O'Reilly slam dunked by Olbermann again [Archive] - The Orange Mane

View Full Version : O'Reilly slam dunked by Olbermann again

gunns

06-03-2006, 10:14 AM

If you click on the link and scroll down you can listen to Olbermann slam Sideshow Bill or the transcript is below.

http://www.crooksandliars.com/2006/06/01.html#a8537

Olbermann on O'Reilly and Wesley Clark transcript

Abraham Lincoln did not shoot John Wilkes Booth...

"Titanic" did not sink a North Atlantic iceberg...

And Fox News is neither fair nor balanced.

These are simple historical facts -- intelligible to all adults, most children, and some of your more discerning domesticated animals.

But not, as the third story on the Countdown proves yet again... not to Billo.

The guilty pleasure offered by the existence of Bill O'Reilly is simple, and understandable.

99 times out of a hundred when we belly up to the Billo bar of bluster... nearly every time we partake of the movable Falafel Feast, he serves us nothing but comedy.

Farce, slapstick, unconscious self-mutilation -- the Sideshow Bob of commentators, forever stepping on the same rake, forever muttering the same grunt of inarticulate surrender, forever resuming the circle that will take him back to the same rake. The Sisyphus of morons, if you will.

But **this** is the 100th time **out** of 100.

It is not funny at all.

Bill O'Reilly has -- for the second time in just under eight months -- slandered at least 84 dead American servicemen. He has turned them, **again**, from victims of the kind of atrocity our country has always fought, into **perpetrators** of that kind of atrocity. He has made these Americans... into War Criminals.

They are dead - and **have** been, for 61 years. They cannot defend themselves against O'Reilly. We will have to do it for them.

Last October, O'Reilly railed against a ruling that more photos from the infamous Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq might be released.

His guest was Wesley Clark.

Clark is a retired four-star General; was, for four years, the Supreme Allied Commander of NATO in Europe, first in his class at West Point, wounded in Vietnam, earned the Bronze Star and the Silver Star, and has streets named for him in Alabama, and **Kosovo**.

Therefore, naturally, **O'Reilly** knows much more about the military than General Clark does.

Clark defended the release of the additional Abu Ghraib photos, saying we needed to know what happened, and to correct it.

O'Reilly **lectured** him, and concluded that there had always been atrocities, even by Americans, in war.

It was a remarkable mistake.

The Belgian town of Malmedy **did** lend its name to one of the most appalling battlefield War Crimes of the 20th Century, but O'Reilly's implication that the **Americans** committed it, was entirely backwards.

Americans - most of them, members of Battery B of the 285th Field Artillery Observation Battalion - surrendered to **German** Panzer troops - and were then shot by their captors from the S.S.

Yet O'Reilly had implied that **the Americans** had massacred this Germans in this one stark moment of the Battle of the Bulge. And he used this Alice-Through-The-Looking-Glass view of history to somehow rationalize Abu Ghraib -- while trying to dress down a four-star American general.

Still. It could've been a mistake.

We make them -- even historians do.

O'Reilly had not explicitly **called** the Americans the war criminals at Malmedy.

Our troops too were **accused** of crimes against prisoners in the second World War.

It was assumed he had simply made a foolish error. And, though he got beaten up appropriately in some places, it was largely dismissed as merely that -- a mistake.

Then came this Tuesday night.

Again O'Reilly's guest was General Wes Clark.

This time the topic was the apparent murder of Iraqi civilians at Hadeetha.

That O'Reilly was **dismissive** of the event, should be no surprise.

That he should have described as the **real** crime of Iraq, the events of Abu Ghraib, should be no surprise to those who know of his willingness to jettison his most important beliefs of yesterday, for the expediencies of today.

But that he should have brought up Malmedy -- **again** -- that **was** a surprise.

Thus was the full **depth** of Bill O'Reilly's insult to the American dead of World War Two made clear.

The mistake of last October was not some innocent slip, nor misremembered history.

This was the way O'Reilly understood it, and thus, this way -- it **had** to be.

No errors corrected, no apologies offered, no stopping the relentless tide of bull even briefly enough to check one fact.

