View Full Version : Staring down TPryce...
He's off to a solid start this season with 2.5 sacks already. He is also reporting in this article that he ran a 4.6 in the offseason... I thought we made the right choice with him because he looked like he was slowing down but playing in Baltimore and some of those weapons on defense, he doesn't have to be the "guy" anymore he can just be one of the role players... its a role I think he is much better suited for.
Hopefully SD can punch some holes in them this weekend and get them knicked up when they come rolling into town...
http://www.baltimoreravens.com/news/article.jsp?id=12665
Requiem
09-27-2006, 06:01 AM
I always liked Pryce, but the PRICE wasn't right for him to stay on the team. Lols, funny guy I am funny.
Nuggets4
09-27-2006, 06:49 AM
BPC, be careful. You're not supposed to like Trevor Pryce here. Remember, he's a traitor or something.
broncsyanks
09-27-2006, 07:15 AM
the guy was correct. pryce if you remember took a pay cut and adjusted his contract ther year prior to last. everyone thought he would be gone. his sacks were down last year because he was double teamed a lot and the broncos didnt let them go like he said when he left. thats understandable. now they wanted him to take another pay cut? why would he thats dumb. remember the chiefs game last year on monday night. he made it his point to make that team hurt from the previous year. and he did just that. i am worried he will do the same thing this year against us. to make us regret cutting him. UH OH
KipCorrington25
09-27-2006, 07:17 AM
But will he stay healthy all season? The problem here was he couldn't keep is back in order for any length of time. Will it only be a matter of time before he hurts it again?
Mediator12
09-27-2006, 07:27 AM
OK, he had sacks versus the Raiders and the Browns. What is missed here is he only had 1 Sack versus the raiders! That is a weak effort. As for the Browns, their OL is pretty weak as well, losing both big FA additions to injuries and down to their Fourth option at Center. Color me unimpressed.
Pryce was a Prima Donna that expected to be paid the back end of a huge deal he signed as the Premier DT in the league. Lo and behold, after switching to DE, getting injured, and being mediocre he wanted the Broncos to pay him 5 times his actual worth to the team anyway.
Remember any big plays he made in the last 3 years??? Yeah, me neither.
cabronco
09-27-2006, 07:37 AM
I've been watching him this year, and he looks to be the samo Ol Pryce. If anything his #'s might be inflated by the fact they werent double teaming him much at all during the 2 games I saw. He doesnt seem to like getting involved much with run tackling either. If one of his D guys have the rb in his grasp Trevor would just watch even though he would be right there to get in on the tackle. I miss the guy when he was a beast for us, but I believe his better days are over.
sirhcyennek81
09-27-2006, 07:49 AM
Have suggs opposite him, ray lewis and ed reed behind him, and i dont think he even starts, i think he rotates in. He has devolved from a 3 down DE to a pass rush DE. Is a pass rush specialist worth 8 mil a season?
:Broncos:
Basileus777
09-27-2006, 08:05 AM
Have suggs opposite him, ray lewis and ed reed behind him, and i dont think he even starts, i think he rotates in. He has devolved from a 3 down DE to a pass rush DE. Is a pass rush specialist worth 8 mil a season?
:Broncos:
He starts, but he doesn't see many double teams with Suggs, Ngata, and Greggs on that line. Ravens fans I have spoken to have said that Pryce has played well for them, not amazing, but better than Weaver. He put alot of pressure on Frye Sunday, and while you may dismiss it because its against the Browns, without those pressure and sacks they have have lost that game.
http://mb14.scout.com/fravensinsiderfrm1.showMessage?topicID=46220.topic
Ravens fans seem pleased with his performance.
Dagmar
09-27-2006, 08:25 AM
Remember any big plays he made in the last 3 years??? Yeah, me neither.
There was MNF Vs the Cheifs, but you are right, he was paid too much.
Pat Bowlen
09-27-2006, 08:44 AM
the guy was correct. pryce if you remember took a pay cut and adjusted his contract ther year prior to last. everyone thought he would be gone. his sacks were down last year because he was double teamed a lot and the broncos didnt let them go like he said when he left. thats understandable. now they wanted him to take another pay cut? why would he thats dumb. remember the chiefs game last year on monday night. he made it his point to make that team hurt from the previous year. and he did just that. i am worried he will do the same thing this year against us. to make us regret cutting him. UH OH
Go back to high school.
Kaylore
09-27-2006, 08:47 AM
OK, he had sacks versus the Raiders and the Browns. What is missed here is he only had 1 Sack versus the raiders! That is a weak effort. As for the Browns, their OL is pretty weak as well, losing both big FA additions to injuries and down to their Fourth option at Center. Color me unimpressed.
Pryce was a Prima Donna that expected to be paid the back end of a huge deal he signed as the Premier DT in the league. Lo and behold, after switching to DE, getting injured, and being mediocre he wanted the Broncos to pay him 5 times his actual worth to the team anyway.
Remember any big plays he made in the last 3 years??? Yeah, me neither.
Thank you. The guy has played two of the worst lines in the NFL and people are annoiting him the king.
He wanted nine million for what he was doing. That's just too much.
The problem with Pryce has always been his inability to finish strong. I think he is one of those guys that does not have the physical stamina to play at top form a full NFL schedule.