View Full Version : Broncos | Broncos show interest in McMichael
Ratboy
03-08-2007, 10:29 AM
Broncos | Broncos show interest in McMichael
Thu, 8 Mar 2007 07:07:55 -0800
Armando Salguero, of the Miami Herald, reports the Denver Broncos are showing interest unrestricted free-agent TE Randy McMichael (Dolphins).
Uhh?
fontaine
03-08-2007, 10:35 AM
Broncos | Broncos show interest in McMichael
Thu, 8 Mar 2007 07:07:55 -0800
Armando Salguero, of the Miami Herald, reports the Denver Broncos are showing interest unrestricted free-agent TE Randy McMichael (Dolphins).
Uhh?
Here's the reason:
The Jets, Broncos, Seahawks, and Raiders have all shown interest in free agent TE Randy McMichael.
We can eliminate Denver from contention after they signed Daniel Graham. No visits are scheduled yet for McMichael. Jerramy Stevens and Eric Johnson are his competition on the open market.
Denver is just doing what the faders tried earlier on.
When we showed interest in Henry/Graham they also lined up visits with these guys even though they had no intention of signing Henry with Jordan on the roster. They were just stalking our moves like jilted lovers looking to play the game without the bankroll or balls to follow through.
Ratboy
03-08-2007, 10:37 AM
Here's the reason:
Denver is just doing what the faders tried earlier on.
When we showed interest in Henry/Graham they also lined up visits with these guys even though they had no intention of signing Henry with Jordan on the roster. They were just stalking our moves like jilted lovers looking to play the game without the bankroll or balls to follow through.
Thats what i figured, but are the Raiders really that dumb? We already have Scheffler and Graham, they can't believe we need another TE.
fontaine
03-08-2007, 10:42 AM
Thats what i figured, but are the Raiders really that dumb? We already have Scheffler and Graham, they can't believe we need another TE.
It's just foreplay. The hard core stuff is what we do to them in regular season.
Ha!
Odysseus
03-08-2007, 10:45 AM
Wouldn't it be funny if Raiders didn't take us seriously and we signed him?
crazyhorse
03-08-2007, 10:57 AM
Wouldn't it be funny if Raiders didn't take us seriously and we signed him?
I know I would be laughin'.
Wouldn't it be funny if Raiders didn't take us seriously and we signed him?
I'd take him if it was a $1-$2M deal. Why not?
SoonerBronco
03-08-2007, 11:01 AM
I know I would be laughin'.
Just like we laugh at the queefs off season acquisitions...
deep snapper....Hilarious!
crazyhorse
03-08-2007, 11:09 AM
Just like we laugh at the queefs off season acquisitions...
deep snapper....Hilarious!
We need a long snapper. What's wrong with that? Just curious.
crazyhorse
03-08-2007, 11:11 AM
I'd take him if it was a $1-$2M deal. Why not?
Does he play D line?
If so he would be a good pick up
fontaine
03-08-2007, 11:21 AM
Does he play D line?
That depends on your definition of D Line play.
If you go by Carl Peterson's, then hell, these 1st day picks are supposed to play DT: Eric Downing, Eddie Freeman, Ryan Sims, Junior Siavi!
By those standards you could play DT for the chefs.
ROFL!
fontaine
03-08-2007, 11:25 AM
That depends on your definition of D Line play.
If you go by Carl Peterson's, then hell, these 1st day picks are supposed to play DT: Eric Downing, Eddie Freeman, Ryan Sims, Junior Siavi!
By those standards you could play DT for the chefs.
ROFL!
Sh*t, 3 of those 4 guys aren't even in the league any more and Peterson only drafted them the last couple of years.
:giggle:
Barry Ramey
03-08-2007, 11:35 AM
That depends on your definition of D Line play.
If you go by Carl Peterson's, then hell, these 1st day picks are supposed to play DT: Eric Downing, Eddie Freeman, Ryan Sims, Junior Siavi!
By those standards you could play DT for the chefs.
ROFL!
That was a good one :rofl:
ludo21
03-08-2007, 11:54 AM
bring hin in.
We have already ignored our DL in FA, might as well go after another TE playmaker.
SoonerBronco
03-08-2007, 11:56 AM
We need a long snapper. What's wrong with that? Just curious.