The facts **of Malmedy** are terrifying.
As described by Michael Reynolds in his painstakingly detailed article from a 2003 issue of "World War 2 Magazine," one week before Christmas, 1944, 139 U.S. soldiers, most of them from the 285th Field Artillery, encountered the "Kampf-gruppe Peiper," the leading formation of the German 1st S.S. Panzer Division, one of only two German units which actually carried Adolf Hitler's **name.**

The Americans were over-run. Eleven of the 139 Americans were killed in the very short **battle** of Malmedy.

Two more were killed as they tried to flee.

Seven escaped.

Six became Prisoners of War.

The other 113 Americans - nearly all of whom had surrendered outright -- were ordered to assemble in an open field next to a restaurant, the Café Bodarwe'.

What happened next has been attributed to many things: a cold-blooded decision by the Panzer unit Commander -- Colonel Joachim Peiper -- that he could not handle prisoners, or an unjustifiable over-reaction to some kind of escape attempt, or simply... horrible mass murder.

Within fifteen minutes, the S.S. Colonel or someone directly under him, had ordered his men to **shoot** the unarmed American POW's.

The bodies at Malmedy were not found until a month later. There were 84 of them, all, American soldiers.

More than half showed gunshot wounds to their heads. Six had received fatal **blows** to the head.

Nine were found with their arms still raised **above** their heads.

The fact that O'Reilly got these horrible facts completely backwards -- twice -- offended even his own usually compliant viewers.

From his program **Wednesday** night...

Wrong answer.

When you're **that** wrong -- when you're defending Nazi War Criminals and pinning their crimes on Americans, and you get **caught** doing so -- **twice** -- you're supposed to say 'I'm sorry, I was wrong'... and then you should shut up for a long time.

Instead, Fox **washed** its transcript of O'Reilly's remarks Tuesday -- its website claims O'Reilly said "In **Normandy**..." when in fact he said "In **Malmedy**..."

The rewriting of past reporting -- worthy of Orwell -- has now carried over into such on-line transcription services as Burrell's and Factiva.

Whatever did or did not happen **later**, in supposed or actual retribution... the victims at Malmedy, were **Americans**, gunned down while surrendering -- by **Nazis** in 1944 -- and again, Tuesday Night and Wednesday Night -- by a false patriot who would rather be loud than right.

"In Malmedy, as you know" Bill O'Reilly **said** Tuesday night, in some indecipherable attempt to defend the events of Hadeetha, "U.S. forces captured S.S. forces who had their hands in the air and were unarmed and they shot them dead, you know that. That's on the record. And documented."

The victims at Malmedy in December, 1944... were Americans. **Americans** with their hands in the air. **Americans** who were unarmed. That's on the record. And documented.

And their memory deserves better than Bill O'Reilly.

We **all** do.

Spider

06-03-2006, 11:16 AM

Letterman told O'Rielly right there on his show ..... 60% of everything you say is crap ......

Hogan11

06-03-2006, 11:32 AM

It's no big challenge for anyone to slap that fool around.

Why anyone outside O'Rielly's churlish personality cult would care one iota about anything he has to say is totally mystifying.

spdirty

06-03-2006, 11:59 AM

Letterman told O'Rielly right there on his show ..... 60% of everything you say is crap ......

Actually, a better paraphrase of it is "Im not exactly smart enough to understand everything you were saying but I'm pretty sure that 60% of what you say is crap."

DBruleU

06-03-2006, 12:17 PM

Actually, a better paraphrase of it is "Im not exactly smart enough to understand everything you were saying but I'm pretty sure that 60% of what you say is crap."

Letterman looked like an idiot that night. To just say, "Im pretty sure 60% of everything you say is crap" shows a laughable ignorance, especially when he didnt even back it up with anything but throwing jokes around like all those left-wing idiots do on their comedy "political" shows.

spdirty

06-03-2006, 12:24 PM

Letterman looked like an idiot that night. To just say, "Im pretty sure 60% of everything you say is crap" shows a laughable ignorance, especially when he didnt even back it up with anything but throwing jokes around like all those left-wing idiots do on their comedy "political" shows.

Yeah, and I was not objective when I watched, but The Leprecaun really smashed Letterman and all Letterman could do to respond was give bumper sticker slogans. It was like a cat fighting a dead mouse, with everyone in audience cheering for the mouse.

Its like it wasn't even fair.

Bronco_Beerslug

06-03-2006, 04:52 PM

It's no big challenge for anyone to slap that fool around.
Why anyone outside O'Rielly's churlish personality cult would care one iota about anything he has to say is totally mystifying.

