PDA

View Full Version : mAnn Coulter hires white house lawyer .....


Spider
06-04-2006, 07:44 AM
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/search/content/local_news/epaper/2006/06/02/m2a_jose_col_0602.html
COULTER LINES UP A HEAVY HITTER

What? Ted Olson wasn't available?

Conservative pundit and best-selling political writer Ann Coulter has hired a white-glove, White House-connected law firm to fight allegations she voted illegally in February's Town of Palm Beach election.

And the attorney from the Miami-based Kenny Nachwalter firm is no stranger to Palm Beach voting. Marcos Jimenez — who was, along with the more famous Olson, one of the lead attorneys who fought for George W. Bush's side in the 2000 presidential election snafu here — was assigned to Coulter.

Jimenez, by the way, also knows a thing or two about criminals. Appointed by Bush as U.S. attorney for the southern district of Florida in 2002, Jimenez was charged with going after terrorists, drug dealers and wayward union bosses.

Jimenez returned to private practice last year.

"Mr. Jimenez asked us to send him all the correspondence we sent Ms. Coulter," deputy dlections chief Charmaine Kelly said.

A poll worker reported to his supervisors that he saw Coulter try to vote in the precinct closest to her Palm Beach home. But when she was told the address on her voter's registration was elsewhere, Coulter ran out instead of correcting it and ended up voting in a precinct that wasn't hers. Knowingly voting in the wrong precinct in Florida is a felony.

Elections Supervisor Arthur Anderson gave Coulter until April 30 to explain what happened, but she has yet to answer his registered letters. Now with Jimenez, Kelly said, officials will wait "a few more weeks" before starting a procedure that could strip Coulter of her right to vote here and refer the case to State Attorney Barry Krischer for possible prosecution.

Coulter couldn't be reached and Jimenez didn't return calls.

L.A. BRONCOS FAN
06-05-2006, 02:06 AM
Ha ha ha! :laugh:

I'm surprised the she-male didn't hire Rehab Rush's lawyer.

http://www.bartcop.com/war-monkeys.jpg

Bronco_Beerslug
06-05-2006, 06:59 AM
She advocates assassinating people who don't agree with her views so not too surprising.

defenseman
06-05-2006, 07:46 AM
Yeah, this is a good way to spend tax payer dollars. Voting in the wrong booth/precinct, however she is registered to cast a vote. Hmmm...smells of politics to be sure. Hang your hat on it if you like, a complete waste of time, it will drop of the radar soon enough..dman

Old Dude
06-05-2006, 08:34 AM
She'll buy her way out of it, or else call in a favor from Jeb.

defenseman
06-05-2006, 08:56 AM
She'll buy her way out of it, or else call in a favor from Jeb.

Whatever you say. They'll politicize this to the hilt, and spend hundreds of thousands of taxpayers dollars to do it.....c'mon, nobody including jeb bush will go near this. Voting in the wrong place? Well you gotta do what you are going to do, the taxpayers paying for it anyway..dman

Spider
06-05-2006, 01:24 PM
Whatever you say. They'll politicize this to the hilt, and spend hundreds of thousands of taxpayers dollars to do it.....c'mon, nobody including jeb bush will go near this. Voting in the wrong place? Well you gotta do what you are going to do, the taxpayers paying for it anyway..dman
you mean like 44 mill to find out Clinton got a hummer from a fat chick ? or is that different ?

defenseman
06-05-2006, 01:38 PM
you mean like 44 mill to find out Clinton got a hummer from a fat chick ? or is that different ?

Great point. And I totally agree with you. Ken Starr wasted alot of tax paper dollars on account of "politics" and our guys let him do it. Pissed me off just as much as it did you....trust me....he admitted it , that was enough for me..dman

Spider
06-05-2006, 01:57 PM
Great point. And I totally agree with you. Ken Starr wasted alot of tax paper dollars on account of "politics" and our guys let him do it. Pissed me off just as much as it did you....trust me....he admitted it , that was enough for me..dman
I thought Clinton warrented to be investigated , but over the Chinia getting nuke secerts , not a blow job ........ still cant figure that one out !!!!!!!!

defenseman
06-05-2006, 02:20 PM
I thought Clinton warrented to be investigated , but over the Chinia getting nuke secerts , not a blow job ........ still cant figure that one out !!!!!!!!

