Caption This:

[Swedish Extrovert]

:rofl:

(I dont like either one of em.... I'll go for Wes Clark or John Edwards. ****, Mccain would be better than Hillary)

[atomicbloke]

vote bill richardson!!

[watermock]

http://www.orangemane.com/BB/attachment.php?attachmentid=18457&stc=1&d=1169985234

If there was ever a photo that explained the democratic party this is it...the only thing missing is Pelosi.

I love the guy with the crossed arms and the one behind her looking down her blouse.

Trying to figure out what drugs Hillary is on is problematic...she looks like something out of DisneyWorld or worse.

Look at the woman in the front bending her ear. It's all so classic.

We need this cabinet in the White House.

Hillary looks like she ate a canary.

The only guy that knows anything is the guy in the purple tie. And he's pissed because someone actually is taking a photo? How classic.

[BroncoBuff]

http://www.orangemane.com/BB/attachment.php?attachmentid=18457&stc=1&d=1169985234
I told you - do NOT turn around!!!
You are invisible to me!!
I can't see you - you're not there!!
La la la la la, La la la la .... :pfbbt: :notthissh

[watermock]

WTF is with these people? Where was this?

BTW...Hillary had a "discussion" in Iowa then announced her candicacy.

[Prodigal19]

http://www.orangemane.com/BB/attachment.php?attachmentid=18457&stc=1&d=1169985234

If there was ever a photo that explained the democratic party this is it...the only thing missing is Pelosi.

I love the guy with the crossed arms and the one behind her looking down her blouse.

Trying to figure out what drugs Hillary is on is problematic...she looks like something out of DisneyWorld or worse.

Look at the woman in the front bending her ear. It's all so classic.

We need this cabinet in the White House.

Hillary looks like she ate a canary.

The only guy that knows anything is the guy in the purple tie. And he's pissed because someone actually is taking a photo? How classic.
You act like you know politics yet you dont even know who "the guy with crossed arms" is.

[BroncoBuff]

You act like you know politics yet you dont even know who "the guy with crossed arms" is.

Omg, you're right! I usually skip mock's late-night posts, but that's a new low in clueless...

[watermock]

It's Obama or whatever his name is. He spoke at the convention. Am I wrong? Huh?

Funny if those two wind up on the same ticket.

You don't think I knew who that was? I just wasn't sure honestly...STFU.

[watermock]

http://obama.senate.gov/img/superman.jpg

this who your talking about dimwit?

[watermock]

I intentionally didn't name him you dimwits. I knew who he was, I didn't want to besmirch him. so whatever. You show your stupidity at every turn.

[watermock]

I actually like Obama, so STFU. That's why I didn't drag his name into the thread.

[watermock]

Omg, you're right! I usually skip mock's late-night posts, but that's a new low in clueless...

No, you set the new low in cluelessness...I didn't want to call his name out you dimwit...

Of course I knew who it was..the comment was about Hillarary and all the body language around her.

[watermock]

Crawl away.

[watermock]

c,mon smartass.

[Prodigal19]

is there a reason that you have to make so many posts when u can just put it all in one?


You don't think I knew who that was? I just wasn't sure honestly...STFU.
yes, but if you arent even sure who one of the most famous politicians in Washington is then I dont think you should be bashing one side of the political spectrum. Also, based on your maturity I wouldnt be surprised if you are under 14.

this who your talking about dimwit?
yes, and once again with the random insult.

I intentionally didn't name him you dimwits. I knew who he was, I didn't want to besmirch him. so whatever. You show your stupidity at every turn.
didnt you just say that you werent sure who he was?
also, your next two commetns have irony written all over them.
I actually like Obama, so STFU. That's why I didn't drag his name into the thread.
how is dragging his name into this thread hurting him in any way?

[Prodigal19]

i looked at your profile and see that you are 47.
I am just going to assume that you are drunk.
or at least i hope for your sake that you are.

[Atlas]

You act like you know politics yet you dont even know who "the guy with crossed arms" is.

That is pretty funny!

[watermock]

I knew damn well who it was.

Typical assertion. It assn't about Osamba, it was about Hillary's deer eyes.

[watermock]

I didn't bring his name into the conversation at all you dimwit...others did.

I knew who was crossing his arms but decorum premented me because I respect the man. Oh I forgot I was a raciset.

[Blueflame]

Yeah, well, it looks like a very poorly-photoshopped pic to me (based on lighting and focus).

[-Slap-]

Which pseudo-celebrity scumbag was it that Mock misidentified as Jake Plummer a couple years ago?

Federline or Lachey? One of those dickheads.

