PDA

View Full Version : Bush Says Don't Use Gays As Election Issue


Bronco_Beerslug
05-14-2006, 04:43 PM
Who would have thunk it, eh? Of course it was Laura not King George but still somewhat significant. I'm curious though, what will republicans run on if they can't ban Gays?




--------------------------------------------------------------------
Mrs. Bush: Don't Campaign on Marriage Ban
By NEDRA PICKLER, Associated Press Writer 1 hour, 10 minutes ago

WASHINGTON - Some election-year advice to Republicans from a high-ranking source who has the president's ear: Don't use a proposed constitutional amendment against gay marriage as a campaign tool.

Just who is that political strategist?
Laura Bush.

The first lady told "Fox News Sunday" that she thinks the American people want a debate on the issue. But, she said, "I don't think it should be used as a campaign tool, obviously."

"It requires a lot of sensitivity to just talk about the issue — a lot of sensitivity," she said.

The Senate will debate legislation that would have the Constitution define marriage as the union between a man and a woman early next month, Majority Leader Bill Frist said on CNN's "Late Edition."

President Bush supports the amendment, but Vice President
Dick Cheney does not. Cheney's daughter, Mary, is a lesbian and has been speaking out against the marriage amendment as she promotes her new book, "Now It's My Turn."

Mary Cheney wrote that she almost quit working on the Bush-Cheney campaign in 2004 because of Bush's position on gay marriage. Asked Sunday about reports that White House political adviser Karl Rove and other Republicans want to use the issue to mobilize conservatives for the midterm election, she said she hoped "no one would think about trying to amend the Constitution as a political strategy."

"I certainly don't know what conversations have gone on between Karl and anybody up on the Hill," Cheney added in her appearance on Fox. "But you know, what I can say is look, amending the Constitution with this amendment, this piece of legislation, is a bad piece of legislation. It is writing discrimination into the Constitution, and, as I say, it is fundamentally wrong."

But Frist said he would defend the amendment even to Dick Cheney.

"I basically say, Mr. Vice President, right now marriage is under attack in this country," Frist said on CNN. "And we've seen activist judges overturning state by state law, where state legislatures have passed laws defining marriage between a man and a woman, and that's being overturned by a handful of activist judges around the country. And that is why we need an amendment to come to the floor of the United States Senate to define marriage as that union between one man and one woman."
http://tinyurl.com/zjp2q

DBruleU
05-14-2006, 05:29 PM
Probably run on the fact Dems have no answer to anything.

Not to mention not one candidate.

Spider
05-14-2006, 05:37 PM
Probably run on the fact Dems have no answer to anything.

Not to mention not one candidate.
are you sure about that ?;D .........

DBruleU
05-14-2006, 05:39 PM
are you sure about that ?;D .........

I hope...;)

I'm honestly not worried about '08 though.

Spider
05-14-2006, 05:51 PM
I hope...;)

I'm honestly not worried about '08 though.
:approve: ah going to Canada ;D

Bronco_Beerslug
05-14-2006, 05:59 PM
Probably run on the fact Dems have no answer to anything.
Not to mention not one candidate.
Like I said, what's their platform if they can't ban Gays?

DBruleU
05-14-2006, 06:15 PM
Like I said, what's their platform if they can't ban Gays?

Ban gay's? Or limit their ability to marry anywhere they like?

Probably the war on terror. Who knows?

DBruleU
05-14-2006, 06:16 PM
:approve: ah going to Canada ;D

I've been there a few times. I wasn't impressed.

Spider
05-14-2006, 06:27 PM
I've been there a few times. I wasn't impressed.
yeah Playing Risk it is important to have Canada ;D

L.A. BRONCOS FAN
05-14-2006, 10:00 PM
Like I said, what's their platform if they can't ban Gays?

There's always the other two "Gs."

L.A. BRONCOS FAN
05-14-2006, 10:11 PM
I'm honestly not worried about '08 though.

http://homepage.mac.com/rcareaga/diebold/little_die/diebold_9a.jpg

spdirty
05-15-2006, 12:23 AM
Who would have thunk it, eh? Of course it was Laura not King George but still somewhat significant. I'm curious though, what will republicans run on if they can't ban Gays?
http://tinyurl.com/zjp2q


Who in the hell gave Laura Bush the authority to tell us what we can and can't run on? Is she like, dictator of the GOP?

spdirty
05-15-2006, 12:28 AM
Who in the hell gave Laura Bush the authority to tell us what we can and can't run on? Is she like, dictator of the GOP?


Im gonna play LABF here..."No, but her sick twisted idiotic dumbass poo poo head husband thinks he's dictator of America.:D"

Was I close?

L.A. BRONCOS FAN
05-15-2006, 12:52 AM
Im gonna play LABF here..."No, but her sick twisted idiotic dumbass poo poo head husband thinks he's dictator of America.:D"

Was I close?

Not the exact adjectives I would have chosen, but it's the thought that counts.

I'm impressed. :thumbs:

:D

L.A. BRONCOS FAN
05-15-2006, 12:54 AM
Probably the war on terror. Who knows?

No longer an option.

All the polls indicate that the majority of Americans know BushCo has botched that as well.

L.A. BRONCOS FAN
05-15-2006, 01:47 AM
http://webpages.charter.net/micah/repjesus29.gif

L.A. BRONCOS FAN
05-15-2006, 10:50 PM
I'm curious though, what will republicans run on if they can't ban Gays?


Looks like they might not have much choice in the matter.

The Patwa Robertsons and James Dobsons of the world say "jump," and the rethugs ask "how high?"

Conservative Christians warn Republicans against inaction

WASHINGTON, May 13 — Some of President Bush's most influential conservative Christian allies are becoming openly critical of the White House and Republicans in Congress, warning that they will withhold their support in the midterm elections unless Congress does more to oppose same-sex marriage, obscenity and abortion.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/15/washington/15dobson.html