It's Chiefs week! Try to not laugh at Gochiefs

[Bob's your Information Minister]

Let's get this party started.

WE WILL RALLY AROUND DAMON HUARD!

[Northman]

Oh man, we are sooooo scared. At least we lost on the road.

[Bob's your Information Minister]

At least we lost to a good football team! :clown:

[broncosteven]

So I see LJ is ahead of LT 2k pace from last year right?

LJ gonna break him off a piece of some 2k this yea!

[Darkhawk24]

It just doesn't really feel like Chiefs week yet... Especially after watching the OL and Huard out there... Hopefully I will get more excited by mid week.

[Northman]

At least we lost to a good football team! :clown:


Still early and Seattle didnt look all that good yesterday. Rams could easily win that division.

[boltaneer]

The Broncos get a bye in week two.

It's so unfair, I tell you!

[labronx]

dont you mean it's Bronco week?

[Mile High Shack]

we suck
Chiefs win 35-2

[Bob's your Information Minister]

we suck
Chiefs win 35-2

That sounds about right....three pick sixes...two Dante returns....and a safety for the Broncos.

[sirhcyennek81]

That sounds about right....three pick sixes...two Dante returns....and a safety for the Broncos.

An aside, Bob. I hope Green is ok.

Onward: If you think the Broncos offense comes out like that 2 weeks in a row, then you are retarded.

Broncos 28, Chiefs 10

:Broncos:

[Iowanian]

Congratulations on your 1-1 start.

With the HuTard at the helm, the Chiefs should strive for "competative".
I'm still too pissed off at Cinci to even care yet.

[Bob's your Information Minister]

Onward: If you think the Broncos offense comes out like that 2 weeks in a row, then you are retarded.

Broncos 28, Chiefs 10


GET READY FOR THE #4 DEFENSE IN THE LEAGUE!

[Northman]

GET READY FOR THE #4 DEFENSE IN THE LEAGUE!



Yea, you sure showed those pesky Bengals. :rofl:

[penguintheory]

Hehe. At least now that we've lost our first game it's a debate.

[Iowanian]

The defense did hold Rudy Johnson under 100 yards, held 85 out of the endzone, and kept a pretty good Bengal offense in check.

Considering Dante's fumble on the 14, int, fumble by huard and a shanked punt, giving Cinci offensive possessions on the Chiefs side of the 50....I think they did alright. They also looked alot better with Page at Safety instead of knight. Now if they'll just be smart enough to sit bell and play Fox.

Walls looked pretty good in his reps too...and like I predicted, he was on the outside, and did cover 85 some.

At this point, Denver hasn't proven that Plummint is anything to fear, and your running game has some work to do.

Actually.....alot of offenses looked like Ass in week 1.

Yea, you sure showed those pesky Bengals. :rofl:

[Bob's your Information Minister]

I'm serious. We're not giving you guys 30 points this week.

Not counting pick sixes thrown by Huard.

[Mediator12]

GET READY FOR THE #4 DEFENSE IN THE LEAGUE!

Hey, you played most of that game in heavy rain and the field was horrible. That defense was not that impressive without the heavy blitz. Cover two my ass. Even Herm knows that your talent level on the DL is piss poor and if you do not blitz you are toast. The real question is if Shanahan is not stupid enough to build some max Protect release schemes.

And, I am not afraid of your ZERO blitz one bit. We invented it and Coyer has already given Shanahan the playbook on beating it. God I hope you all Blitz as Much as STL did, it is your only hope.

[Bob's your Information Minister]

We only did that a few times, Med. Besides, Plummer is no Cutler, and your O-line is nowhere near the pass blocking beast that Cincy's is.

HALI VS FOSTER!

[2KBack]

I'm serious. We're not giving you guys 30 points this week.

You won't give them 30 points, Denver is going to take them against your will

[Mediator12]

I'm serious. We're not giving you guys 30 points this week.

Not counting pick sixes thrown by Huard.

Well there should be plenty of those too. That OL without Sampson was horrendous. Turley was getting bullrushed by RDE's and forcing the QB up into the pocket. Expect a bunch of blitz's yourselves. That OL has gone from Dominant to Trash in one offseason.

Funny how two of the best offenses in the game went to hell in a handbasket that quick.

[Billy Clyde Puckett]

Nothing else to say

[Northman]

We only did that a few times, Med. Besides, Plummer is no Cutler, and your O-line is nowhere near the pass blocking beast that Cincy's is.

HALI VS FOSTER!


Sounds like tough words brother only one problem. YOU GUYS CANT STOP THE BOOTLEG! :thumbsup:

[Jens1893]

At this point, Denver hasn't proven that Plummint is anything to fear, and your running game has some work to do.

I´ll take 161 yards on 25 carries.

[Bob's your Information Minister]

The only time Cincy moved the ball on us was with the no-huddle.

Think Plummer can bust that out? ROFL!

[Northman]

He wont need too, you just missed him already. He's on the BOOTLEG. lol

[~Crash~]

I bet you get a denver team that is up tempo and pounds the football down your DT backs cleat marks by Mike Bell

[Bob's your Information Minister]

We'll stop that bootleg. Hicks is on the bench.

[ludo21]

Regardless of how easy we think it could be, im thinking a tough defensive battle all the way to the end.

Not confident in Plummer yet.

[Tom A Hawk]

The Broncos get a bye in week two.

It's so unfair, I tell you!


ha- and you are getting a bye week one.......

[Crushaholic]

Regardless of how easy we think it could be, im thinking a tough defensive battle all the way to the end.

Not confident in Plummer yet.

Plummer doesn't have two bad games in a row and we OWN the Chiefs in Denver. Plummer will bootleg them to death. If they miraculously DO find a way to stop the bootleg, that will open up the running game and we'll shove a couple of Bells down their throats.

GO BRONCOS!!!!

[loborugger]

I'm serious. We're not giving you guys 30 points this week.

Not counting pick sixes thrown by Huard.

Who did you end up betting for the year ban? It sure was nice of KC to spot Denver 9 points in the first week (18 given up by Denver, 27 by KC...) I enjoyed watching Wesley go for a strip at the goalline, again. That just never gets old.

Most your friends over here have been fairly quiet because they know that while we lost on the road, you got punished at home.

Enjoy 0-2.

One final thought. Setting the bar at 30 is pretty low. Thats like a Broncos fan saying "no way we go worse than 4-12 this season." Why dont you try and get into the realm where contempt D's play. Oh wait, thats cuz you dont have one.

[NaptownChief]

I've got Herm Average winning 3 games this year and this week is not among them.

Denver 27 KC 10

[crazyhorse]

I can appreciate how Bronco fans feel confidence going into this week.

The Chiefs have a tough time beating Denver at home. The Chiefs have just lost thier QB who was struggling when he went down.

It's seems you've quickly forgotten that just over 24 hours ago you were bitch slapped to the tune of 6 scores by the....St Louis Rams. Your bravado is not unusual. However, if you get your butts kicked in your house by the QBless Chiefs it's gonna be tough sleddin' 'round here.

Chiefs will roll

Chiefs 24
Donks 10

[Bob's your Information Minister]

Who did you end up betting for the year ban? It sure was nice of KC to spot Denver 9 points in the first week (18 given up by Denver, 27 by KC...)

That trashhole named Steve Sewell. BTW, it was 23, not 27.

[NaptownChief]

I can appreciate how Bronco fans feel confidence going into this week.

The Chiefs have a tough time beating Denver at home. The Chiefs have just lost thier QB who was struggling when he went down.

It's seems you've quickly forgotten that just over 24 hours ago you were b**** slapped to the tune of 6 scores by the....St Louis Rams. Your bravado is not unusual. However, if you get your butts kicked in your house by the QBless Chiefs it's gonna be tough sleddin' 'round here.

Chiefs will roll

Chiefs 24
Donks 10


Chiefs have an outside chance but only because they have Plummer under center.

[Bob's your Information Minister]

Make no mistake. We're winning. This defense is for real. LJ owns you guys, and he's getting the rock this week.

I'll give you guys a little more credit than Crazyhorse.

Chiefs 24, Broncos 14.

One pick six by Ty Law.

[Bob's your Information Minister]

Denver is opening as 11-point favorites.

NO RESPECT!

[DenverBrit]

Denver is opening as 11-point favorites.

NO RESPECT!

What did you expect, the Chiefs have you for a fan. :spit:

[Hercules Rockefeller]

Denver is opening as 11-point favorites.

NO RESPECT!

Why should they? No QB or OTs, and 2002 was the last time you didn't lose by double digits.

[Inkana7]

One pick six by Ty Law.

You kidding me? Maybe a pick, but at this point in his career, Law would have a hard time against Plummer in a foot race.

[Steve Sewell]

Let's get this party started.

WE WILL RALLY AROUND DAMON HUARD!

Hey Bob, you can pretty much kiss your ass goodbye after the season is over. Enjoy your 1 year hiatus!

[Steve Sewell]

That trashhole named Steve Sewell. BTW, it was 23, not 27.

Trashole, eh? Never heard that one before. Prepare to be banned for an entire year, Bobby. Do you want to just start now and get credit for time served?

[Arkie]

Chiefs have an outside chance but only because they have Plummer under center.

Everybody knows that Plummer throws multiple interceptions in his first game and then goes three to eight games without an interception.

