PDA

View Full Version : Requiem's Broncos Mock Draft - 19 Days Prior.


Requiem
04-10-2006, 03:39 PM
I'm not going to do the graphics at this time, because that'd take forever and there won't be any in-depth explanations like the last draft, however this draft does include a trade which the Broncos send #22 for Houston's #33 and #66. Denver makes out in value in that trade, and I think that even though Houston has holes, it has enough picks to maneuver around with and make this trade more logical than it looks right now.

#15 - Chad Jackson, WR - Florida.
This has nothing to do with personal bias, but there's no doubt the Broncos could use another receiver and it's no secret that the Broncos love the kid. I don't like the options at receiver in this draft, but I know I don't like them any better the longer we wait.

#33 - Mathias Kiwanuka, DE - Boston College.
From what I've heard, the Broncos aren't completely enamored with the prospects at end this year, but there's no doubt that they need a pass-rusher and Kiwanuka is one of the best pure ends in the draft. He may take some time to be an everydown end, but in our rotation, he can put up solid numbers from the get-go.

#61 - Joe Klopfenstein, TE - Colorado.
A local prospect who has impressed in workouts as of late, is not on the same level as Marcedes Lewis, Leonard Pope and Vernon Davis -- but after those three, Klopfenstein could be the next best guy on the board at this position. Some of his doubts, (blocking) have been somewhat put to rest due to solid workouts at those positions. He's been rising as of late and is a solid pick value wise and need based for the Broncos at #61.

#66 - Daniel Bullocks, S - Nebraska.
Daniel isn't quite the prospect is brother Josh was a year ago, but he's no slouch either. With no heir apparent to John Lynch or Nick Ferguson who are both up there in years, Bullocks is ball-hawking safety which is something the Broncos have coveted and haven't had in a very, very long time.

#119 - Omar Jacobs, QB - Bowling Green.
I don't buy the rumors that the Broncos are looking to move up for one of the "blue-chippers" in this years' draft at the QB position, however I do buy their interest in looking for a quarterback that's capable of being a starting caliber player in the NFL, something I don't see Bradlee Van Pelt as. (Not bashing, sorry BVP fans! -- Just my opinion.)

#126 - Jesse Mahelona, DT - Tennessee.
The Broncos don't have too many guys on the inside of the defensive line, and they could use one who could rush the passer. Mahelona fits the bill and is a solid value pick at this time in the draft. Some have him graded as a late-third rounder, but due to his lack of experience at the DI level in college, and the fact he has some things to improve on -- I believe he'll be around by the time the Broncos pick here in the fourth round. (Note: Broncos met with him at the combine.)

#130 - Rashad Butler, OL - Miami.
There's no doubt that the Broncos could use some help on the interior of their offensive line, so why not kill two birds with one stone for a guy who could play there, but also has experience at the tackle positions as well. A guy like Butler is just what the Broncos need, and some scouts have him graded out higher than his teammate and apparent first-to-second rounder Eric Winston.

#161 - Mike Bell, RB - Arizona.
As stated previously, the Broncos make it a tradition to draft a back almost every year and I don't see that trend stopping. Mike Anderson went to Baltimore after being cut this free agency, and the Broncos could use a guy who is tough enough to gain those key yards in 3rd and short and goaline situations. I know most here are in favor of getting one of the top guys in the draft, however I'm not going to give up on Tatum Bell just yet. He was very impressive last year and to draft a back that high could just demoralize him, more than it would light a fire under him to perform better. In my honest opinion, he has just good of a shot at being an every-down guy in our system as DeAngelo, Laurence or LenDale do. Also, it saves us an early pick that can be used to address other needs, when the Broncos aren't so traditional in drafting backs early. (Especially round one!)

#198 - Juston London, ILB - UCLA.
A solid player in college who never lived up to his full potential because of injuries. (Similar to Kevin Simon, who I also considered here.) Probably will never be much more than a special-teams or back-up player at the next level, but it's an area the Broncos could use to address due to the fact that Keith Burns is getting up there in years and the Broncos could stand to use a younger body to back-up Wilson in the most drastic of situations.

_________________________________________________

That's it. I liked the idea of trading down and netting an extra pick. Of course, I was exploring many other options when doing this at work -- but this was a quick half-hour to an hour project I came up with. If you have any questions or comments just ask them. I felt I did a solid job of nailing the teams needs, regardless if you like the prospects or not.

Enjoy, and expect atleast two more of these before the draft begins.

-- Requiem.

Rascal
04-10-2006, 03:42 PM
I'd take it. Good job.

elsid13
04-10-2006, 03:45 PM
I like it, but I still pushing Whitehurst out of Clemson over Jacobs. Jacobs plays in that Meyer system that make college look real good.

ludo21
04-10-2006, 03:47 PM
Houston also needs Quantity, i dont see them trading their picks.

But good draft.

Requiem
04-10-2006, 03:48 PM
Thanks. You're probably not a big fan of the Jackson pick. (Not saying I'm a huge one either, but meh -- I call them like I see them and I think he could very well be the pick.) I'm not a big fan of drafting a RB early and there is no end worth that position either. Also, I think that Ngata and Bunkley (after doing some thinking) won't be there either, so Jackson was a guy who fit a need for us. I couldn't imagine trading down with that pick, but I was tempted to.

I hit most, if not all of our needs and I like how it turned out. Just so you know, I was thinking of making #66 Rod Wright, and turning #126 into a safety, (Anthony Smith) -- but I decided not to. Any suggestions?

Requiem
04-10-2006, 03:49 PM
I like it, but I still pushing Whitehurst out of Clemson over Jacobs. Jacobs plays in that Meyer system that make college look real good.

