View Full Version : No Superbowl for the next 10 years
55CrushEm
10-30-2006, 06:10 AM
....untill Peyton retires.
Man, I am so pi$$ed off this morning. We will NOT beat this team when it matters.
Christ, if someone had told me before the game, that:
1. We would score 31.
2. We would rush for 227 yards.
3. Jake would not throw a pick.....
I'd say EASY, yes EASY win......yet, we still lost to this goddamn team !
We will NEVER win a superbowl as long as this team has Pay-a-ton. Unless, of course, another team knocks them off in the playoffs, like last year. But hey, we'll probably blow another one of THOSE opportunities too.....
Just call me Mr. Pessimist today....
It certainly appears Peyton has our number just as Brady/Billichick had his...
Rocket 7
10-30-2006, 06:20 AM
....untill Peyton retires.
Man, I am so pi$$ed off this morning. We will NOT beat this team when it matters.
Christ, if someone had told me before the game, that:
1. We would score 31.
2. We would rush for 227 yards.
3. Jake would not throw a pick.....
I'd say EASY, yes EASY win......yet, we still lost to this goddamn team !
We will NEVER win a superbowl as long as this team has Pay-a-ton. Unless, of course, another team knocks them off in the playoffs, like last year. But hey, we'll probably blow another one of THOSE opportunities too.....
Just call me Mr. Pessimist today....
Mr. Pessimist
Mile High Shack
10-30-2006, 06:22 AM
give me a break
we won't have Coyer running our D for that long
ROYC75
10-30-2006, 06:23 AM
Now there's the sprit ..........
SoDak Bronco
10-30-2006, 06:23 AM
We need New England to beat Indy, and then we'll take care of the PATS.
55CrushEm
10-30-2006, 06:37 AM
No! No! No!
I said it last night......with the Colts up on us by 2 games with a tie break, we'd have to out-win them by THREE games in order to have a shot at home field advantage. Plain and simple, this is NOT going to happen.
The best we will be able to do (again) is the #2 seed. Therefore, it is in our best interest to have Indy beat the Pats....as the Pats are one of the MANY teams that could challenge us for the 2 seed.
Don't get me wrong....I hate Indy, and would love to see someone kick their a$$....but Indy "out-seeding" us is a foregone conclusion at this point....therefore let them also beat up on our competition for the next best seeds.
spdirty
10-30-2006, 06:42 AM
No! No! No!
I said it last night......with the Colts up on us by 2 games with a tie break, we'd have to out-win them by THREE games in order to have a shot at home field advantage. Plain and simple, this is NOT going to happen.
The best we will be able to do (again) is the #2 seed. Therefore, it is in our best interest to have Indy beat the Pats....as the Pats are one of the MANY teams that could challenge us for the 2 seed.
Don't get me wrong....I hate Indy, and would love to see someone kick their a$$....but Indy "out-seeding" us is a foregone conclusion at this point....therefore let them also beat up on our competition for the next best seeds.
I want to see Belichek beat em and I wanna see how he does it. I want another crack at em.
55CrushEm
10-30-2006, 07:27 AM
I want to see Belichek beat em and I wanna see how he does it. I want another crack at em.
Yeah, but I live in New England.....and have to deal with the "we are the greatest team EVER" crap, constantly.
Every time the Broncos are about to face the Patriots, I hear from my co-workers...."We're going to kick the Broncos a$$es this timeUhh ."
"Why?", I ask.
"Because we won 3 Superbowls."
"That's a good reason.", I say.
wolf754life
10-30-2006, 09:26 AM
Last year was our chance, but COYER blew it, the players blew it, in big games we get outcoached, and we had some really lucky breaks in the New England game last year.
This team is a 5th or 6th seed and a first round loser.................
That is being realistic, the kool aid drinkers will tell you we are going to go 14 and 2 and not lose again.
The colts are 15 and 1, 14 and 2 at the worst....no way we catch them.
In the offseason shannahan will fire coyer, draft 3 d lineman in the first 3 rounds and try to rebuild the D line. The window closed last year at home against the steelers.
Time to put Cutler in, season him for next year, and rebuild that defensive front. Nalen will retire, foster won't be resigned, the offensive line is also a problem.
Not good, not good at all
SoonerBronco
10-30-2006, 09:30 AM
give me a break
we won't have Coyer running our D for that long
I think it is our lack of a pass rush, not Coyer, that is the problem. Manning won't pick the D apart if he has a guy in his face at least once in a freaking while.
Sir Mawn
10-30-2006, 09:35 AM
I think it is our lack of a pass rush, not Coyer, that is the problem. Manning won't pick the D apart if he has a guy in his face at least once in a freaking while.
And that begs the question.... why no blitz??? Ever? Even after 7 or so consecutive drives that resulted in scores?