PDA

View Full Version : The Chiefs are below average


Kaylore
10-08-2006, 04:20 PM
I just got done watching the Cardinals game. I was expecting a blowout but what I saw was two crappy teams playing each other.

Basically everything that could have gone wrong for the Cardinals did and they still almost won. Rackers uncharacteristically missed a field goal for the win. Two fumbles that the Cards had but lost on the bottom of the pile were called the other way and the Cards gave up penalties on key plays that would have been loses. A dropped TD in the endzone (on a repeatedly beaten Walls) - just general bad luck that put the Chiefs back into this.

The Chiefs just looked bad. LJ has no burst and if he's slowed in his launch he can't do crap. Lots of drops by receivers and they're blocking is average. Also, as we all predicted, Lenny Walls is a freebie for any team that wants to score deep. Not to mention Herm's playcalling was hilarious. He pretty much gave Arizona every opportunity to seal the game.

They are probably going to finish with 8 or 9 wins max this season.

Northman
10-08-2006, 04:21 PM
Cant argue there kaylore. Good take.

Bronx33
10-08-2006, 04:33 PM
After watching the game today they still got issues in all departments but iam looking forward to see how bob spins this win in his favor.


Danby owned the KC D.

Hulamau
10-08-2006, 04:35 PM
Both teams suck! Leinert has promise and they have some good recivers but Green called a poor game with horrible clock managment on thd drive before last wasting a critical time out that had they saved it would have let them get closer for Rackers.Keep penalites and missed tackles (LJ was stopped dead in the backfield on his 78 yard run and the LB muffed it and let him loose for what amounted to the game winning run.


This just in ... Bledsoe SUCKS big time too~! JUst threw a 102 yard INT to lito Sheppard RIGHT into LItos arms with no Cowboy anywhere near him to seal game for Philly.

redrage
10-08-2006, 04:35 PM
I agree. After an initial shock of underestimating Leinart going deep, the defense settled in nicely. LJ had an off day, but of course still made the play of the day. I have no idea what you are talking about regarding the two fumbles. Both went right back to KC from what I saw. Yes they were lucky to recover, but Arizona didn't get hosed.

Hey, they went on the road and beat a team they should have even when the really had no right to. Seems to me, Denver was unable to do that this year and Baltimore did it a couple of weeks ago vs. Cleveland, yet some people think they are one of the top 3 teams in the league. A win is a win is a win. The GB game in '03 (overtime) was the last time this team won on the road vs an NFC team. They fought back and won when they didn't play well. I'll take it.

And no, I'm not delusional. They'll likely get toasted next week in Pittsburgh. Especially if Dante and LJ are subpar or out.

Priest Dante
10-08-2006, 04:37 PM
The Chiefs are a banged up team and aging as well. They also have injuries at key positions . After a game like today's though, I have to give them all the respect in the world for having enough heart to fight back. They went into overtime in one road game at a tough place to play and then lost by only 3 against a supposedly potent offense, and then today they pulled out a road win which is never easy to do.

Bob's your Information Minister
10-08-2006, 04:37 PM
Blow it out your ass.

We don't even have our QB.

Bronx33
10-08-2006, 04:38 PM
Blow it out your ass.

We don't even have our QB.


LMAO! EXCUSES!

Priest Dante
10-08-2006, 04:39 PM
LMAO! EXCUSES!

reasons...

24champ
10-08-2006, 04:39 PM
They are probably going to finish with 8 or 9 wins max this season.

That is being generous....

Priest Dante
10-08-2006, 04:41 PM
Realsitically I don't expect The Chiefs to win more than 9 games , but then again I don't see a dominant team in the AFC West So the real question is; Who's going to not suck enough to make it into the playoffs?

Kaylore
10-08-2006, 04:42 PM
That is being generous....

It would be if I didn't believe that Green will be coming back sooner rather than later.

Bronx33
10-08-2006, 04:43 PM
reasons...

Blaming the poor play completely on huard?? is a EXCUSE i would point the finger at the D and sami parker and walls is going to cost you some games down the road, thanks for sticking up for barb maybe let him defend himself.

Kaylore
10-08-2006, 04:43 PM
Blow it out your ass.

We don't even have our QB.

You're just pissed because everything I wrote is 100% true.

freak6
10-08-2006, 04:44 PM
What about LJ's catch and run?