O'Reilly is like Bush. Bush can't form coherent sentences and O'Reilly can't form coherent thoughts.

Spider

06-03-2006, 05:48 PM

LOL you right wingers .. thinking Bill O'Reilley held his own is like thinking comming in last place isnt so bad

Jesterhole

06-03-2006, 06:11 PM

For some reason, I don't think O'Reilley honestly believes half the stuff he says either. He realizes that it is his job to get the right wing riled up. He is the the most popular face on GOP TV, and he has to lead the far right in their way of thinking.

It has made him a very rich man. He basically admitted all this to that assistant he was leaving the dirty voicemail with. That he was just playing a part, and it was his job to give all the stupid opinions he was giving.

At any rate, I consider BO as far right as I am left, but I agree with some of his stuff too. Like how hard he is on children predators., and judges that give them light sentences. But the fact that he's been more critical of Cindy Sheehan than George Bush, after he said he'd never trust the Buscho adim again if there were no weapons of mass destruction, makes cringe...

spdirty

06-03-2006, 06:22 PM

O'Reilly is like Bush. Bush can't form coherent sentences and O'Reilly can't form coherent thoughts.

And for some reason, the Leprecaun still kicked the crap out of Letterman, so what does that make him?

Spider

06-03-2006, 06:27 PM

And for some reason, the Leprecaun still kicked the crap out of Letterman, so what does that make him?
LOL , if you say so , but Letterman cut ORielley down to size on national TV ....Hilarious! and OrIelley couldnt shut off Lettermans mic ....... O'Rielley sat there and took it like bítch

spdirty

06-03-2006, 06:37 PM

LOL , if you say so , but Letterman cut ORielley down to size on national TV ....Hilarious! and OrIelley couldnt shut off Lettermans mic ....... O'Rielley sat there and took it like bítch

Are you high?? You obviously didn't watch the same interview. At the end, when The Leprecaun crushed Letterman, all Letterman could say to rebut him was, and Im paraphrasing, "Im not exactly smart enough to understand everything you were saying but I'm pretty sure that 60% of what you say is crap." And thats cutting him down to size? Sheesh.

Spider

06-03-2006, 06:42 PM

Are you high?? You obviously didn't watch the same interview. At the end, when The Leprecaun crushed Letterman, all Letterman could say to rebut him was, and Im paraphrasing, "Im not exactly smart enough to understand everything you were saying but I'm pretty sure that 60% of what you say is crap." And thats cutting him down to size? Sheesh.
LOL , I was going to ask you if you were High , I saw the interview , I saw Letterman tell Bill 60% of what he says is crap , it was about the war on Christmas ...... Now put down your Bill O'Rielley love glasses for a second and imagine how bad it is for someone to tell you on national TV that you bullshít for a living .........

spdirty

06-03-2006, 06:51 PM

LOL , I was going to ask you if you were High , I saw the interview , I saw Letterman tell Bill 60% of what he says is crap , it was about the war on Christmas .........
No it wasn't, it after they were arguing about Cindy Sheehan.

Now put down your Bill O'Rielley love glasses for a second .........
Actually, those haven't come out yet...its the O'Reilly mug and welcome mat.;D

and imagine how bad it is for someone to tell you on national TV that you bullshít for a living .........
Actually not very hard considering that it was that someones only rebuttal after you exposed him as the mental midget he is.

spdirty

06-03-2006, 06:55 PM

Here...now we can quit paraphrasing ****.

http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/billoreilly/a/billoreillycrap.htm

Transcript of Bill O'Reilly's Interview With David Letterman

From Daniel Kurtzman (http://politicalhumor.about.com/mbiopage.htm),
Your Guide to Political Humor (http://politicalhumor.about.com/).
FREE Newsletter. Sign Up Now! (http://politicalhumor.about.com/gi/pages/mmail.htm)
Letterman to O'Reilly: '60% Of What You Say Is Crap'

Bill O’Reilly: “I think that the Iraq thing has been full of unintended consequences and it’s a vital thing for the country and it's brutal, it’s absolutely brutal. We should all take it very seriously. This simplistic stuff about hating Bush or he lied and all this stuff, does the country no good at all. We've got to win this thing. You have to win it. And even though it's a screw-up, giant, massive, all right, right now, for everybody's protection, it's best for the world to have a democracy in that country functioning and friendly to the West, is it not?”

