PDA

View Full Version : The Colts D with a Booger


fontaine
10-26-2006, 04:13 AM
Nice writeup (based on analysis instead of Espin about the Colts D and how it might be more awkward to run up the middle:

http://www.footballoutsiders.com/2006/10/25/ramblings/every-play-counts/4445/

Every Play Counts: Booger McFarland
10/25/2006

by Michael David Smith

The Indianapolis Colts traded next year’s second-round draft pick to acquire defensive tackle Anthony “Booger” McFarland from the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, and it didn’t take long for him to make an impact. McFarland was in the starting lineup against the Washington Redskins Sunday, and on his first play in a Colts uniform, he stopped Redskins running back Clinton Portis for no gain at the line of scrimmage.

That was the play everyone talked about the next day, but a review of McFarland on every play of the Colts’ 36-22 victory shows that he can be an active player, that he understands the role of the nose tackle in Tony Dungy’s Tampa-2 defense, and that against the run he’s a major upgrade over anyone the Colts had on their roster before they acquired him.

Indianapolis originally intended to ease him into the lineup, but McFarland was on the field for most of the Colts’ defensive plays after starting defensive tackle Montae Reagor was injured in a car accident on the day of the game. McFarland looked like he was playing to prove the Bucs were wrong to give up on him, getting that stop on the first play and then disrupting the middle of the Redskins’ line on the second play, making room for linebacker Gilbert Gardner to tackle Portis for a loss of three yards.

McFarland played nose tackle for Dungy when both were in Tampa Bay, and on a third-and-1 on Washington’s second drive, he showed that he understands the nose tackle’s role on short-yardage plays, penetrating across the line of scrimmage and keeping the offensive linemen from opening a hole. At the snap McFarland submarined Washington center Casey Rabach and left guard Derrick Dockery and took them both out. Portis still picked up the first down by running to the other side of the line, but McFarland showed the kind of aggressiveness we haven’t seen enough of from the Colts’ defensive line this season.

McFarland is strong at the point of attack but slow in pursuit. On a first-and-10 Portis run around the right end on the Redskins’ second possession, the Redskins didn’t even bother to block McFarland because they knew he wouldn’t be quick enough to make an impact on an outside run. You might say that’s the case for all defensive tackles, but the best tackles in the Tampa-2 defensive scheme that Indianapolis employs don’t just tie up blockers and let the middle linebacker make the plays, the way tackles operate in the Marvin Lewis defense. Tampa-2 tackles like Chicago’s Tommie Harris and Ian Scott are quick enough to make plays even when the running back isn’t heading in their direction. McFarland won’t do much of that.

However, it’s important to remember that Dungy is asking McFarland to play the nose tackle position that he played when Dungy was McFarland’s coach in Tampa Bay from 1999 to 2001. McFarland excelled there, but when Warren Sapp left Tampa for Oakland in 2004, McFarland switched to the three-technique tackle, and he wasn’t as effective a player. Now he’s back to playing the nose, and that’s where he’s best suited. The difference is that the three-technique tackle, also known as the under tackle, lines up farther from the center and is expected to cover more of the field, while the nose tackle lines up closer to the center and is responsible mostly for what is directly in front of him.

On a first-and-10 handoff to Portis in the second quarter, Washington’s play called for Rabach to pull to the outside and block linebacker Cato June. But McFarland ran directly into Rabach at the snap and held on, keeping him from pulling. That’s exactly what the Colts need McFarland to do — win his individual battles with the linemen in front of him. Technically, McFarland probably should have been called for defensive holding, although the officials hardly ever enforce that penalty to the letter of the rule.

Rabach got called for holding McFarland once, on a second-and-10 in the second quarter, when Portis ran up the middle and Rabach wrapped his arm around McFarland in an attempt to force him to the outside. Rabach is a good center, but he had trouble with McFarland and held him regularly.

