PDA

View Full Version : Manning, Brady greater than Elway, Montana, Unitas?


DomCasual
11-02-2006, 02:12 PM
Have fun with this one.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/story?columnist=smith_michael&id=2646827

Greatest of all time will come down to Brady, Manning

Know something?

When they're done playing, their résumés complete, and Tom Brady has a fistful of championships and Peyton Manning owns every major NFL passing record and maybe a couple of titles himself, the two of them are going to be considered the best quarterbacks ever. We debate who's the better contemporary QB, and a decade from now, we're sure to be discussing which is history's best.

For many, Manning already is in the conversation. And Brady finally seems to be getting the widespread appreciation for the major role he's played in the Patriots dynasty.

How cool is that we get to see them shoot it out Sunday night when Manning takes his unbeaten Colts to Gillette Stadium to face Brady's once-beaten Patriots?

It'll be the quarterbacks' eighth meeting, and it never gets old. Sade told us to "cherish the day." Football fans should cherish nights like Sunday. It's not quite the same as Magic versus Larry or Russell versus Chamberlain, but it's as close as football gets, I guess.

Should the Patriots go on to win a dozen games this year, Brady, 29, will find himself almost halfway to John Elway's record of 148 victories (regular season) as a starter (Brady has 64 wins right now). Brady threw for an average of about 3,800 yards and 26 touchdowns from 2002 to 2005. Should he manage to keep up that pace for another half dozen seasons, he'll have 300 touchdown passes and 45,000 yards or so, enough to put him well into the top 10 in both categories. If he and the Patriots keep rolling along like they're going, Brady will have the wins and the individual numbers. His spot in the Hall of Fame has long been reserved.

As for Manning, well, there's no use projecting because who knows where he's going to leave Dan Marino's or Brett Favre's records when he's finished. He might do to passing marks what Jerry Rice did to receiving records, which is put them out of reach.

The current G.O.A.T.? Most people seem to favor Joe Montana. Lot of folks like Elway. Some Marino. John Unitas still gets love when talk turns to the greatest of all time. One certainly can make an argument for all those guys. People who've had this conversation with me know I like to argue that Favre is the best ever. I think I've argued enough to where I actually completely believe it. Doesn't matter.

It won't even be close by the end of Brady's and Manning's careers. It'll be those two and everyone else.

Realize you're watching history in the making Sunday night.

What's really cool about the Brady-Manning rivalry (is it OK to call it that when Brady's Patriots have won six of seven matchups?) is how they've come to be linked. Brady's first start, Sept. 30, 2001, was against Manning and the Colts.

Ever since Brady started winning Super Bowls, beating Manning twice along the way, fans have enjoyed answering the question "Which would you rather have?" You know what? I'm not going there anymore. Not playing that game. You guys have at it. From here on out, I'm just going to appreciate them both.

I admit I used to be a Brady guy just because he'd won titles and always -- up until last year, that is -- got the better of Manning head to head. I tell you I can't decide now. They're both unbelievable. I couldn't pick one over the other without second-guessing the decision. And you really couldn't go wrong either way.

And they come from such different places. Manning's the Golden Boy, his dad was a really good quarterback, his younger brother looks to be on his way to being a great quarterback himself. The Mannings are the first family of football. It's as if Manning were bred or created in a lab somewhere. He's just so perfect. Greatness from him was predicted early on. As a teenager growing up in New Orleans, he quarterbacked the scout team for the Saints.

Brady, on the other hand, has more of the self-made-man thing going for him. Whereas Manning was the first overall selection in his draft, Brady famously lasted until pick No. 199. A third-stringer his rookie season, he got his shot his second year because of injury. He doesn't put up the ridiculous numbers Manning does -- probably could, but that isn't how the Patriots play -- but more often than not has the edge over his opponents where it counts.

Brady has a rags-to-riches appeal to him. Manning is more royalty.

But they're really more similar than they are different. You have to start with how tough they are. Including playoffs, Manning has started 144 consecutive games, Brady 96. They're both so studious, so dedicated and so meticulous when it comes to their preparation that they're almost always in total command. There hasn't been a smarter quarterback than either of these two. They're like coaches, only without the titles. In their unique ways, they're both great leaders.