[OrangeShadow]

It's seems you've quickly forgotten that just over 24 hours ago you were b**** slapped to the tune of 6 scores by the....St Louis Rams.

6 field goals against a high powered offense. you make it sound like the defense got their collective asses handed to them when its pretty much the exact opposite.

[ROYC75]

Crap, I'm trying hard to get the excitement to watch the game this week......

Ya know, alot of strange things has happened in this world,miracles, upsets, the Titanic, TITANIC, OH SH*T,WE ARE GOING DOWNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN.

[Bob's your Information Minister]

Trashole, eh? Never heard that one before. Prepare to be banned for an entire year, Bobby. Do you want to just start now and get credit for time served?

I'm off to a good start. I predicted the Chiefs would allow 24 points yesterday. So far, I'm 1 point ahead of the curve.

[Jens1893]

Make no mistake. We're winning. This defense is for real. LJ owns you guys, and he's getting the rock this week.

Yep, he does.

(3:17) L.Johnson up the middle to KC 12 for 2 yards (I.Gold). FUMBLES (I.Gold), RECOVERED by DEN-C.Brown at KC 12. Play Challenged by KC and Upheld. (Timeout #2 by KC at 02:42.)

[ScottXray]

My bet is Green WILL play Sunday....
KC does not have him OUT they have him Questionable.

It is all a SECRET plan to fool the Broncos Defense into preparing
for Huard. Then Trint comes out and magically moves the Cheaps down the field for a few easy TDs before Coyer can adjust the plan.

KC has to pull out ALL the stops because they know that they always LOSE in Denver.


Plan exposed....!!!! Denver 30 KC 17:wiggle:

[Bob's your Information Minister]

After watching Steven Jackson make DJ Williams his biatch, I can't wait to see what LJ does.

[Bob's your Information Minister]

The Chiefs just signed Rod Gardner.

YOU'RE GOING DOWN!

[12th man]

Kansas City is fvcked. We never lose to kc at home and we never lose the home opener. Our defense will dominate with Haurd at qb and a sh!t line. Our offense will be much much better than Sundays offense. There is no way in hell our offense stinks it up two weeks in a row. It's to talanted for it to do that again. especially at home agains the chiefs D.

[Clockwork Orange]

Did I read that right? Did the Chefs once vaunted O-line give up 7 sacks yesterday? To the Bengals "soft" defense?

[Bob's your Information Minister]

To be fair, we were without our starting right tackle. Black sucks.

[Clockwork Orange]

The Chiefs just signed Rod Gardner.

YOU'RE GOING DOWN!

Rod Gardner? Was Freddie Mitchell unavailable?

Watts' workout must have been pretty unimpressive if the Chefs chose to sign Rod Gardner instead.

[Bob's your Information Minister]

There is no way in hell our offense stinks it up two weeks in a row. It's to talanted for it to do that again. especially at home agains the chiefs D.

Too "talanted," huh? LOL

Did you even watch the Chiefs game? The only way Cincinatti moved the ball was via the no huddle offense. They were our bitches the rest of the time, rain or not.

[Clockwork Orange]

To be fair, we were without our starting right tackle. Black sucks.

You never run out of excuses, do you?

Don't worry, TrINT's injury gives you a built in excuse for your next loss at Invesco.

[Jens1893]

Rod Gardner? Was Freddie Mitchell unavailable?

Watts' workout must have been pretty unimpressive if the Chefs chose to sign Rod Gardner instead.

Koren Robinson probably rejected their offer ... he went to work with Brett Favre in GB instead.

[Clockwork Orange]

Too "talanted," huh? LOL

Did you even watch the Chiefs game? The only way Cincinatti moved the ball was via the no huddle offense. They were our b****es the rest of the time, rain or not.

Cincy's defense must really be something then. They made your offense their bitches all day.....on your home field.

[Bob's your Information Minister]

Cincy's defense must really be something then. They made your offense their b****es all day.....on your home field.

Cincinatti made some improvements on defense...I was impressed. They've got a nice defensive tackle rotation, and the new safeties made a difference.

Crow tastes like crap.

[Clockwork Orange]

Cincinatti made some improvements on defense...I was impressed. They've got a nice defensive tackle rotation, and the new safeties made a difference.

Crow tastes like crap.

Have a second helping since Rudi Johnson performed well despite you not being worried about him at all.

[Bob's your Information Minister]

Oh he had a couple of nice runs, but we contained him. Held him under 4 yards per carry. I'll take that any day.

[ZONA]

I'm holding back here some. I would be all over the Chiefs here normally but the last two real games my team has played haven't gone over to well. Our QB has 7 or 8 turnovers and I'm not going to sit here and say how great we are until I see some glimpse of better play from that position. The QB is the most important postion on the field and we might as well have started a High School player the past few games. Jake is just not playing good right now. The Cheifs can beat us easily if he has another game like yesterday.

[Bob's your Information Minister]

That's a good take, ZONA, and I am counting on it. We're going to have to win this game 17-14 or something along those lines.

[Houshmazode]

The Chiefs just signed Rod Gardner.

YOU'RE GOING DOWN!

The Quiefs lost at home. gtfo.

[MrPeepers]

Last year didn't watch the Miami game, we lose. This year, I don't watch the Rams game, we lose. I watch Chiefs games, and we win big.

[Florida_Bronco]

I don't see this being a loss, for what that is worth. Our defense will be able to tee off againt a Chiefs offense without TrInt and we could probably stack 8 in the box and shut LJ down. Expect us to come at Huard full force and rattle his cage early. Jake I'm not worried about. He had a bad game but so has everyone and he's bounced back before. We'll probably run right through KC like we always do.

If we can come out early and put them down by 2 touchdowns, they will be in major trouble and I doubt they will be able to dig themselves out of that hole.

[Frair Tang]

I almost feel sorry for the Chefs - they're facing a pissed off Broncos team playing in front of a pissed off home crowd that will have a pissed off Friar Tang hurling invective and insults at them from 20 rows up.

In addition, beyond the frustration your typical Bronco fan is feeling right now, I have teen-aged stepchildren. I have a LOT of pent-up anger and frustration to get rid of.

I may even get arrested...

[Pezman]

If ever this rivalry meant something special, last year was the golden year. This year just doesnt have that "kick their ass" feel like it has in the past few years. I'm sure come game time though, all I have to do is see that mustard and ketchup color scheme and I'll be fired up to kick their ass. Put me in coach!

Seriously, I wish we would play them later in the year at home. For whatever reason, the NFL never schedules us to play the Chokes in Denver in December anymore.

Heck, even the Mane vs CP just doesnt have that feel like it used to. Maybe its the splintering of factions over there with some going to Warpaint that seems to have changed it.

[Bob's your Information Minister]

We played you guys in December in 2003. We played you guys in December in 2002. You can't have every year.

[Pezman]

Bah, its more about playing division rivals later in the season when both teams are well into their campaigns. Then again...I'd just like to see us play in KC before the whole state turns to ice in December come to think of it.

[Bob's your Information Minister]

I hear ya. I, personally, like it this way. Makes for more drama.

[Billy Clyde Puckett]

My bet is Green WILL play Sunday....
KC does not have him OUT they have him Questionable.

It is all a SECRET plan to fool the Broncos Defense into preparing
for Huard. Then Trint comes out and magically moves the Cheaps down the field for a few easy TDs before Coyer can adjust the plan.

KC has to pull out ALL the stops because they know that they always LOSE in Denver.


Plan exposed....!!!! Denver 30 KC 17:wiggle:

Yea, but ESPN says he is still in the hospital and is out a minimum fo two weeks. If he is smart he retires before he ends up a vegetable.

[Sassy]

I almost feel sorry for the Chefs - they're facing a pissed off Broncos team playing in front of a pissed off home crowd that will have a pissed off Friar Tang hurling invective and insults at them from 20 rows up.

In addition, beyond the frustration your typical Bronco fan is feeling right now, I have teen-aged stepchildren. I have a LOT of pent-up anger and frustration to get rid of.

I may even get arrested...

You need to come to Meck's tailgate Friar!

[No1BroncoFan]

Heck, even the Mane vs CP just doesnt have that feel like it used to. Maybe its the splintering of factions over there with some going to Warpaint that seems to have changed it.
I think it's more simple than that. It's hard to have a rivalry with the Chiefs when they can't field a team that will at least challenge to break .500.

Ben

[Frair Tang]

You need to come to Meck's tailgate Friar!

Last year we had club level. On nice days, we partied in the Bronco Barn; when it was cruddy we partied at the bar or in one of the suites (I have low friends in high places). The suites actually suck, believe it or not. Most people are there to socialize. I like to be in the mix, down in the mosh pit, and scream my brains out. I usually lose my voice by the end of the game...

This year we changed our seats. Club level was nice, but ridiculously expensive, so we opted for east stands, 40 yard line, row 20. So the upshot is we're looking for a place for the pre-game warm-ups - where's Meck's tailgate?

[Bob's your Information Minister]

We were 10-6 last year.

[usedupbraids]

WE lost but it was a impresive lost, the rams made no TDs, but plummer needs to show up plus are running game

[usedupbraids]

We were 10-6 last year.

13-3 , plus playoff 14-4:kiss:

[Bob's your Information Minister]

Oh boy. My favorite Bronco fan. This guy makes Steve Sewell look smart.

[usedupbraids]

which Steve Sewell ??
this one?
http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/7193/1076941799cj6.jpg
or this one?
http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/4863/872794597ar2.jpg

[bpc]

We are going to be kicking ourself for awhile about giving this game away to St. Louis...