McFarland’s best play came on a first-and-10, when Betts took a handoff off the right tackle and McFarland fought through a double-team of Rabach and guard Randy Thomas. He squeezed between Rabach and Thomas using a textbook arm rip — the kind of play high school defensive line coaches should show their players to teach good technique — and tackled Betts after a gain of just two yards.

Those run-stopping plays are what the Colts need from McFarland because he isn’t much of a pass rusher, having recorded only 20 sacks in his eight-year career. When he rushed Mark Brunell on Sunday he looked like he was hustling, but he didn’t quite have the agility to get around the linemen in front of him. On a first-and-15, McFarland tried a Dwight Freeney-style spin move, and it got him exactly nowhere against Thomas. If I never see McFarland try a spin move again, I’ll be happy. I suspect Dungy feels the same way.

McFarland wasn’t totally useless on passing plays, though. On second-and-10 in the fourth quarter, Rabach and Dockery doubled McFarland, and when Freeney chased Brunell outside the pocket, it was McFarland’s continuing pressure that forced Brunell to throw the ball away. On a previous first-and-10, McFarland stunted to the outside while Freeney rushed to the inside. McFarland never got close to Brunell as both Dockery and Clinton Portis blocked him, but he did show a good first step and got to the outside quickly. Having McFarland around should help Freeney, who has yet to record a sack and has been one of this season’s biggest disappointments. (Indianapolis’s next opponent, Denver, should also help Freeney because the Broncos will be without starting left tackle Matt Lepsis. One of the NFL’s most underappreciated players, Lepsis tore his ACL Sunday.)

Still, McFarland’s lack of mobility can be a problem. On a Ladell Betts run over the right tackle, Thomas had no trouble sealing McFarland off in the middle of the line. A more active defensive lineman might have been able to get around Thomas and make the tackle. But the Colts are adequate against runs to the outside because of fast linebackers like Cato June, who played a very big part in holding Portis in check on Sunday. The way teams have succeeded against the Colts is running up the middle. That’s where McFarland helps.

So was McFarland worth the price the Colts paid for him? For a typical team, trading a second-round pick for McFarland would be unwise. He’s probably a better player than a typical second-round pick, but he’s 28 years old and makes more than $5 million a year, whereas a typical second-round pick is 22 years old and makes about $1 million a year. But the Colts aren’t a typical team. They’re a team with legitimate Super Bowl aspirations and one glaring weakness, the run defense. A team in that situation should do what it can to shore up that weakness, and the Colts have done just that.

-Slap-
10-26-2006, 05:30 AM
Based on this scouting report, Booger is tailor made for our scheme.

watermock
10-26-2006, 06:07 AM
We should of dumped Plummer for a Booger.

I doubt we even get phlem in this offseason.

fontaine
10-26-2006, 06:14 AM
It's going to be interesting to see what they do with Plummer in the offseason.

We can't keep him and pay him a starter's salary if he's on the bench. What's his cap hit if we cut him in the offseason?

55CrushEm
10-26-2006, 06:14 AM
Here I am getting excited that we'll probably be able to run vs. the Colts, because their run D is ranked 31st in the league.....but now it seems they've acquired Booger, and that ranking is now very misleading. Sounds like he is a bigtime run stopper.

Now I'm concerned......someone make me feel better.....

Mile High Shack
10-26-2006, 06:21 AM
Here I am getting excited that we'll probably be able to run vs. the Colts, because their run D is ranked 31st in the league.....but now it seems they've acquired Booger, and that ranking is now very misleading. Sounds like he is a bigtime run stopper.

Now I'm concerned......someone make me feel better.....

don't worry

we have Jake Plummer as our QB :spit:

Mediator12
10-26-2006, 06:32 AM
Mcfarland is an excellent run stopper, but he is not going to single handedly stop this running scheme. He has trouble moving laterally and rushing the passer inside unlike Reagor, Tripplet, and Simon have been able to do in the past. Since Denver runs few straight inside runs this is not the problem it was for WAS who prefers to run inside the tackles and especially right up the gut.

