Is the US Navy vulnerable in the Persian Gulf?

[mhgaffney]

Bronco fans,

The level of complacency in this country is incredible. No one in the press is asking the obvious questions, such as: what would be the consequence of a US attack on Iran's nuclear sites?

I investigated this last year, and I submit the following article, one of a series on what I found. Warning: It's a stunner.

Sincerely,

Mark Gaffney, author, Dimona the Third Temple (1989)

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article8558.htm

ps. I can be reached for comment at mhgaffney@sbcglobal.net

or: check out my web site at www.gnosticsecrets.com

[defenseman]

Bronco fans,

The level of complacency in this country is incredible. No one in the press is asking the obvious questions, such as: what would be the consequence of a US attack on Iran's nuclear sites?

I investigated this last year, and I submit the following article, one of a series on what I found. Warning: It's a stunner.

Sincerely,

Mark Gaffney, author, Dimona the Third Temple (1989)

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article8558.htm

ps. I can be reached for comment at mhgaffney@sbcglobal.net

or: check out my web site at www.gnosticsecrets.com


What is this Bait?....one word , submarines. No mention at all. The test run did not take them into account. Trust me, the scenario wouldn't have played out the way the marine general would have wanted with one or two fast boats running wing man...dman

[Hotrod]

Im not sure this sounds right to me either Dman.

[Orange4ever]

In the event of an attack against Iran the US will easily nuetralize any weapons system Iran may think is in its advantage.

This really reminds me of the first gulf war when everyone was talking up the Iraqi "4th largest army in the world, battle hardened and outfitted with the most sophisticated Soviet arms and 2nd most sophisticated air defense system in the world!" I think we all know how that turned out.

First rule of psyops. Make your enemy believe they are better than they really are.

[ClevelandBronco]

Bronco fans,

The level of complacency in this country is incredible. No one in the press is asking the obvious questions, such as: what would be the consequence of a US attack on Iran's nuclear sites?

I investigated this last year, and I submit the following article, one of a series on what I found. Warning: It's a stunner.

Sincerely,

Mark Gaffney, author, Dimona the Third Temple (1989)

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article8558.htm

ps. I can be reached for comment at mhgaffney@sbcglobal.net

or: check out my web site at www.gnosticsecrets.com

He investigated this last year. He found an article (sounds like a year well spent).

He can be reached for comment at mhgaffney@sbcglobal.net

or: check out his web site at www.gnosticsecrets.com[/QUOTE]

[elsid13]

This is the second time that you posted an article by some amateur that doesn't show concept of true military analysis. The closure of the straits has been war gamed for the last 30 years, by the DON, and CINCs. An introduction of new weapons system doesn't mean automatic victory, in fact only amateur think that new shiny gun equals victory. The US is the heavy favorite in any conflict because of 1. C4SIR 2. Logistic Management 3. Training, and 4. Speed of its Command Decision loop (also it the only military able to effectively fight at night and all weather)

Put this article/posting in the same vain as the "Mother of all Battles" made by a certain former dictator

[defenseman]

This ain't happenin, one who believes this needs to do some more "homework", or they believe it because they WANT TO...I'm sure know one on the board believes this. If so, roger up and attempt to support..dman