Really the only difference is that Manning's team hasn't won a championship. Not yet, at least. Manning's the two-time regular-season Most Valuable Player, Brady a two-time Super Bowl MVP.

Brady has earned a reputation as being clutch in the big game. Manning, fairly or not, has earned a rep as being a choker in big games. That's what I used to use to break the tie.

But I'm off getting on Manning for not yet winning a title and for his 3-6 playoff record vs. Brady's 10-1 mark. If Manning were never to win a title -- and I believe he eventually will; he's only 30 -- it doesn't make him any less of a quarterback or inferior to any of the QBs who have. Anyway, I think that criticism tends to die down once a player retires. Does anybody hold it against Marino or Jim Kelly or Warren Moon that their teams didn't win a Super Bowl? I'm of the opinion now that championships don't define individuals in team sports. Too many other people, other variables are involved in who wins it all and who doesn't.

Manning will get his ring one day, just as I believe Brady will add a regular-season MVP award to his Super Bowl trophies sooner or later. And if neither does either, it doesn't change anything.

I'm just glad I've had the privilege of watching both careers from the beginning and all but one of their meetings, even if only a couple have been so much as competitive. It seems as if every Colts-Patriots matchup is more anticipated than the last. With this one, we have them both coming off performances among the best of their careers, Brady at Minnesota and Manning at Denver. Combined, they passed for 717 yards and seven touchdowns while completing 61 of 82 attempts against two of the league's top defenses.

Think they might have just been warming up?

Both guys seem to get it done no matter what, or rather, no matter who. Manning is doing his thing without Edgerrin James. And how's this for being on top of your game: Manning has thrown only two interceptions this year and 32 the past 3˝ years compared with 121 touchdown passes. Sick. Brady only lost both of his starting wide receivers, yet he just keeps racking up wins.

I think most of you would agree that when you're talking today's quarterbacks, it's Brady, Manning (or Manning, Brady if you prefer) and everyone else. It's just a matter of time, and a little more résumé padding, before we think of the position's history in the same way.

Michael Smith is a senior writer at ESPN.com.

Atwater His Ass
11-02-2006, 02:18 PM
No.

Florida_Bronco
11-02-2006, 02:19 PM
I highly doubt it.

Billy Clyde Puckett
11-02-2006, 02:20 PM
Bs

DomCasual
11-02-2006, 02:22 PM
I think Brady will be there, eventually. But I don't put Marino in the group with Elway and Montana (I never watched Unitas). Fair or not, the Super Bowls make a difference, in my opinion. Until or unless Manning wins at least one, I think he's destined to be a Marino (or even Tarkenton). That certainly isn't bad, but it isn't the greatest of all time. That's just stupid.

Elway 4 Life
11-02-2006, 02:30 PM
This is the way i see it.

Manning = Marino - A ton of passing reocrds 0 championships.
Brady = Montana - probably wont have any passing records but will have a fistful of rings.

I think Manning will go down in history as the greastest QB to never win a championship. God i hope Im right.

Mountain Bronco
11-02-2006, 02:31 PM
Just ESPN hype of the game. Typical overreactions by sportswriters. I have said it before and will say it again, everything these days is overhyped and people throw out the words "the greatest" far to much.

Bronx33
11-02-2006, 02:34 PM
Another hooker red lipstick artical from espn.

Dr. Broncenstein
11-02-2006, 03:17 PM
Pretend all were just out of college and entering the draft. Who ya got now? I'd take the Duke and laugh at the rest of you b!tches..

Alkazar
11-02-2006, 03:17 PM
Agreed, to be considered among the Greatest Of All Time as a QB, you DO have to win a SB or two. Thats why I'm so glad that Elway got his in before he retired. To me, Marino was just a great passer and thats it. Hell, in my book, Kelly was a better QB because he at least lead his team to 4 consecutive SBs, even though he ended up losing all four, he at least got his team there more than once. Brady MIGHT be listed among the Greats before its all said and done because he does have the 3 SB Titles. Until Manning gets at least one, he'll just be another, if better, Marino.

Clockwork Orange
11-02-2006, 03:22 PM
Just ESPN hype of the game. Typical overreactions by sportswriters. I have said it before and will say it again, everything these days is overhyped and people throw out the words "the greatest" far to much.

