PDA

View Full Version : BushCo spurned offer of full cooperation from Iran in 2003


L.A. BRONCOS FAN
06-25-2006, 06:50 PM
This week an interesting story appeared in the Washington Post – buried on page 16, of course, lest anyone think it was of the slightest importance. It revealed that documentary proof has now emerged confirming the fact that in the spring of 2003, the Bush Regime – flush with its illusory "victory" in Iraq – spurned a wide-ranging peace feeler from Iran which offered "full cooperation" on every issue that the Bushists claim to be concerned about in regard to Tehran: "nuclear programs, acceptance of Israel and the termination of Iranian support for Palestinian militant groups."

The offer was made through the Swiss Embassy, which has served as the conduit for communication between Washington and Tehran since America's Peacock patsy, the Shah of Iran, was overthrown in 1979. The 2003 proposal included "full cooperation on nuclear safeguards, 'decisive action,' against terrorists, coordination in Iraq, ending 'material support' for Palestinian militias and accepting the Saudi initiative for a two-state solution in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict [which called for all Muslim states to recognize Israel]," the Post reports. The unprecedented initiative was approved by Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and then-President Mohammad Khatami – the moderate whose attempts at dialogue were mocked and undercut at every turn by the Bush Regime, helping to discredit the entire reformist movement in Iran and leading to Khatami's replacement by the militant hardliner Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

In other words, everything that George W. Bush says he wants from the Iranians now, he could have had for the asking – three years ago. What then can we conclude from the rejection of this extraordinary initiative? The answer is obvious: that the Bush Faction is not really interested in curbing nuclear proliferation or defusing the powder keg of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, and the regional and global terror that it spawns.

What are they interested in? This answer too is obvious, to anyone who's been paying the slightest attention to the Faction's words and actions over the years: they are interested in loot and dominion. What they want from Iran is nothing less than its return to quasi-colonial control by the crony conquistadors of the West. And they're willing to play a (reasonably) long game to get it.

In the meantime, it serves their interests well for the entire Middle East to seethe and boil. War and rumors of war are engines of limitless profits for the crony-cons. It sends oil prices sky-high and keeps those pork-laden contracts for weapons and "military servicing" rolling in. And the terrorism that thrives in this deliberately created chaos is another massive money-maker, as vast armies of "security consultants" ply their political connections to gobble up tons of insider grease. Bush Regime minions have led the way in this alchemical transmutation of fear into gold: more than 90 officials from the Department of Homeland Security have stampeded through the revolving door from government service to lucrative private posts with companies seeking – and getting – fat deals from, er, the Department of Homeland Security, the New York Times reports.

Continued: http://www.lewrockwell.com/floyd/floyd10.html

http://www.bartcop.com/hat-thugocracy.jpg

fdf
06-25-2006, 08:13 PM
Wow. What an opportunity we missed. Mullahs have never been know to dissemble.

So I guess Iran offering "full cooperation" would be even more credible than, say, Kim Jong Il offering to shut down his nukes program in the 80's or Ted Bundy converting to Christianity. At least noone fell for Bundy, unlike Madeline Allbright falling for Kim's scam.

Spider
06-25-2006, 08:38 PM
Wow. What an opportunity we missed. Mullahs have never been know to dissemble.

So I guess Iran offering "full cooperation" would be even more credible than, say, Kim Jong Il offering to shut down his nukes program in the 80's or Ted Bundy converting to Christianity. At least noone fell for Bundy, unlike Madeline Allbright falling for Kim's scam.
pass the Buck .......... But then Republicans are only good for 2 things .......
Blaming Clinton and his people ........ and Molesting Kids ,

TheDave
06-25-2006, 09:34 PM
Does this shock me... NO

Right it wouldn't suprise me to see a video of Bushii and the Devil shaking hands...

... well considering i don't believe in the Devil i guess it would...a little :devil:

BroncoBuff
06-26-2006, 06:42 AM
That was before Ahmadinejad was elected ...

footstepsfrom#27
06-26-2006, 08:03 AM
This week an interesting story appeared in the Washington Post – buried on page 16, of course, lest anyone think it was of the slightest importance. Continued: http://www.lewrockwell.com/floyd/floyd10.html

I'm a pure information geek. Show me the source. Who wrote it and who published it. What are they all about?. I checked out the Lew Rockwell website first...a libertarian view, then the author of the originall story to see who he is.

