PDA

View Full Version : No cause for block party IE (Our line is crap)


HEAV
09-14-2006, 06:24 AM
http://www.denverpost.com/broncos/ci_4334122

No cause for block party

As the normally elusive Jake Plummer was getting trapped by charging behemoths, the point was made.

Problems in the passing game do not lie with the quarterback alone.

Plummer has committed eight turnovers in his past two games - the AFC championship game loss to Pittsburgh last season and the 2006 season-opening defeat to St. Louis. In those two games, the Broncos were dealing with pass-protection breakdowns, and Plummer was sacked seven times. Compare that to 2004, when the Broncos allowed a mere 15 sacks in 16 games.

And among Plummer's eight turnovers, three were fumbles that occurred while under pass-rush duress.

Against the Rams, sacks ended three of the Broncos' first five possessions. The other two were stopped by a fumble and interception.

"The theory is, if they bring 11, you have to block at least 10," Broncos fullback Kyle Johnson said. "The quarterback is throwing, so he can't get the other. They got us. Sometimes they had good plays called."

It became apparent early on that the Broncos' vaunted offensive line needed reinforcements. Right tackle George Foster, struggling to hear the cadence amid the din inside St. Louis' dome, was getting beaten off the jump by Rams defensive end Leonard Little.

"It was pretty loud," Foster said.

Lining up with a second tight end most of the game, the Broncos added the fullback Johnson pretty much from the second quarter on. The adjustments

Rascal
09-14-2006, 06:33 AM
Like I said. They were forced to put a TE on Foster's side to help and use Johnson as well.

Foster was owned.

HEAV
09-14-2006, 06:35 AM
Foster is a guard.

ZachKC
09-14-2006, 06:58 AM
http://coachella.com/artists_images/bloc_party.jpg
http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B0007NFMDK.01._SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg

12th man
09-14-2006, 07:04 AM
Our line isn't crap. Foster is the only one that's crap.

fontaine
09-14-2006, 07:12 AM
I guess that explains why on those interceptions Plummer was under no direct pressure. Two were on rollouts (where one was to a wide open Devoe, the other was a forced pass to Rod), while the third was a quick short step drop where Plummer threw off the back foot right into a rookie CB.

Mile High Shack
09-14-2006, 07:16 AM
gee, maybe what some of us are saying about Foster is true???

naaaa, it's can't be, it's all Jake's fault

Jake is below average no doubt, but so is Foster

Rascal
09-14-2006, 07:25 AM
I guess that explains why on those interceptions Plummer was under no direct pressure. Two were on rollouts (where one was to a wide open Devoe, the other was a forced pass to Rod), while the third was a quick short step drop where Plummer threw off the back foot right into a rookie CB.

Good grief.

Not once have we said Plummer was not at fault for his INT's.

Hercules Rockefeller
09-14-2006, 07:28 AM
[
And among Plummer's eight turnovers, three were fumbles that occurred while under pass-rush duress.


What a stupid line, there's really no other way he's going to fumble unless he flat out drops it with no one around him.

Jetmeck
09-14-2006, 07:54 AM
What a stupid line, there's really no other way he's going to fumble unless he flat out drops it with no one around him.

Anything and I mean anything is possible with this guy.
He does have a problem fumbling when sacked, he doesn't put the ball away.

Dante007
09-14-2006, 08:16 AM
Jake the mistake and Goeorge Foster = bad combination. If he is blaming the noise in St. Louis, what is the excuse for the Steelers game here at home (in the AFC Championship)?