View Full Version : Week 2 Poll - Cutler or Jake
freak6
09-17-2006, 05:42 PM
Today Jake did next to nothing, his QB rating was around 56.
Bringing up his rating. To about 40.
Another terrible read, another terrible pick, costing us a FG. The defense gave up 2 yards on that Chief drive, so the pick led directly to the FG.
I know I know, another Jake vs Cutler thread, but I want to collect votes to see the trend over the season.
Spider
09-17-2006, 05:45 PM
Jake made plays in the end when it counted ........
freak6
09-17-2006, 05:47 PM
Jake made plays in the end when it counted ........
Yeah, he did alright.
But with such a dominating defense, can we afford Jake the Mistake handing teams free points with his terrible ints?
Rigs11
09-17-2006, 05:50 PM
Yeah, he did alright.
But with such a dominating defense, can we afford Jake the Mistake handing teams free points with his terrible ints?
What is it that makes you thinnk that Cutler would be better?The preseason? Where he was facing 2nd and 3rd string defenses? Ok so we put in Cutler. What if he sucks? How many games does he get before you call for his head?
Spider
09-17-2006, 05:53 PM
Yeah, he did alright.
But with such a dominating defense, can we afford Jake the Mistake handing teams free points with his terrible ints?
our D hasnt allowed a TD yet .........
spdirty
09-17-2006, 05:57 PM
start Jake unless he gets hurt this year. I can't wait till next year. I really can't.
Rock Chalk
09-17-2006, 05:58 PM
Yeah, he did alright.
But with such a dominating defense, can we afford Jake the Mistake handing teams free points with his terrible ints?
That dominating Defense you speak of, the one that allowed the Jets to damn near come back and beat them? The one that almost choked to Buffalo? That dominating defense?
New England is a vastly over rated team this year and their defense is nothing spectacular anymore.
BABronco
09-17-2006, 06:12 PM
I'm wanting plummer to be the starter barring injury. Although everytime he threw the ball I was praying "Jake plz dont threw a freaking int!"
freak6
09-17-2006, 06:30 PM
That dominating Defense you speak of, the one that allowed the Jets to damn near come back and beat them? The one that almost choked to Buffalo? That dominating defense?
New England is a vastly over rated team this year and their defense is nothing spectacular anymore.
I meant our defense Alec.
Rock Chalk
09-17-2006, 06:31 PM
I'm wanting plummer to be the starter barring injury. Although everytime he threw the ball I was praying "Jake plz dont threw a freaking int!"
Yeah. In OT I kept thinking "Please dont blow it Jake, I will have to find a new message board as this one will be boring with everyone on ignore."
What's he do? Win the game for us. ;D
freak6
09-17-2006, 06:32 PM
What is it that makes you thinnk that Cutler would be better?The preseason? Where he was facing 2nd and 3rd string defenses? Ok so we put in Cutler. What if he sucks? How many games does he get before you call for his head?
His poise,arm strength, and accuracy.
His decision making couldn't be any worse than Jakes.
If Cutler had played the entire game vs the Rams would we have been better or worse for it?
Better.
Same this week.
Rock Chalk
09-17-2006, 06:33 PM
I meant our defense Alec.
Dont get me wrong, they have played well but are still prone to the big play and the tackling needs work.
We have a better than average defense but still lack a pass rush. How many sacks did we get on them? Cincy got 7 sacks last week, I only remember really 1, maybe 2. Further, Damon Huard completed his first 9 passes against us, ended up only having 5 incompletions and one of those was a drop by Gonzo that was right in his hands.
We got room to improve. GOod, yes, Dominating, no.
Dedhed
09-17-2006, 06:36 PM
Jake made plays in the end when it counted ........
I think you mean Javon made plays when it counted.
Natedogg
09-17-2006, 06:40 PM
The wording in you poll is biased. Why is there no "Start Jake and watch him kick ass like he did last year in KC" option?
Spider
09-17-2006, 06:41 PM
I think you mean Javon made plays when it counted.
I know what the **** I mean .......... dont need you to help me out on that .....
Jake did what he had to do ........
freak6
09-17-2006, 06:47 PM
No, it is dominating.
Teams passing against us are faced with only 75% of the field to throw to. From the right hash marks to the sideline is a blackhole QBs don't risk throwing passes to. We got ran on quite a bit today, that was troubling. But we only gave up 6 pts, really 3.
freak6
09-17-2006, 06:50 PM
I can't wait for our offense to get in gear, and force teams to go one dimensional and throw against us. So far in2 games we have seen vanilla offenses running it down after down.
