PDA

View Full Version : What should the Raiders do?


Atlas
03-19-2007, 06:03 AM
Read this article and then read what a Raider fan thought of it. Pretty hilarious. I gotta admit raider fan made a lot of good points.

Raiders should trade down, stockpile picks
By Andy Targovnik on March 15, 2007 12:18 AM

SoCAls link: http://www.realfootball365.com/nfl/articles/2007/03/raiders-should-tradedown150307.html


It was early 1997. Bill Parcells had just taken over for Rich Kotite, the man who was responsible for the mess that the New York Jets found themselves in.

New York had just come off its two worst years in franchise history, winning a total of four games during the 1995 and 1996 seasons.

Because Kotite had paid too many mediocre players like quarterback Neil O'Donnell huge sums of money, the Jets were hamstrung by the salary cap. They also owned the No. 1 pick in the '97 draft.

But just two seasons later, the Jets were only 30 minutes of football away from beating the Denver Broncos and going to the Super Bowl.

The 2007 Oakland Raiders find themselves in an eerily similar situation to that 1997 Jets squad. The question is, can the Silver and Black turn things around the same way?

Of course, there is only one Bill Parcells, but Raiders owner Al Davis should take note of how the legendary coach transformed the Jets from a laughingstock to a contender.

To start, Parcells could have drafted left tackle Orlando Pace with the top pick, and had he done that, who could have argued?

But the Jets had so many more holes to fill than just one specific position.

In addition, because Pace would demand a huge amount of money -- too much for a team trying to fix a disastrous salary cap situation -- Parcells traded the pick to the St. Louis Rams and received the Rams' first-, third-, fourth- and seventh-round selections.

Two of those picks turned out to be linebacker James Farrior and nose tackle Jason Ferguson, both of whom were major contributors to the team for a number of seasons.

Now, had Peyton Manning opted to enter the draft that year, Parcells may well have not traded the pick because Manning was and still is a franchise-changing player. But Manning's decision to stay at Tennessee made Parcells' decision an easy one.

In addition to managing the draft well, Parcells jettisoned aging veterans and got back whatever he could -- mainly younger and cheaper players.

That's what bad teams with salary-cap problems have to do.

Therefore, the Raiders should trade or release as many overpaid veterans as possible. That includes dealing Randy Moss for a ham sandwich, if that's all they can get in return. At minimum, it'll clear cap space.

And because it is unlikely that there is Manning-caliber quarterback in this year's draft, the Raiders would be wise to trade the top pick for a package of draft choices.

Of course, not all the selections will turn out well, but throw enough "you know what" against the wall, and some of it eventually sticks.

Not only have many solid NFL players -- like the abovementioned Ferguson (seventh round) -- been drafted late, but if a team gets lucky, it just might land somebody of Curtis Martin's (third round) or Tom Brady's (sixth round) ilk.

Unfortunately for Raiders fans, though, Al Davis likely won't follow the franchise-building path of trading down. He'll keep trying for that quick fix, thus continuing to run his once-proud organization into the ground.



wtf kinda article is this? i RARELY bash an article but first of all YOU CONTRIDICTED YOURSELF BY SAYING PACELLS WOULDNT HAVE TRADED THE PICK AWAY SO HE COULD GET THE FRANCHISE CHANGING PLAYER IN PEYTON MANNING. what the hell do u think JaMarcus is?!?!?!?! DID U WATCH THE WORKOUTS? DID U SEE HOW EVERY EXPERT, CURRENT PRO, FORMER PRO, SCOUT, GENERAL MANAGERS, AND EVEN LANE KIFFIN HIMSELF COULD ONLY SAY THE GREATEST THINGS ABOUT HIM. including mike mayock: "this was the most impressive workout i've ever seen by a quarterback". todd mcshay "he is the best quarterback i've ever seen coming out of college". Lane Kiffin "all of his throws were professional and he was truly impressive". and then Al Davis was bashed by saying "unfortunately for raiders fans though al davis likely wont follow the franchise building path of trading down, he'll keep trying for that quick fix, thus continuing to run his once proud organization into the ground"... F**K YOU. DID THE COLTS TRADE DOWN???? NO! AND THEY GOT #1 QB PEYTON MANNING. AND THEN U MENTION A TEAM (THE JETS) THAT DIDNT EVEN MAKE IT TO THE SUPERBOWL...AND WHY DIDNT THEY WIN? BECAUSE THEIR QB SUCKED. HE GOT HIS ASS KICKED BY JOHN ELWAY...WHO WAS ALSO THE #1 PICK!!! anyways...JaMarcus ONLY RAN .07 SLOWER THEN HEISMAN WINNER TROY SMITH. .07 is really nothing! this is the line that really hits me: "its unlikely there is a manning-caliber qb in this year's draft, the raiders would be wise to trade the top pick". MANNING NEVER WON A BOWL GAME AND HE WAS BEING QUESTIONED ABOUT A MILLION THINGS AND PPL DIDNT KNOW WHO WAS BETTER, HIM OR RYAN FREAKING LEAF! at least we KNOW JaMarcus is the best qb in the draft now in the draft and will be a top 5 qb in his 2nd full season of playing. So writer andy, you can personally email me and tell me the reasons why JaMarcus isnt good. please. I HATE BASHING ARTICLES. but if you are going to try to imitate a team we're trying to build after, at least imitate a team that won the superbowl. (or in this case a team that got to a superbowl).