@NE, Baltimore, @Pitt, Indy, Seattle, @KC, Cincy, two games against SD and @Arizona... we better hope our division is not very good because we might have to take this baby at 11-5 or 10-6 at best.

[usedupbraids]

We are going to be kicking ourself for awhile about giving this game away to St. Louis...

@NE, Baltimore, @Pitt, Indy, Seattle, @KC, Cincy, two games against SD and @Arizona... we better hope our division is not very good because we might have to take this baby at 11-5 or 10-6 at best.

I agreee :kiss: :thumbs:

[Steve Sewell]

I almost feel sorry for the Chefs - they're facing a pissed off Broncos team playing in front of a pissed off home crowd that will have a pissed off Friar Tang hurling invective and insults at them from 20 rows up.

In addition, beyond the frustration your typical Bronco fan is feeling right now, I have teen-aged stepchildren. I have a LOT of pent-up anger and frustration to get rid of.

I may even get arrested...

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

[Steve Sewell]

Oh boy. My favorite Bronco fan. This guy makes Steve Sewell look smart.

You're just pissed because I posted a photo of your new "job"

[Steve Sewell]

Oh boy. My favorite Bronco fan. This guy makes Steve Sewell look smart.

Oh, and by the way...to anyone who doesn't know: Bobo is the ****ing idiot who accused me of calling his home because I know his real name. Bob, you are a total ****tard, that much is patently obvious. I'm just happy that you'll be gone come 1/1/07.

[Cito Pelon]

Mod's should change the title to "It's Cupcake Week."

[Bob's your Information Minister]

That's true. We're getting a break after facing the Bengals.

[Sassy]

Last year we had club level. On nice days, we partied in the Bronco Barn; when it was cruddy we partied at the bar or in one of the suites (I have low friends in high places). The suites actually suck, believe it or not. Most people are there to socialize. I like to be in the mix, down in the mosh pit, and scream my brains out. I usually lose my voice by the end of the game...

This year we changed our seats. Club level was nice, but ridiculously expensive, so we opted for east stands, 40 yard line, row 20. So the upshot is we're looking for a place for the pre-game warm-ups - where's Meck's tailgate?

I think this time it's in lot "MH" his private lot by the shed that he bought...otherwise RV Lot C. Look for OF1...it's a blast! We are sitting in Row 9, Section 129 in the SE Corner!!! :yayaya:

[Sassy]

(KFFL) The Associated Press reports Denver Broncos RB Tatum Bell will start the Week 2 game. RB Mike Bell will rotate in and whoever is performing better will receive the majority of carries.

[ludo21]

Tatum ran well and deserves the start.

Cant wait, 2 more crappy days, then the adventure starts!!!

[SureShot]

(KFFL) The Associated Press reports Denver Broncos RB Tatum Bell will start the Week 2 game. RB Mike Bell will rotate in and whoever is performing better will receive the majority of carries.

Why would Mike name a starter? That doesn't seem like him. I say start MBell, he has been unstoppable on the goaline.

[Kaylore]

It's not even fun. I feel too bad for Green and with their crappy O-line and LJ exposed as a product of a good offensive line, Green out, Shanahan pissed off- It's like it's not even fun.

At least Bob is puting on a good show.

[ClevelandBronco]

Forgive me, but I think it's absolutely disgusting that this thread was started by a rival poster and the members of this board are posting in it, AS IF THERE'S NOTHING WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE.

This is the first and last time you'll see my name in this pile of crap. I'll wait until a member of our board starts this thread.

Jeez.

[Bob's your Information Minister]

LJ exposed as a product of a good offensive line, Green

Whatever. LJ had 150 yards from scrimmage.

[ludo21]

Im not backing off my prediction of a tough game.

Chiefs aresnt going to just give up, its going to be a good game.

[Kaylore]

Im not backing off my prediction of a tough game.

Chiefs aresnt going to just give up, its going to be a good game.

They were better last year and we killed them. Imagine the same game except no Priest, no Tony Richardson and no Trent Green. Oh yeah, and we're really pissed off right now. The only way they win is if they spread out Plummer's suckiness throughout the whole game so that Cutler isn't put in.

[Bob's your Information Minister]

They were better last year and we killed them.

No way. No way. Last year we had Jordan Black playing LEFT tackle. And our defense was horrendous. And LJ wasn't even starting.

We're better this year. We will NOT lose by 20 points.

[Sassy]

They were better last year and we killed them. Imagine the same game except no Priest, no Tony Richardson and no Trent Green. Oh yeah, and we're really pissed off right now. The only way they win is if they spread out Plummer's suckiness throughout the whole game so that Cutler isn't put in.

That game was a blast last year wasn't it!
Now...where is that pic with the chalkboard that says "The Chiefs have never won at Invesco..." ;D

[SureShot]

We're better this year. We will NOT lose by 20 points.


You are right it will be 30.:strong:

[Kaylore]

No way. No way. Last year we had Jordan Black playing LEFT tackle. And our defense was horrendous. And LJ wasn't even starting.

We're better this year. We will NOT lose by 20 points.

Yeah, but LJ played that game and even fumbled the ball for us. Remember that Bailey left the game at the half with a torn Hamstring and Lenny Walls was our right corner.

Yeah, this is going to be a total ass whuppin'.

[Bob's your Information Minister]

BTW, Lenny Walls played great on Sunday. :D

[Kaylore]

BTW, Lenny Walls played great on Sunday. :D
....

[Sassy]

Good Karma!

http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a128/SSundheim/BroncoCountry.jpg

[Sassy]

http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a128/SSundheim/100_0273.jpg

[Sassy]

http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a128/SSundheim/100_0234.jpg

[Sassy]

http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a128/SSundheim/100_0270.jpg

[Florida_Bronco]

Why would Mike name a starter? That doesn't seem like him. I say start MBell, he has been unstoppable on the goaline.

Tatum played better on Sunday, he earned it. Mike will get his carries though.

[55CrushEm]

Tatum played better on Sunday, he earned it.

Not sure I agree......yeah, Tatum had more yards, but....

Mike Bell - 1 TD
Tatum Bell - 1 Fumble

[Tom A Hawk]

Last year didn't watch the Miami game, we lose. This year, I don't watch the Rams game, we lose. I watch Chiefs games, and we win big.

Mr. Peepers: please report to work on Sunday.....that is all!!

[Bob's your Information Minister]

Why is this off the front page!

[Garcia Bronco]

Bump

[azbroncfan]

The only time Cincy moved the ball on us was with the no-huddle.

Think Plummer can bust that out? ROFL!

KC let up some long runs early and the rain came and Cincy was running out the clock. Cincy knew KC couldn't move the ball with the ex U of W QB whatever his name is. What is your excuse why CroyletheNextMontana isn't the #2. Croyle can't hold Cutler's jock or Plummers for that matter. Chiefs are in a world of trouble with Green down.

[Bob's your Information Minister]

We gave up ONE long run in the second quarter. 22 yards.

And I really don't care about the rain.

[azbroncfan]

We gave up ONE long run in the second quarter. 22 yards.

And I really don't care about the rain.

Watson TD is a long run in the redzone. That game was over in the second Q. Cincy could of ran the score up but just wanted to get the hell out of the mulletville.

[Bob's your Information Minister]

It wasn't over. We were driving the ball before Trent went down.

[azbroncfan]

It wasn't over. We were driving the ball before Trent went down.

Yeah that's why the Bengals decided to Rush the ball 60% of the time when they had success through the air. They knew Huard couldn't move the ball.

[Bob's your Information Minister]

Just for future reference...BOB WAS RIGHT:

You guys always come out flat. Rams win.

And the funny thing is, you'll probably lose to the Rams anyway.

[broncofan2438]

There was horrible refs in that game and Rams didn't win we lost

[BroncoFiend]

Just for future reference...BOB WAS RIGHT:

Didn't you want to throw in your quotes about how there was no way the Chiefs would lose at home to the Bengals?

[crazyhorse]

Watson TD is a long run in the redzone. That game was over in the second Q. Cincy could of ran the score up but just wanted to get the hell out of the mulletville.

This statement is inaccurate.

Cincy struggled to move the ball throughout the game. When it was raining. When is wasn't. The weather was not indicative of success or failure. By the 4th quarter Cincy was 4 of 11 on 3rd down.

Carry on.

[Rock Chalk]

The defense did hold Rudy Johnson under 100 yards, held 85 out of the endzone, and kept a pretty good Bengal offense in check.

Considering Dante's fumble on the 14, int, fumble by huard and a shanked punt, giving Cinci offensive possessions on the Chiefs side of the 50....I think they did alright. They also looked alot better with Page at Safety instead of knight. Now if they'll just be smart enough to sit bell and play Fox.

Walls looked pretty good in his reps too...and like I predicted, he was on the outside, and did cover 85 some.

At this point, Denver hasn't proven that Plummint is anything to fear, and your running game has some work to do.

Actually.....alot of offenses looked like Ass in week 1.

161 yards rushing and our running game has some work to do?

Wow, high expectations for Denver's running game.

[Kaylore]

I just noticed that the Chiefs gave up five sacks. If it wasn't for the Raiders, the Chiefs would have the worst offensive line in the conference. I thought Turley was "the answer" to the loss of Roaf. Hilarious!