Thier gameplan seems to be, don't make a mistake and Plummer will. Just wait, it's coming, pow INT, free 3 pts.
Kaylore
09-17-2006, 08:26 PM
Jay Cutler would have no trouble playing just as badly as Jake has these last two games.
However, I think you keep Jake until the middle of the season and see how things are going at that point.
freak6
09-17-2006, 08:48 PM
However, I think you keep Jake until the middle of the season and see how things are going at that point.
I think it may be to late by then. We are all patiently waiting for the real Jake the Snake the show up. If we are 4-4 at the halfway point, I think you gamble that Jake can go 6-2 out of the last 8 and make it. But if we fall to 4-5, gotta make the switch.
One game at a time. Bring on the Pats.
SoCalBronco
09-17-2006, 08:50 PM
I really hate the way Jake is playing but keep him in there regardless.
Hercules Rockefeller
09-17-2006, 08:53 PM
Oakland would be the earliest I'd call for Cutler. Even if they lose @NE, give them the bye week to right the ship because there's no way I want JC getting his first start against Baltimore. If the offense can't move it through 4 games and they're 1-3, it's time to make the change.
maven
09-17-2006, 08:56 PM
Start Cutler from day 1.
freak6
09-17-2006, 10:30 PM
50/50 on those that would want to see Jay Cutler next week.
Noone is mentioning the terrible passes in goalline. He missed Sheffler who was open, but he threw it with no touch, way behind him when he was isolated left, and he threw it behind him when he got drilled.
Then the miscommunication between him and Javon on the jump ball throw.
<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Xz6YSmhTXk4"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Xz6YSmhTXk4" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>
Notice how that deep ball to Kircus doesn't float, he is hitting him in stride on a pass that flew 56 yards in the air, and it got there in a hurry.
Wow. And he is holding a clipboard because Jake Plummer has more experiance reading defenses?
Play2win
09-18-2006, 12:11 AM
The only thing JAKE has going for him is that, together, the "K" and the "E" almost look like a "Y"...
Hulamau
09-18-2006, 12:57 AM
That dominating Defense you speak of, the one that allowed the Jets to damn near come back and beat them? The one that almost choked to Buffalo? That dominating defense?
New England is a vastly over rated team this year and their defense is nothing spectacular anymore.
The one Glimmer of Hope is if the coaches AND Plummer fully grasp how much better Jake looked when he wasn't mezmerized by Rod Smith's presence (or lack thereof) and suddenly seemed to discover that other WRs on this team can play!
We should gracefully, quietly and with proper respect demote Rod to 2nd or third string not so much just because he has absolutely lost a step, nor for any failure on his part, but simply to demand Walker get the lion share of the primary WR calls from here on out ... and thus most of Jake's attention since he rarely checks down more than 1 spot.
That, combined with what you point out Alec, that NE might be living on smoke and mirrors too so far this year could result in what would surely be considered an upset at NE next week which would be HUGE for Jake and th team going into the bye week.
We lose to NE and Jake has another stinker day and its going to be an extremely long and painful two week bye!
Hulamau
09-18-2006, 01:02 AM
50/50 on those that would want to see Jay Cutler next week.
Noone is mentioning the terrible passes in goalline. He missed Sheffler who was open, but he threw it with no touch, way behind him when he was isolated left, and he threw it behind him when he got drilled.
Yes those two passes when we were ready to take the game was the low point for me .
Notice how that deep ball to Kircus doesn't float, he is hitting him in stride on a pass that flew 56 yards in the air, and it got there in a hurry.
Wow. And he is holding a clipboard because Jake Plummer has more experiance reading defenses?
No doubt, that logic is starting to spring some major leaks.
freak6
09-18-2006, 07:02 AM
The numbers are close from week one to week 2, looks like the start Cutler % is coming up though.
Crushaholic
09-18-2006, 07:15 AM
Once we get the running game going and figure out how to open holes for the Bells, Jake will return to winning form. Starting Jay would doom our season because he's just not as experienced in reading NFL defenses.
fontaine
09-18-2006, 07:45 AM
Once we get the running game going and figure out how to open holes for the Bells, Jake will return to winning form.
Man, I'd love for this to be true but how exactly do you open up more holes for the running game if there are extra defenders constantly cheating up to the box? The OL can only do so much. On any given play there might two OL at the most that get to the 2nd level and blast LBs but that's not going to happen all the time. It's like trying to get water out of a stone.