watermock
03-19-2007, 06:10 AM
Trust us, we are hoping Oakland takes Russell and fails to trade Moss. It would be priceless to watch Moss, Calvin and Porter throwing helmets. With some loser at QB. That picture made me LOL.

It's a lose lose situations. A reach media queen or a WR.

broncocalijohn
03-19-2007, 06:11 AM
I am just happy Faider fan is mad. They are sucking so long and so bad that it just makes me smile. Enjoy Faiders.

broncswin
03-19-2007, 09:58 AM
I think the Raiders should move to Toronto and then pry McGahee away from the Ravens!! Just a thought :approve: ?

Rohirrim
03-19-2007, 10:03 AM
The Faders absolutely have to take Jamarcus at number one. Their Oline sucks, so they need a big guy who can take a beating. ;D Really though, their QB position has sucked for so long they need to start somewhere. Might as well be there.

chrisp
03-19-2007, 10:21 AM
Whatever the rights and wrongs of the situation, its really nice to see a Faider fan get so worked up....

In a way, I'd love them to take a Franchise QB in the first round because that means they get someone who doesn;t really contribute (even if he starts) untill the following year or the year after. It would mean that they are set at the position for a decade, however. Hmmmm.....

I suppose it is fair to compare JaMarcus Russel to Manning in terms of the pre-draft hype, but in terms of the player Manning has proved himself to be, no way!!!! Yes, its fair to say that not everybody realised Manning was the QB he was prior to the draft, but its also fair to say that good workouts do not necesarily mean that Russell is even in the same ballpark as is Manning today, or that he ever will be.

The thing is, Russell is clearly an outstanding athelete, but how does he handle the mental aspect of the game? That's one of the toughest things for new NFL QBs and one of the areas where Manning is strongest.

-Slap-
03-19-2007, 10:22 AM
I think the Raiders should either trade down or draft Calvin Johnson.

They could go Calvin Johnson in round one and take Drew Stanton or Trent Edwards in round two.

The excitable fan saying Russell will be a top five quarterback by year two is living in fantasy land. Its far more likely Johnson will be a top five player at his position than Russell.

Jens1893
03-19-2007, 10:26 AM
What should the Raiders do?

Disband the franchise.

Billy Clyde Puckett
03-19-2007, 10:40 AM
I have been told by someone active in the Ga Tech Alumni assoc that Calvin has told the Raiders not to draft him.

Atlas
03-19-2007, 10:41 AM
I have been told by someone active in the Ga Tech Alumni assoc that Calvin has told the Raiders not to draft him.

Really, I guess he does have good sense.

Broncojef
03-19-2007, 10:42 AM
The Faiders would have drafted Ryan Leaf if they were in the number 1 slot that year anyway. I completely agree what the Raiders need at this point is a huge influx of draft picks. I'd trade my number one away for huge amounts of second and third round talent at this point if I was in Al's shoes, but rest assured he won't.

Atlas
03-19-2007, 10:43 AM
The Faiders would have drafted Ryan Leaf if they were in the number 1 slot that year anyway. I completely agree what the Raiders need at this point is a huge influx of draft picks. I'd trade my number one away for huge amounts of second and third round talent at this point if I was in Al's shoes, but rest assured he won't.

Al can't afford to, he isn't going to be alive much longer.

Odysseus
03-19-2007, 10:51 AM
I have been told by someone active in the Ga Tech Alumni assoc that Calvin has told the Raiders not to draft him.

Calvin deserves to be with a better organization.

That means if the Raiders do what I thought they should do and pick up Calvin as the best in the draft and find a QB elsewhere they lose.