Bingo. ESPN has this habit of trying to portray everything going on in sports today as being greater than anything that's ever happened before. Unfortunately, too many people these days have the attention span of a goldfish and buy into it.

KipCorrington25
11-02-2006, 03:33 PM
Brady won't get anymore so that three followed by some mediocre years won't look too great when it's all said and done.

-Slap-
11-02-2006, 03:35 PM
You mean the 1999 Rams aren't the greatest offense ever?

The 2000 Ravens aren't the greatest defense ever?

Mark McGwire isn't the greatest power hitter ever?

Shaq isn't the greatest center ever?

USC isn't the best college football team ever?

Tiger Woods isn't the greatest athlete ever?

Mike Tyson isn't the greatest heavyweight ever?

Etc, etc, etc.....?

-Slap-
11-02-2006, 03:36 PM
Brady won't get anymore so that three followed by some mediocre years won't look too great when it's all said and done.

He might get another in a few months.

After everybody wrote his team off in September, I might add.

Hogan11
11-02-2006, 03:38 PM
Bingo. ESPN has this habit of trying to portray everything going on in sports today as being greater than anything that's ever happened before. Unfortunately, too many people these days have the attention span of a goldfish and buy into it.

Yup, plus what's the demographic ESPN caters to? I'm willing to bet the average age of the ESPN viewer is such that they barely remember the QB's that Manning & Brady are rated ahead of.

BroncoBuff
11-02-2006, 03:46 PM
[/COLOR]You mean the 1999 Rams aren't the greatest offense ever? '98 Broncos

The 2000 Ravens aren't the greatest defense ever? '85 Bears

Mark McGwire isn't the greatest power hitter ever? George Herman Ruth

Shaq isn't the greatest center ever? Bill Russell

USC isn't the best college football team ever? '95 Huskers :TJnPopps:

Tiger Woods isn't the greatest athlete ever? Michael Jordan

Mike Tyson isn't the greatest heavyweight ever? Joe Louis

Etc, etc, etc.....?

IMHO :thanku:

watermock
11-02-2006, 03:59 PM
OH LORDIE...And Sam Bowie was destined to be better than M.J.

Michael Smith is a senior writer at ESPN.com.

No wonder it's so well written with assertions for players barely halfway thru their careers.

Does anybody hold it against Marino or Jim Kelly or Warren Moon that their teams didn't win a Super Bowl? I'm of the opinion now that championships don't define individuals in team sports.

Ummm...no, but they aren't on my list of all time greatest QB's.

Elway was basically crowned Duke for life and rode off into the Orange Sunset riding Thunder bareback with two trophys in each fist like a freakin' God.

Marino went out with a wimper. I'm not sure any QB carried a team on his back like Elway. Does anyone else have 5 SuperBowl starts?

That's why I laughed when told that certain players can't "push a button and turn it on at will". These greenpeas should at least be old enough to take their Ritalin with Brady so fresh in the past.

I'm not saying that they are not two of the best quarterbacks of our era, SO FAR, but saying they WILL be the greatest and COULD be the greatest are two very different things, especially midway thru their careers. Remember Walsh saying SOB would be the next Montana? There was a QB that could push a button right along with Elway when the stew was boiling late in a game. Remember when he outdueled Elway even in his twilight? I was there.

Brady has three rings, but one came on a comical "Tuck call" noone had ever seen called before but now is a staple of the pass friendly league, and got pulled out of the fire three times in SuperBowls for three, three point wins.

Guess what happened Sunday to Denver. Yep, some money player named Vinateri pulled Manning's ass out of the fire for yep, a 3 point win. That's a money kicker.

How anyone pays for ESPiN Insider is astounding.

There is nothing "Insider" about the virtually any of their articles. That's an editorial that makes an idiotic assertion.

Breaking news, Weekly World News Insider has confirmed Bat Boy is a Chupacabra. Or a Churito...they don't know for sure...it's remains a mystery...be sure to get the inside story in the next issue.

watermock
11-02-2006, 04:04 PM
You mean the 1999 Rams aren't the greatest offense ever?

The 2000 Ravens aren't the greatest defense ever?

Mark McGwire isn't the greatest power hitter ever?

Shaq isn't the greatest center ever?

USC isn't the best college football team ever?

Tiger Woods isn't the greatest athlete ever?

Mike Tyson isn't the greatest heavyweight ever?