Hulamau
10-08-2006, 04:44 PM
Two biggest disappointments today are that two lousy teams prevented themselves from beating Indy and KC. Hopefully, Steelers knock off SD to partially redeem this Sunday.

Bob's your Information Minister
10-08-2006, 04:45 PM
Whatever. I just poured M&M's in my ice cream.

You guys are going to get ass-raped by the Ravens.

Priest Dante
10-08-2006, 04:45 PM
Blaming the poor play completely on huard?? is a EXCUSE i would point the finger at the D and sami parker and walls is going to cost you some games down the road, thanks for sticking up for barb maybe let him defend himself.

Actually Huard has been a ton better than I have expected. Sammie Parker is definately inconsistant at best. I could say a lot worse when it comes to that guy...

Bronx33
10-08-2006, 04:46 PM
Actually Huard has been a ton better than I have expected. Sammie Parker is definately inconsistant at best. I could say a lot worse when it comes to that guy...


Iam just talking about todays game.....

Bob's your Information Minister
10-08-2006, 04:46 PM
What about LJ's catch and run?

Hey man he has no burst....he just ripped a giant fart.

Paladin
10-08-2006, 04:47 PM
The Chiefs are a banged up team and aging as well. They also have injuries at key positions . After a game like today's though, I have to give them all the respect in the world for having enough heart to fight back. They went into overtime in one road game at a tough place to play and then lost by only 3 against a supposedly potent offense, and then today they pulled out a road win which is never easy to do.

I don't have to give them any respect at all, and I don't. What a crappy team, what crappy game management by Hermy the Wormy, and what a stupid need by mullets to come to the Broncos' board and try to pump their own little tallywackers. Go home and stroke yourselves on the Planet, or whatever rat hole you mullets inhabit when you are not here.

Stupid mullets.

Bob's your Information Minister
10-08-2006, 04:48 PM
Yeah, Samie Parker is going to cost us games with those clutch touchdown catches....

Priest Dante
10-08-2006, 04:48 PM
I don't have to give them any respect at all, and I don't. What a crappy team, what crappy game management by Hermy the Wormy, and what a stupid need by mullets to come to the Broncos' board and try to pump their own little tallywackers. Go home and stroke yourselves on the Planet, or whatever rat hole you mullets inhabit when you are not here.

Stupid mullets.

Mullets?

24champ
10-08-2006, 04:50 PM
I don't have to give them any respect at all, and I don't. What a crappy team, what crappy game management by Hermy the Wormy, and what a stupid need by mullets to come to the Broncos' board and try to pump their own little tallywackers. Go home and stroke yourselves on the Planet, or whatever rat hole you mullets inhabit when you are not here.

Stupid mullets.

Yup...POOR POOR MULLETS.Hilarious!

Bronx33
10-08-2006, 04:50 PM
Matt threw for 253 yards on the new and improved D i have been hearing about for the last few games, gunny ball rears it's ugly head again in mulletville.

DenverBrit
10-08-2006, 04:51 PM
Hey man he has no burst....he just ripped a giant fart.

Blow it out your ass.

You guys are going to get ass-raped by the Ravens.


Having another gay-day, Bob? :curtsey:

Yeah, I know......everyday is that way for you.

Try keeping it to yourself.

Garcia Bronco
10-08-2006, 04:52 PM
I wonder how we would do if we lost Jake, KJ, Anderson, Shanahan, Kubes, Foster, and Lepsis. Now we actually did lose some of those, but it's difficult to keep the system running when you lose integral parts. The Chiefs will get better as the season gos on.....9 or 10 wins could be enough

24champ
10-08-2006, 04:52 PM
Having another gay-day, Bob? :curtsey:

Yeah, I know......everyday is that way for you.

Try keeping it to yourself.

Don't quote the retard please.

Bronx33
10-08-2006, 04:52 PM
Yeah, Samie Parker is going to cost us games with those clutch touchdown catches....


OOOOOK now lets talk about his drops.

Garcia Bronco
10-08-2006, 04:53 PM
Whatever. I just poured M&M's in my ice cream.

You guys are going to get ass-raped by the Ravens.

absolutely...that's why...I will also be eating ice cream tomorrow.

Ravens 38
Broncos 7

Kaylore
10-08-2006, 04:53 PM
Actually Huard has been a ton better than I have expected. Sammie Parker is definately inconsistant at best. I could say a lot worse when it comes to that guy...