Instead of addressing your more pressing needs like...oh, let me see...WIDE RECIEVER...your front office goes out and gets a deep snapper and a linebacker. It must suck to a queefs fan...always playing not to loose.
Does he play D line?
If so he would be a good pick up
No he doesn't, but even I'd have a shot if I tried out for the chefs.
Vegas_Bronco
03-08-2007, 01:05 PM
Here's the reason:
Denver is just doing what the faders tried earlier on.
When we showed interest in Henry/Graham they also lined up visits with these guys even though they had no intention of signing Henry with Jordan on the roster. They were just stalking our moves like jilted lovers looking to play the game without the bankroll or balls to follow through.
So are you saying the Raiders are really our poor gay lovers...LOL
orinjkrush
03-08-2007, 01:19 PM
Shanny believes we can NEVER have enough TEs or LBs. For special teams and other reasons. (PS can you say goodbye Alexander and Jackson?)
Crushaholic
03-08-2007, 02:10 PM
While a 2 TE set of Graham and McMichael sounds good, it wouldn't be wise to shell out big money for him. I doubt Scheffler has any significant trade value right now. He needs another year under his belt...
Flyboy063
03-08-2007, 02:18 PM
<TABLE class=s_playerNewsTable id=Table1 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=487 border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=s_playerNewsTitle style="BACKGROUND: #001945" width=430><TABLE class=s_playerNewsTitle cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%"><TBODY><TR><TD align=left>Randy McMichael (http://www.rotoworld.com/Content/playerpages/player_main.aspx?sport=NFL&id=1281)-TE- Rams (http://www.rotoworld.com/Content/clubhouse_news.aspx?sport=NFL&majteam=STL)</TD><TD style="FONT-SIZE: 10px" align=right>Mar. 8 - 2:03 pm et</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><TD style="BACKGROUND: #001945" width=14>http://www.rotoworld.com/images/right_corner_player_news.gif</TD><TD width=6>http://www.rotoworld.com/images/pixel.gif</TD></TR><TR><TD>http://www.rotoworld.com/images/pixel.gif</TD><TD class=s_playerNewsLeftBorder>http://www.rotoworld.com/images/pixel.gif</TD><TD class=s_playerNewsText></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
http://www.rotoworld.com/Content/playerpages/player_main.aspx?sport=NFL&id=1281
Rams agreed to terms with TE Randy McMichael on a three-year contract.
A shocker here after St. Louis used two first-day picks on tight ends in 2006. However, coach Scott Linehan knowns McMike from Miami in 2005, when the inconsistent tight end caught 60 passes, five for TDs. This kills Joe Klopfenstein's keeper value and makes it likely Domonique Byrd will be cut. The Rams will address their run defense issues in the draft.
Crushaholic
03-08-2007, 02:59 PM
<TABLE class=s_playerNewsTable id=Table1 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=487 border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=s_playerNewsTitle style="BACKGROUND: #001945" width=430><TABLE class=s_playerNewsTitle cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%"><TBODY><TR><TD align=left>Randy McMichael (http://www.rotoworld.com/Content/playerpages/player_main.aspx?sport=NFL&id=1281)-TE- Rams (http://www.rotoworld.com/Content/clubhouse_news.aspx?sport=NFL&majteam=STL)</TD><TD style="FONT-SIZE: 10px" align=right>Mar. 8 - 2:03 pm et</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><TD style="BACKGROUND: #001945" width=14>http://www.rotoworld.com/images/right_corner_player_news.gif</TD><TD width=6>http://www.rotoworld.com/images/pixel.gif</TD></TR><TR><TD>http://www.rotoworld.com/images/pixel.gif</TD><TD class=s_playerNewsLeftBorder>http://www.rotoworld.com/images/pixel.gif</TD><TD class=s_playerNewsText></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
http://www.rotoworld.com/Content/playerpages/player_main.aspx?sport=NFL&id=1281
Rams agreed to terms with TE Randy McMichael on a three-year contract.
A shocker here after St. Louis used two first-day picks on tight ends in 2006. However, coach Scott Linehan knowns McMike from Miami in 2005, when the inconsistent tight end caught 60 passes, five for TDs. This kills Joe Klopfenstein's keeper value and makes it likely Domonique Byrd will be cut. The Rams will address their run defense issues in the draft.
LOL Thread over...