It will make things more difficult for their rotation in Denver without Reagor and it weakens their depth at an inside pass rush on early downs and allows for more help on the more prolific DE's. Their DL is going to suck wind if Denver can have sustained drives.

fontaine
10-26-2006, 06:35 AM
I personally can't wait to see what our running game does.

This is one game where I hope we just keep it simple and run smash mouth football down that defense.

The Colts front 7 (apart from Booger) is built for speed but WILL NOT have the Dome speed advantage. Freeney, Raheem Brock, Dan Klecko, and too many others in that front 7 are banged up and Questioable. Plus they'll be missing their starters at safety.

I have no doubt that most of these Questionable guys will play along the front 7 but WE HAVE to put the hurt on them early and often to get inside that defense's head. Foster especially. He should have no trouble on paper in being the road grader. I hope he brings his A-game along with lots of pain.

I want to see Kyle Johnson, Alexander, and Foster beat the living crap out of their undersized front 7. Their safeties can cheat up to the line but they will be backups so I trust Tatum Bell in those situations. Kyle Johnson, and Alexander especially will get opportunities to get to the 2nd level and neutralize DBs/LBs. I don't care if we have to run the ball 9 out of 10 time in the first half. I expect us to be successfull.

If we have to throw the ball then do it in the 2nd half when our O has had a chance to beat up on that front 7 so they won't be so aggressive.

All of this depends on the Colts not jumping out to an early lead and I expect the D to do it's part.

Just don't screw it up for our defense early Jake. When you throw your ints just do it in the 2nd half when we're hopefully ahead.

If the dysfunctional Redskins offense can put up 22 points on these guys with running slants, screens, end arounds, reverse end arounds, short passes then we should be able to do that too.

55CrushEm
10-26-2006, 06:38 AM
Thanks, Med.

mattleecrew
10-26-2006, 06:53 AM
Here I am getting excited that we'll probably be able to run vs. the Colts, because their run D is ranked 31st in the league.....but now it seems they've acquired Booger, and that ranking is now very misleading. Sounds like he is a bigtime run stopper.

Now I'm concerned......someone make me feel better.....


They may have a Booger but we have Nails and Company to take care of business in the trenches. They are definitely up to the challenge.

watermock
10-26-2006, 07:24 AM
Now I'm concerned......someone make me feel better.....

Let's just coax that weaael out of it's nest.

http://www.orangemane.com/BB/image.php?u=4479&dateline=1156531649

Hey, if Jake can nail a cheerleader, Jay gets a shot...

69bronco
10-26-2006, 09:08 AM
It's going to be interesting to see what they do with Plummer in the offseason.

We can't keep him and pay him a starter's salary if he's on the bench. What's his cap hit if we cut him in the offseason?


my guess. If he doesn't want to be a backup for cutler then cut him then probably bring in somebody like brian Griese to back up the blade.

Steve Sewell
10-26-2006, 09:13 AM
We should of dumped Plummer for a Booger.

I doubt we even get phlem in this offseason.

Why does every thread on this board have to turn into a Plummer thread? My goodness!

Billy Clyde Puckett
10-26-2006, 09:18 AM
Why does every thread on this board have to turn into a Plummer thread? My goodness!

Ban Hijackers

Rohirrim
10-26-2006, 09:23 AM
This game is simple: We can run. They can't. Hopefully, the weather is bad.

DivineLegion
10-26-2006, 10:37 AM
With our active zone blocking scheme I think he will disapear. If his weakness is moving down the line hes gonna be left watching alot of plays move past him. It will be funny to see him try to contain Nails while our O-line sweeps the the left on a run and ends up with Big George in his face...

Hercules Rockefeller
10-26-2006, 10:43 AM
This game is simple: We can run. They can't. Hopefully, the weather is bad.

