PDA

View Full Version : Boston Herald article on potential Patriots/Broncos playoff game


Broncobuddy7
12-27-2006, 08:00 AM
FOXBORO - The New York Jets cleared up the AFC playoff picture considerably with their Monday night win at Miami. Now if the final weekend breaks down the way the wise guys in Las Vegas believe it will, the Patriots [team stats]’ first- and second-round matchups are all set.
It’s home against Denver in the wild card game and then, with a win, out to San Diego for the second round.
Not that appealing, is it?
For that scenario to play out, Indianapolis must take care of Miami at home Sunday, the Jets need to handle Oakland at the Meadowlands and the Broncos have to dismiss San Francisco in Denver. The Colts are early 7-point favorites, the Jets are giving 11 points to the woeful Raiders and Denver is favored by 10.
If those numbers play out, it doesn’t matter whether the Pats win or lose at Tennessee on Sunday. They’re locked in.
But if you’re thinking a tank job from the Patriots is in store against the Titans, one reminiscent of their 2005 finale against Miami, keep in mind the No. 3 seed is still within reach, and it comes with great value. With the Pats kicking off in Tennessee at 1 p.m. and the Colts-Dolphins game moved to 4:15, thanks to the NFL’s flex scheduling, the Patriots won’t have the benefit of dictating their position like last year.
A No. 3 seed likely would mean a date with the Jets in the first round, not the Broncos. It would also mean a divisional game in Baltimore, which would constitute a much shorter flight and, arguably, a more beatable opponent than San Diego.
But first things first. A look at the Patriots’ prospective first-round opponents and an assessment of who they want, and who they want no part of:

Denver Broncos
The scenario: Laid out above. The Pats also can play the Broncos as the No. 3 seed if Denver loses to the 49ers but still gets in as the sixth seed.
Why the Pats want them: The law of averages. Jay Cutler.
Why they don’t: Champ Bailey. Speed at linebacker. Mike Shanahan.
The skinny: Everyone talks about the Denver running game, but that shouldn’t scare the Patriots. No one’s running on the Pats right now, and the Broncos didn’t run on them in the playoffs last year either (96 yards). What should be far more concerning is the uncanny ability of Shanahan to always get his receivers open against the Pats’ secondary. While the prospect of facing a rookie quarterback in Cutler is appealing, most fans were looking forward to facing Jake Plummer the last two years, too, and Plummer went 3-0.
The coach, the scheme and the receivers are the issue here.
But the biggest problems are on the other side of the ball, where the matchups for the Pats remain unfavorable. The Broncos’ speedy linebacker trio of Al Wilson, Ian Gold and D.J. Williams can neutralize both the Pats’ running game (the Pats ran for 50 yards in the 17-7 loss earlier this year) and their tight ends in the passing game. Cornerback Bailey can shut down half of the field with his eyes closed against whatever Pats receiver he faces.
That leaves Tom Brady [stats] with few options.
Bottom line: The Broncos have won the last three matchups, and most Pats fans just can’t envision a scenario where a Bill Belichick-coached team is beaten four straight times by the same opponent. The law of averages would seem to favor New England, but forgive us if we’re not buying that line of reasoning. The Pats should hope for some upsets this weekend."

http://patriots.bostonherald.com/patriots/view.bg?articleid=174036

OrangeShadow
12-27-2006, 08:15 AM
"Cornerback Bailey can shut down half of the field with his eyes closed against whatever Pats receiver he faces."

i LOVE that quote

sirhcyennek81
12-27-2006, 08:24 AM
Denver has only lost to Tom Brady one time, in Denver, and Kanell was starting. Do we march into foxboro and win in January? Yes, if we want to go further into the playoffs. We could pull an Indi and beat the Pats two years in the row in the playoffs, wouldnt that be unbearable for the greatest coach not named Lombardi Belichek? Articles like this amuse me, its not always getting 150 yards that beats opponents, but the fact you stick with the run means the defense cant cheat and focus on one thing. Also, a rookie QB who is not playing like a rookie is not something Pats fans should mark as a sign they win.

:Broncos:

Rulon Velvet Jones
12-27-2006, 09:46 AM
The "law of averages" never applies in head-to-head matchups. You either win or lose. No one is due. Not even those sissy Pats.

Mile High Shack
12-27-2006, 10:07 AM
the Pats worst nightmare is to face us in the playoffs

just like our worst nightmare is to face Indy

watermock
12-27-2006, 10:09 AM
Actually we lost to Brady in a game and Deltha was banished.

watermock
12-27-2006, 10:11 AM
The "law of averages" never applies in head-to-head matchups. You either win or lose. No one is due. Not even those sissy Pats.

You can flip a coin 50 times and it comes up tails each time. The odds are still 50/50.

Tyrant
12-27-2006, 10:15 AM
Actually we lost to Brady in a game and Deltha was banished.

Yep, that was the Kanell game....

broncsyanks
12-27-2006, 10:58 AM
throw the past out. this will be a hell of a tough game. beliichek is real smart. its the playoffs though.

anything can happen.
winner plays the bolts in the bolts stadium. i would love another shot at them. beating a team 3 times in a season? i like those odds

Atlas
12-27-2006, 11:04 AM
Actually we lost to Brady in a game and Deltha was banished.

That was the year Kannel started for Denver.

Jason in LA
12-29-2006, 01:00 AM
The law of averages says that if one team beats the other team 100% of the time, chances are they'll beat them in the next match up.

Garcia Bronco
12-29-2006, 01:08 AM
That was the year Kannel started for Denver.

*twitch*

Jetmeck
12-29-2006, 01:53 AM
Yep, that was the Kanell game....


Yep and he was playing with the flu.

Kaylore
12-29-2006, 02:02 AM
So yeah, the Niners are still on the schedule last time I checked.

Killericon
12-29-2006, 02:27 AM
So yeah, the Niners are still on the schedule last time I checked.

I hear they've got this young guy...What is his name...Frank something or other. Oh well. He's of no concern to us, our run defense is inpregnable! Let's all stare right past this game we are huge favourites to win against this young, dangerous team and into the Playoffs. Nothing can go wrong. Nothing at all.