[Steve Sewell]

Question for Chiefs fans...Do you see Trent Green coming back this year? Or anytime soon for that matter? That was one of the more vicious helmet to ground impacts I've seen in 25 years of watching football. Are there any updates?

[Bob's your Information Minister]

I just noticed that the Chiefs gave up five sacks. If it wasn't for the Raiders, the Chiefs would have the worst offensive line in the conference. I thought Turley was "the answer" to the loss of Roaf. Hilarious!

We gave up seven sacks, dude. It was really bad.

And Turley played OK. The real problem is that bum Jordan Black. He's a guard, not a tackle. Sampson's hamstring injury was a stroke of horrible luck.

[Bob's your Information Minister]

Question for Chiefs fans...Do you see Trent Green coming back this year? Or anytime soon for that matter? That was one of the more vicious helmet to ground impacts I've seen in 25 years of watching football. Are there any updates?

I'm optimistic at this point, just because I don't even want to think about not seeing him play again. I think he'll be back for the 49er game, or the game after. We can probably beat the 49ers without him. God, I hope so. :pray:

[Steve Sewell]

We gave up seven sacks, dude. It was really bad.

And Turley played OK. The real problem is that bum Jordan Black. He's a guard, not a tackle. Sampson's hamstring injury was a stroke of horrible luck.

Is Sampson playing this week?

[Steve Sewell]

I'm optimistic at this point, just because I don't even want to think about not seeing him play again. I think he'll be back for the 49er game, or the game after. We can probably beat the 49ers without him. God, I hope so. :pray:

Well, if he doesn't, it's going to be a long year. I wanted the Chiefs at full strength so that it could be a fair fight for the division. At this point, it really isn't.

[Bob's your Information Minister]

Is Sampson playing this week?

I don't know. Probably not considering our luck. They ought to just throw Svitek out there. He was the best offensive lineman in NFL Europe this year. At least he has the feet to play OT.

[broncofan2438]

The Qweefs are scared

[Steve Sewell]

The Qweefs are scared

It's more like the Chiefs are "screwed". They have to go with Damon Huard for the next 3-4 weeks.

[Bob's your Information Minister]

Damon Huard relieved an injured Dan Marino in 2000 and led Miami to the playoffs.

I BELIEVE!

[brncs_fan]

Damon Huard relieved an injured Dan Marino in 2000 and led Miami to the playoffs.

I BELIEVE!

Don't Stop believing...

http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B0000026NF.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg

...you can still make .500

[brncs_fan]

p.s. we loose 45-5

[Florida_Bronco]

Damon Huard relieved an injured Dan Marino in 2000 and led Miami to the playoffs.

I BELIEVE!

Dan Marino retired in 1999

[400HZ]

Who cares about the game? You guys are playing for 2nd place anyways :yayaya:

http://www.chargers.com/assets/130/26315.jpg

[crawdad]

Yet no single game can tarnish the dazzling career of Dan Marino. His NFL-record career passing totals of 61,361 yards, 8,358 attempts, 4,967 completions, and 420 touchdowns may never be surpassed. His 13 seasons in which he threw for at least 3.000 yards is also a record. His total of 147 regular season games won is second only to John Elway’s 148. Marino finishes with 49 Dolphins team records (regular season and playoffs) and 24 NFL regular season records. There is no doubt in anyone’s mind, when Dan announces his retirement in early 2000, he leaves the game a winner.

[crawdad]

Says here that Huard only had 318 yards passing in 1 game in 2000. Maybe it was the five games he played in 1999 with 1200 plus yards. Anyway, he ain't the answer.

http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/playerStats?categoryId=70205

[Tredici]

Who cares about the game? You guys are playing for 2nd place anyways :yayaya:

http://www.chargers.com/assets/130/26315.jpg

You declare this after a week one bye?

;)

[Smiling Assassin27]

At least we lost to a good football team! :clown:

gee, i may be dreaming but i swear you called that 'good' football team 'soft' last week...LOL

[KipCorrington25]

The Charger fan comes out of the woodowork this week, I'm surprised it took this long.

[400HZ]

Ya the raiders are admitedly beyond pathetic, but KCs D would have let them score a few times and Flummer probably would have kept Oakland in the game...so where from where I'm sitting, San Diego is the best team in the AFCW right now.

[Sassy]

Ya the raiders are admitedly beyond pathetic, but KCs D would have let them score a few times and Flummer probably would have kept Oakland in the game...so where from where I'm sitting, San Diego is the best team in the AFCW right now.

Yeah you beat the crap out of the crappiest team in the league... big deal...I think we'll reserve our opinion on the Chargers for now. (At least until we see if you have a passing game with Rivers...)

[sirhcyennek81]

Ya the raiders are admitedly beyond pathetic, but KCs D would have let them score a few times and Flummer probably would have kept Oakland in the game...so where from where I'm sitting, San Diego is the best team in the AFCW right now.


Yeah. Good thing its January...oh wait...


:Broncos:

[loborugger]

The Qweefs are scared


Absolutely. Which is why Bob is about the only KC fan here this week. They know the drill.

Imagine if Jake went down instead of TrInt, and KC won by 25 points. KC fans would be coming outta the wood works.

But they didnt, and they arent. Bob is just about the sole representation, and unfortunately he is here for the duration, win, lose or draw. Hell, he would be here if the apocalypse was going outside his door and the rest of were running for the hills, saying, "where are all the Donkey fans, afraid to talk about their team?"

[400HZ]

Yeah you beat the crap out of the crappiest team in the league... big deal...I think we'll reserve our opinion on the Chargers for now. (At least until we see if you have a passing game with Rivers...)

Well, based on week 1, I'd take Rivers' numbers over Plummer's any day. So yes, from where I'm sitting, we're better off than you guys are right now.:welcome:

[Tom A Hawk]

That's right Bronco fans. It is time for your asses to get kicked up between your shoulders so that you will have to part your hair to crap.

When we get done kicking Bronco ass, we are then going to take all your women and have our way with them. They will probably want to leave you after that.

That felt so much better than making excuses about: "with Green out", "with Roaf gone" etc etc. woe is us.

[Rock Chalk]

Charger week might just be the most exciting week of the year unfortunately.

[maven]

Charger week might just be the most exciting week of the year unfortunately.

Most definately. They're the real threat to take the AFC West.

[Rohirrim]

Hilarious!

[Florida_Bronco]

Yet no single game can tarnish the dazzling career of Dan Marino. His NFL-record career passing totals of 61,361 yards, 8,358 attempts, 4,967 completions, and 420 touchdowns may never be surpassed. His 13 seasons in which he threw for at least 3.000 yards is also a record. His total of 147 regular season games won is second only to John Elway’s 148. Marino finishes with 49 Dolphins team records (regular season and playoffs) and 24 NFL regular season records. There is no doubt in anyone’s mind, when Dan announces his retirement in early 2000, he leaves the game a winner.

Yeah, he actually announced his retirement in 2000 after the 1999 season. 1999 was the last time he played.

[Jetmeck]

I can appreciate how Bronco fans feel confidence going into this week.

The Chiefs have a tough time beating Denver at home. The Chiefs have just lost thier QB who was struggling when he went down.

It's seems you've quickly forgotten that just over 24 hours ago you were b**** slapped to the tune of 6 scores by the....St Louis Rams. Your bravado is not unusual. However, if you get your butts kicked in your house by the QBless Chiefs it's gonna be tough sleddin' 'round here.

Chiefs will roll

Chiefs 24
Donks 10

Nobody got biatch slapped as you put. 5 turnovers and lost by just a td. Defense obviously played well. Plummer obviously was the problem. Most of the rest of the team showed up. The Chefs will be lucky to win 6 games this year.

[loborugger]

Hey dingdong, we already have a thread - and its top of the first page.

[Jetmeck]

Make no mistake. We're winning. This defense is for real. LJ owns you guys, and he's getting the rock this week.

I'll give you guys a little more credit than Crazyhorse.

Chiefs 24, Broncos 14.

One pick six by Ty Law.

idiot

[Iowanian]

What an intellectually stimulating and well thought out, football relevant retort. You're truely a value added comodity to the minge.

idiot

[Mediator12]

Well, based on week 1, I'd take Rivers' numbers over Plummer's any day. So yes, from where I'm sitting, we're better off than you guys are right now.:welcome:

Hilarious!

Yeah, there are two teams in the NFL you can throw the ball 11 times in a game and score 27 points. Fortunately, We still get to play OAK twice too ;D

[Iowanian]

It is Fun when the Dolt fans climb out of the woodwork. They're always strangely silent until after a W.

The Bolts are stout, but Phillips isn't as good at stopping the run, Rivers hasn't proven he can throw, and there should still be questions in the secondary.

A win against the Raiduhs is about as telling as beating the Chiefs with 3rd string OTs and Damon HuTard at QB.

[Jetmeck]

Too "talanted," huh? LOL

Did you even watch the Chiefs game? The only way Cincinatti moved the ball was via the no huddle offense. They were our b****es the rest of the time, rain or not.


Your defense gave up 23 points and your offensive line gave up how many sacks ? I lost count.

[smalltowngrll]

Hey dingdong, we already have a thread - and its top of the first page.


And you expect a chief's fan to read??

[Iowanian]

Yeah........I'm not feeling as confident.

Its possible that the Chiefs win, but Huard is not the threat the Green is in the passing game, which puts more pressure on the Line and running game.