Agreed..whitewater got interesting, however they should have pulled the plug way before they did. The evidence and such was leading no one anywhere but to a waste of tax dollars..dman

Spider
06-05-2006, 02:50 PM
Agreed..whitewater got interesting, however they should have pulled the plug way before they did. The evidence and such was leading no one anywhere but to a waste of tax dollars..dman
;D see with me D or R doesnt matter , no one is above the law .......if an investigation is warrented , I will back it no matter who it is .......

L.A. BRONCOS FAN
06-05-2006, 03:37 PM
Hmmm...smells of politics to be sure.

That's your standard response when anyone with an 'R' after his or her name gets caught doing something improper or illegal, isn't it?

...it will drop of the radar soon enough..dman

"Move along, folks - nothing to see here." :pity:

defenseman
06-06-2006, 08:50 AM
That's your standard response when anyone with an 'R' after his or her name gets caught doing something improper or illegal, isn't it?



"Move along, folks - nothing to see here." :pity:

Glad you agree....dman

alkemical
06-06-2006, 08:54 AM
with the clinton BJ thing - i felt it was a distraction from what was really news.

defenseman
06-06-2006, 08:59 AM
with the clinton BJ thing - i felt it was a distraction from what was really news.

yep, minor blip on the radar screen. I will say, the fact that he did not come "clean" and lied about it bothered me much. Can't stand a liar. Stand up, roger up and take the gunfire. I would have thought ALOT more of him if he had just done that....dman

alkemical
06-06-2006, 09:17 AM
yep, minor blip on the radar screen. I will say, the fact that he did not come "clean" and lied about it bothered me much. Can't stand a liar. Stand up, roger up and take the gunfire. I would have thought ALOT more of him if he had just done that....dman


Dman, it was a distraction from the chinese incident (which clinton's admin was guilty, but US companies were also the ones dishing items to be sold as well) and the millenium copyright act, etc.

To me, it's all shakespeare. it's one big play.

defenseman
06-06-2006, 09:34 AM
Dman, it was a distraction from the chinese incident (which clinton's admin was guilty, but US companies were also the ones dishing items to be sold as well) and the millenium copyright act, etc.

To me, it's all shakespeare. it's one big play.

To a point. The chinese thing REALLY pissed me off. There should have been an investigation on that....dman

defenseman
06-06-2006, 09:36 AM
Word is , US has offered Iran "nuclear technology" to help them with their goal of energy production via nuclear power. My guess, this is possible, IF no enrichment, it stops dead in the water. In addition, Light water technology ONLY. Not heavy water, lots of nuclear "weapons" material is by product of heavy water reactors...dman

alkemical
06-06-2006, 09:38 AM
Word is , US has offered Iran "nuclear technology" to help them with their goal of energy production via nuclear power. My guess, this is possible, IF no enrichment, it stops dead in the water. In addition, Light water technology ONLY. Not heavy water, lots of nuclear "weapons" material is by product of heavy water reactors...dman


You mean like the reactors that Rumsfield's old company sold to N. Korea?

defenseman
06-06-2006, 09:46 AM
You mean like the reactors that Rumsfield's old company sold to N. Korea?

Didn't know about that. Interesting. Hopefully, they weren't heavy water reactors if it is true...dman

alkemical
06-06-2006, 10:09 AM
Didn't know about that. Interesting. Hopefully, they weren't heavy water reactors if it is true...dman


No, they were light water reactors. This is why i feel that N. Korea fell off the map....

alkemical
06-06-2006, 10:23 AM
Didn't know about that. Interesting. Hopefully, they weren't heavy water reactors if it is true...dman


Here ya go dman, here's at least 'one' link to it -

http://www.guardian.co.uk/korea/article/0,2763,952289,00.html

The two faces of Rumsfeld

2000: director of a company which wins $200m contract to sell nuclear reactors to North Korea
2002: declares North Korea a terrorist state, part of the axis of evil and a target for regime change

Donald Rumsfeld, the US defence secretary, sat on the board of a company which three years ago sold two light water nuclear reactors to North Korea - a country he now regards as part of the "axis of evil" and which has been targeted for regime change by Washington because of its efforts to build nuclear weapons.
Mr Rumsfeld was a non-executive director of ABB, a European engineering giant based in Zurich, when it won a $200m (£125m) contract to provide the design and key components for the reactors. The current defence secretary sat on the board from 1990 to 2001, earning $190,000 a year. He left to join the Bush administration.

The reactor deal was part of President Bill Clinton's policy of persuading the North Korean regime to positively engage with the west.
The sale of the nuclear technology was a high-profile contract. ABB's then chief executive, Goran Lindahl, visited North Korea in November 1999 to announce ABB's "wide-ranging, long-term cooperation agreement" with the communist government.