If they go with Russell the lose. :wiggle:

TheDave
03-19-2007, 11:04 AM
Oddly, i think Brady Quinn is the smarter choice for #1. I realize he does not have the jaw dropping physical skills of Russel, but to me he is the safer pick with good upside and a high floor. Maybe i'm missing something but Russel seems to have boom or bust written all over him.

400HZ
03-19-2007, 11:34 AM
Russell is definetely not a sure thing. With their position and a talent like Calvin Johnson in the draft, the Fade could easily get a couple 1st rounders and a few other first day picks if they traded down. They NEED about 7 first day picks to put together a worthwhile offense, and some of those 2nd and 3rd round quarterbacks look pretty good. A coach like Parcells probably could turn Oakland around in a few years if he had control. That being said, I hope Al doesn't die for at least a few more years.

bendog
03-19-2007, 11:40 AM
Trade down and draft the QB Kolb. Trade down with somebody in the NFC, so Johnson isn't in our conference.

obediah
03-19-2007, 11:50 AM
What should the Raiders do?

They should join the Euro League and leave the real footballin to Us.

Obediah

-Slap-
03-19-2007, 11:53 AM
Oddly, i think Brady Quinn is the smarter choice for #1. I realize he does not have the jaw dropping physical skills of Russel, but to me he is the safer pick with good upside and a high floor. Maybe i'm missing something but Russel seems to have boom or bust written all over him.

It raises a red flag to me when a kid shows up at the biggest job interview of his life unprepared. That's exactly what Russell did by showing up at the Combine at 265 pounds.

It cracks me up because everybody is comparing JaMarcus to Duante Culpepper, but nobody seems to have noticed Pep's notoriously out-of-shape body already began breaking down on him at 28. That's normally an athlete's physical peak, but Duante is an overweight, underconfident basket case at 30. Maybe carrying 20 extra pounds of fat around isn't the best idea for an athlete coming off knee surgery.

I know Russell faced a strong level of competition, but his splits show his QB rating was about 30 points higher against unranked opponents. The guy basically feasted against weak competition and played alright against good teams.

People hammered the hell out of Quinn for not stepping up against good opponents, but its more a matter of this kid being over scouted. If that's his weakness, than Russell has the same flaw. I don't believe either one of these guys is measurably better than the other one and I'm not convinced either one will be all that great at the next level.

I think they should be rated about where Leinart and Cutler were last year in the 10/11 range. No way should they be ranked over super prospects like Johnson, Thomas and Peterson.

bendog
03-19-2007, 12:04 PM
Seemed to me that Quinn has about the same arm as Lionheart, but he's not as accurate. Or he hasn't seemed as accurate in his workouts. It may be that he's more a gamer than "wow you" guy.

Last year was sort of unique, because Lionheart was Hollywood and Vince Young was superman. I thought all along that just plain qb-wise, Cutler was the best. He out played Eli Manning as a Junior. Sort of a similar thing to how Rothlisburger slid.

But yeah, in Johnson and Landry we have like one year in five type talent. Thomas looks to be a sure won't miss, though his measurements won't really tell the tale, and only a good olinecoach can know what his upside is. Two DE who should be good pass rush, 3 down types. A freak one gap DT. Adrian Peterson may be ranked a bit high just cause it's a weak high round RB class.

Rohirrim
03-19-2007, 12:07 PM
But if the Fade takes CJ, what do they do with him? Who throws him the ball? Who protects his QB? If Moss goes to Green Bay, do they throw CJ out there to get slapped around in double coverage all year? I don't believe that Russell is as good as Cutler or Leinart, but he's better than Brooks, Walter or Tuiasosopo. If he gets his head straight, he might even be very good. Lord knows, he's got the arm.

TheDave
03-19-2007, 12:07 PM
It raises a red flag to me when a kid shows up at the biggest job interview of his life unprepared. That's exactly what Russell did by showing up at the Combine at 265 pounds.

It cracks me up because everybody is comparing JaMarcus to Duante Culpepper, but nobody seems to have noticed Pep's notoriously out-of-shape body already began breaking down on him at 28. That's normally an athlete's physical peak, but Duante is an overweight, underconfident basket case at 30. Maybe carrying 20 extra pounds of fat around isn't the best idea for an athlete coming off knee surgery.

I know Russell faced a strong level of competition, but his splits show his QB rating was about 30 points higher against unranked opponents. The guy basically feasted against weak competition and played alright against good teams. As a coaching staff and a front office there are just too many benefits not to take one of the QB's.

