View Full Version : Make your Predictions...
listopencil
07-28-2006, 09:39 PM
What's going to be worse this year, our D-Line without Pryce or KC's O-Line without Roaf? And when we play each other will both lines just kind of slam together ineptly wondering what to do next?
Bob's your Information Minister
07-28-2006, 09:47 PM
The answer is Denver's defensive line.
The Chiefs still have the best interior offensive line in the NFL. Two pro-bowler's a vastly underrated center.
listopencil
07-28-2006, 09:56 PM
The answer is Denver's defensive line.
The Chiefs still have the best interior offensive line in the NFL. Two pro-bowler's a vastly underrated center.
That's an unusual opinion. Most of your fellow KC fans disagree with you:
http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=144506
Spider
07-28-2006, 09:58 PM
Damn Griese
Bob's your Information Minister
07-28-2006, 10:01 PM
That's an unusual opinion. [/url]
It's the right one. I mean...you guys have one good player and a bunch of average-at-best castoffs.
ward63
07-28-2006, 10:02 PM
Easily KC O-line, especially if Sheilds decides to call it a career too.
listopencil
07-28-2006, 10:10 PM
It's the right one. I mean...you guys have one good player and a bunch of average-at-best castoffs.
Until we actually play each other it's just a bunch of talking crap on the internet, but I think your O-Line is toast now. We cut Pryce. The team made the decision that they could do better without him. Roaf retired on you guys. KC desperately wanted him to stay but he told them he was retiring weeks ago. That should speak volumes to any impartial observer.
ludo21
07-28-2006, 10:12 PM
KC wont be near as efficient without Roaf.
Bob's your Information Minister
07-28-2006, 10:25 PM
I think your O-Line is toast now.
:rofl:
Yeah, we've got one the best interior lines in the league and maybe THE best between-the-tackles running back.
We're TOAST!!! ROFL!
listopencil
07-28-2006, 10:27 PM
:rofl:
Yeah, we've got one the best interior lines in the league and maybe THE best between-the-tackles running back.
We're TOAST!!! ROFL!
Do you honestly believe that Offensive Tackles have nothing to do with "Between-the-Tackles" plays? come on, I know you're not that stupid.
azbroncfan
07-28-2006, 10:27 PM
Easy because KC's line has been tops for awhile and only has room to go down and Denvers DL has been sh!t and only has room to go up.
listopencil
07-28-2006, 10:30 PM
:rofl:
Yeah, we've got one the best interior lines in the league and maybe THE best between-the-tackles running back.
We're TOAST!!! ROFL!
Not to mention that even LJ can't run through a D-Lineman.
Bob's your Information Minister
07-28-2006, 10:32 PM
Easy because KC's line has been tops for awhile and only has room to go down and Denvers DL has been sh!t and only has room to go up.
So...using your logic, Denver's defense is headed south and KC's is headed for glory?
azbroncfan
07-28-2006, 10:33 PM
So...using your logic, Denver's defense is headed south and KC's is headed for glory?
If that's how you want to take it.
Bob's your Information Minister
07-28-2006, 10:34 PM
I agree with you, anyway. KC will field the best defense in the division this year.
listopencil
07-28-2006, 10:36 PM
This is what I was referring to, gochiefs. I didn't expect much of a response from The Planet because it just happened and a bunch of people over there are freaked out about it but they agree with us so far:
Bob's your Information Minister
07-28-2006, 10:40 PM
Anyone with half a brain knows our offensive line outclasses your defensive line easily. It's simple math.
2 Pro Bowlers > 0
listopencil
07-28-2006, 10:50 PM
Anyone with half a brain knows our offensive line outclasses your defensive line easily. It's simple math.
2 Pro Bowlers > 0
If you want to get into math, it took five guys to make your O-Line hum. Two of them are now gone. It took four guys to make our D-Line go last year. One of them is gone. We split our games last year, 1 and 1. So, mathematically speaking:
1=1
3/4 > 3/5
You're toast.
OK. That last part wasn't math but I think you get the picture.
DenverBrit
07-28-2006, 10:51 PM
Anyone with half a brain knows our offensive line outclasses your defensive line easily. It's simple math.
2 Pro Bowlers > 0
That's the kind of dumbass statement I would would expect from someone with half a brain. So you're right.
Clockwork Orange
07-28-2006, 10:54 PM
I agree with you, anyway. KC will field the best defense in the division this year.
Cutting an pasting your lines from a year ago again? Weren't Surtain, Knight and Bell (combined with the almighty Gunther, of course) supposed to do that last year?
It's gonna be funny when reality jumps up and bites you on the ass.....again.:laugh:
Bob's your Information Minister
07-28-2006, 10:56 PM
There's more talent on the Chiefs offensive line. You can't refute that.
Hell, our DEFENSIVE line has more talent than your D-line. You guys are idiots.
Bob's your Information Minister
07-28-2006, 10:57 PM
Ty Law folks...Ty Law.
Don't act like you aren't scared. The hounds of hell are coming to Denver in week two. Shanahan better run the ball every play.
