K.(F)C. Chiefs are One of 4 Teams Still Over Cap

[epicSocialism4tw]

Ironically, the Raiders are another of the "frugal four"! The Clots and Redskins are the other two.

Raiders | Team remains over the salary cap
Thu, 9 Mar 2006 17:08:14 -0800

Adam Schefter, of the NFL Network, reports the Oakland Raiders are one of four teams over the new salary cap limit. The Raiders are about $4 million over the cap.


Chiefs | Team remains over the salary cap
Thu, 9 Mar 2006 17:08:58 -0800

Adam Schefter, of the NFL Network, reports the Kansas City Chiefs are one of four teams over the new salary cap limit. The Chiefs are about $2.5 million over the cap.

Colts | Team remains over the salary cap
Thu, 9 Mar 2006 17:07:36 -0800

Adam Schefter, of the NFL Network, reports the Indianapolis Colts are one of four teams over the new salary cap limit. The Colts are about $5 million over the cap.

Redskins | Team remains over the salary cap
Thu, 9 Mar 2006 17:04:36 -0800

Adam Schefter, of the NFL Network, reports the Washington Redskins are one of four teams over the new salary cap limit. The Redskins are about $7 million over the cap.

[DarkHorse30]

this is hysterical....my four worst-hated teams are all idiots/capovers......

[2KBack]

I love that 2 out of the 4 teams in the AFC west are having troubles

[CHANGSTER]

this is hysterical....my four worst-hated teams are all idiots/capovers......

Thats exactly what i thought when i read this. Those are the 4 teams i actually hate. All that voodoo must of payed off

[Raider Bill]

The Raiders never clear extra cap room. They clear it as they need it.

If this were to happen.

http://waumadscn7.eastbay.com/is/image/EB/70042161?tags=no&WID=500&$Number=11&$LNumber=1&$RNumber=1&$Name=CULPEPPER&$ENLARGE$

Collins would be cut clearing over 9 million in cap room.

[Jetmeck]

The Raiders never clear extra cap room. They clear it as they need it.

If this were to happen.

http://waumadscn7.eastbay.com/is/image/EB/70042161?tags=no&WID=500&$Number=11&$LNumber=1&$RNumber=1&$Name=CULPEPPER&$ENLARGE$

Collins would be cut clearing over 9 million in cap room.

I would be real proud of that acquisition, the best thing he did for the VIKES last year was get hurt.

[Jetmeck]

Ironically, the Raiders are another of the "frugal four"! The Clots and Redskins are the other two.

Raiders | Team remains over the salary cap
Thu, 9 Mar 2006 17:08:14 -0800

Adam Schefter, of the NFL Network, reports the Oakland Raiders are one of four teams over the new salary cap limit. The Raiders are about $4 million over the cap.


Chiefs | Team remains over the salary cap
Thu, 9 Mar 2006 17:08:58 -0800

Adam Schefter, of the NFL Network, reports the Kansas City Chiefs are one of four teams over the new salary cap limit. The Chiefs are about $2.5 million over the cap.

Colts | Team remains over the salary cap
Thu, 9 Mar 2006 17:07:36 -0800

Adam Schefter, of the NFL Network, reports the Indianapolis Colts are one of four teams over the new salary cap limit. The Colts are about $5 million over the cap.

Redskins | Team remains over the salary cap
Thu, 9 Mar 2006 17:04:36 -0800

Adam Schefter, of the NFL Network, reports the Washington Redskins are one of four teams over the new salary cap limit. The Redskins are about $7 million over the cap.

According to BOB the Chefs are under the cap, so who you gonna' believe ? NFL NETWORK or BOB ?

[Bob's your Information Minister]

According to BOB the Chefs are under the cap, so who you gonna' believe ? NFL NETWORK or BOB ?

The Chiefs said no more cuts would be needed for them to get under the salary cap. That was BEFORE the new CBA.

When you factor in the new CBA they should be about 8 million under.

I am guessing NFL Network doesn't know **** about any of the contracts the Chiefs restructured.

[epicSocialism4tw]

According to BOB the Chefs are under the cap, so who you gonna' believe ? NFL NETWORK or BOB ?

