PDA

View Full Version : Top 25 Censored stories of the year


Dudeskey
12-30-2006, 02:12 AM
1 Future of Internet Debate Ignored by Media
2 Halliburton Charged with Selling Nuclear Technologies to Iran
3 Oceans of the World in Extreme Danger
4 Hunger and Homelessness Increasing in the US
5 High-Tech Genocide in Congo
6 Federal Whistleblower Protection in Jeopardy
7 US Operatives Torture Detainees to Death in Afghanistan and Iraq
8 Pentagon Exempt from Freedom of Information Act
9 The World Bank Funds Israel-Palestine Wall
10 Expanded Air War in Iraq Kills More Civilians
11 Dangers of Genetically Modified Food Confirmed
12 Pentagon Plans to Build New Landmines
13 New Evidence Establishes Dangers of Roundup
14 Homeland Security Contracts KBR to Build Detention Centers in the US
15 Chemical Industry is EPA’s Primary Research Partner
16 Ecuador and Mexico Defy US on International Criminal Court
17 Iraq Invasion Promotes OPEC Agenda
18 Physicist Challenges Official 9-11 Story
19 Destruction of Rainforests Worst Ever
20 Bottled Water: A Global Environmental Problem
21 Gold Mining Threatens Ancient Andean Glaciers
22 $Billions in Homeland Security Spending Undisclosed
23 US Oil Targets Kyoto in Europe
24 Cheney’s Halliburton Stock Rose Over 3000 Percent Last Year
25 US Military in Paraguay Threatens Region…

http://www.projectcensored.org/censored_2007/index.htm

epicSocialism4tw
12-30-2006, 04:53 PM
Some more unadressed issues:

US moves further away from domestic economical concerns and moves toward more widespread globalist economic endeavors.

US refuses to maintain its borders with the intention of moving towards globalism.

The US media unabashedly remains committed to propaganda directives.

The two party system is the worst thing ever to happen to US government, and the media refuses to address this...why the avoidance?

Uncovering the dark, purposeful, and intentionally subversive humanist philosophical movement within the public domain.

RMT
12-30-2006, 05:01 PM
Some more unadressed issues:

US moves further away from domestic economical concerns and moves toward more widespread globalist economic endeavors.

US refuses to maintain its borders with the intention of moving towards globalism.

The US media unabashedly remains committed to propaganda directives.

The two party system is the worst thing ever to happen to US government, and the media refuses to address this...why the avoidance?

Uncovering the dark, purposeful, and intentionally subversive humanist philosophical movement within the public domain.

Right on about the borders!

The reason the media doesn't address the "2-party U.S." system is because 3 parties would reduce the media's ability to influence politicians and voters. With 2 parties, there is always a "majority" - 3 parties would allow a minority majority opinion to evolve, thus, reducing the media's influence.

Play2win
12-30-2006, 05:30 PM
Right on about the borders!

The reason the media doesn't address the "2-party U.S." system is because 3 parties would reduce the media's ability to influence politicians and voters. With 2 parties, there is always a "majority" - 3 parties would allow a minority majority opinion to evolve, thus, reducing the media's influence.

ACCESS is the reason why there is not a 3rd part.

alkemical
03-26-2007, 11:15 AM
Shssh! Don’t Tell Americans How We Treat “Enemy Combatants” (http://www.fff.org/comment/com0703h.asp)

by Jacob G. Hornberger, March 21, 2007

The case of accused terrorist Jose Padilla is moving toward a jury trial on April 16 in U.S. District Court in Miami. It is still unclear whether the presiding judge in the case, Marcia Cooke, will order an evidentiary hearing on Padilla’s motion to dismiss the charges based on the government’s outrageous pre-trial conduct while Padilla was in military custody as an “enemy combatant” in the “war on terror.” (Under post-9/11 jurisprudence, the government has the option of treating accused terrorists either as “enemy combatants” or as federal-court defendants.)

The government is doing everything it can to prevent the American people from learning what the U.S. military did to Padilla during his three years of pre-trial confinement. In fact, U.S. officials are doing the same thing with respect to “enemy combatants” that the CIA has been holding for years in its secret overseas prisons. They say the prisoners should not be permitted to reveal what the CIA has done to them because to do so would threaten “national security.”

Meanwhile, the American people are walking through all this with an ambivalent numbness. Frightened after 9/11 over the prospect that “the terrorists” were coming to get them, many Americans were either silent or supportive when U.S. officials assumed the most powerful dictatorial tool possible — the power to arbitrarily take people into custody, torture them, and even execute them after a kangaroo proceeding. What never occurred to many Americans was that the military would have the authority to exercise this dictatorial power on them.

Not surprisingly, federal officials now want to keep Americans from learning the full extent of the federal government’s post-9/11 power over them. That’s why they used their plea bargain with John Walker Lindh, the “American Taliban,” to prohibit him from revealing what they did to him while he was in pre-trial military custody. That’s why they’re fighting fiercely in the Padilla case to keep Americans from learning what they did to Padilla. That’s why they’re claiming “national security” to prevent accused terrorist Khalid Sheikh Mohammad and other CIA prisoners from describing the waterboarding and other “alternative” forms of interrogation to which they have been subjected.

Unfortunately, all too many Americans still don’t want to know what U.S. officials don’t want to tell them. It’s much easier to continue walking in blind numbness and reassuring themselves with, “It can’t happen here. This is America.”

As the late psychiatrist M. Scott Peck pointed out, mental health involves an unwavering commitment to reality at all costs. Any hope of restoring a healthy, balanced, and free society requires that Americans fully confront the revolutionary changes that 9/11 has wrought in our nation, including everything that the government now has the power to do to Americans.

Reality is that the U.S. military now wields the power to take anyone, including American citizens, into custody as “enemy combatants” in the “war on terror” and to do everything to them that the CIA and the Pentagon have done to other “enemy combatants.”

Reality is the power to subject American and foreign “enemy combatants” to extreme isolation and sensory deprivation over long periods of time. That’s what those eerie blacked-out goggles and earmuffs on Padilla were all about.

Reality is the government’s power to subject “enemy combatants” to waterboarding and similar forms of “alternative-interrogation techniques.”

Reality is the government’s power to inject substances into “enemy combatants.” (Padilla says it was LSD they injected into him while the military says it was actually an inoculation against the flu.)

Reality is the government’s power to not account for “enemy combatants” who have disappeared after being taken into custody. As Human Rights Watch attorney Joanne Mariner recently wrote, there are many “enemy combatants” who are believed to have once been in CIA custody and who are now unaccounted for.

President Bush recently said that to combat terrorism, the federal government needs to continue spreading freedom around the globe. What he obviously meant was the “freedom” of the CIA and the Pentagon to continue taking “enemy combatants,” both Americans and foreigners, into custody, treating them accordingly, and then keeping what they do to them secret from the American people and the world.

Jacob Hornberger is founder and president of The Future of Freedom Foundation. Send him email.

Spider
03-26-2007, 11:22 AM
you self serving bastards ..... today we find out how Anna Nicole Smith died , who is the Daddy of her baby .............. Whats more important then that ?
;D