(again, see my point on there aren't two parties - just one big party and "WE" are paying for it)

defenseman
06-06-2006, 10:32 AM
Here ya go dman, here's at least 'one' link to it -

http://www.guardian.co.uk/korea/article/0,2763,952289,00.html

The two faces of Rumsfeld

2000: director of a company which wins $200m contract to sell nuclear reactors to North Korea
2002: declares North Korea a terrorist state, part of the axis of evil and a target for regime change

Donald Rumsfeld, the US defence secretary, sat on the board of a company which three years ago sold two light water nuclear reactors to North Korea - a country he now regards as part of the "axis of evil" and which has been targeted for regime change by Washington because of its efforts to build nuclear weapons.
Mr Rumsfeld was a non-executive director of ABB, a European engineering giant based in Zurich, when it won a $200m (£125m) contract to provide the design and key components for the reactors. The current defence secretary sat on the board from 1990 to 2001, earning $190,000 a year. He left to join the Bush administration.

The reactor deal was part of President Bill Clinton's policy of persuading the North Korean regime to positively engage with the west.
The sale of the nuclear technology was a high-profile contract. ABB's then chief executive, Goran Lindahl, visited North Korea in November 1999 to announce ABB's "wide-ranging, long-term cooperation agreement" with the communist government.


(again, see my point on there aren't two parties - just one big party and "WE" are paying for it)

Good information. I'll do my homework on this one. the thing is, LWR's yeah you can get material from them but it is much more difficult and doesn't necessarily meet the "standard" for nuclear bombs so to speak. Heavy waters definitely produce the right stuff for nukes. I honestly was not aware of this, and if true, yeah it bothers me, on BOTH parties parts. Then again, we are offering Nuke tech. to Iran right now, my only question "will they stop enrichment"? N. Korea's flip / flop after the fact is a good example why you can't trust these regimes to "standdown" from WMD attempted production and posturing. Scary stuff these days...dman

alkemical
06-06-2006, 10:36 AM
Good information. I'll do my homework on this one. the thing is, LWR's yeah you can get material from them but it is much more difficult and doesn't necessarily meet the "standard" for nuclear bombs so to speak. Heavy waters definitely produce the right stuff for nukes. I honestly was not aware of this, and if true, yeah it bothers me, on BOTH parties parts. Then again, we are offering Nuke tech. to Iran right now, my only question "will they stop enrichment"? N. Korea's flip / flop after the fact is a good example why you can't trust these regimes to "standdown" from WMD attempted production and posturing. Scary stuff these days...dman


yah Dman, i hear ya - but american companies make big bucks selling tech and equipment to 'evil people'. Look at the US companies that supported hitler, saddam, etc. That's why i laugh at the whole WMD thing, we knew what was there. From our continued sorties over the no fly zone, to our own companies selling them goods.... we knew what was there.

defenseman
06-06-2006, 10:47 AM
yah Dman, i hear ya - but american companies make big bucks selling tech and equipment to 'evil people'. Look at the US companies that supported hitler, saddam, etc. That's why i laugh at the whole WMD thing, we knew what was there. From our continued sorties over the no fly zone, to our own companies selling them goods.... we knew what was there.

Knowing what is there, assumes that you know what isn't there. I honestly think our intell in that part of the world is partially reliable at best. The ME folks can carry on the "disinformation" angle just as good as anyone else in the world. Human intelligence needs to become more efficient for my blood..dman

alkemical
06-06-2006, 10:51 AM
Knowing what is there, assumes that you know what isn't there. I honestly think our intell in that part of the world is partially reliable at best. The ME folks can carry on the "disinformation" angle just as good as anyone else in the world. Human intelligence needs to become more efficient for my blood..dman


These guys should help us out Dman:


Key: A - nuclear K - chemical B - biological R - rockets (missiles)

1. Honeywell (R,K) 2. Spektra Physics (K) 3. Semetex (R) 4. TI Coating (A,K) 5. UNISYS (A,K) 6. Sperry Corp. (R,K) 7. Tektronix (R,A) 8. Rockwell )(K) 9. Leybold Vacuum Systems (A) 10. Finnigan-MAT-U.S. (A) 11. Hewlett Packard (A.R,K) 12. Dupont (A) 13. Eastman Kodak (R) 14. American Type Culture Collection (B) 15. Alcolac International (C) 16. Consarc (A) 17. Carl Zeis -US (K) 18. Cerberus (LTD) (A) 19. Electronic Associates (R) 20. International Computer Systems 21. Bechtel (K) 22. EZ Logic Data Systems,Inc. (R) 23. Canberra Industries Inc. (A) 24. Axel Electronics Inc. (A)

This list doesn't include governmental and quasi-governmental agencies that gave technology to Iraq, including the Pentagon, Lawrence Livermore Laboratories, Sandia Labs, Los Alamos, and the Centers for Disease Control.