Then you obviously didn't hear Bob Kravitz blow the Colts on 950 yesterday morning. After hearing him speak, I don't know why the NFL just doesn't give them homefield and not make them play until the playoffs. The Rhodes and Addai combination is better than Edge, and they can turn on the offense whenever they want against anyone.

Rohirrim
10-26-2006, 11:05 AM
Then you obviously didn't here Bob Kravitz blow the Colts on 950 yesterday morning. After hearing him speak, I don't know why the NFL just doesn't give them homefield and not make them play until the playoffs. The Rhodes and Addai combination is better than Edge, and they can turn on the offense whenever they want against anyone.

They're the media darlings. ;D I think Mike will punch them in the mouth with the ground game until they're all bunched up and then go deep on 'em. I've really been hoping (and expecting) to see Tatum have a bust out game. I'm guessing this will be it. Given what Mike must think of Jake after last week, I'm betting Tatum gets his chances this week. Maybe even Cobb can come in and play a little smash mouth? Anyway, I expect Javon and Tatum to post some numbers this Sunday. Also there will be some, "Elvis, Payaton. Payaton, Elvis." :kiss:

Kaylore
10-26-2006, 11:27 AM
Then you obviously didn't here Bob Kravitz blow the Colts on 950 yesterday morning. After hearing him speak, I don't know why the NFL just doesn't give them homefield and not make them play until the playoffs. The Rhodes and Addai combination is better than Edge, and they can turn on the offense whenever they want against anyone.

I heard that too. They kept side-stepping the lack of production on the ground by beating the Addai "versatility" drum.

CaColtsfan
10-26-2006, 12:08 PM
Then you obviously didn't here Bob Kravitz blow the Colts on 950 yesterday morning. After hearing him speak, I don't know why the NFL just doesn't give them homefield and not make them play until the playoffs. The Rhodes and Addai combination is better than Edge, and they can turn on the offense whenever they want against anyone.

Krapitz is an idiot...plain and simple.
No way are our new guys comparable to having Edge...but he is gone so we got to back what we have.
We use the run to set up the pass as long as we can show we can run effectively that is all we need.
Gladys is once again a homer cuz we are undefeated, watch what happens when the Colts drop one. He will be back to slamming the Colts.
Every team has a moron like this writing about them. He is ours...

as for turning on the offense I am seriously puzzled by what is going on with the Colts.
I know we are winning but it just seems like they are just going thru the motions Maybe the let down of last season has jaded em...who really knows
I hope we get it together soon, we are going to need it.

Hercules Rockefeller
10-26-2006, 12:11 PM
Every team has a moron like this writing about them. He is ours...


Here was here before Indy, then he was just one of many idiots.

sirhcyennek81
10-26-2006, 12:17 PM
AFC's leading rusher...Tatum Bell. Not bad for a "change of pace" back.


:Broncos:

Odysseus
10-26-2006, 02:41 PM
Ban Hijackers

I cannot agree with you totally because that would include us but then I digress from agreeing with your digression over someone else's indisgression which would have been funny as a digression but since it was just rude is not.

Jetmeck
10-26-2006, 03:56 PM
I cannot agree with you totally because that would include us but then I digress from agreeing with your digression over someone else's indisgression which would have been funny as a digression but since it was just rude is not.


So you agree to disagree, I gotcha. ;)

Odysseus
03-26-2007, 06:44 AM
So you agree to disagree, I gotcha. ;)

The Broncos need to do this kind of move DURING the season. Everyone panned the Colts defense and now lookee lookee.

TheChamp24
03-26-2007, 09:28 AM
What the hell? Why bump this now? Good lord. McFarland hardly did anything really for the Colts. They were getting gashed in the run by the Texans, Dayne had 150+ on them in December. With Bob Sanders back, suddenly they shut everybody down on the run. Magic.

Crushaholic
03-26-2007, 02:23 PM
Are you asking if we are going to pick a Booger? The Colts picked a Booger and won the Super Bowl...