy, coach of the Super Bowl champion Indianapolis Colts.

Shanahan identified two areas of need - weapons for Cutler and a pass rush for Bates, the new defensive head coach who replaced defensive coordinator Larry Coyer after the Broncos allowed an average of 26.1 points in their final 10 games of 2006.

If Bates hasn't been given carte blanche of the Broncos' defense, he clearly possessed the most influential voice in the team's draft war room last weekend. The Broncos made four picks in the draft and three were defensive linemen.

Let the Jim Bates era begin.

"I won't be playing a down," Bates said. "It's going to be the Denver Broncos defense. All I am is the head with a bunch of great coaches who put it all together. I'll be the decision maker, but the end result will be how our guys on the field come together as a Denver Broncos defense."

Bates' philosophical synopsis includes many of the same terms espoused by Coyer. Accountability. Fundamentals.

All-out pursuit. Steal the ball. The biggest difference is Coyer never could consistently develop a strong pass rush, while Bates has a long history of coaching double-figure sack artists, most recently Jason Taylor and Aaron Kampman.

"In this league, the defensive ends are usually the leading sackers," Bates said. "To have that edge speed, have guys who have that good first step and play with good technique, we will have an opportunity with our coverage scheme to make more sacks. We've added speed to this defense, there's no doubt about it."

The perception is the Broncos' first big step toward a stronger pass rush was in selecting defensive ends Jarvis Moss and Tim Crowder in the first two rounds of the NFL draft. Bates views it differently.

When attacking the quarterback, Bates works inside-out, back-to-front. Pressure from the defensive ends becomes the final step.

"No. 1, the top priority is you have to play well against the run," Bates said. "You have to stop the run to get the sticks in our favor where it's third down-and-long. That gets you more sack opportunities."

Indeed, a significant factor in the Broncos' second-half slide last season was their inability to contain premier ball carriers such as LaDainian Tomlinson, Larry Johnson and Frank Gore.

Sacking a quarterback isn't easy when he has to complete only a second-and-3 pass.

In rebuilding the middle of their front four, the Broncos restructured the contract of Gerard Warren and added noted run-stoppers Marcus Thomas through the draft and Alvin McKinley through free agency.

So now it is second-and-9, third-and-7. Now what? Against the Pittsburgh Steelers in the AFC championship game of the 2005 season, the Broncos surrendered a flurry of quick -hitting completions thrown by Ben Roethlisberger.

Bates believes nothing gets a defense to a quarterback quicker than a covered receiver. It's no coincidence Dré Bly became the Broncos' first acquisition of the offseason. With Bly and Champ Bailey at the corners, an opposing quarterback's only chance may be to try the intermediate patterns between the linebackers and safeties.

Only Bates rarely plays the cover 3 zone preferred by most teams.

"There are so many good quarterbacks - and even the average quarterbacks can beat cover 3," Bates said. "There's a lot of windows. A lot of defenses do it so well because they can disguise it, but that's not what we do. We know we have excellent corners, so if you're good there, you can get coverage sacks."

If the down and distance calls for a pass, but Bailey and Bly have it covered, this is when the Broncos can unleash the pass-rush speed of Moss, Crowder or Elvis Dumervil, who had 8 1/2 sacks in limited playing time as a rookie last season.

"It usually takes more than one guy when it comes to putting pressure on the quarterback," Bates said.

Sacks mean punts, pressure means turnovers and turnovers mean a shorter field for the Cutler-led offense. The theory is sound.

"Now you've got to get it done," Shanahan said.

http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f65/dragondawg/20070501_101214_BroncosChart050207.jpg

http://www.denverpost.com/broncos/ci_5796213

Clockwork Orange
05-02-2007, 03:23 AM
"I won't be playing a down," Bates said. "It's going to be the Denver Broncos defense. All I am is the head with a bunch of great coaches who put it all together. I'll be the decision maker, but the end result will be how our guys on the field come together as a Denver Broncos defense."

Bates is The Decider! ;D

Odysseus
05-02-2007, 06:04 AM
Popps: You were right all along!
Taco John: You were right all along!

Three years of listening to chicken and the egg! :)

Bates makes Coyer's philosophy seem really out of focus and diffused. All the changes that Coyer made were in the right direction but lack of clarity really defeated some of his best ideas.

Bates weakness is his philosophy is so well known we've got people around quoting his stuff like the man personally mentored him. Some smart guy is working on a way to crack the code. It comes down to our depth on the DL and can those guys execute.

watermock
05-02-2007, 06:21 AM
I can't help but laugh thinking about SoCal knawing on a bone because we only had 4 picks in the draft.

OrangeShadow
05-02-2007, 07:46 AM
nice article,thanks man

Barry Ramey
05-02-2007, 09:26 AM
No doubt the defense is in much better hands with Bates. As I've mentioned before, I'm hoping for many more 3 plays and punt type series from this defense, which will help in better field position for Cutler and the offense.