David Letterman: “Yes, absolutely.”

O’Reilly: “Okay, so let's stop with the lying and the this and the that and the undermining and let's get him. That is putting us all in danger. <SCRIPT>zSB(3,3);if(!z336){var zIsb=gEI("adsb");if(zIsb){zIsb.style.display="inline";zIsb.style.height="0px";zIsb.style.width="0px";}var zIss=gEI("adss");if(zIss){zIss.style.display="inline";zIss.style.height="0px";zIss.style.width="0px";}}</SCRIPT>
Sponsored Links

David lettermanBrowse a huge selection now. Find exactly what you want today.www.eBay.com (http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/iclk?sa=l&ai=BUHAKZC-CRK7EA4TspQKM3dj8C5nw9RXFvIjPAsCNtwHAqQcQARgBILyl9 wEoCEiYOVDGj_tzmAHGjwaqARdwcmltZWRpYV9wb2xpdGljYWx odW1vcrIBGHBvbGl0aWNhbGh1bW9yLmFib3V0LmNvbcgBAdoBR Gh0dHA6Ly9wb2xpdGljYWxodW1vci5hYm91dC5jb20vb2QvYml sbG9yZWlsbHkvYS9iaWxsb3JlaWxseWNyYXAuaHRtlQIK5EkK&num=1&adurl=http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-38686-15222-0%3Ftype%3Dcontent%26mpre%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fsea rch.ebay.com%252Fsearch%252Fsearch.dll%253Fquery%2 53Ddavid%2520letterman%2526sonewuser%253D1%2526st% 253D1%2526sortproperty%253Dmetaendsort%2526st%253D 1%26keyword%3D317515461_David%2520letterman&client=ca-primedia-basic_js)
David Letterman SurveysWe'll pay you $75 right now to complete a simple survey! (aff)PaidSurveysOnline.com (http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/iclk?sa=l&ai=BrkeyZC-CRK7EA4TspQKM3dj8C_2EpAfHjf2WAcCNtwHQhgMQAhgCILyl9 wEoCEiLOVCy65Ga-f____8BmAHGjwaqARdwcmltZWRpYV9wb2xpdGljYWxodW1vcrI BGHBvbGl0aWNhbGh1bW9yLmFib3V0LmNvbcgBAdoBRGh0dHA6L y9wb2xpdGljYWxodW1vci5hYm91dC5jb20vb2QvYmlsbG9yZWl sbHkvYS9iaWxsb3JlaWxseWNyYXAuaHRtlQIemUgK&num=2&adurl=http://hop.clickbank.net/%3Fholteboo10/surveys2&client=ca-primedia-basic_js)
Humor RingtoneSend this ringtone to your phone right now, at no charge!spicymint.com (http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/iclk?sa=l&ai=Bxr-sZC-CRK7EA4TspQKM3dj8C_jSvRnAkLaeAsCNtwHgzS8QAxgDILyl9 wEoCEiNOVCz8fPF-P____8BmAHGjwaqARdwcmltZWRpYV9wb2xpdGljYWxodW1vcrI BGHBvbGl0aWNhbGh1bW9yLmFib3V0LmNvbcgBAdoBRGh0dHA6L y9wb2xpdGljYWxodW1vci5hYm91dC5jb20vb2QvYmlsbG9yZWl sbHkvYS9iaWxsb3JlaWxseWNyYXAuaHRtlQIfEkgK&num=3&adurl=http://c.azjmp.com/az/chb.php%3Ff%3D2482%26i%3D8728%26sub%3D1%7C11949320 %7Chumor&client=ca-primedia-basic_js)

So our philosophy is we call it as we see it. Sometimes you agree, sometimes you don't. Robust debate is good. But we believe that the United States, particularly the military, are doing a noble thing, a noble thing. The soldiers and Marines are noble. They're not terrorists. And when people call them that, like Cindy Sheehan called the insurgents 'freedom fighters,’ we don't like that. It is a vitally important time in American history. And we should all take it very seriously. Be very careful with what we say.”

Letterman: “Well, and you should be very careful with what you say also.” [audience applause]

O’Reilly: “Give me an example.”

Letterman: “How can you possibly take exception with the motivation and the position of someone like Cindy Sheehan?”

