View Full Version : pick a mock
Here are two mock drafts, if you had to pick one or the other too happen witch one would you go with.
A.http://www.thefootballexpert.com/coxmockdraft.html
OR
B.http://www.thefootballexpert.com/abromowitzmockdraft.html
I picked B.
Brodrick Bunkley,Leonard Pope,Maurice Drew :approve:
Victor
04-04-2006, 02:16 PM
I like A. I am leary about Pope at 22.
Crushaholic
04-04-2006, 02:22 PM
B, just because I don't want to draft a RB in the first round. Finding a playmaker on D-line and TE will be much harder than finding a playmaker at RB.
The Neck
04-04-2006, 02:25 PM
I take A as well.
Martin Nance is a 6'5'' red zone threat and Kiwi does have potential
Liquid Courage
04-04-2006, 02:30 PM
I am OK w/ either Rd1 scenario. As for Round 2:
A) Interested to see Nance over Stovall. Stovall seems to be the 'safer' pick.
B) I would take Bullocks or Tapp over Drew in Rd2. Both of them fit our needs better than Vaughn Hebron 2. :-)
maven
04-04-2006, 02:33 PM
Not real happy with either one... But, I'd have to go with A.
Clockwork Orange
04-04-2006, 02:46 PM
Wow, I'd have to call it a tie. I'd be very happy with either.
Kaylore
04-04-2006, 02:49 PM
B please.
WABronco
04-04-2006, 02:49 PM
Martin Nance isn't even projected to go on the first day anymore, from what I've read.
I'd take A with Stovall or Wright before Nance.
Play2win
04-04-2006, 02:55 PM
Wow, I'd have to call it a tie. I'd be very happy with either.
Me too. We get one of the guys I really like, and another guy who is going to (potentially) really help this team a lot.
I would Love to have DW2 and POPE, but I will be very happy with either of them and another sound addition. Both KIWI and BUNKLEY fit that bill.
I would be very happy with either of those 1st Rounds... ;D
SpringStein
04-04-2006, 03:41 PM
Easily A! Drew in the second round? Really??????? I pray not to Denver anytime on day 1.
Now give us Bullocks who went two picks earlier and I might reconsider.
broncohaven
04-04-2006, 05:03 PM
B- Any draft where we take Bunkley has it over any other, and if we're going to take a midget RB I'd rather it at least be in the 2nd and not #15 overall.
I'd rather combine the two and go Bunkley/Kiwi/Nance
meangene
04-04-2006, 05:09 PM
B. I love the first round - it would be my ideal first round. I'd rather go WR in round 2, though. Also, I'm not a Kiwi fan and don't think RB is a priority so A is out for me.
BombsOverBaghdad
04-04-2006, 05:20 PM
Without a doubt -- A
D. Williams will be a star in the NFL
Not too excited about Kiwi's prformance, but he does have the physical tools.
Nance is round 2 is okay (not great)
watermock
04-04-2006, 05:22 PM
B and it's so obvious it's funny.
Rascal
04-04-2006, 05:42 PM
Here are two mock drafts, if you had to pick one or the other too happen witch one would you go with.
A.http://www.thefootballexpert.com/coxmockdraft.html
OR
B.http://www.thefootballexpert.com/abromowitzmockdraft.html
I picked B.
Brodrick Bunkley,Leonard Pope,Maurice Drew :approve:
I'd like A a lot better if we picked up Rod Wright who was taken immediately after us instead of that WR.
Since it doesn't I'd take B. Although I'd rpefer Bullocks over Drew and get a RB in round 4 (Griggs, Mike Bell, among others).
Broncojef
04-04-2006, 05:47 PM
We are way undermanned at DT. If Bunkley is there at 15 I think we need to take him. That being said we need some serious weapons on Offense or will meet the same fate as last year. Put me down for the "B" plan.
ludo21
04-04-2006, 05:59 PM
B - just because of Bunkley.
Billy Clyde Puckett
04-04-2006, 06:01 PM
Can I have them both?
I don't think Drew is a fit in Denver except as a return specialist.
Arkie
04-04-2006, 06:06 PM
Bunkley, Pope, and Bing were my ideal day one picks in another thread.
broncohaven
04-04-2006, 07:29 PM
Bunkley, Pope, and Bing were my ideal day one picks in another thread.
I've got Bunkley, Lawson, and Fasano on day one.
longtimer
04-04-2006, 09:46 PM
B please!
I do not want any midget running backs on the team.
B gives us a DT that could be a probowl player and a get over the middle / red zone threat.