Rohirrim
05-02-2007, 09:42 AM
A lot of the success of this whole thing hinges on DJ. I hope he's up for it.

Traveler
05-02-2007, 10:23 AM
Not to be a spoiled sport here, but why all the confidence in Bates system? Although he has a pretty solid history, just remember, so did Ray Rhodes.

The departure from Coyers is relief for us all. But until I see the final product, I reserve giving Bates props until the end of the season.

Steve Sewell
05-02-2007, 10:37 AM
OK, that article has me all juiced up. I think it's going to be a lot of fun to watch this defense play next year. I keep forgetting that we easily have the best CB tandem in the league.

Billy Clyde Puckett
05-02-2007, 10:50 AM
Not to be a spoiled sport here, but why all the confidence in Bates system? Although he has a pretty solid history, just remember, so did Ray Rhodes.
.

Agree - Let's see some results before we declare his birthday a national holiday.

Rohirrim
05-02-2007, 11:01 AM
Not to be a spoiled sport here, but why all the confidence in Bates system? Although he has a pretty solid history, just remember, so did Ray Rhodes.

The departure from Coyers is relief for us all. But until I see the final product, I reserve giving Bates props until the end of the season.

Gaack! Never bring up that name again. ROFL!

BroncoInferno
05-02-2007, 11:04 AM
Rhodes got overrated because of an unbelievable stable of talent he had to work with on the '94 San Francisco defense. Bates has had success in multiple NFL stops, so it's a little bit different.

dragondawg
05-02-2007, 08:49 PM
can't wait to see what he does

telluride
05-02-2007, 09:28 PM
It is pretty remarkable how different this team is going to be as compared to last year's. Almost every area has been overhauled. Someone more energetic than I should do a side-by-side post of the opening day roster from last year, and projected opening day roster upcoming. That's be interesting.

All that said, I wish we were in slightly better shape WR-wise.

CoopDawg
05-02-2007, 09:44 PM
How will we ever replace the franchise tackle that was George Foster? :spit: It looks like we are in the middle of a damn arms race with the Colts, Pats, and Bolts.

azbroncfan
05-02-2007, 10:38 PM
It looks like we are in the middle of a damn arms race with the Colts, Pats, and Bolts.

Lets look at this objectively

Denver isn't in those leagues yet other than ARGUABLY on paper.

QB is unknown at this point and will have streaks of bad and good.

OL should be improved but how much.

WR outside of Walker it's an unknown, Marshall has shown promise and how will he do as a starter remains to be seen.

TE RB improved

DL is very unknown and it is known you hope rookies produce but you should never rely on them.

LB should be okay if DJ plays up to his draft status instead of a 4th rounder, SLB will be okay with a stop gap.

CB Strongest position on team as long as injuries don't bite.


S good not bad not great.


If every unit steps up and plays up to potential they can make a strong run but they are just potential now. Potential has never won anything.
ST can't be any worse than last year. +

Kaylore
05-03-2007, 01:04 AM
Bates weakness is his philosophy is so well known we've got people around quoting his stuff like the man personally mentored him.
No, good defenses aren't about being tricky. It doesn't matter if they know a scheme. If you execute, then nothing can stop you. It's like when we used to really run the ball well and on third and short we'd line up with TD in backfield. Everybody knew what we were doing. They all knew who would get the ball. It didn't matter because the team would execute and we'd convert.

The same goes the other way. Knowing a scheme is of little advantage when they're really good at executing it. The very best defenses are typically pretty simple they would just play good fundamentals and out-execute their opponents.

Requiem
05-03-2007, 01:10 AM
I'm dying for a cause. It's Jim Bates'.

Odysseus
05-03-2007, 08:30 AM
No, good defenses aren't about being tricky. It doesn't matter if they know a scheme. If you execute, then nothing can stop you. It's like when we used to really run the ball well and on third and short we'd line up with TD in backfield. Everybody knew what we were doing. They all knew who would get the ball. It didn't matter because the team would execute and we'd convert.

The same goes the other way. Knowing a scheme is of little advantage when they're really good at executing it. The very best defenses are typically pretty simple they would just play good fundamentals and out-execute their opponents.

There is an old saying when some claims they are going to kick your ass. Every ass kicker brings one. Nobody is invulnerable. It comes down to execution no question about it.

What I like about Bates is he is focused on shutting down the LOS not the POA. The point of attack could be anywhere. Why chase the football? If you are hard on the line it's coming to you sooner or later.

D.J. is going to have to do a LOT more than he has done in the past. I am excited for him. Even if he sucks year one I think he will be rock steady in 2008. That's just D.J. He stands up when called on.

Teams know what we are going to do on offense and defense but it doesn't stop us from producing. The trick to being effective at what you do is not only knowing your strengths and weakness but how to play those so that people come at you when they really should run.

DWill would be stoked to see our D Line.