PDA

View Full Version : Best and Worst 5 Drafts in the NFL


Drek
04-30-2007, 12:20 PM
Here's my best and worst 5 draft weekends from around the league.

Best:

Cleveland - Were very pro-active and added a franchise LT and franchise QB to a team that already had a franchise WR and some other good offensive investments. Lost their future first round pick but they were considering Quinn at #3, its very possible that they'll be better in '07 and even if they aren't they got top value this year with a late 1st contract instead of a top 3 contract.

San Francisco - Amazing draft here. Patrick Willis was a great choice. Then they made great moves with both the Pats and Colts to move from 42 up to 28, the end cost being only 16 spots back on their 4th rounder and swapping firsts with the Colts in '08. Wouldn't surprise me if they were both in the early to mid 20's in next year's draft with the direction they're each headed this off-season. They used 28 on Staley who is a good developmental LT answer for them. Jason Hill is a good developmental WR, and McDonald is a great fit for their 3-4 front at DE. They also added Darrell Jackson from a division rival for only a 4th round pick. My choice for best draft of the year.

Minnesota - Peterson and Rice were great talent picks at need positions. Little meh on McCauley but Robison, Allison, and Alexander were all great values. They got a lot of talent throughout the draft, made great use of all their picks, and they walked away with our '08 3rd in the process.

Carolina - Beason, Jarrett, Kalil, Shaw, and Johnson, five potential starters. Hell of a draft for them. A lot like Minnesota's, a draft that'll pay dividends for years to come.

Dallas - They got a good pass rusher who should do well as a OLB opposite Ware, two good OT prospects, and a great athlete in Stanback. That's a solid draft in its own right, but at the same time they pocketed a future first. Some very smart moves there.


Worst:

Houston - Okoye was a pretty good pick, but they have a lot of other, much bigger, needs. They didn't address OL until the 5th round, took a flyer on a small school WR with their only other first day pick despite this being a deep WR class. They should've been hunting for a trade back, even if it meant taking future picks as part of the package. They didn't address needs well at all.

Philly - Worst draft of the year? While other teams that moved out of the first round netted future 1sts to compensate Philly did it for a bunch of later round picks. They then blew their only top 50 pick on a QB when they're financially tied to McNabb. They made some ok choices from there on out but they didn't get any real steals or great values. They didn't bring back a single sure fire starter in this draft, and have no future value to show for it. SAD attempt.

Tennessee - You can sum this draft up with one word. "REACH". I like Griffin but with Nelson and Meriweather also still on the board there was no need to take him here, a trade back could have still gotten them their guy. They then take Chris Henry in the middle of round 2, even though he's done nothing to prove himself as a football player, just an athlete. Bring in a host of 3rd tier WRs and you have the makings of a totally unremarkable draft out of a team that had middle picks in every round along with an extra late 4th and two late 6ths. Young will still be trying to carry them offensively and their defense won't be able to hold up any better than last year while Griffin is trying to cover the whole backfield.

Miami - Overpicked Ginn, took an older "safe" pick QB when they're looking to bring in a stop gap QB with Trent Green as it is, and brought in a center who they'll probably have to move to guard. Not exactly how you should address needs in the first day. Soliai wasn't a bad pick but he's got character concerns and has questions about his motor. Booker was an ok choice but you minimize his role by already having Ginn. Lot of questionable moves for a team picking near the top holding plenty of ammo.

New York Giants - Wasn't really that bad of a draft but they overpicked on Ross and Alford while doing nothing to fix their OL exodus. They've been lucky with late rounders and retreads at OL before so maybe it'll pay off again, but they had the chance to add some real long term talent there or at safety instead of an overpicked CB and made what I think is the wrong choice. Still, they're the best of this bad lot, far better than the other four.

Bronco LB 59
04-30-2007, 02:32 PM
What kept you from slotting Oakland in the top five?

Odysseus
04-30-2007, 02:59 PM
San Francsisco was amazing
Philly was horrifying.
Atlanta did great.
Raiders actually did well but not top 5

I didn't think Houston did THAT bad but yeah...maybe.
I don't know if Cleveland's draft saved Romeo
Miami definitely put a finger in their own eye.

It's too bad Chiefs didn't pick up Walter Thomas.

Arkansas Bronco
04-30-2007, 03:22 PM
What kept you from slotting Oakland in the top five?

I would say giving Moss up for a 4rth is a very bad move.

U GOT JACKED UP
04-30-2007, 03:27 PM
I thought that the Colts had a top five draft.