(source: http://eatthestate.org/07-09/ListCompaniesSold.htm - but you can find this anywhere)

defenseman
06-06-2006, 01:05 PM
These guys should help us out Dman:


Key: A - nuclear K - chemical B - biological R - rockets (missiles)

1. Honeywell (R,K) 2. Spektra Physics (K) 3. Semetex (R) 4. TI Coating (A,K) 5. UNISYS (A,K) 6. Sperry Corp. (R,K) 7. Tektronix (R,A) 8. Rockwell )(K) 9. Leybold Vacuum Systems (A) 10. Finnigan-MAT-U.S. (A) 11. Hewlett Packard (A.R,K) 12. Dupont (A) 13. Eastman Kodak (R) 14. American Type Culture Collection (B) 15. Alcolac International (C) 16. Consarc (A) 17. Carl Zeis -US (K) 18. Cerberus (LTD) (A) 19. Electronic Associates (R) 20. International Computer Systems 21. Bechtel (K) 22. EZ Logic Data Systems,Inc. (R) 23. Canberra Industries Inc. (A) 24. Axel Electronics Inc. (A)

This list doesn't include governmental and quasi-governmental agencies that gave technology to Iraq, including the Pentagon, Lawrence Livermore Laboratories, Sandia Labs, Los Alamos, and the Centers for Disease Control.

(source: http://eatthestate.org/07-09/ListCompaniesSold.htm - but you can find this anywhere)

Seems to me, many answers may lie with these corporations/businesses. If this is truley the case, we should have already scowered through their collective data..dman

alkemical
06-06-2006, 01:08 PM
that's my point dman

defenseman
06-06-2006, 01:21 PM
that's my point dman

Well thats a good point. If we did canvass the info, did we do it correctly? Was an underlying theme to "protect" in some cases? Alot of answers should have been there for the taking, assuming we did the business of acquiring the information correctly? Very suspect in retrospect...dman

*One other question, WHEN did this research occur? Who performed it? What was the QA/QC ensuring it was done correctly? Lots of questions come to think of it...

alkemical
06-06-2006, 01:35 PM
agreed

Mile High Shack
06-06-2006, 01:58 PM
she's insane
I saw her on the today show b4 I went to work

she is literally insane

L.A. BRONCOS FAN
06-06-2006, 02:52 PM
she's insane
I saw her on the today show b4 I went to work

she is literally insane

Yep.

But being insane is practically a prerequisite for any supporter of this administration. :crazy:

Mile High Shack
06-06-2006, 02:55 PM
Yep.

But being insane is practically a prerequisite for any supporter of this administration. :crazy:

I voted for Bush, but I'm not naive to not understand why his poll #'s are so low
Matt Lauer asked her why they were she said
ummmmm.....immigration

that was the only reason why

Iraq was not the reason, nor soaring gas prices

but immigration

I mean c'mon, I appreciate a good spin doctor, but at least try to make it believeable

alkemical
06-06-2006, 03:04 PM
My only concern, is we had the push for extreme 'liberalism' (lack of better word/term) with clinton, we have the push for extreme 'conservatism' (lack of better word/term) - my only question or concern is:

What option is the establishment going to give us next?

L.A. BRONCOS FAN
06-06-2006, 03:10 PM
I voted for Bush, but I'm not naive to not understand why his poll #'s are so low
Matt Lauer asked her why they were she said
ummmmm.....immigration

that was the only reason why

Iraq was not the reason, nor soaring gas prices

but immigration

I mean c'mon, I appreciate a good spin doctor, but at least try to make it believeable

Word! :thumbs:

It's refreshing to see someone who voted for Bush who is honest enough to say this.

TheDave
06-06-2006, 04:00 PM
My only concern, is we had the push for extreme 'liberalism' (lack of better word/term) with clinton, we have the push for extreme 'conservatism' (lack of better word/term) - my only question or concern is:

What option is the establishment going to give us next?

Where's that picture of extreme jesus when you need it Ha!

L.A. BRONCOS FAN
06-06-2006, 11:07 PM
Where's that picture of extreme jesus when you need it Ha!

You rang? :D

http://www.bartcop.com/xtreme-Jesus.jpg