At least this guy is being honest. Kennison and Gonzo look to be a step slower as well. Cruz is much better than I thought. I really thought the loss of Tony Richardson would hurt more but while he isn't that good, he isn't that bad either.

And by the way, I hope your running back is ok. At least was able to walk off the field on his own power. Hopefully he's not hurt too badly.

Priest Dante
10-08-2006, 04:53 PM
Matt threw for 253 yards on the new and improved D i have been hearing about for the last few games, gunny ball rears it's ugly head again in mulletville.

And 2 INTs... Selective memory?

Bob's your Information Minister
10-08-2006, 04:53 PM
I wonder how we would do if we lost Jake, KJ, Anderson, Shanahan, Kubes, Foster, and Lepsis.

Nice take.

In response, I will say that it helps to have players like Ty Law and Tamba Hali.

Bronx33
10-08-2006, 04:55 PM
And 2 INTs... Selective memory?


2 TDs selective memory?

Killericon
10-08-2006, 04:56 PM
If the only reason you beat a failing franchise starting a rookie QB was because of a clutch INT, I don't care where your starting QB was on the depth chart, You're in rough shape.

You say you didn't have Trent Green, I say they didn't have Larry Fitzgerald.

A win is a win, and getting Green back will be paramount, but you should feel about as good about this game as we did after beating the Chiefs 9-6. :-*

Bob's your Information Minister
10-08-2006, 04:58 PM
You guys were lucky to get Huard in his first start. He's a gamer. He's really accurate.

Florida_Bronco
10-08-2006, 05:02 PM
You guys were lucky to get Huard in his first start. He's a gamer. He's really accurate.

Huard has proven to be an ideal backup in this league. He's not someone you'd want to have as your regular starter, but as a backup he's one of the best around.

Bronx33
10-08-2006, 05:02 PM
You guys were lucky to get Huard in his first start. He's a gamer. He's really accurate.


Your lucky as hell you didn't have to play warner or you would have won this game no problem, Leinart spread the ball around on that world class D ehhh?

Kaylore
10-08-2006, 05:04 PM
Huard has proven to be an ideal backup in this league. He's not someone you'd want to have as your regular starter, but as a backup he's one of the best around.

I really wanted Brad Johnson. Then the Vikings found out he could still play football. :-/

Bob's your Information Minister
10-08-2006, 05:04 PM
Actually, we would have probably done better against Warner. Leinart made some plays with his legs. I was impressed. He's going to be good. Better than Cutler.

Kaylore
10-08-2006, 05:07 PM
Actually, we would have probably done better against Warner. Leinart made some plays with his legs. I was impressed. He's going to be good. Better than Cutler.

I know that last bit is a feeble attempt to get back ut us for laughing at your Germ-fence run the ball twice in a two minute drill.

Outside of that I agree. The Warner would have helped Law or Surtain start making a pro-bowl bid. At least two fumbles as well.

Mile High Shack
10-08-2006, 05:07 PM
Actually, we would have probably done better against Warner. Leinart made some plays with his legs. I was impressed. He's going to be good. Better than Cutler.

your defense is overly aggressive to make up for it's lack of skill, they have to go all out and attack, so a qb getting away will leave lanes wide open due to the blitzing nature of KC

you are very prone to falling for misdirection

giving up 20 points to a team with NO running game and a rookie qb doesn't impress anyone

Florida_Bronco
10-08-2006, 05:07 PM
He's going to be good. Better than Cutler.

You'd LOVE to actually believe that. :spit: Ha!

loborugger
10-08-2006, 05:19 PM
I just got done watching the Cardinals game. I was expecting a blowout but what I saw was two crappy teams playing each other.

Basically everything that could have gone wrong for the Cardinals did and they still almost won. Rackers uncharacteristically missed a field goal for the win. Two fumbles that the Cards had but lost on the bottom of the pile were called the other way and the Cards gave up penalties on key plays that would have been loses. A dropped TD in the endzone (on a repeatedly beaten Walls) - just general bad luck that put the Chiefs back into this.

The Chiefs just looked bad. LJ has no burst and if he's slowed in his launch he can't do crap. Lots of drops by receivers and they're blocking is average. Also, as we all predicted, Lenny Walls is a freebie for any team that wants to score deep. Not to mention Herm's playcalling was hilarious. He pretty much gave Arizona every opportunity to seal the game.