If Jake will throw a couple of INTs and one of the Bell's is nice enough to contribute a fumble or two deep in donk territory, the Chiefs have a fighting chance.

If the Donks don't win this weekend, I think they're looking at 8-8.

[Jetmeck]

Whatever. LJ had 150 yards from scrimmage.

About 75 on the ground...........weak, especially for SUPERMAN.......Hilarious!

[Iowanian]

The defense did give up 23 points, to one of the top scoring offenses in the league, and with several possessions on their own side of the 45 and in. Given those circumstances, 23 points isn't a bad performance.

LJ ran the ball well, hard and patiently. Its going to affect rushing numbers when the team falls behind by 2 TDs in the 2nd quarter. Hrrr.

Contrary to popular belief, sometimes there is more to the story than the number, but I wouldn't expect you to comprehend that.

[Jetmeck]

No way. No way. Last year we had Jordan Black playing LEFT tackle. And our defense was horrendous. And LJ wasn't even starting.

We're better this year. We will NOT lose by 20 points.

How about by 24 ? Better yet a shutout............here you are running your piehole while your starting and only decent QB gets out of the hospital today. Your defense allowed 23 points and almost 100 to Rudi. That SIR is not
ANYTHING to brag about. STFU

[Iowanian]

How much $ are you willing to put up with the Chiefs and giving 24points? I'll take some of that action.

[Mountain Bronco]

If the Donks don't beat the sorry ARS Chiefs then there record will be more like 6-10, because the Chiefs are one of the easiest teams left on our schedule, besides the Faid and Niners.

[Jetmeck]

The defense did give up 23 points, to one of the top scoring offenses in the league, and with several possessions on their own side of the 45 and in. Given those circumstances, 23 points isn't a bad performance.


Contrary to popular belief, sometimes there is more to the story than the number, but I wouldn't expect you to comprehend that.

POT

KETTLE

BLACK

[mecklenburg77]

Bob who the F*$% is your back up? Don't matter we but 8-9 in the box blitz your ass all day and have a great week here on the Mane

[Iowanian]

Just Tap out already. You're embarrassing your board.

[Jetmeck]

How much $ are you willing to put up with the Chiefs and giving 24points? I'll take some of that action.

You I ASSUME expect Plummer to repeat his last Sunday's performance ?

24 is actually low. But I'll take whatever you feel comfortable parting with ? Given past history this is easy money.

[Iowanian]

How many points are you giving? You just said you'd do more than 24. If 24 is low, I assume you'll go 28?

[Jetmeck]

How many points are you giving? You just said you'd do more than 24. If 24 is low, I assume you'll go 28?

JUST TAP OUT ALREADY, you are embarassing yourself.

24 points is the bet and the payoff we don't see nor hear from you for a month ? Deal ?

[No1BroncoFan]

Yeah........I'm not feeling as confident.

Its possible that the Chiefs win, but Huard is not the threat the Green is in the passing game, which puts more pressure on the Line and running game.

If Jake will throw a couple of INTs and one of the Bell's is nice enough to contribute a fumble or two deep in donk territory, the Chiefs have a fighting chance.

If the Donks don't win this weekend, I think they're looking at 8-8.
If we can't beat the sorry assed Chiefs we're looking at 3-13.

Ben

[400HZ]

It is Fun when the Dolt fans climb out of the woodwork. They're always strangely silent until after a W.

The Bolts are stout, but Phillips isn't as good at stopping the run, Rivers hasn't proven he can throw, and there should still be questions in the secondary.

A win against the Raiduhs is about as telling as beating the Chiefs with 3rd string OTs and Damon HuTard at QB.


Phillips was being groomed as Foley's replacement anyways, so losing him mainly just hurts our depth. We're still stacked at LB though. As for Rivers...he did everything he was asked to do. The throws that he did make were dead on. He turned the ball over 4 fewer times than Flummer did. He managed the game well. Marty plays Martyball, and he's not going to throw 30 times if there's no reason to. Week 1 was about Rivers managing the game. I think he'll probably throw 15-20 passes against Tennessee next week. Week 4 against Baltimore you'll get to see him unleashed :D

Our secondary..well hard to say. McCree looked great. It wasn't really a test though cuz dumbass Art was trying to run deep route plays when Brooks only had about 3 seconds to throw. On the few passes Brooks got off though, our secondary was all over them. I'm confident that our secondary is improved over last year.:afro:

[Iowanian]

What are you putting up? You going to stay away for a month? I'll absolutely take the Chiefs +24.

If so, I'll take that action, if you can't cash enough foodstamps to back up that alligator mouth.

JUST TAP OUT ALREADY, you are embarassing yourself.

24 points is the bet and the payoff we don't see nor hear from you for a month ? Deal ?

[sirhcyennek81]

Our secondary..well hard to say. McCree looked great. It wasn't really a test though cuz dumbass Art was trying to run deep route plays when Brooks only had about 3 seconds to throw. On the few passes Brooks got off though, our secondary was all over them. I'm confident that our secondary is improved over last year.:afro:

...uhh...Or, it could be a sign the team you are playing cant stop the run. Or, that the team you played sucks. You made no real improvement in the secondary. Running the ball 41 + times was designed to protect a weak secondary from a pretty decent WR group. Also, its easy to have a QB look awesome when he only throws the football 11 times.

:Broncos:

[Iowanian]

*crickets*


So....Are you ready to cyber-shake on the bet you proposed jet?
I take the Chiefs +24 points.....If I lose, I make 1 post to acknowledge the L
and don't post here for 1 month....Chiefs win, or lose by less than 24....you are gone for 1 month.

[sirhcyennek81]

*crickets*


So....Are you ready to cyber-shake on the bet you proposed jet?
I take the Chiefs +24 points.....If I lose, I make 1 post to acknowledge the L
and don't post here for 1 month....Chiefs win, or lose by less than 24....you are gone for 1 month.

This bet sucks.

That is all. Hilarious!

:Broncos:

[Iowanian]

I don't know....I think Jet being gone for a month improves the place alot.
the collective IQ raises 5points.

[Florida_Bronco]

I gotta admit, 24 points is a pretty big margin. I wouldn't take that bet.

[Bob's your Information Minister]

OK. The injury report is out.

No Courtney Brown for Denver. Chiefs get Sampson back at right tackle, thank god.

http://img97.imageshack.us/img97/1310/22d4c5c60b2a41caaebbc5618b7cf9bcgif0ny9.gif (http://imageshack.us)

[OrangeShadow]

im glad walker isnt on the report his ankle must not be that bad

[crazyhorse]

Absolutely. Which is why Bob is about the only KC fan here this week. They know the drill.

Imagine if Jake went down instead of TrInt, and KC won by 25 points. KC fans would be coming outta the wood works.

But they didnt, and they arent. Bob is just about the sole representation, and unfortunately he is here for the duration, win, lose or draw. Hell, he would be here if the apocalypse was going outside his door and the rest of were running for the hills, saying, "where are all the Donkey fans, afraid to talk about their team?"

Hey, I'm here. I don't mind telling you the Donks sucked at least as bad as the Chiefs last week.

Besides, I've seen Chiefs fans here all week. You just kind of make it up as you go, huh? I can appreciate that. How else would you get through the ass whipping by St. Louis.:spit:

[Billy Clyde Puckett]

OK. The injury report is out.

No Courtney Brown for Denver. Chiefs get Sampson back at right tackle, thank god.

http://img97.imageshack.us/img97/1310/22d4c5c60b2a41caaebbc5618b7cf9bcgif0ny9.gif (http://imageshack.us)

So how did Hali hurt his azz? Did he get knocked on it too many times or did Quitterson catch him in the shower?

[Florida_Bronco]

Hey, I'm here. I don't mind telling you the Donks sucked at least as bad as the Chiefs last week.

Besides, I've seen Chiefs fans here all week. You just kind of make it up as you go, huh? I can appreciate that. How else would you get through the ass whipping by St. Louis.:spit:

Hey now, we definetly sucked in the passing game, but running, defense and special teams were all solid. Getting beat by 8 points is hardly an ass whooping though.

[Bob's your Information Minister]

So how did Hali hurt his azz? Did he get knocked on it too many times or did Quitterson catch him in the shower?

Hali hurt his ass jumping up and down with joy, knowing he faces George Foster this week.

[Florida_Bronco]

Hali hurt his ass jumping up and down with joy, knowing he faces George Foster this week.

I'll bet you that Hali does not beat George Foster for a single sack. Loser does not post for 1 week (7 days).

[crazyhorse]

Getting beat by 8 points is hardly an ass whooping though.

Perhaps. But getting beat 6 scores to 2 is getting your ass beat.

[OrangeShadow]

Perhaps. But getting beat 6 scores to 2 is getting your ass beat.

You keep saying 6 scores this 6 scores that. You make it sound like they gaveup 42 points. I know its purley how you interpret the word 'scores' but if you say 6 scores or 6 field goals which sounds worse? The defense played spectacular considering the offense they faced and the position jackass jake put them in(thats now my nickname for him).

[Florida_Bronco]

Perhaps. But getting beat 6 scores to 2 is getting your ass beat.

Not when it's 6 field goals.

[crazyhorse]

You keep saying 6 scores this 6 scores that. You make it sound like they gaveup 42 points. I know its purley how you interpret the word 'scores' but if you say 6 scores or 6 field goals which sounds worse? The defense played spectacular considering the offense they faced and the position jackass jake put them in(thats now my nickname for him).