By far the worst draft was the Eagles.

MechanicalBull
04-30-2007, 03:30 PM
I'll see in about 3-5 years who had the best and worst draft. On paper you can say this team did good and that team did bad but no one has played a down yet.

The jury is still out if Oak and Cle got their franchise QBs. These guys can be great and play for 10-15 yrs or they can be out of the league in a few years and the Raiders and Browns will be looking to draft another QB again down the line.

NaptownChief
04-30-2007, 04:25 PM
I thought that the Colts had a top five draft.

By far the worst draft was the Eagles.




I agree on both accounts. Last year I thought the Colts reached on a lot of players but this year they got a lot of very good football players that are also very good athletes. I think they will come away with 3 to 5 eventual starters from this draft class which isn't easy to do when you are picking dead last.

Billy Clyde Puckett
04-30-2007, 05:10 PM
I would say giving Moss up for a 4rth is a very bad move.

That's addition by subtraction.

I think Philly had the worst draft, but one of the NFL Network commentators picked KC as the worst.

bloodsunday
04-30-2007, 05:20 PM
That's pretty tough to know. It depends on what you are grading on.

I think Denver did well. They addressed most every area of this team in FA except the DL and they went DL heavy -- and guys that should contribute this year. So in my book Denver had an "A" draft. Of course those guys could miss and down the road they may bust. But my critieria was:
1) Get depth at areas of need - DL
2) Get guys that can be playmakers and contribute this year (Thomas and Moss)
3) Give yourself a chance to be a better team in '07, not '10

I know this is not how drafts are usually graded but that's how Denver has built this roster. They are trying to win this year.

R8R H8R
04-30-2007, 05:56 PM
That's pretty tough to know. It depends on what you are grading on.

I think Denver did well. They addressed most every area of this team in FA except the DL and they went DL heavy -- and guys that should contribute this year. So in my book Denver had an "A" draft. Of course those guys could miss and down the road they may bust. But my critieria was:
1) Get depth at areas of need - DL
2) Get guys that can be playmakers and contribute this year (Thomas and Moss)
3) Give yourself a chance to be a better team in '07, not '10

I know this is not how drafts are usually graded but that's how Denver has built this roster. They are trying to win this year.

I agree, I too would put the Broncos in the top five for much of the same reasons you have stated. The Broncos improved the secondary and offense with FA, and really only had one glaring need left. And that was DL, particularly the pass rush. I think we filled that need fairly well.

Drek
04-30-2007, 07:33 PM
What kept you from slotting Oakland in the top five?

Why would I? They had a crap draft. Just because they started with tons of good picks doesn't mean they made good use of it.

Like I said in another thread, I think Russell is a combination of Vick and Culpepper, and less refined than either coming into the league. This after Oakland passed on a polished QB in Leinart last year and now passed on the most talented WR in recent history with CJ. Then they took a mediocre TE in the early part of round 2? Miller would've been hard pressed to make the first day last year.

They landed some solid middle round prospects with Moses, Higgins, and Bush, but then took mediocre guys from there on out. So why exactly should a team that has tons of picks, most of them at the beginning of each round, get rewarded for not making good use of a large chunk of them?

Nope, I do my rankings based on what a team starts with. Washington had one good pick, they got a stud, solid draft on their part.

San Francsisco was amazing
Philly was horrifying.
Atlanta did great.
Raiders actually did well but not top 5

I didn't think Houston did THAT bad but yeah...maybe.
I don't know if Cleveland's draft saved Romeo
Miami definitely put a finger in their own eye.

It's too bad Chiefs didn't pick up Walter Thomas.

I really liked Atlanta's, but I was down to Dallas and Atlanta and Dallas walked away with a first round pick.

Houston didn't answer a lot of key needs and short of some amazing FA signings or break out players they aren't going to be a significantly better team any time soon.

Cleveland's draft hinges on Quinn. If he's the QB I think he is their coaching staff will be off the hot seat by the end of next year.


I thought that the Colts had a top five draft.

By far the worst draft was the Eagles.

They failed to address some major needs though, and I think the 49ers bent them over a table for pick 42. No '08 first and no answer to any of the new holes open on their already mediocre defense. I don't think they're close to the top 5.

BroncoMan4ever
04-30-2007, 07:50 PM
I thought that the Colts had a top five draft.

By far the worst draft was the Eagles.

i agree that the eagles draft sucked, although i kinda like the S they got in the 2nd that Piscatelli guy. I think he has a lot of potential.