Etc, etc, etc.....?

Oh but Tiger Woods WILL be the greatest of all time.

Greatest Defense I ever saw in my era was the 1985-6 Bears with that suffocating, just WWF defense.

Mike Tyson is the perfect example Slappy...people slobberknobing him that he would go down as the greatest heavyweight ever.

I think it was a rather mediocre article that was made absurd with assertions that were complete opinions.

watermock
11-02-2006, 04:05 PM
You mean the OSU/Michigan game won't be the "Game of the Century" Slappy?

Rohirrim
11-02-2006, 04:08 PM
ESPN. Air sickness bags are located in the pouch behind the seat in front of you.

Cito Pelon
11-02-2006, 04:19 PM
Hard to say who's the greatest ever. It's a team sport.

Also, Unitas, Fouts, Elway, Moon, Kelly, Archie Manning, Staubach, Namath, Lamonica, Tarkenton, etc., etc. weren't protected by the whistle or the flag like QB's are today. Unitas, Staubach, Fouts even didn't even have the "in the grasp" rule. When that became effective I can't remember.

watermock
11-02-2006, 04:21 PM
http://www.orangemane.com/BB/image.php?u=1211&dateline=1162393056

I'll Man Up on Sunday...I'm going to make Ciche Pie

Entomopathogenic Nematodes (Steinernematidae and Heterorhabditidae ...

Someone give me the spelling of this stupid word....Ciche is a beetle that eats hemp.

I don't want a Beetle pie even if it gets me stoned and is tasty...

Alkazar
11-02-2006, 04:28 PM
Quiche

Billy Clyde Puckett
11-02-2006, 04:31 PM
Hard to say who's the greatest ever. It's a team sport.

Also, Unitas, Fouts, Elway, Moon, Kelly, Archie Manning, Staubach, Namath, Lamonica, Tarkenton, etc., etc. weren't protected by the whistle or the flag like QB's are today. Unitas, Staubach, Fouts even didn't even have the "in the grasp" rule. When that became effective I can't remember.

Very true. And there are about a dozen other names that could be added to that list.

watermock
11-02-2006, 04:44 PM
Quiche

Queen. ROFL! Actually I like it and haven't had it in ages. Not on Sunday tho. Thanks. Sounds too much like a Queef.

I knew how to spell that. Ha! Oh man.

brncs_fan
11-02-2006, 04:51 PM
These guys could make sh*t-in-a-box the all-time greatest cereal if they wanted to.

This guy lost me at Favre is the best of all time.

Pezman
11-02-2006, 05:04 PM
ESPN, irrelevant to real world sports news since 1995.

OrangeShadow
11-02-2006, 05:08 PM
sportswriters riding the hot hand nothing more nothing less

Ballhawk
11-02-2006, 07:21 PM
I think the rule enforcement does help the NFL to be more stat friendly, but I do not know how many QBs will be able to put 5 SB appearances on their Resume. Brady has had a hell of a start, but I do not think he will see it this year or anytime in the near future. On top of that, I think the AFC east gives the pats a free trip to the playoffs every year. Manning just about gets a free playoff pass playing in his division (although the Jags now and Titans then were ok).

The AFC West was always a tough division in the 80s and 90s and for most years in this decade. Watching Brady and Manning get 5 easy division games a year goes a long way to their success.

Willynowei
11-02-2006, 07:45 PM
Manning and Brady are both great. Brady's one of the toughest SOBs to play center, and still keep cool under pressure. But tougher than Elway? Cooler than Montana? Well, we'll see.

Mannings smart, he's hard working, and throws the best ball in the NFL today. But does Manning throw a better ball than Marino? Not even close.

It will be all said and done when its all said it done, not a moment before. Manning's never had a year without great weapons and Brady's Patriots looks to have developed a bad reputation in Free Agency.

If I had to guess, i would say there's one for the each of them left. Some day, the colts running game will get consistent enough to help Manning against the defenses that hone in on the Colts passing game. And that day is when Manning will get his crack at it. Meanwhile, the Patriots will get another shot sooner or later.

SprintRightOption
11-02-2006, 08:24 PM
I bet Brady will get 1 or 2 more, and Peyton will probably get 1 one of these years. There's a good chance that one of them gets it this year.