They are probably going to finish with 8 or 9 wins max this season.

Good take, Kaylore. I would say you and I were watching the same game. What was LJ's final run yardage total? 35 yds on the ground? Against that mighty AZ defense. Ya, he got the long screen play, but you can count on those happening but every 2 or 3 games.

Kaylore
10-08-2006, 05:20 PM
your defense is overly aggressive to make up for it's lack of skill, they have to go all out and attack, so a qb getting away will leave lanes wide open due to the blitzing nature of KC

you are very prone to falling for misdirection

giving up 20 points to a team with NO running game and a rookie qb doesn't impress anyone

I totall forgot about their running game sucking. I almost believed they had a good run defense and then I remembered that the Cardinals haven't been able to run on anyone.

loborugger
10-08-2006, 05:20 PM
Oh, ya, I forgot to mention that KC ate up that bootleg. Nice stuff. If I did a double take I woulda sworn that was Jake to Rod.

Bob's your Information Minister
10-08-2006, 05:21 PM
Arizona's run defense is actually pretty good. They held Shaun Alexander to 89 yards on 26 carries and shut down Steven Jackson. I thought our offense would struggle in this game, and it did. We still managed to put together drives to win the game. Mark of a good team!

Bob's your Information Minister
10-08-2006, 05:21 PM
Oh, ya, I forgot to mention that KC ate up that bootleg. Nice stuff. If I did a double take I woulda sworn that was Jake to Rod.

They got us a couple times, because we weren't expecting it. But we stopped it later in the game. Kendrell Bell had a huge sack. Yeah, that Kendrell Bell. He made a play. Whodathunkit?

Orange_Beard
10-08-2006, 05:26 PM
what happened in the second half? I took my kid to the park at half time, I come back and az blew it.

The chefs run blocking when from GREAT to below average. it's so saad.........haha

Hotwheelz
10-08-2006, 05:26 PM
I can't find the ignore button, help!

Bob's your Information Minister
10-08-2006, 05:27 PM
The chefs run blocking when from GREAT to below average. it's so saad.........haha

Yeah. How did Larry get 126 on your boys?

loborugger
10-08-2006, 05:28 PM
You putz. There was a bootleg in the 4th quarter. We werent expecting it? Why is that? If I was playing KC, its the first damn thing I would do. Everyone in the league knows you guys bite on the boot more it seems pros should be able.

redrage
10-08-2006, 05:35 PM
KC may or may not be a below average team, but they certainly played below average today. Yet they still won on the road, something even good teams have trouble doing when they don't play well. Eh?

ZachKC
10-08-2006, 05:36 PM
Interesting, I am a little strapped for time...just browsed a few things in this thread.

The Cards are not a good team. They played a decent game, did some things well. We had a rough and tumble day. You can't turn the ball over like that. You also can't clone and transplant Darrius Watts' hands on to all of your receivers.

We have a few things to figure our...we have a QB and a line that needs to get healthy and gel. I like that we were able to play like **** and come away with a road win in the NFL. Its tough to win on the road and we did it while not playing our A-Game.

This team will keep finding ways to make things happen. You would think a below average team would never have managed to keep the mighty Broncos out of the endzone...heh...

This is an above average team that needs to focus and keep healthy...lots of football to play...exciting time.

Bob's your Information Minister
10-08-2006, 05:37 PM
I wonder if Jake Plummer could have led the Chiefs to victory today?

Bronx33
10-08-2006, 05:38 PM
I wonder if bob finished a whole box of lucky charms today.

Hotwheelz
10-08-2006, 05:39 PM
No seriously, where is the ignore button?

Bronx33
10-08-2006, 05:40 PM
No seriously, where is the ignore button?


In your user CP

elsid13
10-08-2006, 05:40 PM
I wonder if bob finished a whole box of lucky charms today.

That plus a box of Ho-Hos and three bags of Cheese Doodles

ZachKC
10-08-2006, 05:44 PM
I thought LJ was ****ign dead on that play...seriously...the way he fell and the angle his neck was at? I thought he died right there.

Bob's your Information Minister
10-08-2006, 05:46 PM
I thought LJ was ****ign dead on that play...seriously...the way he fell and the angle his neck was at? I thought he died right there.