You keep saying that stopping the StL offense is something special. They were one of the worst teams in the league in the red zone. And in the bottom half of the league in offense. A better team and it would not have been 6 field goals.

[Iowanian]

Jet is the one running his pickleholster and is the one that offered the bet, and 24 points. He needs to back it up by taking the wager he offered, or admit he's full of $hit, and tap out.


I gotta admit, 24 points is a pretty big margin. I wouldn't take that bet.

[Steve Sewell]

Yeah........I'm not feeling as confident.

Its possible that the Chiefs win, but Huard is not the threat the Green is in the passing game, which puts more pressure on the Line and running game.

If Jake will throw a couple of INTs and one of the Bell's is nice enough to contribute a fumble or two deep in donk territory, the Chiefs have a fighting chance.

If the Donks don't win this weekend, I think they're looking at 8-8.

I completely agree with this statement, believe it or not. If the Broncos win, we will still not know whether things are back on track or not, considering the Chiefs aren't playing with Green.

[Paladin]

Jeezus. Mullets trying to spin their way to a "win." What a bunch of losers.

Poor, poor mullets......

[Frair Tang]

Last year...

[Florida_Bronco]

Bob, will you take my bet?

[Bob's your Information Minister]

I have another "banned for a week" bet with 12th man, I believe.

[Florida_Bronco]

Find out and let me know.

[ROYC75]

IMHO, the only bet I can make is, we lose in Denver, again, without Trent.

[DenverBrit]

Perhaps. But getting beat 6 scores to 2 is getting your ass beat.


Too funny! Hilarious!

The Chiefs can only dream of having such good red zone defense....
... on the road against the best Home field QB of the last 3 years.

Anyone know when the Rams were last shut out of their own endzone at home?

[Bob's your Information Minister]

OK. It's not 12th man. It's youcandoit1687 (http://www.orangemane.com/BB/member.php?u=5424), although personally I can't tell a difference.

[TheDave]

Bob, will you take my bet?

Sure he will.... He won't pay up, but he'll be glad to take your bet Ha!

[Bob's your Information Minister]

I'll bet you that Hali does not beat George Foster for a single sack. Loser does not post for 1 week (7 days).

I will, however, take this bet. I don't see why the two are mutually exclusive.

[Florida_Bronco]

I will, however, take this bet. I don't see why the two are mutually exclusive.

What is the other bet you have, and what happens if you lose both?

[Bob's your Information Minister]

The other bet is which defense allows more yards.

If I lost both, I suppose that would be two weeks.

[DenverBrit]

The other bet is which defense allows more yards.

If I lost both, I suppose that would be two weeks.



Do you play 5 cent limit poker too?

Lot of posting for meaningless bets.

Pony up something we can all enjoy. :~ohyah!: :stirstir:

[Florida_Bronco]

The other bet is which defense allows more yards.

If I lost both, I suppose that would be two weeks.

Ok, here are the terms.

1) You agree to honor your bet regardless if others welch on their bets with you. This bet is between us and only us, no other factor can come into play. Of course, I will agree to do the same.

2) If Hali beats George Foster for a sack, I will not post for 1 week. If Hali can't beat Foster for a sack, you will not post for 1 week. Note that this deal is not valid if Hali beats someone else for a sack, he must beat Foster and only Foster.

Am I missing anything?

[Bob's your Information Minister]

You can't enjoy my absence?

[Bob's your Information Minister]

Ok, here are the terms.

1) You agree to honor your bet regardless if others welch on their bets with you. This bet is between us and only us, no other factor can come into play. Of course, I will agree to do the same.

2) If Hali beats George Foster for a sack, I will not post for 1 week. If Hali can't beat Foster for a sack, you will not post for 1 week. Note that this deal is not valid if Hali beats someone else for a sack, he must beat Foster and only Foster.

Am I missing anything?

Sounds good to me.

[Florida_Bronco]

Well I'm fine with that. So it's a bet?

*EDIT* I forgot that the loser may start 1 thread to acknowledge their temporary absence, but they may only post the thread, they cannot reply in it until after the ban is up.

[DenverBrit]

You can't enjoy my absence?

How can I miss you if you won't go away.

[400HZ]

...uhh...Or, it could be a sign the team you are playing cant stop the run. Or, that the team you played sucks. You made no real improvement in the secondary.
OK...that's pretty much what I said - Oakland sucks and couldn't stop the run - which has nothing to do with our secondary. Running the ball 41 + times was designed to protect a weak secondary from a pretty decent WR group.
That doesn't even make sense. We ran the ball to protect our secondary? Is that what you're trying to sputter out? How are they related? I don't think that's a coherent thought.

Also, its easy to have a QB look awesome when he only throws the football 11 times.
Whatever. Week one Rivers should more skill and poise than Plummer did. I know Oaklands D sucks...but St Louis is no steel curtain either.

[Paladin]

I am amazed at the number of Maners who actually post on this thread and in apparent respose to the mullets/trolls. To be honest, the mullets are absoulutely boring. There is nothing new here at all, and they say the same crap over and over again, as if they are trapped in a time warped recording of listless slogans and claptrap. This is especially true of the nut from Iowa, Boob, Crazy, and T. A. Hawk. I also think that Zack has a serious brain injury that keeps him from expressing a new idea ever.

Boorishness as trumped and practiced by the KC mullets hereon is so very, very old, and is the eqiuivalent of word pollution. There is not any great trick to copying stuff from other sites and pasting them here and claiming to be a "good poster." Boob is still a fat jackarse in the first magnitude of frumpiness, and has no (zero, zippo, nada, nil) interesting personality features. He writes like a moron.

I am amazed. Why even bother to "discuss" the upcoming game with these ninnys? They present idiotic stupidty masquerading as "cute" which only further degrades their poor, limited language skills.

Please do not feed the trolls, and please do not quote them. The idiocy is stupifying.

[Iowanian]

Sounds like Paladin needs to change her pad.

[Jetmeck]

*crickets*


So....Are you ready to cyber-shake on the bet you proposed jet?
I take the Chiefs +24 points.....If I lose, I make 1 post to acknowledge the L
and don't post here for 1 month....Chiefs win, or lose by less than 24....you are gone for 1 month.

What's with all this crickets crap ? Some of us have a life unlike you Chef homers who campout on an opponents board.

Your not exactly the sharpest tool in the shed, of course If
I lose I take a one month hiatus. As long as the Broncs put an ass whippin on your boys I am happy even if I lose my bet to you. I don't have an inferiority complex like you Chef fans who have to live on another team's board defending your team all day.

At least you have a pair unlike BOBO.

[Jetmeck]

Sure he will.... He won't pay up, but he'll be glad to take your bet Ha!


Exactly he won't honor anything like being banned.........

[Jetmeck]

I gotta admit, 24 points is a pretty big margin. I wouldn't take that bet.


Hell dipstick wanted more ! He's a real KC fan that one.
Now I just gotta find a way for Plummer to sit this sunday.....:wiggle:

[Jetmeck]

Hali hurt his ass jumping up and down with joy, knowing he faces George Foster this week.

Possibly, but at least the rest of OUR line is pretty solid.

[Jetmeck]

I completely agree with this statement, believe it or not. If the Broncos win, we will still not know whether things are back on track or not, considering the Chiefs aren't playing with Green.

Exactly, even beating a healthy Chief team in Denver would have not proven much as that is the norm anyway.

[No1BroncoFan]

I don't know....I think Jet being gone for a month improves the place alot.
the collective IQ raises 5points.
Yeah, but if you're gone it goes up 10.

Ben

[No1BroncoFan]

Perhaps. But getting beat 6 scores to 2 is getting your ass beat.
Last time I heard the NFL counts points, not scores. That's why two FG doesn't beat one TD.

18 points with the field position we gave them is a fvcking miracle.

Ben

[No1BroncoFan]

What's with all this crickets crap ? Some of us have a life unlike you Chef homers who campout on an opponents board.

Your not exactly the sharpest tool in the shed, of course If
I lose I take a one month hiatus. As long as the Broncs put an ass whippin on your boys I am happy even if I lose my bet to you. I don't have an inferiority complex like you Chef fans who have to live on another team's board defending your team all day.

At least you have a pair unlike BOBO.
It's a bad bet. If the Chiefs cover or win you have to leave for a month. If they fail to cover, Iowanker won't show his troll face around here for at least a month, bet or no bet.

Ben

[ak1971]

http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b37/ak1971/daintyhall8pa.jpg

[Sassy]

Hey Ak...you ready to get married? ;D

[crazyhorse]

Last time I heard the NFL counts points, not scores. That's why two FG doesn't beat one TD.

18 points with the field position we gave them is a fvcking miracle.

Ben

Absolutely. My intention wasn't to intimate that a field goal is the same as a TD. In many cases, the FG is the best case senario. As was the case with some of the Rams scores. My point was simply that ST.L had 6 or more opportunities to score on the Broncos defense. 6 times they were within scoring range. Whether that be a product of poor offensive play, or from poor defensive play the Rams as a team were in position. A better red zone team very well could have crossed the goal line at least a couple of times.

Given the Rams inability to score from the red zone in the past couple years, (especially last year) it is reasonable to assume that though the defense of the Broncos has been good at times, the offense of the Rams is a strong contributor to the reasoning behind not scoring a TD at least once or twice.