John Elway might have all the passing records to go with the Lombardis if he had Mannings offensive weapons for most of his career. And Brady would have the same numbers at this point if he did.

If Brady wins 2 more championships, he will probably have the wins to match Elway when he's done, and he could be in the top 3 ever with Elway and Montana. It's pretty hard to argue with what the guy has done so far, and his playoff performances. It's pretty cool that we are the one team that has the kryptonite for him, and his only playoff loss in 10 games.

Best line about Elway/Montana, from Rick Reilly in 1996: "Everybody wants to talk Superbowls, but put Elway in San Francisco and the 4 titles still happen, put Montana in Denver and he's either dead or selling insurance by age 28."

Ballhawk
11-02-2006, 09:07 PM
Brady or Manning better get one because once we insert Cutler they have no shot :)

Xenos
11-02-2006, 10:09 PM
I bet Brady will get 1 or 2 more, and Peyton will probably get 1 one of these years. There's a good chance that one of them gets it this year.

John Elway might have all the passing records to go with the Lombardis if he had Mannings offensive weapons for most of his career. And Brady would have the same numbers at this point if he did.

If Brady wins 2 more championships, he will probably have the wins to match Elway when he's done, and he could be in the top 3 ever with Elway and Montana. It's pretty hard to argue with what the guy has done so far, and his playoff performances. It's pretty cool that we are the one team that has the kryptonite for him, and his only playoff loss in 10 games.

Best line about Elway/Montana, from Rick Reilly in 1996: "Everybody wants to talk Superbowls, but put Elway in San Francisco and the 4 titles still happen, put Montana in Denver and he's either dead or selling insurance by age 28."

Wow. I guess in a way that is true since Elway was the more physically dominating of the two (though to be fair, not very many QBs had the physical tools that Elway did). I just can't imagine Joe in that way though. I think he would have turned the Broncos around like Brady did with the Patriots. Though, I don't think he would have been able to do win a championship without Walsh and some of the other key players that the niners had.

Sir Mawn
11-02-2006, 10:15 PM
I'm not sure Elway could match Manning's stats even with all those weapons. That's what I liked about Elway. He'd win first. He didn't mind taking chances. He hated playing fancy.

Now imagine Peyton the 80's and early 90's Broncos teams.... The difference: Elway would win with both teams. Manning just puts up all world stats with the Colts.

yavoon
11-02-2006, 10:21 PM
both have a shot at being best ever, so why not waste time talking about it? what u want em to write about?

though I do agree that espn is horrible for sports. goto outsiders:).

PatsWin2002
11-02-2006, 10:22 PM
Please note that Michael Smith was a Boston Globe writer that went to ESPN.

It's probably not fair to compare the guys that are still playing to guys that achieved icon status (yet).

Just like it's not like me to think Montana is better than Unitas or Otto Graham or whoever because I'm too young to know any different.

I think he's saying that when Brady and Manning are done they will have the benefit of being the most recent thing in people's memory and, therefore, "the greatest".

And I'm a Pats homer and welcome Brady's place in history. :)

Slap put it well. You can't ignore how good the Babe was in his day and other people he has stuck up for over the years....Jack Johnson comes to mind as well.

spdirty
11-02-2006, 10:36 PM
If Marsha wins it this year, he should be considered one of the top 5 ever. Doing it with inferior talent from his past SB titles is the kicker. Nice that we own his ass though.

maven
11-02-2006, 11:46 PM
For ESPN.

Nobody cares about Elway, Montana, Marino, etc.

It's all about now. Manning and the undefeated colts play 6-1 NE with tom brady. It is all about today regarding ESPN, not what happened in the past.

BroncoInferno
11-03-2006, 05:31 AM
Problem with guys like Smith is they look at the eye-popping stats of guys like Manning, look at the lesser numbers of guys like Elway, Unitas, et al, and don't bother to consider that Manning and Brady have much more favorable conditions to work with in terms of stats...rules that allow the DBs to make little contact with the WRs, expansion dilluting the overall quality of defenses, more sophisticated offensive systems, etc. You have to judge stats by comparing the numbers to their peers, not with guys who played in different eras. If you do that, then Smith's assertion is just plain silly. That said, Brady certainly could get into the conversation with another ring or two. But to say guys like Elway, Montana and Johnny U won't even be close? Nothing short of silly.