He is Dr. Trita Parsi, an Iranian-born Sweedish citizen with UN experience who also served as an advisor to Republican Congressman Rob Ney of Ohio and is an aknowledged authority on the middle east and Iran-US relations. His articles have appeared...among other places, in the Jerusalem Post. His organizational website is pretty tame, no cries for Jihaad, rants on the Great Satan, sword waving Mullahs...etc... http://www.niacouncil.org/index.asp but looking closer at two things, their mission statement and their board:

Mission Statement
The National Iranian American Council was established in 2001 for the purpose of:

*Serving as a catalyst for information sharing and collaboration among Iranian-American organizations.
*Providing an organized framework for effective networking and civic education for Iranian-Americans.
*Building bridges and strong alliances with other communities in a continuing union of friendship and constructive partnership
*Educating the American public on Iran's rich cultural heritage and the achievements and contributions of the Iranian American community

The objectives of the National Iranian American Council are to:

*Build an expanding network of Iranian-American organizations by offering services and activities that foster enhanced communication and cooperation.
*Encourage opportunities for the Iranian-American community to present its own image on its own terms by promoting art shows, television programs, and other forms of media directed at enhancing public awareness and education.
*Engage in capacity-building activities for Iranian-American organizations through information sharing, professional development, and the promotion of philanthropy among Iranian-Americans.
*Foster greater understanding between Iran and the United States by helping to enable Iranian-Americans to serve as a natural bridge between both peoples.

Board of Directors

Three PhD's, an aclaimed scientist, 2 financial services executives for Citigroup, a publisher, three philanthropical leaders, a doctor...looks like they're all US based, some born here. The advisory board is similiar...another batch of PhD's and business exectutives...all in all a very solid group.

So the bottom line...this looks like a pretty reputable source that produced this information. Another scandal...by next week we'll have forgotten this one and moved on to the next one...but file this away for when we go to war with Iran.

L.A. BRONCOS FAN
06-26-2006, 07:01 PM
I'm a pure information geek. Show me the source. Who wrote it and who published it. What are they all about?. I checked out the Lew Rockwell website first...a libertarian view, then the author of the originall story to see who he is.

He is Dr. Trita Parsi, an Iranian-born Sweedish citizen with UN experience who also served as an advisor to Republican Congressman Rob Ney of Ohio and is an aknowledged authority on the middle east and Iran-US relations. His articles have appeared...among other places, in the Jerusalem Post. His organizational website is pretty tame, no cries for Jihaad, rants on the Great Satan, sword waving Mullahs...etc... http://www.niacouncil.org/index.asp but looking closer at two things, their mission statement and their board:

Mission Statement
The National Iranian American Council was established in 2001 for the purpose of:

*Serving as a catalyst for information sharing and collaboration among Iranian-American organizations.
*Providing an organized framework for effective networking and civic education for Iranian-Americans.
*Building bridges and strong alliances with other communities in a continuing union of friendship and constructive partnership
*Educating the American public on Iran's rich cultural heritage and the achievements and contributions of the Iranian American community

The objectives of the National Iranian American Council are to:

*Build an expanding network of Iranian-American organizations by offering services and activities that foster enhanced communication and cooperation.
*Encourage opportunities for the Iranian-American community to present its own image on its own terms by promoting art shows, television programs, and other forms of media directed at enhancing public awareness and education.
*Engage in capacity-building activities for Iranian-American organizations through information sharing, professional development, and the promotion of philanthropy among Iranian-Americans.
*Foster greater understanding between Iran and the United States by helping to enable Iranian-Americans to serve as a natural bridge between both peoples.

Board of Directors

Three PhD's, an aclaimed scientist, 2 financial services executives for Citigroup, a publisher, three philanthropical leaders, a doctor...looks like they're all US based, some born here. The advisory board is similiar...another batch of PhD's and business exectutives...all in all a very solid group.

So the bottom line...this looks like a pretty reputable source that produced this information. Another scandal...by next week we'll have forgotten this one and moved on to the next one...but file this away for when we go to war with Iran.


Good research! :thumbsup:

...but file this away for when we go to war with Iran.

That would be the sane thing to do.

However, I have a bad feeling that the same flat-earthers (pardon the expression) who supported Bush's Iraq handjob will blindly cheerlead an attack on Iran - no matter how obvious the lies and propaganda used to justify such an attack and no matter what the consequences for America and the rest of the world.