That said, I wont pretend that I saw the game. If you say it was all defense by the Broncos, I wont dispute it. I was using the same evaluation process that many here used to assess the Chiefs defensive performance against the Bengals.

I am just going on history. The Chiefs defense played pretty darn well against a good offensive football team. The score doesn't indicate that. The Chiefs history on defense would be a strong indicator that they gave up 23 points and therefore they played poorly.

For that reason, I conceed that I could be wrong in a sense. However, defense is not the only aspect of football.

Is it not true that the Rams played better defense? Is it not true that they played better on offense? Just because a team holds another to 6 field goals is not an indicator they weren't getting thier but kicked. It's simply an indicator that the Bronco defense was able to keep the score close enough to appear they weren't getting beat as bad as they really were.

In any event, the Chiefs should be good medicine for the Broncos and what happened last week. Not only is it tough enough to beat the Broncos in their home opener, but we have to do it without Green. I have little faith that will happen.

So if you want to say the Broncos did well, I can't hardly argue. However, 6 scores in a game is a lot reguardless of how it's done.

What were the total yards for the Rams? Were they able to move the ball at all, or was it just poor field position given up by the O?

[DenverBrit]

The defense did give up 23 points, to one of the top scoring offenses in the league, and with several possessions on their own side of the 45 and in. Given those circumstances, 23 points isn't a bad performance.

LJ ran the ball well, hard and patiently. Its going to affect rushing numbers when the team falls behind by 2 TDs in the 2nd quarter. Hrrr.

Contrary to popular belief, sometimes there is more to the story than the number, but I wouldn't expect you to comprehend that.

Have you tried explaining stats, and their place in the grand scheme, to your pal Clayton? He is often clueless.

[No1BroncoFan]

Absolutely. My intention wasn't to intimate that a field goal is the same as a TD. In many cases, the FG is the best case senario. As was the case with some of the Rams scores. My point was simply that ST.L had 6 or more opportunities to score on the Broncos defense. 6 times they were within scoring range. Whether that be a product of poor offensive play, or from poor defensive play the Rams as a team were in position. A better red zone team very well could have crossed the goal line at least a couple of times.
Holy chit, Batman. Crazyhorse brings an actuall football take instead of pure smak! ;D Seriously though, our offense turned the ball over five times, four of them resulting in the Rams taking over on our end of the field. 24 of their first 26 plays were in Bronco territory. They had two sustained drives that bolstered their numbers, but they also had a 1st and goal situation that led to a 44-yard missed FG thanks to our defense.
Given the Rams inability to score from the red zone in the past couple years, (especially last year) it is reasonable to assume that though the defense of the Broncos has been good at times, the offense of the Rams is a strong contributor to the reasoning behind not scoring a TD at least once or twice.
You could be right. The Rams are not known for their powerhouse red zone offense, still they had seven shots at a TD on our end of the field (1 missed FG after a goal to go situation) and no touchdowns. You'll be hard pressed to find another game with the same opportunities and the same result, regardless of the teams ability in the red zone.
That said, I wont pretend that I saw the game. If you say it was all defense by the Broncos, I wont dispute it. I was using the same evaluation process that many here used to assess the Chiefs defensive performance against the Bengals.
I'm certainly not going to say it was all defense by the Broncos, but I do think last year's team gets beat 26-10 (all else being equal).
I am just going on history. The Chiefs defense played pretty darn well against a good offensive football team. The score doesn't indicate that. The Chiefs history on defense would be a strong indicator that they gave up 23 points and therefore they played poorly.

For that reason, I conceed that I could be wrong in a sense. However, defense is not the only aspect of football.
Again, we gave them the ball inside our 50 four times. Even the weakest offenses can usually pull off at least one TD given that many chances, especially when one of those turnovers is inside the 10.
Is it not true that the Rams played better defense? Is it not true that they played better on offense? Just because a team holds another to 6 field goals is not an indicator they weren't getting thier but kicked. It's simply an indicator that the Bronco defense was able to keep the score close enough to appear they weren't getting beat as bad as they really were.
This was not a good game for me to judge the Rams defense. I'm not terribly familiar with them and the Broncos laid such a huge egg... Same with their offense. Seven trips inside the 35, six field goals, but the Broncos played better on defense than I've seen in a while.
In any event, the Chiefs should be good medicine for the Broncos and what happened last week. Not only is it tough enough to beat the Broncos in their home opener, but we have to do it without Green. I have little faith that will happen.
Indeed. With the retirement of Roaf, I didn't see the Chiefs stealing on at Invesco. With Green out, we'd have to give the game away, and beg you to take it. Any given Sunday not withstanding.
So if you want to say the Broncos did well, I can't hardly argue. However, 6 scores in a game is a lot reguardless of how it's done.

What were the total yards for the Rams? Were they able to move the ball at all, or was it just poor field position given up by the O?
Six scores were all they needed, so it was indeed a lot. Keep in mind though, four turnovers on our own end of the field, one at the four (which, oddly enough was the one they didn't score on, wide right). I don't remember exactly what the Rams total offense was, but it wasn't the circus act numbers they used to put up. All in all, the defense did their job (and then some), and the offense (primarily Jake Plummer) pissed it away.

Ben

[Iowanian]

SO...just to be clear YOU'RE giving me +24. If the Chiefs win, or lose by less than 25, you leave the mange for a month....4nfl weeks and If the Chiefs lose by 25 or more points, I'm gone for the same time period after making one post after the game.

Your statement about homers on other boards would be funnier, if YOURboard's owner didn't have 30k posts on chiefsplanet.

Your and Idiot.

What's with all this crickets crap ? Some of us have a life unlike you Chef homers who campout on an opponents board.

Your not exactly the sharpest tool in the shed, of course If
I lose I take a one month hiatus. As long as the Broncs put an ass whippin on your boys I am happy even if I lose my bet to you. I don't have an inferiority complex like you Chef fans who have to live on another team's board defending your team all day.

At least you have a pair unlike BOBO.

[NYBronc]

Saw this on <A HREF="http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=147728">CP. </A> LOL!

1. Joe Montana has 10 letters, and Damon Huard has 10 letters.

2. Joe went to Notre Dame, and Damon went to Washington, both colleges that are named after people or places that were around before 1800.

3. Joe arrived in Kansas City as a seasoned veteran, and Damon arrived in Kansas City as a seasoned veteran.

4. Until last week, neither Joe nor Damon had completed a pass in the NFL since the year 2000.

5. Joe had a teammate named named Eric (Wright) and Damon has a teammate named Eric (Hicks).

6. Joe won four Super Bowls, and Damon played for the Patriots, who have appeared in four Super Bowls.

7. Joe is right-handed, and Damon is right-handed.

8. Joe started his career in 1979, and Damon started his career in 1997, which is 1979 with the last two numbers reversed.

9. Joe was viewed as expendable by his old team, which thought they had a better quarterback available. Damon was also viewed as expendable by his old team, which thought they had a better quarterback available.

10. Joe led the Chiefs to an impressive win in Denver, and Damon will lead the Chiefs to an impressive win in Denver.


You have to admit, it's uncanny.

[Iowanian]

You've made alot of comment on my posts and what I will and won't do.

Being here since 2001....you've been here long enough to KNOW this statement is unadulterated, bull$h@t. I've been here before AND after EVERY Chiefs-Donk game since I joined. Anyone paying attention knows that. I've also honored every bet I've made.

If you and a few others reversed that cranial-rectal inversion, you'd see that you could have legitimate football discussion with opposing fans.


It's a bad bet. If the Chiefs cover or win you have to leave for a month. If they fail to cover, Iowanker won't show his troll face around here for at least a month, bet or no bet.

Ben

[No1BroncoFan]

You've made alot of comment on my posts and what I will and won't do.

Being here since 2001....you've been here long enough to KNOW this statement is unadulterated, bull$h@t. I've been here before AND after EVERY Chiefs-Donk game since I joined. Anyone paying attention knows that. I've also honored every bet I've made.

If you and a few others reversed that cranial-rectal inversion, you'd see that you could have legitimate football discussion with opposing fans.
And just a few posts back you were telling someone else it was time to change their pad...

Maybe I just supress whatever it is you have to say after a Chiefs loss to the Broncos because you're such an insufferable prick most of the time. You always talk about wanting to talk football, but you never seem to get around to it. You're too busy throwing personal attacks and generally acting like a douche. And don't give me your usual "self defense" bullsh*t either. I know better.

Piss off Iowanker.

Ben

[ROYC75]

I am amazed at the number of Maners who actually post on this thread and in apparent respose to the mullets/trolls. To be honest, the mullets are absoulutely boring. There is nothing new here at all, and they say the same crap over and over again, as if they are trapped in a time warped recording of listless slogans and claptrap. This is especially true of the nut from Iowa, Boob, Crazy, and T. A. Hawk. I also think that Zack has a serious brain injury that keeps him from expressing a new idea ever.

Boorishness as trumped and practiced by the KC mullets hereon is so very, very old, and is the eqiuivalent of word pollution. There is not any great trick to copying stuff from other sites and pasting them here and claiming to be a "good poster." Boob is still a fat jackarse in the first magnitude of frumpiness, and has no (zero, zippo, nada, nil) interesting personality features. He writes like a moron.

I am amazed. Why even bother to "discuss" the upcoming game with these ninnys? They present idiotic stupidty masquerading as "cute" which only further degrades their poor, limited language skills.