Actually, LJ died on that play. Then he went to hell, kicked the devil's ass, and resurrected himself.

Bronco_Beerslug
10-08-2006, 05:50 PM
I wonder if Jake Plummer could have led the Chiefs to victory today?
How many threads are you going to infect today pinworm?

redrage
10-08-2006, 06:03 PM
Are the Rams below average? They are 4-1 but it seems to me that they have victories against some pretty suspect teams (Lions, Packers, Cardinals) and they actually got BEAT by the Niners. Oh, yeah, they won week one vs someone else.

Blueflame
10-08-2006, 06:08 PM
No seriously, where is the ignore button?

Click on the username of the poster you want to ignore... then click on "view public profile"... then on "add to ignore list".

scttgrd
10-08-2006, 06:10 PM
No seriously, where is the ignore button?

Welcome to the Chiefs Mane.

DenverBrit
10-08-2006, 06:15 PM
Are the Rams below average? They are 4-1 but it seems to me that they have victories against some pretty suspect teams (Lions, Packers, Cardinals) and they actually got BEAT by the Niners. Oh, yeah, they won week one vs someone else.

A clue for you.
It was the same team that sent KC to 0-2.
You've been taking Bob lessons. :clown:

redrage
10-08-2006, 06:18 PM
A clue for you.
It was the same team that sent KC to 0-2.
You've been taking Bob lessons. :clown:

Not at all. Either you think the Rams are below average, in which case the Broncos could not overcome an off day to beat them, or you think they are notbelow average in which case, how in the hell did the Niners beat them?

Blueflame
10-08-2006, 06:28 PM
Any given Sunday..... the 9ers got lucky, imho.

Man-Goblin
10-08-2006, 06:37 PM
Leinart made some plays with his legs. I was impressed. He's going to be good. Better than Cutler.

Blasphemy.

DenverBrit
10-08-2006, 06:40 PM
Not at all. Either you think the Rams are below average, in which case the Broncos could not overcome an off day to beat them, or you think they are notbelow average in which case, how in the hell did the Niners beat them?

I didn't think either.

That's your Bob-like logic, not mine.

Iowanian
10-08-2006, 06:50 PM
I thought Bob was the only one who started Chiefs threads? All of the usual crying characters about Chiefs threads? here.

The game was ugly. I like the W, but am not happy about this win. It should have been easier.

The Chiefs lost 2 starting Ts in the off season, they're down to 2 active on the roster with 2 injured. They're missing the starting QB, the backup RB, the starting LT, the Backup LT, are down to 3 corners active, and now, could be missing the #3 WR and K/p returner, and starting RB(due to another filthy play by an opponent).

Everyone knew that AZ was capable on offense with dangerous WRs.....Leinart started off well, but made some rookie mistakes. I think he'll be a good QB in this league, if the Cards will get him an Oline.

The Defense played well enough....got some sacks, a crucial INT and stops when they needed to.

I've considered this a 10-6 possibly 11-5 team all along, and still feel like they can reasonably do 10-6.

gunns
10-08-2006, 08:29 PM
I wonder if bob finished a whole box of lucky charms today.

Naw he's pouring M & M's on his ice cream. Trying to figure out what all the W's mean.

Last week they were a Super Bowl caliber team for slaughtering the 49ers, today they are a gutsy above average team for having the "heart" to keep struggling against the Cardinals and winning on the road. hmmm...

Dagmar
10-08-2006, 08:36 PM
How many threads are you going to infect today pinworm?

Dude, it doesn't help that you quote him, it makes it pointless for us who have him on ignore.

DomCasual
10-08-2006, 08:47 PM
Hey Bob. How's that Lenny Walls signing looking now?

My favorite play was when Walls gets torched down the left sideline by Anquan Boldin and gets bailed out by the safety (I think it was Greg Wesley). Walls gets up and starts pounding his chest and celebrating. Had it not been for the safety, it's 1st and goal, late in the 4th quarter. Nothing to be celebrating there, Lenny.

But he is 6' 5". Don't forget that.

DomCasual
10-08-2006, 08:51 PM
Oh, and on a little Cheffie sidenote, I loved this quote from ESPN's Bill Simmons - from Friday's NFL picks column (http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=simmons/061006):

But check out this week's show (HBO's Inside the NFL) just for the bizarre Larry Johnson segment -- he's more emotionally fragile than a pregnant 14-year-old. The KC coaches spend the entire game alternately hugging him and consoling him. It's crazy. After the Chiefs won the game, I thought Herm Edwards was going to reward him with cotton candy and a new Transformer.