O’Reilly: “Because I think she’s run by far-left elements in this country. I feel bad for the woman.”

Letterman: “Have you lost family members in armed conflict?”

O’Reilly: “No, I have not.”

Letterman: “Well, then you can hardly speak for her, can you?” [applause]

O’Reilly: “I’m not speaking for her. Let me ask you this question.”

Letterman, referring back to O’Reilly’s examples of a war on Christmas: “Let’s go back to your little red and green stories.”

O’Reilly: “This is important, this is important. Cindy Sheehan lost a son, a professional soldier in Iraq, correct? She has a right to grieve any way she wants, she has a right to say whatever she wants. When she says to the public that the insurgents and terrorists are 'freedom fighters,’ how do you think, David Letterman, that makes people who lost loved ones, by these people blowing the Hell out of them, how do you think they feel, waht about their feelings, sir?”

Letterman: “What about, why are we there in the first place? [applause] The President himself, less than a month ago said we are there because of a mistake made in intelligence. Well, whose intelligence? It was just somebody just get off a bus and handed it to him?”

Bill O’Reilly: “No.”

Letterman: “No, it was the intelligence gathered by his administration.”

O’Reilly: “By the CIA.” Letterman: “Yeah, so why are we there in the first place? I agree to you, with you that we have to support the troops. They are there, they are the best and the brightest of this country. [audience applause] There’s no doubt about that. And I also agree that now we’re in it it’s going to take a long, long time. People who expect it’s going to be solved and wrapped up in a couple of years, unrealistic, it’s not going to happen. However, however, that does not eliminate the legitimate speculation and concern and questioning of ‘Why the Hell are we there to begin with?’”

O’Reilly: “If you want to question that, and then revamp an intelligence agency that’s obviously flawed, the CIA, okay. But remember, MI-6 in Britain said the same thing. Putin’s people in Russia said the same thing, and so did Mubarak’s intelligence agency in Egypt.”

Letterman: “Well then that makes it all right?”

O’Reilly: “No it doesn’t make it right.”

Letterman: “That intelligence agencies across the board makes it alright that we’re there?”

O’Reilly: “It doesn’t make it right.”

Letterman: “See, I’m very concerned about people like yourself who don’t have nothing but endless sympathy for a woman like Cindy Sheehan. Honest to Christ.” [audience applause]

O’Reilly: “No, I’m sorry.”

Letterman: “Honest to Christ.”

“O’Reilly: “No way. [waits for applause to die down] No way you’re going to get me, no way that a terrorist who blows up women and children.”

Letterman: “Do you have children?”

O’Reilly: “Yes I do. I have a son the same age as yours. No way a terrorist who blows up women and children is going to be called a ‘freedom fighter’ on my program.” [mild audience applause]

Letterman: “I’m not smart enough to debate you point to point on this, but I have the feeling, I have the feeling about 60 percent of what you say is crap. [audience laughter] But I don’t know that for a fact. [more audience applause]

Paul Shafer: “60 percent.”

Letterman: “60 percent. I'm just spit-balling here.”

Spider

06-03-2006, 06:55 PM

No it wasn't, it after they were arguing about Cindy Sheehan.
Bill O started out with the war on Christmas ...

Actually, those haven't come out yet...its the O'Reilly mug and welcome mat.;D

Actually not very hard considering that it was that someones only rebuttal after you exposed him as the mental midget he is.
Yeah Bill O is on the slow side ...... Letterman should have brought up the time Bill O claimed to have won the Peabody award to prove his point Hilarious!

L.A. BRONCOS FAN

06-03-2006, 06:59 PM

LOL you right wingers .. thinking Bill O'Reilley held his own is like thinking comming in last place isnt so bad

LOL

These are the same half-wits who think Bush won all three debates, so what do you expect?

:D

spdirty

06-03-2006, 07:09 PM

LOL

These are the same half-wits who think Bush won all three debates, so what do you expect?

:D

Did it matter who won the debates in the end?

Bronco_Beerslug

06-03-2006, 07:42 PM

Did it matter who won the debates in the end?