Our running game is already very good. We could get them to elite status but the biggest improvement in this offense is going to come from the passing game clicking on the intermediate routes.
freak6
09-18-2006, 07:48 AM
Starting Jay would doom our season because he's just not as experienced in <b>reading </b>NFL defenses.
In comparison to a QB whose TD/INT ratio is 0/4. Maybe Jake is dyslexic.
KYChamp24
09-18-2006, 07:49 AM
I say we let Jake play. Its not going to help him by boooing at the game. Are we really that quick to forget last season?
Rohirrim
09-18-2006, 07:49 AM
Man, I'd love for this to be true but how exactly do you open up more holes for the running game if there are extra defenders constantly cheating up to the box? The OL can only do so much. On any given play there might two OL at the most that get to the 2nd level and blast LBs but that's not going to happen all the time. It's like trying to get water out of a stone.
Our running game is already very good. We could get them to elite status but the biggest improvement in this offense is going to come from the passing game clicking on the intermediate routes.
Bingo! Give that man a cigar. Football is a game of force. If Jake can't "force" the D to back off, they won't. The NFL has figured out Jake's game. Either he takes it up a notch, or the Broncos are toast. Let's face it. His passing is abysmal.
obediah
09-18-2006, 07:50 AM
I say you dont even think of putting Cutler in until Plummer either puts a nail in our coffin and blows our season at which point we have nothing to loose, Or until we start playing like the Bronco instead of the friggin Donkeys and put enough points up on the board that Shanny can put him in for a few plays.
This is not Cutlers year. Next year i will be voting differently.
Obediah
Crushaholic
09-18-2006, 07:52 AM
In comparison to a QB whose TD/INT ratio is 0/4. Maybe Jake is dyslexic.
I don't expect this bad play to continue. He had a great year last season and I don't believe he just suddenly lost the ability to be a good QB. Jay isn't ready.
Rigs11
09-18-2006, 08:30 AM
His poise,arm strength, and accuracy.
His decision making couldn't be any worse than Jakes.
If Cutler had played the entire game vs the Rams would we have been better or worse for it?
Better.
Same this week.
His decision making couldn't have been worse? Really? A rookie with the pressure that Plummer faced at St. Louis? Come on. You're being a homer. Poise? Against 2nd and 3rd string defenses? Of course.I'll give you the arm strength and accuracy.I wonder how come no one is blaming the coaching and their dumb downed and predictable playcalling.
Alkazar
09-18-2006, 08:42 AM
One thing that I've noticed about Jake this year is that he can't make passes to the flat or short sideline throws. He is always so far off target on those tosses it ain't even funny and every single time the receiver has been so open they could've gotten at least 10 yards if not more except Jake couldn't hit them. Whatsup wit dat Jake?
ScottXray
09-18-2006, 09:12 AM
Once we get the running game going and figure out how to open holes for the Bells, Jake will return to winning form. Starting Jay would doom our season because he's just not as experienced in reading NFL defenses.
It is EVIDENT that Jake doesn't BOTHER to read the defense, IF he is capable of that. We don't have an abreviated game plan , limited to half the field, because Jake can read defenses better. For a player in their 10th season, Jake is AWFUL.
The only reason Jake is in there is because we came close to going all the way last year.
As to the reasons for the Offensive ineptitude...
1. Jake has lost arm strength?
2. Jake has no confidence since we drafted Cutler?
3. No Mike Anderson...Tatum and Mike Bell aren't good enough?
4. Our Offensive line IS getting OLD. Maybe THEY are the problem?
5. Rod Smith Has Lost a step?
6. Pittsburgh showed everyone how to beat Denver and Plummer.
7. Poor game plans by Shanahan? The loss of Kubiak?
IT DOESN'T MATTER. 'The team has to find a way to get the offense going!
Perhaps the BEST thing that happened yesterday was Rod Smith getting knocked out of the game. It MADE Plummer look elsewhere,check hsi reads, and throw halfway decent balls. I hope Rod is OK, but for right now I wouldn't mind if he sat a few games.
IF we can weather the storm in the first half of the season (not likely if the offense doesn't improve) and come out at least 5-3 then Jake will stay the starter. Right now our offense is on life support. If Jake plays like he HAS the first two weeks , the NEXT two games I think Shanahan will pull the plug and Transplant Cutler into the starting line-up, because we will be 1-3. Maybe he will wait for 1-4.:welcome:
freak6
09-18-2006, 09:23 AM
Jake was incredibly inaccurate yesterday as Alkazar said. It's so frustrating. I'd love to see Cutler get a shot and see what he can do with the first team. Right now, Jake aint it.