[SureShot]

Oh how I love Mock's cluster bomb posting when he is called out. A little defensive aren't we Mock?

[PatsWin2002]

http://orangemane.com/BB/attachment.php?attachmentid=18457&stc=1&d=1169985234

People at Madame Tussauds wax museum in New York marvel at the new Hillary Clinton exhibit.

http://www.nycwax.com/images/hillary_top.jpg

[Rigs11]

http://www.orangemane.com/BB/attachment.php?attachmentid=18457&stc=1&d=1169985234
"Bush calls that a new strategy?What a moron!"

[Spider]

http://www.orangemane.com/BB/attachment.php?attachmentid=18457&stc=1&d=1169985234
can I tickle your ass with a feather Hillary ?

[Spider]

http://www.orangemane.com/BB/attachment.php?attachmentid=18457&stc=1&d=1169985234
My Bears Have Brian Griese ...... Far better QB then Eli Manning

[Swedish Extrovert]

<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/CUMcPGZOT-A"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/CUMcPGZOT-A" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>

[Bronco Bob]

You act like you know politics yet you dont even know who "the guy with crossed arms" is.

:thumbsup:

How could anyone not living in a cave the last year not know who that was?

[Natedogg]

I just had my dialy dose of moc's idocy. Thanks you waste of life.

[Swedish Extrovert]

Yeah, well, it looks like a very poorly-photoshopped pic to me (based on lighting and focus).

Except most journalists who work for time have and ethical code not to photoshop photos.

I'm a journalist, and in school they gave us strict guidlines as to what we could and couldent do to a photo. Theres a fine line, and anything that alters the outward perception of a photo can get a journalist in trouble.

[ChampBailey24]

that hilarious

[watermock]

Quote:
Originally Posted by eddie mac
If we trade Jake or cut him and dont designate him as our one and only post June cut we save around $250,000. If we designate him as the June 1st cut then we save around $6m this year but take a $6m hit next year.


This needs to be stickied. Or at least bolded and put in someones signature a la "YOU CANNOT TRADE COMPENSATORY PICKS!"


We have a real genius here.

[epicSocialism4tw]

http://www.orangemane.com/BB/attachment.php?attachmentid=18457&stc=1&d=1169985234

General Democrat Candidate Obama: "You said you'd love me forever, Hillary. Our moments together were special. I've never known a woman to be so cold and so unlikeable, and you seemed like the one. I know that I'm just another substanceless candidate from the beloved party that we share, but please...LOOK AT ME! Don't deny me your aknowledgement. This is all for you...I thirst for you!"

[Ron Mexico]

Obama: "I've had better."

[brother love]

Mr. Obama pease zip your pants http://www.orangemane.com/BB/attachment.php?attachmentid=18457&stc=1&d=1169985234

[Blueflame]

Except most journalists who work for time have and ethical code not to photoshop photos.

I'm a journalist, and in school they gave us strict guidlines as to what we could and couldent do to a photo. Theres a fine line, and anything that alters the outward perception of a photo can get a journalist in trouble.

An unaltered photo doesn't usually have some of the subjects in sharp, clear focus while others are fuzzy. And the lighting doesn't look even to me. Is this a journalist's photo? It doesn't have a watermark (like "GettyImages", etc.)...

I dunno. It still looks like a photoshop to me.

[Swedish Extrovert]

An unaltered photo doesn't usually have some of the subjects in sharp, clear focus while others are fuzzy. And the lighting doesn't look even to me. Is this a journalist's photo? It doesn't have a watermark (like "GettyImages", etc.)...

I dunno. It still looks like a photoshop to me.

It was in TIME magazine. But I can see what you mean about the lighting - like on the right side of Obama.

[-Slap-]

http://filebox.vt.edu/users/drdepoy/jj_is_redickulously_gay.w492.jpg

It would suck if this one was photoshopped.

[Blueflame]

It was in TIME magazine. But I can see what you mean about the lighting - like on the right side of Obama.

Yeah, and if it's an unaltered photo, then either Hillary is on a riser or that gray-haired guy whose head doesn't even come up to her shoulder is incredibly short.... it also doesn't look like there would be room for the guy to really be standing between her and the other two people in the left foreground. In my opinion, the photo looks "multi-layered"....

[Prodigal19]

smurf where did you get the picture if i may ask?

[BroncoBuff]

is there a reason that you have to make so many posts when u can just put it all in one?

yes, but if you arent even sure who one of the most famous politicians in Washington is then I dont think you should be bashing one side of the political spectrum. Also, based on your maturity I wouldnt be surprised if you are under 14.

how is dragging his name into this thread hurting him in any way?