Please do not feed the trolls, and please do not quote them. The idiocy is stupifying.

Oh my, a little Midol does work wonders with some bitches, try some, it just might work for ya .:welcome:

[Paladin]

Oh my, a little Midol does work wonders with some b****es, try some, it just might work for ya .:welcome:


Eff you, punk: Nnyah! _i_O_i_ : chiefssux

[Arkie]

....as if they are trapped in a time warped recording of listless slogans and claptrap.

It's weird, man. I don't get it. They've won only three playoff games since their SB in '69. Many teams would have had to relocate due to fan failure, but the Chiefs' fans think they'll win the Super Bowl every offseason. That's why such a futile franchise is able to have dedicated fans.

[Kaylore]

Chiefs Suck.

:kcbard: :chefstink :manesmack

[ROYC75]

Eff you, punk: Nnyah! _i_O_i_ : chiefssux


:rofl: Did I make yur day ? :thanku:

[NYBronc]

It's weird, man. I don't get it. They've won only three playoff games since their SB in '69. Many teams would have had to relocate due to fan failure, but the Chiefs' fans think they'll win the Super Bowl every offseason. That's why such a futile franchise is able to have dedicated fans.

They're the Chicago Cubs of the NFL.

[ROYC75]

They're the Chicago Cubs of the NFL.

Sshhhhh ........ not too loud now, the Cubbies willya and debate it .

[Crushaholic]

Betting with any Chiefs fan besides El Bobbo and Crazyhorse is pretty stupid, IMO. Nobody else frequents the Mane like they do...

[Bob's your Information Minister]

Friday night and this thread is buried on page two! Shame on you guys!

Let's get some score predictions up in here!

Chiefs 20, Broncos 14

[Florida_Bronco]

My prediction...you will have a very lonely 2 weeks.

[usedupbraids]

why do people even like the Chiefs they stink. Last time they had a good QB when they had Joe Mantana and one of there best RB works for nfl network now so they stink http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/7455/montanatc9.jpg

[ORANGEJARHEAD]

The Kansas City Chiefs suck, they will always suck, & until they win a playoff game no Chiefs fan should talk any crap at all.

No Chiefs fan can say their fans are the best in the League. I went to a Chefs Broncos game in Arrowhead 1987, The stadium was'nt even half full. Broncos fans nearly outnumbered spleefs fans.

Where were you then Iowanker? You need to stick to watching Iowa vs Iowa St hump each other instead of saying you are a spleefs fan.

Here's a joke for you Iowanker, Why do the crows fly upside down over Iowa?
Cause there is nothing worth s**tting on.

What does Iowa really mean? Idiots Out Wandering Around.

What does A.I.D.s stand for? Another Iowegian Discovers Sex

[Bob's your Information Minister]

Who the **** is Joe Mantana?

[Bob's your Information Minister]

This thread needs an injection of adrenaline! Here's my stupid weekly column from yesterday!

Into The Belly Of The Beast

<table align="center" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="1" width="98%"><tbody><tr><td valign="top">You could not have accurately predicted the Bengals game if you had tried.
</td></tr> <tr> <td colspan="3">
Imagine someone told you before last Sunday that the Chiefs would hold the Bengals to 236 yards of total offense, keep Carson Palmer (http://scout.scout.com/a.z?s=115&p=8&c=1&nid=2462163) and Chad Johnson (http://scout.scout.com/a.z?s=115&p=8&c=1&nid=2462162) out of the endzone and hold Rudi Johnson (http://scout.scout.com/a.z?s=115&p=8&c=1&nid=2462158) to 3.4 yards per carry. Meanwhile, the Chiefs would gain 289 yards of total offense and hold the ball for almost 32 minutes.

You would have taken that, right? I know I would have.

But that’s the NFL. It’s ridiculously hard to predict what happens week to week. Even the experts get it wrong. Bang! ran a cartoon last week about how Chris Berman, Tom Jackson and all the other talking heads at ESPN were way off in their 2005 season predictions.

How many aberrations does week one contain? Everyone remembers the 31-0 stomping the Patriots took at the hands of the Bills to start 2003. New England went on to win the Super Bowl.

How about last week? Bears wide receiver Bernard Berrian (http://scout.scout.com/a.z?s=115&p=8&c=1&nid=2437861) caught a 49-yard touchdown pass. Think he’ll haul in many more of those this year?

The Seattle Seahawks scored nine points. Nine! Against the Detroit Lions! This is a complete shot in the dark, but I’m predicting the Seahawks will rebound and rank among the leaders in scoring offense again.

Brett Favre (http://scout.scout.com/a.z?s=115&p=8&c=1&nid=2431765) threw two interceptions on Sunday (OK, bad example). The Oakland Raiders were shut out – uh, nevermind.

Anyway, the point is, that week one is always full of aberrations.

Who’s to say that week two can’t contain a few?

The Chiefs are going to need one. They haven’t beaten the Broncos in Denver since 2000.

Invesco Field has literally been a house of horrors. In 2003, Clinton Portis (http://scout.scout.com/a.z?s=115&p=8&c=1&nid=2377027) ran for 218 yards and five touchdowns.

In 2004, the Chiefs let a midget run for 156 yards and three scores.

And last year? Last year, the Chiefs were flat-out dominated. The Broncos didn’t even need Vaseline.

So, yeah, the Chiefs haven’t been able to win in Denver. They’ve barely been able to show up. And with Damon Huard (http://scout.scout.com/a.z?s=115&p=8&c=1&nid=2459351) starting at quarterback this time, most of you probably figure the Chiefs have no chance to win this football game.

But the tide has to turn sometime. Paris Hilton and Tom Cruise will eventually be ignored by Americans (and return to their home planet). Gas prices will eventually return to normal. And yes, the Kansas City Chiefs will eventually win a game in Denver.

The Chiefs dominated the Oakland Raiders for years at Arrowhead (and away from it) during the 1990’s. But eventually, the Raiders won a game in Kansas City, even when the odds were against them. I don’t think I need to remind Chiefs fans of that game.

So I say, yes, the Chiefs CAN win in Denver. And here’s why.

1. Larry Johnson (http://scout.scout.com/a.z?s=115&p=8&c=1&nid=2475269) has never started a game in Denver. He’s ripped the Broncos twice at Arrowhead. What difference does it make where the game is played? Give Johnson the ball, and let him pound that defense into glue.

2. This is the best defense we’ve had in Kansas City since 1997. The Bengals couldn’t move the ball against Gunther Cunningham’s unit last week without the no-huddle. And what’s more, I watched a Rams defense with mediocre talent dominate Jake Plummer (http://scout.scout.com/a.z?s=115&p=8&c=1&nid=2475732) and the Broncos last week. There’s no doubt in my mind that the Chiefs coaching staff is capable of duplicating St. Louis’ gameplan, and there’s no doubt in my mind that the Chiefs have the talent to execute it. And let’s be honest. Plummer isn’t going to bust out the no-huddle offense on Sunday.

So there you have it. On the strength of the best running back in the NFL and a solid defense, the Chiefs are capable of beating the Denver Broncos this week.

As for the rest of the season, I have only one desire: Don’t wear the white jerseys at home again. Ever.
</td></tr> </tbody></table>

[ORANGEJARHEAD]

Larry Johnson might have a big day, BUT, K.C. is gonna have to throw it sometime, and without T. Green that is gonna be a big problem.

Lets get something else straight, the Rams defense did not dominate our offense in any way. Misscues, dropped passes, & not sticking with the running game made it look like the Rams D dominated. I was there, and I am a Shanahan fan, but they should have ran the ball a lot more, especially with the Broncos D keeping the Rams O out of the endzone & keeping the game close. All the turnovers did'nt help, but on a couple Plummer threw the ball into Double coverage, and one was tipped. I will give you this, the O-Line could have played better, but running the ball more would have kept the Rams D away from Plummer more, kept them honest.

I yelled all 2nd Half, RUN THE G*DD*MN BALL!!!!

BRONCOS RULE!!!!!!!!

[watermock]

Who the **** is Joe Mantana?

It's Tony Montoya and you don't forget that you cockaroachas.

http://images.movieeye.com/store/images/al-pacino-scarface-celebrity-photo.jpg

[ORANGEJARHEAD]

Hey Bob, any drooling imbecile, & everyone else for that matter could have predicted Cincy Destroying the Spleefs. For any fool to see, Herm Edwards is definately not the answer. If Dick friggin' Vermiel could't get those losers to a Super Bowl, Herm Edwards definatley won't. What was Herms playoff record in N.Y.? His record in the weak AFC east? Herm sucks, Spleefs suck.

Re-building since 1970.

[Bob's your Information Minister]

What was Herms playoff record in N.Y.?


Herm coached more playoff games in the history of the New York Jets than any other coach.

[MajikMan7]

after the Broncos dismantle the Chiefs, I wonder whats gonna be left of them. So it inspired me to do this.......

http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&videoid=1173047698

<embed src="http://lads.myspace.com/videos/vplayer.swf" flashvars="m=1173047698&type=video&cp=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="430" height="346"></embed><br>Get this video and more at <a href="http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&videoid=1173047698&n=2">MySpace.com</a>

[loborugger]

Herm coached more playoff games in the history of the New York Jets than any other coach.

Thats like saying, "she's the prettiest 5 toothed girl at the dance."