Circle Orange
11-03-2006, 05:39 AM
ZZZ... Bah...I don't like it...

Okay. Ring freaks, swallow on this.

Aikman has three, Brady has three. Which one is being touted as perhaps best of all time?

Montana has four, Bradshaw has four. Which one is being touted as perhaps best of all time?

Elway, Staubach (I may be leaving someone out here) have two. Which one is being touted as perhaps the best of all time?

This argument is older than fish.

Who has the most appearances in the 'bowl' and being touted as perhaps the best of all time?

Elway (5)
Montana (4)
Bradshaw (4)
Kelly (4)
Aikman (3)
Brady (3)

For the stat freaks, which 'unchampionship' qb is touted as perhaps the best of all time?

Marino
Manning
Fouts

Bottom line? Whoever you fall in love with. You can pluck stats and statistics to back up any 'point'. Just add water and stir, and everyone is the greatest thing that ever walked. The local TEAM 980 AM has been on an obsession all week about BRADY vs. MANNING. Who gives a rats ass? They say the same things over and over, and basically its been nothing but a lovefest for Brady. Here's what I pay attention to: when OTHER PLAYERS AND COACHES AND GMS say such things I listen. Anything else is just noise and hype.

I'm not convinced Brady is a true 'carry team' type of qb. I think to a point he can, but he isn't spectacular in any way. Manning may actually have more talent (more upstairs than physical) but is the team too unbalanced to make a real run? Also, in this era the AFC is loaded. you can't just look at 2 quarterbacks in a vaccum. Every team leans either towards O or D. When you commit to the salary cap you have to make decisions. The question is do you have enough playmakers to support the 'weaker' half of your team?

And yeah, I've never seen so many great quarterbacks that haven't done much, or haven't even finished their freaking career. Because if you play long enough the percentages will nail your ass. :espnsux: :bs:

Circle Orange
11-03-2006, 05:45 AM
Espn is loaded with midlife squares who don't have a clue.

x123z
11-03-2006, 06:18 AM
Yes

Circle Orange
11-03-2006, 06:35 AM
I'm not sure Elway could match Manning's stats even with all those weapons. That's what I liked about Elway. He'd win first. He didn't mind taking chances. He hated playing fancy.

Now imagine Peyton the 80's and early 90's Broncos teams.... The difference: Elway would win with both teams. Manning just puts up all world stats with the Colts.


Interesting point. The difference being elway could win any which way...running, throwing, hard count, reacting with those 'eyes in the back of his head.' Manning's whole deal is cerebral and orderly...take him out of that zone and he's average. And Manning has no real signature games, nothing to really identify his career other than 'running the offense' and putting up stats. It's more of a continuous thing. Manning relies more on order, Elway relied more on chaos. He could stink up the joint for three quarters and suddenly pull a win out of his @ss. That's not Manning's game. When he's on, he's on...when he's off, he can't hit anything. Elway needed rhythm too, but he didn't rely on it as much as Manning does.

And why isn't Jeff George mentioned here? If he had a brain, pulse and personality he'd be in the hall of fame too. Just another case of the NFL holding a guy down. He needed the right players around him or he'd have 10 rings by now. :clown:

One of the comments Shanahan made that I thought was interesting was that he said Elway was the best ever. The reason I was impressed was because this guy also coached Montana and Steve Young, two other HOFers and one who is called the best ever by some. A surprising observation, so you can't call him a homer for Seven. I have a paperback book called the NFL HALL OF SHAME its a funny book with stories, anecdotes and junk about players at different stages of their careers. Montana and Marino were pumped up, Elway was hated because of media buildup (and the need to see him fail). But on the field Montana wasn't nearly as revered as ESPN would have you think. In fact several players on D who played against the 'dynasty' niners thought the system and other players made Montana as much as anything. I don't completely agree with that, but I see their point.

perception < reality

Cito Pelon
11-05-2006, 09:16 AM
Very true. And there are about a dozen other names that could be added to that list.

As far as "greatest ever" is concerned, these days a player - not just QB's -gets back on the field fast after a knee-ligament injury because of arthroscopic surgery. I can't remember when arthroscopic surgery came about, but prior to that any knee injury was a major deal. It wasn't just 2-4 weeks, it was 8 weeks because the surgery was so invasive.