I like Whitehurst a lot as well, and it was a toss-up between him and there. Seriously, it was a flip of the coin. *shows you quarter* -- He was definitely the next option at that pick though, no questions asked.

Rascal
04-10-2006, 03:51 PM
Since we have three people currently at DT I wouldn't have been opposed to both Jesse and Wright.

Requiem
04-10-2006, 03:52 PM
Houston also needs Quantity, i dont see them trading their picks.

But good draft.

At this point in time, Houston has #1, #33, #65 and #66 on the first day a lone. They could use some help in the defensive backfield and I'm predicting a lot of prospects key in that area will go from picks #18 to #32 so I thought they'd be interested in moving up to grab one of them. Sure, they could use some offensive line help, but they could grab a solid tackle at #65, and if they still keep their fourth (I'm not sure which went to Buffalo) I still see Eslinger as a realistic possibility at #98, along with several other lineman.

I think it's a possibility, but it probably won't happen. Just thought I'd give something new a chance.

Requiem
04-10-2006, 03:54 PM
Since we have three people currently at DT I wouldn't have been opposed to both Jesse and Wright.
Either would I, and I think that Wright has the athleticism to play end for us if need be. I thought of that as well, but I do see safety as a need. We do have Brandon and Cox did fairly well in his limited role last season. I hope Browner pans out, but that could be a fools' hope. I'm definitely a huge advocate of the Broncos drafting DL, but I tried to make this a reflection of what could happen, and I know you can never predict the Broncos exactly, but the chances of us taking three DL that early in this years' draft would be the chances of me getting laid in the next ten minutes. Slim to none.

Rascal
04-10-2006, 03:55 PM
Either would I, and I think that Wright has the athleticism to play end for us if need be. I thought of that as well, but I do see safety as a need. We do have Brandon and Cox did fairly well in his limited role last season. I hope Browner pans out, but that could be a fools' hope. I'm definitely a huge advocate of the Broncos drafting DL, but I tried to make this a reflection of what could happen, and I know you can never predict the Broncos exactly, but the chances of us taking three DL that early in this years' draft would be the chances of me getting laid in the next ten minutes. Slim to none.

No draft both Jesse and Wright and not draft a QB (keep Bullocks).

elsid13
04-10-2006, 04:01 PM
Wright is a Shanahan type of player, had the ability to be 1st rounder but slipped and means we will move up to get him.

Atlas
04-10-2006, 04:26 PM
i don't like that draft.

1st of all I don't think Denver is going to draft a DE in the first round or even at all.

2nd there are alot of good TEs coming out this year. If Denver can't get one of the top 4 with their 2nd they should wait until the 4th to pick up one. I believe both Mercedes Lewis and Pope will be there for Denver in the second round if they aren't they should wait for the 4th round. Klopfenstein isn't a game changer or a play maker. He could be solid but you can get solid in the 4th round.

3rd There is no way Bullocks will slip to 66. He is a top 50 prospect probably will go in the 40's somewhere. I'm thinking Arizona at 41.

4th Omar Jacobs is an intriguing pick but like all the other picks he will be gone before Denver chooses. Someone will choose him in the third. I think Brodie Croyle from Alabama has more upside anyway but again I think both these guys go in the 3rd round.

5th. Butler is a tackle and I guess Denver could go tackle of guard but I think Denver could get a real solid G in Fred Matua from USC. He is a perfect fit for Denver's system and he would push Carlise in 2007.

6th Everyone is on Bell's band wagon. I like Wali Lundy from Virginia. He is a good size back but he is alot faster than Bell and he is also a good inside runner.
"A natural runner with good vision and instincts...Tough and runs hard between the tackles...Excels in short-yardage situations...Versatile...Does a nice job in pass pro...Good body control and lean...Can catch the ball out of the backfield."

elsid13
04-10-2006, 04:53 PM
I seen both Mike Bell and Wali Lundy play over the years, and Bell is more physical back. I like Lundy but he remind me a lot of Westbrook out of Philly or Moats of LATECH last year.

Ratboy
04-10-2006, 06:00 PM
I say draft a QB next year. Quinn or Keller would be sweet.

Atlas
04-10-2006, 06:01 PM
I seen both Mike Bell and Wali Lundy play over the years, and Bell is more physical back. I like Lundy but he remind me a lot of Westbrook out of Philly or Moats of LATECH last year.

I have seen Lundy more than Bell but Lundy is a lot bigger than Westbrook, Lundy is 5' 11" and 215lbs. He ran between the tackles very well I thought and he has 4.45 speed as oppossed to Bell's 4.59 speed.

Requiem
04-10-2006, 06:06 PM
You don't need speed in a guy who is going to run N/S. Also, I'm not on his bandwagon. I was a fan long before the post article was ever written about him and he's been the guy in most of my mocks for Denver taking a back since Day 1.

elsid13
04-10-2006, 06:14 PM
You don't need speed in a guy who is going to run N/S. Also, I'm not on his bandwagon. I was a fan long before the post article was ever written about him and he's been the guy in most of my mocks for Denver taking a back since Day 1.


I agree Bell has enough speed to make impact. Beside my brother been pimping him for a long time to me.

eddie mac
04-10-2006, 06:42 PM
In hindsight the Broncos are down 1.5 DT's at present losing Pope and Pryce.

Requiem
04-10-2006, 06:50 PM
Which is why I strongly considered Wright at #66 too. Claude Wroten was even a consideration at #33, but I like Kiwi better there. I don't think Claude will drop nearly as much as others think.

SoCalBronco
04-10-2006, 09:57 PM
Good stuff requiem

Kaylore
04-10-2006, 10:55 PM
I don't like the first pick, but the rest seems pretty good.