Cotton candy and a new Transformer - I love that.

Bob's your Information Minister
10-08-2006, 08:52 PM
Hey Bob. How's that Lenny Walls signing looking now?


We have a top five secondary. It's looking just fine. Every corner gives up a play at some point. The fact that you guys can only point to two plays against Lenny in the first 4 games is proof that he was a great pickup for us and a huge upgrade over last year's nickel cornerback.

DomCasual
10-08-2006, 08:57 PM
We have a top five secondary.
A total homer comment, even by your standards. What could you possibly base this on? The season is four games old - let's hold off on the awards until we see how it plays out.

Bronx33
10-08-2006, 09:11 PM
A total homer comment, even by your standards. What could you possibly base this on? The season is four games old - let's hold off on the awards until we see how it plays out.



Bob used to love getting the white ribbons on field day.

Bob's your Information Minister
10-08-2006, 09:14 PM
A total homer comment, even by your standards. What could you possibly base this on?

Maybe the fact that they are ranked in the top five, statistically? They were ranked 2nd a week ago.

Paladin
10-08-2006, 09:16 PM
And you, boob, are a top five arsehole.

TheChamp24
10-08-2006, 09:24 PM
Good lord, the Chiefs beat the 49ers and Cardinals, and now their fans think they can win 10+ games, make it to the playoffs, and possibly further than that? Good lord.

Bob's your Information Minister
10-08-2006, 09:27 PM
Thanks.

Bob's your Information Minister
10-08-2006, 09:28 PM
Good lord, the Chiefs beat the 49ers and Cardinals, and now their fans think they can win 10+ games, make it to the playoffs, and possibly further than that? Good lord.

We've been in every game, and we're missing our quarterback.

If you really think Denver is that much better than KC, check out Week 2.

400HZ
10-08-2006, 09:56 PM
The way things are looking, it's doubtful that KC will be able to field 22 players come week 12 or so. Better start trying to find some more retirees to fill in the ranks for the big Super Bowl run. Congrats on squeaking by a crappy team with a rookie making his first start at QB. 14-2, for sure.

ZachKC
10-08-2006, 10:02 PM
The way things are looking, it's doubtful that KC will be able to field 22 players come week 12 or so. Better start trying to find some more retirees to fill in the ranks for the big Super Bowl run. Congrats on squeaking by a crappy team with a rookie making his first start at QB. 14-2, for sure.
Kind of like when we replaced our kick returner with a rookie who almost took it to the house?

Sassy
10-08-2006, 10:05 PM
Maybe the fact that they are ranked in the top five, statistically? They were ranked 2nd a week ago.

They barely beat the lowly Cardinals and the Niners suck and they lost to the Broncos who were one game away from the SB last year....Hmmm impressive.

24champ
10-08-2006, 10:10 PM
The way things are looking, it's doubtful that KC will be able to field 22 players come week 12 or so. Better start trying to find some more retirees to fill in the ranks for the big Super Bowl run. Congrats on squeaking by a crappy team with a rookie making his first start at QB. 14-2, for sure.

How the **** are they going to find retirees when their own players are filing retirement papers?Ha!

Trent Green sign along the dotted line please...

DenverBrit
10-08-2006, 10:33 PM
They barely beat the lowly Cardinals and the Niners suck and they lost to the Broncos who were one game away from the SB last year....Hmmm impressive.


But wait till they beat Nebraska, Bob will need Depends.. Ha!

DenverBrit
10-08-2006, 10:36 PM
And you, boob, are a top five arsehole.

You didn't hear?

Bob had an arsehole transplant.

But the arsehole rejected him. ;D

Florida_Bronco
10-09-2006, 05:04 AM
But wait till they beat Nebraska, Bob will need Depends.. Ha!

Nebraska is a college football team...and right now they could probably beat the Chiefs. :wiggle:

Florida_Bronco
10-09-2006, 05:31 AM
I gotta tell you too, these Chiefs fans are some serious front runners coming second only to the Faider fans.

With the exception of Bob, Crazy, Zach and a few others, they are virtually non existant until after a win.