Clockwork Orange
07-28-2006, 11:00 PM
There's more talent on the Chiefs offensive line. You can't refute that.
Hell, our DEFENSIVE line has more talent than your D-line. You guys are idiots.
There's a lot less talent on your O-line this year than last. No Roaf, no Welbourne. Are you honestly expecting everyone to shiver at the thought of Black, Tait & Turley. That's funny.
As for your D-line, meh. The Broncos O-line had no trouble with them a year ago, especially Lepsis vs Allen. Man, that was a one-sided battle.
Clockwork Orange
07-28-2006, 11:04 PM
Ty Law folks...Ty Law.
Don't act like you aren't scared. The hounds of hell are coming to Denver in week two. Shanahan better run the ball every play.
Javon Walker kiddo....Javon Walker.
Congratulations on getting someone to cover opposing teams #1 receiver, though. Damn shame that Surtain wasn't that guy a year ago as you'd hoped. But wait, the Broncos have two #1 caliber receivers! I guess Surtain will have to be used in nickel coverage only, you know, when the Broncos put a third receiver on the field that he can handle. :laugh:
listopencil
07-28-2006, 11:06 PM
Don't act like you aren't scared. The hounds of hell are coming to Denver in week two. Shanahan better run the ball every play.
Oh, did you guys finally figure out the bootleg? I guess we'll have to come up with another play now.
Clockwork Orange
07-28-2006, 11:09 PM
Oh, did you guys finally figure out the bootleg? I guess we'll have to come up with another play now.
Figure out the bootleg? They can't even figure out when Bradlee Van Pelt is lining up at QB with Jake Plummer split out as a receiver. :rofl:
listopencil
07-28-2006, 11:10 PM
Figure out the bootleg? They can't even figure out when Bradlee Van Pelt is lining up at QB with Jake Plummer split out as a receiver. :rofl:
Well, in all honesty, that Jake Plummer is one shifty MoFo. I wonder if BVP could hit Plummer in stride? We may find out this year in KC.
listopencil
07-28-2006, 11:11 PM
Come to think of it...that's a great gameplan. When KC unleashes the hounds of hell we'll just whip out the unbeatable 2QB Set. Gets 'em every time.
Clockwork Orange
07-28-2006, 11:13 PM
Come to think of it...that's a great gameplan. When KC unleashes the hounds of hell we'll just whip out the unbeatable 2QB Set. Gets 'em every time.
Success rate for that set thus far: 100%. :thumbs:
DenverBrit
07-28-2006, 11:13 PM
Ty Law folks...Ty Law.
Don't act like you aren't scared. The hounds of hell are coming to Denver in week two. Shanahan better run the ball every play.
Hounds of hell? What happened to 'Be afwaid, be vewy afwaid'?
Whistling in the dark! :drown:
Bob's your Information Minister
07-28-2006, 11:13 PM
Javon Walker kiddo....Javon Walker.
Congratulations on getting someone to cover opposing teams #1 receiver, though. Damn shame that Surtain wasn't that guy a year ago as you'd hoped. But wait, the Broncos have two #1 caliber receivers! I guess Surtain will have to be used in nickel coverage only, you know, when the Broncos put a third receiver on the field that he can handle. :laugh:
That's a freaking joke, CO. I know you're smart enough to realize that Surtain and Law are a top five CB tandem.
Clockwork Orange
07-28-2006, 11:13 PM
Well, in all honesty, that Jake Plummer is one shifty MoFo. I wonder if BVP could hit Plummer in stride? We may find out this year in KC.
Well, they've got Ty Law to cover Plummer when he lines up out there now. :)
DenverBrit
07-28-2006, 11:16 PM
Figure out the bootleg? They can't even figure out when Bradlee Van Pelt is lining up at QB with Jake Plummer split out as a receiver. :rofl:
I wondered about that myself.
That was probably the 'dumbass' defensive play of the year. BVP strolled into the endzone. They were clueless.
They really thought he was going to pass? Hilarious!
Bob's your Information Minister
07-28-2006, 11:17 PM
Let me use Bronco-fan logic in my reply:
Who cares? We won!
Clockwork Orange
07-28-2006, 11:17 PM
That's a freaking joke, CO. I know you're smart enough to realize that Surtain and Law are a top five CB tandem.
I'm just remembering last year when I saw Surtain covering a lot of #2 receivers. That's all.
Besides, as I've said, this isn't Madden. They have to go out there and show that they're a top 5 combo. McAllister and Rolle were supposed to be the unbeatable duo last year and they weren't.
They'll get their chance in a little over a month to show what they've got. Their first couple of tests will be doozies with the likes of Chad Johnson, Housh(however you spell his name), Rod Smith and Javon Walker.
Clockwork Orange
07-28-2006, 11:18 PM
Let me use Bronco-fan logic in my reply:
Who cares? We won!
Now you're starting to get it. Good job. :thumbsup:
listopencil
07-28-2006, 11:18 PM
Well, they've got Ty Law to cover Plummer when he lines up out there now. :)
Aww ****. I guess we'll have to come up with two more plays now.