Not to the Bush bootlickers who towed the party line and sent this country into four more years of uncontrolled spending, sh*ting on the constitution, granting 20 million criminals amnesty and STILL, failing to secure our ports, borders and coastlines.

spdirty

06-03-2006, 07:45 PM

Not to the Bush bootlickers who towed the party line and sent this country into four more years of uncontrolled spending, sh*ting on the constitution, granting 20 million criminals amnesty and STILL, failing to secure our ports, borders and coastlines.
OK, so you think Kerry wouldve been any different on spending, granting amnesty to criminals(to my knowledge he VOTED for that amendment just like every dem in the Senate except 4), and securing our borders?

Bronco_Beerslug

06-03-2006, 08:02 PM

OK, so you think Kerry wouldve been any different on spending, granting amnesty to criminals(to my knowledge he VOTED for that amendment just like every dem in the Senate except 4), and securing our borders?
ANYONE would have been different on spending than Bush. Amnesty is Bush's idea. And he would have definitely funded homeland security (http://tinyurl.com/gqfun) to secure our ports, coastlines and borders, nuclear power plants, chemical plants, etc...

Washington isn’t living up to its obligation to protect the American people.
We should invest at least $60 billion more over the next ten years to protect America. We should secure our ports and our borders by screening cargo for nuclear materials. We should make sure that we have enough border agents with the right technology to keep commerce flowing in while keeping terrorists out. We should make sure we have a single, effective, and integrated terrorist watch list that is accessible to everyone who needs it to keep America safe.

We should protect our transportation systems by making sure we screen airplane cargo just like we screen baggage; by ensuring our airports have enough trained staff to protect us; by investing more than $2 billion to improve security on our railroads, subways, bridges and tunnels.

We should protect our chemical and nuclear plants by requiring them to develop and implement real security plans.

We should protect our country against bioterrorism by making investments in our public health system to detect possible threats; by giving hospitals and emergency rooms the resources they need to contain an attack; and by making sure our public health system can develop and distribute enough vaccines for the people who need them.

TheDave

06-03-2006, 08:46 PM

Bill O'riley and David Letterman are the same thing... Both entertainers/celebrities.

Sad thing is i would guess the majority of factor viewers think they are watching a news program. At least the "left-wing idiots" watching letterman know it is for entertainment purposes.

Spider

06-03-2006, 08:53 PM

TheDave

06-03-2006, 09:13 PM

question is whats funnier O'Rielleys talking points . or lettermans top 10 ?

Depends... most of O'Rileys **** makes me sick, on the other hand his taped phone conversations, well come to think of it those made me sick to....bad visual, baaaaad visual.

By the way i was kind of disapointed Letterman didn't pull out a falafel during the interview ;D

Spider

06-03-2006, 09:14 PM

Depends... most of O'Rileys **** makes me sick, on the other hand his taped phone conversations, well come to think of it those made me sick to....bad visual, baaaaad visual.

By the way i was kind of disapointed Letterman didn't pull out a falafel during the interview ;D
LOL he should have ..... i was listening to the Factor Radio program , Bill O is about 100 miles from reality

gunns

06-03-2006, 09:27 PM

No it wasn't, it after they were arguing about Cindy Sheehan.

Actually, those haven't come out yet...its the O'Reilly mug and welcome mat.;D

Actually not very hard considering that it was that someones only rebuttal after you exposed him as the mental midget he is.

Defending Billy O. How low the 29% have sunk.

Mile High Shack

06-03-2006, 10:02 PM

why is Olberman obsessed so much with O'Reiley anyway?

TheDave

06-03-2006, 10:07 PM

why is Olberman obsessed so much with O'Reiley anyway?

falafels ???

Mile High Shack

06-03-2006, 10:09 PM

falafels ???

your saying O'Reiley makes good falafels

I can see that......I hear the Irish make good ones...lol

everytime I switch over to Olberman, he seems to always be talking about O'Reiley, I just find it odd.

gunns

06-03-2006, 10:38 PM

O Reilly provides great material. He seems to be rivaling Bush for top liar.

ClevelandBronco

06-03-2006, 10:42 PM

I'll give Letterman a pass. He's one of the elite comedic geniuses of all time. He's out of his element entirely when he tries to discuss journalism, politics and other such matters in a serious way.

BTW, I said it then and I'll say it now: Pres. Bush was owned by Sen. Kerry in the debates. I thought his poor performance would tip the election. I was relieved to see that it didn't.