Tom A Hawk
10-09-2006, 06:05 AM
Blaming the poor play completely on huard?? is a EXCUSE i would point the finger at the D and sami parker and walls is going to cost you some games down the road, thanks for sticking up for barb maybe let him defend himself.

You are right on all counts.
1) Huard did as well as Green would have done in this situation -- not having the first string QB is a stupid comment from the resident goof.

2) Never liked Walls and never will....he is as you all said he was

3) Sammie Parker, practice squad player at best

4) Here is where we might differ some. The D put them in the 14 point hole.
The D kept it from getting much worse. Lineart played much better than any QB the Chiefs have faced so far. I think it has more to do with his talent.
He is better than Jake right......... well, who isn't.

Steve Sewell
10-09-2006, 07:05 AM
your defense is overly aggressive to make up for it's lack of skill, they have to go all out and attack, so a qb getting away will leave lanes wide open due to the blitzing nature of KC

you are very prone to falling for misdirection

giving up 20 points to a team with NO running game and a rookie qb doesn't impress anyone

It was pretty funny when Arizona ran like 10 misdirection/bootlegs in a row with success against them...Hali constantly crashing down the line with the flow.

Steve Sewell
10-09-2006, 07:07 AM
Good take, Kaylore. I would say you and I were watching the same game. What was LJ's final run yardage total? 35 yds on the ground? Against that mighty AZ defense. Ya, he got the long screen play, but you can count on those happening but every 2 or 3 games.

That long screen play was sprung by one of the biggest non-call holds I've ever seen. The fact that a professional referee couldn't see that is damaging to the credibility of the officiating in the NFL.

Steve Sewell
10-09-2006, 07:11 AM
Naw he's pouring M & M's on his ice cream. Trying to figure out what all the W's mean.

Last week they were a Super Bowl caliber team for slaughtering the 49ers, today they are a gutsy above average team for having the "heart" to keep struggling against the Cardinals and winning on the road. hmmm...

Bob is so stupid, he tried to put M & M's in alphabetical order.

DenverBrit
10-09-2006, 07:31 AM
Nebraska is a college football team...and right now they could probably beat the Chiefs. :wiggle:

Nah, really? :clown:

Iowanian
10-09-2006, 09:52 AM
Keep selling the Chiefs D short if you must......but so far the secondary is doing very well. What reasoning can Bob have for feeling good about the corner play, including Walls, who is an upgrade as the 3rd corner. Even Champ Bailey gets beaten for a TD once in a while......even on the TD he had decent coverage....a good throw to a great WR.

So far, the Chiefs secondary has faced Anquan Boldin, Larry Fitzgerald, Chad Johnson, Rod Smith and Javon Walker.....and has given up 2 TDs in 4 games. Thats not bad at all vs pretty decent WRs.

A total homer comment, even by your standards. What could you possibly base this on? The season is four games old - let's hold off on the awards until we see how it plays out.

Rock Chalk
10-09-2006, 09:54 AM
Kaylore went fishing and predictably caught the usual suspects. Hahaha tards.

ZachKC
10-09-2006, 09:57 AM
Kaylore went fishing and predictably caught the usual suspects. Hahaha tards.

Alright...well if Kaylore goes fishing and gets credit then what was does Bob get?

Hilarious! Hilarious!

http://www.dumbphotos.com/images/Wow/284-bigcatfish.jpg

Paladin
10-09-2006, 10:08 AM
Bob is so stupid, he tried to put M & M's in alphabetical order.

Hilarious! ROFL!

DenverBrit
10-09-2006, 10:08 AM
Alright...well if Kaylore goes fishing and gets credit then what was does Bob get?

Hilarious! Hilarious!

http://www.dumbphotos.com/images/Wow/284-bigcatfish.jpg

He gets rescued from the farm pond? :spit:

Rock Chalk
10-09-2006, 10:35 AM
Alright...well if Kaylore goes fishing and gets credit then what was does Bob get?

Hilarious! Hilarious!

http://www.dumbphotos.com/images/Wow/284-bigcatfish.jpg

I dont know, I have Boob on ignore and if you keep up your tripe, you are next.

Killericon
10-09-2006, 10:36 AM
They suck at celebrating, too.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v608/mistrx4/capt.jpg

Garcia Bronco
10-09-2006, 11:17 AM
They suck at celebrating, too.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v608/mistrx4/capt.jpg

Helemt off....should have been a flag and an untimed down.

redrage
10-09-2006, 01:33 PM
I don't know about untimed. Wasn't there two seconds left? And technically, the helmet was removed AFTER the play and thus AFTER the change in possesion, so the penalty should be assesed on KC's first down.

