USA TODAY mock NFL draft

[GSRelyea]

They have 8 "experts" predict the first round

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/football/draft/2007-mock-draft.htm

[Mediator12]

Ok, I like Gattis more than about anyone else but to draft him in the FIRST round is computer throwing material.

[GSRelyea]

Ok, I like Gattis more than about anyone else but to draft him in the FIRST round is computer throwing material.

Her first round had plenty of reaches in it......and plenty of top 10 talent dropping pretty late.

[Kaylore]

Ok, I like Gattis more than about anyone else but to draft him in the FIRST round is computer throwing material.

I agree on both counts.

I also am a little miffed not a single one had the stones to have the Fade taking Calvin Johnson in the first. I still think it could happen!

That chick has Alan Branch almost falling out of the first round and Eric Weddle going before him to the Patriots at 24, Greg Olson in the top 15 before Landry. Silly.

[-Slap-]

All eight of them blew the very first pick.

[-Slap-]

I also am a little miffed not a single one had the stones to have the Fade taking Calvin Johnson in the first. I still think it could happen!


It will happen. Al's not going to screw this one up.

[-Slap-]

That chick has Alan Branch almost falling out of the first round and Eric Weddle going before him to the Patriots at 24, Greg Olson in the top 15 before Landry. Silly.

She has five safeties going in the first 24 picks and none of them are Michael Griffin.

[Barry Ramey]

Nice find. Yeah, I like Gattis too, but at #21? That's a reach.

Surprising a few have Jamaal Anderson out of the top 10 and maybe a mistake, but Corbett doesn't even have Anderson in the 1st round at all.

[JCMElway]

Hmmmmm, only one person has Jarvis Moss going before #21. More and more, that's the guy I want there.

[TheDave]

Hmmmmm, only one person has Jarvis Moss going before #21. More and more, that's the guy I want there.

I'm starting to warm up to that pick also.

[Kaylore]

She has five safeties going in the first 24 picks and none of them are Michael Griffin.

Yeah. I can appreciate wanting to show that women know about football too, but this lady is an example of one step forward, two steps back. They should have had Tredici do it.

[want2bAbronco2]

I like DE Moss, FS Meriweather/Nelson, LB Paul P, or DT Harris.

[That One Guy]

I may be ignorant and sexist for saying this but IF a woman has to talk football, don't let her spew nonsense. As the guy above said, that's just gonna set em back. Why in the world would GB take Ginn and let Lynch slide down the board? Why would we take Gattis (as was said above) and pass on Branch in the process? Does SF really need to take CB at #11? That sounds like a bit much at one position for a team that needs to add talent at a few different positions.

That being said, it looks as if noone knows where DL are gonna fall now. Other than Gaines, everyone is all over the board. Branch is selected between 9 and 31... Anderson between 6 and 19... Carriker between 11 and 23...

It seems as though we wont know who we might be able to get until draft day rolls around.

[usedupbraids]

here we go with the Mock thing once again >:(

[That One Guy]

here we go with the Mock thing once again >:(

What do you expect to find in the draft forum? Someone with a crystal ball revealing all the draft picks a month early?

[usedupbraids]

What do you expect to find in the draft forum? Someone with a crystal ball revealing all the draft picks a month early?

OH MAN your so funny OH MAN WOW your funny :D

[That One Guy]

OH MAN your so funny OH MAN WOW your funny :D

Sarcasm is intended to be kind of a whitty jab, not really intended to be funny. That being said, I notice you're still here in the NFL Draft Forums reading replies. So do you hate these threads, like these threads, or just say things in threads trying to get someone to respond to you?

[Paladin]

Is 'Braids a 3 on the Wonderlic?

[Billy Clyde Puckett]

It seems as though we wont know who we might be able to get until draft day rolls around.

That is the obvious truth.

[R8R H8R]

I may be ignorant and sexist for saying this but IF a woman has to talk football, don't let her spew nonsense. As the guy above said, that's just gonna set em back. Why in the world would GB take Ginn and let Lynch slide down the board? Why would we take Gattis (as was said above) and pass on Branch in the process? Does SF really need to take CB at #11? That sounds like a bit much at one position for a team that needs to add talent at a few different positions.

That's what I was thinking. If that scenario ever came to pass where, by the grace of God, Branch fell that far, and we pass to get a safety that might be there for our 2nd pick. I think I would put my foot thru my $2000 widescreen.

Then I decided to give her the benefit of the doubt and thought that maybe she is considering that the Bears got Branch because they traded up. There has been rumors that they had been shopping LB Briggs.

Then I saw her whole list, and decided she's just nuts. Ha!

[That One Guy]

Is 'Braids a 3 on the Wonderlic?

Only if he glances at his buddy's test a couple times.

[Play2win]

Is 'Braids a 3 on the Wonderlic?

I don't know, Do Wonderlics score in the NEGATIVE Numbers...

[Play2win]

Only if he glances at his buddy's test a couple times.

he must be a U of M "alum"

[MechanicalBull]

I'm no draft expert but those are some very strange picks by those people.

[watermock]

Don't argue with the "experts".

Ship Al and a late 3rd for Jenkins and wait for the draft.

[SureShot]

Don't argue with the "experts".

Ship Al and a late 3rd for Jenkins and wait for the draft.

Didn't you just guarantee the Broncos were done making moves?Hilarious!

[bpc]

The only thing I'll say for this lady is that there could be as many as 5 impact safety's that come from this draft class. The class is really deep.

[watermock]

Didn't you just guarantee the Broncos were done making moves?Hilarious!

Not if Al is moved.