Jake's got at least the first four games (through week 5, Baltimore). If we're 1-3 by then we can begin to consider a QB change. Even then I'd be hesitant until we're at least through the first half of our season, having faced off with Indy and Pittsburgh.
freak6
09-18-2006, 09:55 AM
If Jak'e QB rating is below 70 this week, and we lose, which we will if it is more than likely, Cutler HAS to start.
bloodsunday
09-18-2006, 10:04 AM
Our running game is already very good. We could get them to elite status but the biggest improvement in this offense is going to come from the passing game clicking on the intermediate routes.
Quoted for turth. (And because I was beaten down for criticizing our running game last week.)
Orange_Beard
09-18-2006, 10:07 AM
Wow, another Plummer poll. I am riveted.
bloodsunday
09-18-2006, 10:07 AM
I say we let Jake play. Its not going to help him by boooing at the game. Are we really that quick to forget last season?
Although I am leaning toward making a move at QB, I agree with this. It doesn't help anyone to boo your own team. Although, if I paid $65 (plus $7 a beer and $20 to park) to go watch a football, then I guess I'd boo a 5 field goal game.
bloodsunday
09-18-2006, 10:10 AM
Jake's got at least the first four games (through week 5, Baltimore). If we're 1-3 by then we can begin to consider a QB change. Even then I'd be hesitant until we're at least through the first half of our season, having faced off with Indy and Pittsburgh.
I think that is too absolute, and if it happens that way could be too late. Shanahan needs to be in tune with which guy he believes gives us the better chance to win this week, period. As soon as he decides he has lost too much confidence in Jake, then he has to pull the trigger, whether its today or next year. It's not fair to the team or the fans to have some absolute benchmark if you aren't confident in the guy right now. Having said that, I think more patience is needed and doubt Shanny has reached such a conclusion just yet.
Tom H.
09-18-2006, 10:12 AM
How about an option where you can select "Start Jake and don't boo him as he plays"
freak6
09-18-2006, 10:20 AM
His decision making couldn't have been worse? Really? A rookie with the pressure that Plummer faced at St. Louis? Come on. You're being a homer. Poise? Against 2nd and 3rd string defenses? Of course.I'll give you the arm strength and accuracy.I wonder how come no one is blaming the coaching and their dumb downed and predictable playcalling.
Did you see him shred the Cards first team D.
In game 3 he tore up the Titans first team D too.
Doh!!!
You really think Cutler would have done worse in the last 2 games???
bwa ha ha
BroncsRule
09-18-2006, 12:33 PM
Shanny will start Cutler the week after he figgures out that he will not win this year's superbowl with Jake under center.
If we go 1-3 with continued lacckluster offensive performances, you could see Jay against the Raiders.
If we win a couple more, Jake's the man 'till we rack up our 7th loss.
Rock Chalk
09-18-2006, 12:54 PM
We are going 3-1 adn you people are faithless Mohammad whores if you believe otherwise.
Bleh.
defenseman
09-18-2006, 12:57 PM
Once we get the running game going and figure out how to open holes for the Bells, Jake will return to winning form. Starting Jay would doom our season because he's just not as experienced in reading NFL defenses.
Optimism. Well, for our sakes and the broncos sake, I hope you are correct. However, I took my orange colored glasses off and to be quite honest the offense is having major issues. Don't see that getting corrected in one week. But, we'll see...dman
freak6
09-18-2006, 01:52 PM
We are going 3-1 adn you people are faithless Mohammad whores if you believe otherwise.
Bleh.
Hey look, a religious person calling another religion wrong.
Omg, and he is a rightwing nut at that. I am just as shocked as I am appalled.
NOT.
We aren't faithless. We are smart. I guess if we don't predict us going 16-0 we are jihadist sympathizers.
Fearmongering might work with uneducated southern white trash, but this is a Bronco football board Alec. Take your hate and place it elsewhere, you sound like a crazy redneck.
BroncsRule
09-18-2006, 02:38 PM
Hey now -
let's keep the political discourse on the short bus where it belongs.
Although I will admit I laughed at "faithless Mohammad whores"..
To clarify, I'm not "wishing" or "hoping" or even predicting that we're going to go 1-3.
I'm just saying that if we do - you'll see Jay C.
loborugger
09-18-2006, 04:27 PM
So much has been said, that there is little else to add...
However, if we pull Jake, we better do it for good. As in, you're done and a permenant back up as long as you are here in Denver. Pulling him, restarting him, etc will only make his play worse.
I am for keeping Jake for a while longer. You gotta play better, buddy... there are a lot of still pulling for ya.