It was haaarrrd watching the president. It was really haaarrrd.

spdirty

06-03-2006, 11:15 PM

Atlas

06-04-2006, 12:01 AM

Actually, a better paraphrase of it is "Im not exactly smart enough to understand everything you were saying but I'm pretty sure that 60% of what you say is crap."

I see you avoided what this thread was about. Not really suprising since you can't defend that idiot. But please go on and spin.....

Atlas

06-04-2006, 12:03 AM

why is Olberman obsessed so much with O'Reiley anyway?

Olberman HATES O'Reiley. He jams him almost every show. Olberman is great and has a great show. He knows sh!t when he smells it and he just let's everyone else in on what he knows.

ClevelandBronco

06-04-2006, 12:17 AM

Olberman HATES O'Reiley. He jams him almost every show. Olberman is gret and has a great show. He knows sh!t when he smells it and he just let's everyone else in on what he knows.

Stop posting drunk, Atlas.

DBruleU

06-04-2006, 12:40 AM

Also, is it healthy for a grown man like Atlas to be so obsessed with a women he can't, and will not ever obtain like Kyla Cole? I dont it is.

gunns

06-04-2006, 12:51 AM

Blueflame

06-04-2006, 12:56 AM

Also, is it healthy for a grown man like Atlas to be so obsessed with a women he can't, and will not ever obtain like Kyla Cole? I dont it is.

And this is your business why? ???

DBruleU

06-04-2006, 01:01 AM

And this is your business why? ???

Keep walking...

Blueflame

06-04-2006, 01:42 AM

Keep walking...

Yes, dear.

(the question of how it's any of your business still stands... ;D) :P

Atlas

06-04-2006, 02:37 AM

Stop posting drunk, Atlas.

Thanks for thinking about me but I'm sober. Actually I took viagra last night and I'm still suffering from a headache. Sh!t works great but I do get these annoying headaches.

Atlas

06-04-2006, 02:41 AM

Also, is it healthy for a grown man like Atlas to be so obsessed with a women he can't, and will not ever obtain like Kyla Cole? I dont it is.

How do you know that I'm not married to her??

Kyla Cole is one of the most beautiful women in the world IMO. The only time I obsess with her is on the Mane. I would think you might be more concerned about Kaylor. He "obsesses" over Kahn! Either that or maybe it's just some amusing schtick he can have some fun with.

Bronco_Beerslug

06-04-2006, 06:25 AM

BTW, I said it then and I'll say it now: Pres. Bush was owned by Sen. Kerry in the debates. I thought his poor performance would tip the election. I was relieved to see that it didn't.

It was haaarrrd watching the president. It was really haaarrrd.
Yes, isn't cool to see how great this turned out? Thank your god that we don't have someone in there that can form coherent sentences, actually would've moved to securing this country and wouldn't have used the Constitution for sh*t paper.

Thank goodness the republican leadership is concentrating on protecting this country!!!!

Bush Appeals for Same-Sex Marriage Ban (http://tinyurl.com/ruwab)

.

L.A. BRONCOS FAN

06-04-2006, 07:04 AM

I thought his poor performance would tip the election. I was relieved to see that it didn't.

Yeah, I'll bet you're still praising the lord for Diebold and Kenneth Blackwell.

:pity:

L.A. BRONCOS FAN

06-04-2006, 07:09 AM

How do you know that I'm not married to her??

Kyla Cole is one of the most beautiful women in the world IMO. The only time I obsess with her is on the Mane. I would think you might be more concerned about Kaylor. He "obsesses" over Kahn! Either that or maybe it's just some amusing schtick he can have some fun with.

Pay no attention to DBruleU, dude.

He probably doesn't even dig chicks.

He'll probably come off the wall with some verse from the Old Testament that claims lust is evil, a sin, etc., etc.

Spider

06-04-2006, 07:16 AM

Also, I have never seen The Leprecaun talk about Olberman. Funny how Olberman is sending out a cry to be noticed and The Leprecaun just ignores him and his 37 viewers instead of giving him the time of day.
http://movies.crooksandliars.com/Countdown-Falafel-police.wmv
OLBERMANN: And Ted Baxter goes ballistic.

(BEGIN AUDIO CLIP, “THE RADIO FACTOR”)

BILL O'REILLY, HOST: Orlando, Florida, Mike, go.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE (on phone): I think Keith Olbermann's show...