I think that Bob knows Jar Jar Binks personally, so...I go with Bob. There's not much more credibility than that.

[Play2win]

I dont think the Redskins should loose a draft pick for being in Violation...

I think we should get a HIGHER ONE!!!!!

If they didn't violate the cap, they wouldn't have had the same players on their team, and would have had a worse, maybe a much worse, 2005 season...

meaning we would have gotten a HIGHER PICK!!!

So, NFL, give us a TOP TEN PICK, dammit !!!

[broncohaven]

The Raiders never clear extra cap room. They clear it as they need it.

If this were to happen.

http://waumadscn7.eastbay.com/is/image/EB/70042161?tags=no&WID=500&$Number=11&$LNumber=1&$RNumber=1&$Name=CULPEPPER&$ENLARGE$

Collins would be cut clearing over 9 million in cap room.
Um, pretty sure Collins has already been cut. Usually that's why you're on the list of UFAs.

[Atlas]

The Raiders never clear extra cap room. They clear it as they need it.

If this were to happen.

http://waumadscn7.eastbay.com/is/image/EB/70042161?tags=no&WID=500&$Number=11&$LNumber=1&$RNumber=1&$Name=CULPEPPER&$ENLARGE$

Collins would be cut clearing over 9 million in cap room.

To me Culpepper is another Arron Brooks. He is better than Collins but I would be interested in what type of contract he is going to get.

[Raider Bill]

Um, pretty sure Collins has already been cut. Usually that's why you're on the list of UFAs.


Collins has not been cut. When the deadline was extended, we rescinded the cut.

[Raider Bill]

The Raiders last week released starting quarterback Kerry Collins, then rescinded the move when the league delayed the start to the free agent signing period. Collins' status with the team remains in limbo, in large part because of a prohibitive salary cap figure for 2006 that the Raiders would prefer to reduce.

Whatever list he is on is wrong as of right now, although he will likely be cut. Selling another year of Collins to the Raiders fans will be like trying to sell a dental plan to a Chiefs fan.

[Rock Chalk]

The Chiefs said no more cuts would be needed for them to get under the salary cap. That was BEFORE the new CBA.

When you factor in the new CBA they should be about 8 million under.

I am guessing NFL Network doesn't know **** about any of the contracts the Chiefs restructured.
Im guessing you dont realize Adam Schefter, food asswipe that he is, has good contacts everywhere and is rarely wrong.

But, then, you are usually wrong, so why should I be surprised.

[Paladin]

[QUOTE=Raider Bill Selling another year of Collins to the Raiders fans will be like trying to sell a dental plan to a Chiefs fan.[/QUOTE]


Hilarious!

[DBroncos4life]

I don't get this...

Redskins | Team was scheduled to meet with Archuleta
Thu, 9 Mar 2006 19:52:15 -0800

ESPN.com's Len Pasquarelli reports free agent S Adam Archuleta (Rams), who will become an unrestricted free agent, was prepared to visit the Washington Redskins on the first day of free agency, but had to cancel his trip when free agency was delayed.

[Crushaholic]

This is gold...We're supposed to believe BOB over someone with actual NFL contacts? Thanks for the laugh...:rofl:

[Rausch]

This is gold...We're supposed to believe BOB over someone with actual NFL contacts? Thanks for the laugh...:rofl:

OM also reports Shields and Roaf are both going to retire...

[Orange_Beard]

Just wait till they grab TO tonight.
Who will they cut? We'll take Tony Gonzalez off your hands. Help you out with the cap a little.

[Sarcastro]

Just wait till they grab TO tonight.
Who will they cut? We'll take Tony Gonzalez off your hands. Help you out with the cap a little.

This is totally going to happen man.

[bronco militia]

The Chiefs said no more cuts would be needed for them to get under the salary cap. That was BEFORE the new CBA.

When you factor in the new CBA they should be about 8 million under.

I am guessing NFL Network doesn't know **** about any of the contracts the Chiefs restructured.

I read that article and posted it for people to read...
some of those agreements may have been contingent on not getting a new CBA..