If there was time left, he should have been flagged. If not, the game is over and it doesn't matter anyway. It's inconsistencies like this that bugs the crap out me about officials. Like Big Ben fumbling the ball twice on sacks last night and since he was in the grasp the fumble never happened. I don't think I've ever seen that before, especially since the whistles never blew.

Then Manning runs for a first down in the Titan game, slides WAY late (is nearly still vertical) when the defender hits him) and the announcer said the guy should have been called for a late hit on a sliding QB (he wasn't, but it wouldn't shock me to see a Manning get a different ruling)

400HZ
10-09-2006, 01:45 PM
I don't even understand that "grasp" thing, but it sounds like BS to me.

Mile High Shack
10-09-2006, 01:56 PM
Helemt off....should have been a flag and an untimed down.

same thing happened to KC in Cleveland a couple years ago and Cleveland got a flag and they lost b/c KC got another shot to kick the FG

Northman
10-09-2006, 02:29 PM
Helemt off....should have been a flag and an untimed down.


Good point, didnt one of the Brownies a few years ago cost themselves a win against K.C for taking his helmet off?

ROYC75
10-09-2006, 02:31 PM
same thing happened to KC in Cleveland a couple years ago and Cleveland got a flag and they lost b/c KC got another shot to kick the FG

Was not, yesterday the kick was wide and the play was called.

In Cleveland, the play was still in progress, Rudd started the celebration too early.

ROYC75
10-09-2006, 02:33 PM
Bottom line is any good news to a Chiefs fan is poision to a Donk....... any bad Chiefs news is Candy / ice cream to the Donks.

Here's hoping you don't get too much sweets this year.

Northman
10-09-2006, 02:35 PM
Bottom line is any good news to a Chiefs fan is poision to a Donk....... any bad Chiefs news is Candy / ice cream to the Donks.

Here's hoping you don't get too much sweets this year.



I dont know, im getting used to all the goodies you guys provide us year in and year out. :P

Crushaholic
10-09-2006, 02:38 PM
I was listening to a little bit of the post-game show. The "helmet off" incident was brought up to Sims. He said something to the effect that he goofed and it won't happen again. We'll see...:wiggle:

Mile High Shack
10-09-2006, 02:39 PM
I was listening to a little bit of the post-game show. The "helmet off" incident was brought up to Sims. He said something to the effect that he goofed and it won't happen again. We'll see...:wiggle:

Sims was just excited to even get on the field since he is a huge gigantic BUST

Mile High Shack
10-09-2006, 02:40 PM
Was not, yesterday the kick was wide and the play was called.

In Cleveland, the play was still in progress, Rudd started the celebration too early.

I disagree

when a TD is scored, you can't take your helmet off and the play is over

fact is, Chiefies got lucky :wiggle:

Paladin
10-09-2006, 02:52 PM
chiefs are not below average.




They are WAY below average.

ROYC75
10-09-2006, 04:20 PM
Sims was just excited to even get on the field since he is a huge gigantic BUST

Now this, I can relate to.......... and it sucks.

Leroy The Disembowler
10-09-2006, 05:15 PM
I just got done watching the Cardinals game. I was expecting a blowout but what I saw was two crappy teams playing each other.

Basically everything that could have gone wrong for the Cardinals did and they still almost won. Rackers uncharacteristically missed a field goal for the win. Two fumbles that the Cards had but lost on the bottom of the pile were called the other way and the Cards gave up penalties on key plays that would have been loses. A dropped TD in the endzone (on a repeatedly beaten Walls) - just general bad luck that put the Chiefs back into this.

The Chiefs just looked bad. LJ has no burst and if he's slowed in his launch he can't do crap. Lots of drops by receivers and they're blocking is average. Also, as we all predicted, Lenny Walls is a freebie for any team that wants to score deep. Not to mention Herm's playcalling was hilarious. He pretty much gave Arizona every opportunity to seal the game.

They are probably going to finish with 8 or 9 wins max this season.
typical donks fans, they see what they want to see.

Bronx33
10-09-2006, 05:22 PM
typical donks fans, they see what they want to see.


Kinda like KC fans and their D.