View Full Version : Who's Afraid of an Iranian Bomb?
mhgaffney
11-01-2006, 10:27 AM
Uri Avnery is a voice of sanity in the Mideast. But -- is anyone listening?
http://www.counterpunch.org/avnery10312006.html
Hotrod
11-01-2006, 10:56 AM
Uri Avnery is a voice of sanity in the Mideast. But -- is anyone listening?
http://www.counterpunch.org/avnery10312006.html
Um I am but Im even more afraid of nuts like you.
Spider
11-01-2006, 04:47 PM
Load of **** .......... If Iran wants to jump in the arena with the Big dogs , thats fine , but they better be prepared to face whatever comes down the pike ..... Ask that little ****er in N.Korea , we sealed his bank accounts , now the little bastard wants to talk ..........**** him ..........
mhgaffney
11-01-2006, 07:41 PM
Load of **** .......... If Iran wants to jump in the arena with the Big dogs , thats fine , but they better be prepared to face whatever comes down the pike ..... Ask that little ****er in N.Korea , we sealed his bank accounts , now the little bastard wants to talk ..........**** him ..........
Spider -- This must hear discussion about the coming war (with Sy Hersh and Scott Ritter) will keep you from getting drowsy on the road. Do pass it on. MHG
http://informationclearinghouse.info/article15434.htm
Spider
11-01-2006, 08:07 PM
Spider -- This must hear discussion about the coming war (with Sy Hersh and Scott Ritter) will keep you from getting drowsy on the road. Do pass it on. MHG
http://informationclearinghouse.info/article15434.htm
we are not goin to war with Iran ..... if iraq had a different outcome perhaps
SteveTensi13
11-02-2006, 04:04 AM
Iran is a paper tiger like all Arab countries. They train no where near like the U.S. Yea, they have a modern military, a large standing army and talk a good game, but when push comes to shove they will fall apart much like the Iraqi military did during Operation Desert storm.
-Slap-
11-02-2006, 05:33 AM
Iran has a cultural civil war going on in their country and western influences gain more ground every day. Getting into a war with them would be the most counter intuitive approach we could possibly take, which is why I'm surprised Bush hasn't forced the issue yet.
Bronco_Beerslug
11-02-2006, 06:20 AM
Iran has a cultural civil war going on in their country and western influences gain more ground every day. Getting into a war with them would be the most counter intuitive approach we could possibly take, which is why I'm surprised Bush hasn't forced the issue yet.
Well, the Neocons, Ramey, Tensi, etc... don't understand that there ISN'T an American trapped inside of every Iraqi and Iranian.
It's the "Internets" (and MTV) that will eventually give people repressed by religion and government the information needed for change.
Load of **** .......... If Iran wants to jump in the arena with the Big dogs , thats fine , but they better be prepared to face whatever comes down the pike ..... Ask that little ****er in N.Korea , we sealed his bank accounts , now the little bastard wants to talk ..........**** him ..........
Sealed his bank accounts huh... Well maybe he will have a "garage sale"
mhgaffney
11-02-2006, 01:33 PM
Iran is a paper tiger like all Arab countries. They train no where near like the U.S. Yea, they have a modern military, a large standing army and talk a good game, but when push comes to shove they will fall apart much like the Iraqi military did during Operation Desert storm.
Got news for ya, Iran is not an Arab country. Listen to the Ritter interview. You'll learn something.
SteveTensi13
11-02-2006, 01:49 PM
Got news for ya, Iran is not an Arab country. Listen to the Ritter interview. You'll learn something.
Wet wood, dry wood it all floats the same!! Either way, Iran could be militarily defeated within a week. If we use nukes give it one day!!
SteveTensi13
11-02-2006, 01:56 PM
Scott Ritter, the American traitor, has about as much credibility as you and thats not saying much!
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/002/605fgcob.asp
TailgateNut
11-02-2006, 02:07 PM
Wet wood, dry wood it all floats the same!! Either way, Iran could be militarily defeated within a week. If we use nukes give it one day!!
Just like the mission in Iraq was accomplished years ago. :spit:
Hotrod
11-02-2006, 02:29 PM
Just like the mission in Iraq was accomplished years ago. :spit:
Depends on what the mission in Iran would be. If it were missles/air attack and ZERO boots on the ground we could flatten the place within days. We currently have or will have enough air power in the region to hold none stop bombing raids over Iran until the place was destroyed.
Just for the record Im not advocating we do so.
TailgateNut
11-02-2006, 02:49 PM
Depends on what the mission in Iran would be. If it were missles/air attack and ZERO boots on the ground we could flatten the place within days. We currently have or will have enough air power in the region to hold none stop bombing raids over Iran until the place was destroyed.
Just for the record Im not advocating we do so.
The question is: Do we have enough to ward off the wrath of the rest of the region if we were to implement that strategy.
For the record: we need to stay the hell out of the ME!
SteveTensi13
11-02-2006, 06:08 PM
The question is: Do we have enough to ward off the wrath of the rest of the region if we were to implement that strategy.
For the record: we need to stay the hell out of the ME!
Hmm, we have what, 10,000 nuclear warheads? I think that is ample to "ward off " the wrath. Hard to be wrathful when your dead!! Question is, do we have the resolve to use them? Most likely not.
SteveTensi13
11-02-2006, 06:41 PM
Just like the mission in Iraq was accomplished years ago. :spit:
Saddam removed from power, WMD's, real or not, no longer a threat. MISSION ACCOMPLISHED:thumbs:
Bronco_Beerslug
11-03-2006, 05:41 AM
Saddam removed from power, WMD's, real or not, no longer a threat. MISSION ACCOMPLISHED:thumbs:
Saddam, never a threat, removed from power, theocracy created in his place, religious sect war engulfing the country, 2900 Americans dead, 25,000 maimed, 1.5 trillion dollars passed onto American tax payers for VA benefits alone.
Mission completely f**ked!!!
Hmm, we have what, 10,000 nuclear warheads? I think that is ample to "ward off " the wrath. Hard to be wrathful when your dead! Question is, do we have the resolve to use them? Most likely not.
I for one am glad to know that the ranks of our armed police force are populated with rational compassionate individuals unlike the fear griped reactionaries that make up those scary ME countries.
Atlas
11-03-2006, 01:02 PM
we are not goin to war with Iran ..... if iraq had a different outcome perhaps
Exactly, why would Bush want to lose two wars?? That surely wouldn't help his legacy.
Atlas
11-03-2006, 01:03 PM
Hey, my post count is 11,111!!!!!
What do i win?!?!?!?!
Bronco_Beerslug
11-03-2006, 02:29 PM
Hey, my post count is 11,111!!!!!
What do i win?!?!?!?!
Don't post any more or you'll ruin it!!!
mhgaffney
11-04-2006, 02:55 AM
Exactly, why would Bush want to lose two wars?? That surely wouldn't help his legacy.
Two? How about three?
1. Iraq
2. Afghanistan
3.(Iran).....
Spider
11-04-2006, 06:31 AM
Wet wood, dry wood it all floats the same!! Either way, Iran could be militarily defeated within a week. If we use nukes give it one day!!
see this is a problem ........... you are told as a kid dont touch the hot stove , you will get burnt so you touched it and got burnt ,problem is you seem to touch it over and over , when will you conservitives learn you just cant invade countrys ?