CONGRATULATIONS, NEW GUY! You handled the scourge of the site like a 10-year veteran!!

:notworthy

[BroncoBuff]

i looked at your profile and see that you are 47.
I am just going to assume that you are drunk.
or at least i hope for your sake that you are.

Man, you are one impressive rookie ... you've got my vote for OrangeMane rookie of the year....

http://img208.imageshack.us/img208/7596/orangemanesmalljh8.jpg

[broncocalijohn]

Nice to see Mock found another thread to add approx. 10 post what 2 post could have done. Prodigal it is a few things including the booze tha tmakes mock a mock.

[Dagmar]

Man, you are one impressive rookie ... you've got my vote for OrangeMane rookie of the year....

http://img208.imageshack.us/img208/7596/orangemanesmalljh8.jpg

Seconded!

Got mock to a tee within moments!

:rofl:

[Dagmar]

Nice to see Mock found another thread to add approx. 10 post what 2 post could have done. Prodigal it is a few things including the booze tha tmakes mock a mock.

What are the other things so I can avoid them?

[spdirty]

Hillary: Need more. Need more!

Obama: Damn! I wish these white b****es knew how to handle my Illinois Blacksnake.

[Swedish Extrovert]

Yeah, and if it's an unaltered photo, then either Hillary is on a riser or that gray-haired guy whose head doesn't even come up to her shoulder is incredibly short.... it also doesn't look like there would be room for the guy to really be standing between her and the other two people in the left foreground. In my opinion, the photo looks "multi-layered"....

Its not..... remmember the stadium seating. I guarantee you that the picture was taken with a long lens... and it was probabally digital, meaning that the f-stop had to have been closed. This is why the focus is in the the middle while the foreground and back ground are out of focus.

The lighting is coming from the right bottom, coming up.

Remmember, in the mid 90's Time magizine got into big trouble once, and have never photoshoped a photo again. It happened when that family gave birth to sextupletts, and the mother had VERY bad, disgusting yellow, crooked teeth. TIME fixed them up while Newsweek left the decrepit teeth - ironically both the magizines had the same cover picture that week. Very embarrasing for TIME, only weeks after they had been criticized for adding headlighting and a snarle to the mugshot of OJ Simpson, and being criticized for that.

Ever since then, Time hasn't photoshopped. It's evident on the occasion when Time and Newsweek hold the same cover, and sometimes there is a noticable difference as per the fact that Time doesen't photoshop at all and Newsweek does just a little.

Of the grey haird person you are refering to... it would appear one of them is on a lower step, and the other is taking his seat.

A little excessive, I know, but remmemer I make a living taking feature pictures for the military to submit to getty, ap, whatever.... I have been published in several Newspapers, and in several online feature articles.

[Swedish Extrovert]

smurf where did you get the picture if i may ask?

cnn.com under Time photos of the day.

[Blueflame]

Its not..... remmember the stadium seating. I guarantee you that the picture was taken with a long lens... and it was probabally digital, meaning that the f-stop had to have been closed. This is why the focus is in the the middle while the foreground and back ground are out of focus.

The lighting is coming from the right bottom, coming up.
If that's true, then why is the spotlight glaring off the top of the bald pate of the man directly in front of Hillary? There had to have been a light source above that man... and the lady beside him... when the pic was taken.

Remmember, in the mid 90's Time magizine got into big trouble once, and have never photoshoped a photo again. It happened when that family gave birth to sextupletts, and the mother had VERY bad, disgusting yellow, crooked teeth. TIME fixed them up while Newsweek left the decrepit teeth - ironically both the magizines had the same cover picture that week. Very embarrasing for TIME, only weeks after they had been criticized for adding headlighting and a snarle to the mugshot of OJ Simpson, and being criticized for that.

Ever since then, Time hasn't photoshopped. It's evident on the occasion when Time and Newsweek hold the same cover, and sometimes there is a noticable difference as per the fact that Time doesen't photoshop at all and Newsweek does just a little.

Of the grey haird person you are refering to... it would appear one of them is on a lower step, and the other is taking his seat.
The focus and lighting is consistent with the four people in the front left, in front of Hillary. It is different than in the rest of the picture. Obama, for example, is definitely not lighted from above.

A little excessive, I know, but remmemer I make a living taking feature pictures for the military to submit to getty, ap, whatever.... I have been published in several Newspapers, and in several online feature articles.
I've done a lot of layered images in Paintshop Pro... compositing images to make a single graphic and this picture definitely looks like a composite to me. It looks like at least 3 layers of images (and maybe even more) merged into one. I still think it's 'shopped.