PDA

View Full Version : FO: Split on Denver Broncos (o/u 10)


El Minion
08-11-2006, 01:07 PM
Link (http://www.footballoutsiders.com/2006/08/11/ramblings/scramble/4091/)

Denver Broncos (o/u 10)
Bill: We’re getting up to the serious win totals here now. The most important thing for me when it comes to the 2006 Denver Broncos is that they’ll be facing, according to DVOA, the hardest schedule in pro football. Last year, a very good Chargers team couldn’t overcome that task on their way to a disappointing season. That being said, I think there’s some reason to think the Broncos will, in fact, be able to overcome that. First, I think the Chiefs are about to collapse, and the Raiders aren’t anything to write home about, either. If that’s the case, the Broncos’ schedule difficulty decreases some. Unlike the Chiefs, this isn’t a particularly old team, which makes me think there is some room for improvement upon last year. I’m not going to lie — I’m a little worried that Mike Shanahan’s geniusosity has gone haywire and he is trying to prove his infallibility to fantasy football fans by naming an undrafted rookie free agent as his starting running back, but he gets the benefit of the doubt at this point. A somewhat iffy Over.

Ian: Here’s the number of regular season wins for the Broncos over the last four seasons, beginning with 2002: nine, ten, ten, thirteen. Clearly the Broncos have been getting it done, thanks in part to the best home field advantage in all of football. But do they have what it takes to win eleven games this season? I’m not so sure.

Yes, Shanahan’s pulling another one of his motivational tricks to get Tatum Bell fired up, and it seems to be working. Rumor also has it that newly-acquired Javon Walker has been tearing it up in camp. And, thankfully, Denver realized that they shouldn’t be handing the ball off to Ron Dayne more than a couple of times a game. Eleven wins is not gonna happen though.

Gary Kubiak is gone. Off to become coach of the Texans, he leaves behind an offense that he steered to prominence. His balanced approach to moving the football helped numerous no-name running backs become first-round fantasy picks, and even helped Jake Plummer do a good job of leading the offense. Not that the offense will fall apart with him gone; he certainly leaves behind a legacy of success that won’t fall apart overnight. But watch out for Jake Plummer this season — I’m predicting that he returns to the Jake of Arizona past, and forces too many passes where they shouldn’t be thrown. Mike Shanahan won’t hesitate to mess with things and throw Jay Cutler in there, and then Denver can kiss an 11-win season goodbye. I’m taking the Under.

Kid A
08-11-2006, 01:15 PM
But watch out for Jake Plummer this season — I’m predicting that he returns to the Jake of Arizona past, and forces too many passes where they shouldn’t be thrown. Mike Shanahan won’t hesitate to mess with things and throw Jay Cutler in there, and then Denver can kiss an 11-win season goodbye. I’m taking the Under.

Ah, yes. The oft predicted "Jake Plummer will collapse into ARizona form" and the "There is no way Shanahan is patient enough to not start Cutler this season" picks. Given our schedule I would say we could be a much improved team this year and still not come close to last years record. I see 10-11 wins myself. Aside from the Colts, I don't see too many teams out there who should rack up 13+ wins in the AFC, so we should be in the playoffs with 10.

BroncoMan4ever
08-11-2006, 01:28 PM
Every year these guys say the running game is going to collapse, and that Jake is going to revert to the Arizona Jake. The truth is these guys have no idea wat they r talking about.
Truthfully Denver is a superior team to the team of last season, but i would not be surprised to see a drop in the wins column, but a very deep run into the playoffs and quite possibly a super bowl victory.
Denver this year is pissed, flying under the radar and want to take the opportunity they had last season. The NFL needs to watch out for them because Denver is going to hurt sum teams this year.

Also all these writers and announcers by midseason will b saying how great Denver is and will b telling how they have been saying all year that denver was for real.

TallyBronco
08-11-2006, 01:40 PM
I think we're on trajectory to be a better team than last year. But New England, Pittsburgh, Indianapolis, and Seattle as non-conference games? Ugh. That's to say nothing of Baltimore and Cincinnati, two inferior teams we've struggled against even in victory.

We're playing 4 of the 5 other playoff teams from last year. The silver lining is that the other non-conference teams had a 26-54 combined record last season.

BMF Bronco
08-11-2006, 02:13 PM
19-0

broncosteven
08-11-2006, 02:54 PM
New England is on way down, Manrino is a challange but their D looked weak & they don't have much depth, they will miss Edge. Pitt could be a win or a loss depending on any given sunday. I sure hope our Dline firms up.

Dagmar
08-11-2006, 03:05 PM
19-0
:thumbs:

DeusExManning
08-11-2006, 03:27 PM
23-0 including pre season.

DeusExManning
08-11-2006, 03:29 PM
I really think this will be good for us. We are facing the best teams throughout the season. Denver has always played up and down to their competition. There will not be as much of that this year. Plus, we will get a chance to see how these teams game plan us so going into post season we will have an advantage. It is almost impossible to beat Shanahan twice.