People hammered the hell out of Quinn for not stepping up against good opponents, but its more a matter of this kid being over scouted. If that's his weakness, than Russell has the same flaw. I don't believe either one of these guys is measurably better than the other one and I'm not convinced either one will be all that great at the next level.

I think they should be rated about where Leinart and Cutler were last year in the 10/11 range. No way should they be ranked over super prospects like Johnson, Thomas and Peterson.

Completely agree with your comparison of the players. On the other hand i disagree with where they should go in the draft. IF a team feels that they can be a good QB for thew next decade or so then you have to pick them @ #1. Notice i didn't say great, even a good QB these days commands alot of respect in the draft... IMO. With the rediculous money that even marginal players are making getting an above average signal caller that will remain on a rookie contract (even if it is the #1 pick) makes good sense for the team from both a cap position and the business of selling tickets.

In addition, with new coaching staff with a brand new "Franchise QB" there is a honeymoon period that will probably keep everyone employed for 3 seasons before the fans turn on you.

TheDave
03-19-2007, 12:11 PM
Seemed to me that Quinn has about the same arm as Lionheart, but he's not as accurate. Or he hasn't seemed as accurate in his workouts. It may be that he's more a gamer than "wow you" guy.



I agree that he is not as accurate as Lieneart, but i think Quinn's arm is much better... Plus he is pretty mobile and throws better on the run.

-Slap-
03-19-2007, 12:20 PM
Completely agree with your comparison of the players. On the other hand i disagree with where they should go in the draft. IF a team feels that they can be a good QB for thew next decade or so then you have to pick them @ #1. Notice i didn't say great, even a good QB these days commands alot of respect in the draft... IMO. With the rediculous money that even marginal players are making getting an above average signal caller that will remain on a rookie contract (even if it is the #1 pick) makes good sense for the team from both a cap position and the business of selling tickets.

In addition, with new coaching staff with a brand new "Franchise QB" there is a honeymoon period that will probably keep everyone employed for 3 seasons before the fans turn on you.

I think that strategy is very risky for a couple of reasons. First, I don't believe you should dramatically overvalue based by position. I'm a best-available-player/athlete type of guy when it comes to personnel. If I can have a great player at WR, RB, OT, I want him over a good player at QB.

I also think the effect on the cap is not as beneficial as you suggest. Primarily because you've going to overpay the guy based strictly on the position he plays (quartrerback), so why compound things by adding the premium of the number one draft position to the equation? Its just a wasteful application of finite resources. It could also lead to salary unrest within your ranks from guys who really are All Pro caliber players that are getting squeezed because the Golden Boy QB is sucking the cap trough dry.

-Slap-
03-19-2007, 12:25 PM
This is cool.......:)

Brady Quinn and JaMarcus Russell Don't Like Each Other (http://nfl.aolsportsblog.com/2007/03/06/brady-quinn-and-jamarcus-russell-dont-like-each-other/)

KipCorrington25
03-19-2007, 12:31 PM
That guy has Rohan Davy written all over him.

ZONA
03-19-2007, 12:41 PM
Who gives a damn what the Raiders should do or will do. :mullet2:

fdf
03-19-2007, 12:51 PM
"What should the Raiders do?"

I have only two suggestions:

1. Pray that Al Davis finally goes to meet his maker; or

2. Absent that, curl up in a ball, put their thumbs in their mouths, and accept another season as doormats.

Odysseus
03-19-2007, 01:48 PM
This is cool.......:)

Brady Quinn and JaMarcus Russell Don't Like Each Other (http://nfl.aolsportsblog.com/2007/03/06/brady-quinn-and-jamarcus-russell-dont-like-each-other/)

It says a heck of a lot more about Russell than it does about Quinn.

Great discussion.

milehimike
03-19-2007, 11:52 PM
I am just happy Faider fan is mad. They are sucking so long and so bad that it just makes me smile. Enjoy Faiders.Not only do the faders SUCK, they Swallow.:thumbs:

Kaylore
03-20-2007, 12:05 AM
I think they should draft Joe Thomas or trade Moss and take Calvin Johnson - or trade down and stockpile line picks. Puting a rookie behind a crappy line isn't going to help your team or motivate them to want to play each week.

Tombstone RJ
03-20-2007, 12:21 AM
God, I can only hope the dumbazz faid don't trade down. I can only hope Davis pins it all on one completely uprepared QB in JR.

Go ahead Al, make our day.

baja
03-20-2007, 12:26 AM
Clearly the Raiders best move would be to trade down but they won't....

Los Broncos
03-20-2007, 12:27 AM
We might see a champ v cj.