O'REILLY: There you go. Mike is a—he's a gone guy. So if you're listening, Mike, we have your phone number, and we're going to turn it over to Fox security. Fox security then will contact your local authorities, and you will be held accountable. Fair?

(END AUDIO CLIP)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11697576/
First it was the warnings to NBC chairman Robert Wright, then the phone calls to NBC president Jeff Zucker, then the petition to get me fired and Phil Donahue brought back, then the erroneous ratings information he gave out. Even in that context, though, this is pretty special. Ted Baxter telling uncooperative listeners that he'll turn their phone numbers over to Fox security, and that Fox security will in turn contact the local authorities.

Bill thinks he has his own police.

A caller got through to O'Reilly's radio show yesterday. He insists he used no foul language, that all he did was mention my name, compliment my show, and asked, Why are you always smearing him, Bill? And the host, using the dump button all talk radio shows have on the seven-second delay, cut him off.

We're not certain what actually got on the air, but this was what was posted on O'Reilly's Web site as the air check for that part of the show.......

ClevelandBronco

06-04-2006, 11:04 AM

Yeah, I'll bet you're still praising the lord for Diebold and Kenneth Blackwell.

:pity:

I'm pleased that Pres. Bush won and that I'll never have to key "Pres. Kerry."

I leave the Diebold and Blackwell fantasies to you.

Atlas

06-04-2006, 12:27 PM

From Crooks and Liars.

SoCals link: http://stevegilliard.blogspot.com/2005/10/bill-oreilly-slanders-82nd-airborne.html

There was an exchange on Fox News last night between Bill O'Reilly and Wes Clark. The issue was the release of further Abu Ghraib pictures and video.

O'Reilly was incensed that it "puts our troops at risk". Clark responded that what's putting the troops at risk is the chain of command letting, or even making, this happen in the first place.

O'Lielly was saying that it happens just like this in every war, with Clark rebutting that those were isolated incidents which were court-martialed.

And then, this:

Clark: And let me explain something. You go all the way up the chain of command ...
O'Reilly: General! You need to look at the Malmedy massacre in World War Two, and the 82nd Airborne who did it!

DBruleU

06-04-2006, 12:30 PM

How do you know that I'm not married to her??

Kyla Cole is one of the most beautiful women in the world IMO. The only time I obsess with her is on the Mane. I would think you might be more concerned about Kaylor. He "obsesses" over Kahn! Either that or maybe it's just some amusing schtick he can have some fun with.

It's true. I was being more sarcastic than anything. If you are married to her, than great.

Atlas

06-04-2006, 12:30 PM

O‘REILLY: In Malmady, as you know, U.S. forces captured S.S. forces who had their hands in the air and they were unarmed and they shot them down. You know that. That‘s on the record. Been documented.

DBruleU

06-04-2006, 12:33 PM

Pay no attention to DBruleU, dude.

He probably doesn't even dig chicks.

He'll probably come off the wall with some verse from the Old Testament that claims lust is evil, a sin, etc., etc.

Why would I pull it from the OT? Lust is pretty much the same thing as coveting. So I'd say its a sin. Not like all of us guys have not fallen into lust though.

Anyway, I dont want to get into Bible discussions with you again.

freak6

06-04-2006, 07:49 PM

Play2win

06-04-2006, 08:06 PM

Bronco_Beerslug

06-04-2006, 08:43 PM

Edskins_RVA

06-04-2006, 10:31 PM

[size=6][/b][/color]
It's always refreshing when truth is revealed.. Thanks Atlas! For that and your avatars! :thumbs:

Edskins_RVA

06-04-2006, 10:33 PM

L.A. BRONCOS FAN

06-05-2006, 12:27 AM

Lust is pretty much the same thing as coveting.

??? Are you sure this is your final answer?

So I'd say its a sin.

Congratulations, you've finally managed to make me feel sorry for you (as opposed to just mildly annoyed.)

:D

DBruleU

06-05-2006, 12:49 AM

??? Are you sure this is your final answer?

Congratulations, you've finally managed to make me feel sorry for you (as opposed to just mildly annoyed.)

:D

Yes, and I dont care.

L.A. BRONCOS FAN

06-05-2006, 12:59 AM

Yes, and I dont care.

Bzzzzzt!

I'm sorry, but that would be an incorrect answer.

Lust and coveting are not the same thing.