PDA

View Full Version : Offenses going at Bailey at their own peril


jmz313
12-15-2005, 11:33 AM
New article on Champ. Interesting, how they credit his injury for his int numbers.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=ap-broncos-champspicks&prov=ap&type=lgns


Offenses going at Bailey at their own peril

By EDDIE PELLS, AP Sports Writer
December 15, 2005
DENVER (AP) -- Opposing offenses used to stay away from Champ Bailey because bad things seemed to happen anytime the ball went his way.

This year, thanks to a tweak in the Denver defense and Bailey's perceived vulnerability because of injury, he's seeing the ball more. Opposing offenses are paying.

So far this season, Bailey has a career-high eight interceptions.

ADVERTISEMENT




"I look forward to getting them," Bailey said. "I want to get them every week. Hopefully, I can get two or three this week. You dream to get them."

Bailey has had an interception in each of the last five games, breaking a franchise record set by Tyrone Braxton in 1996.

It has been quite a surge for Bailey, a player some thought wasn't worth what the Broncos paid when they traded away Clinton Portis to acquire him before the 2004 season. New rules that restricted defensive backs' contact with receivers further limited the impact a shutdown corner could have.

Bailey finished with only three interceptions last year, and though he was good enough to be voted All-Pro, many focused on the handful of big plays he allowed, and the fact that he and John Lynch weren't enough to revive a defense that got torched by Peyton Manning for the second straight year in the playoffs.

Bailey still gives up a big play now and then -- see Terrell Owens' 91-yard catch and run in one-on-one coverage on Oct. 30 -- but he is getting interceptions, too, a big reason the Denver defense has made more big plays en route to a 10-3 record.

To put him in position to have more of an impact, the Broncos massaged their defense in the offseason, allowing him to play off the receiver more instead of tight, man-to-man on the line. The result: Bailey can sit back, see plays develop and get good jumps on the ball.

"You could say it was pretty calculated," coach Mike Shanahan said. "He's a shutdown corner, but this just put him in position to do more things."

One play might have turned the Broncos' season -- the break Bailey made on the first pass Drew Brees threw in the second half for the Chargers in Week 2.

The Broncos were reeling from a 34-10 loss in the opener to Miami. They were trailing 14-3 at halftime and the fans were booing. Bailey, playing a good 10 yards off the receiver, took an educated guess, got a good jump on Brees' pass and made an interception that he returned 25 yards for a touchdown.

Denver won that game 20-17.

"If you play off, you can see more," Bailey said. "I started doing that. It's hard when I'm playing bump and run to get them. When I'm off, I can see more. I'm more comfortable with it and I usually have a chance to be in the right place."

The second part of Bailey's success may be because of his injury. His hamstring has bothered him since training camp and he also dislocated his shoulder in the season opener. He missed the first two games of his career this season.

So teams throw more to his side although the Broncos downplay that.

"I think some of that's overblown," defensive coordinator Larry Coyer said. "They're going to run their offense and we're going to play our defense. Sometimes, early, they might target a guy."

Clearly, if they're targeting Bailey, it's a bad choice. And if they're not, he's simply taking better advantage of limited opportunities. He needs three more interceptions to tie one of the oldest records in franchise history -- Goose Gonsoulin had 11 picks back in 1960, the first year the Broncos played.

"I want to see passes all the time," Bailey said. "You are going to have some weeks when quarterbacks are going to throw your way and others when they aren't. But I want to throw them my way."

Man-Goblin
12-15-2005, 11:46 AM
I've noticed recently teams have been targeting Foxworth more and more. I think he has responded reasonably well, but he could get even more action if Bailey keeps picking balls off.

Play2win
12-15-2005, 12:14 PM
I've noticed recently teams have been targeting Foxworth more and more. I think he has responded reasonably well, but he could get even more action if Bailey keeps picking balls off.
I think FOX has alot of the same attributes that bailey has. He is alittle bit smaller, though. But he put his nose in the action and tackle practically as well as Bailey, atleast for a "rookie". He has incredible closing speed and very good cover technique. Yes, he has made some mistakes and mis-calculations, but, lord knows, he technically still is just a rookie...

Sometimes I look at FOX and think I am getting Deja Vú from Bailey... ;D

Bob's your Information Minister
12-15-2005, 12:19 PM
Those teams just don't have Dante Hall.

Mile High Shack
12-15-2005, 12:23 PM
Those teams just don't have Dante Hall.

Bailey wasn't covering Hall on that TD boob

Fergy messed up the 2 deep coverage assignment

Rascal
12-15-2005, 12:26 PM
Like I said in another thread:

And if you actually watched that game you would know, and even admitted to by the secondary, that they simply didn't talk during the game and had multiple blown assignments. The rookies have been playing very well this year, unfortunately darrent got hurt, but Foxworth will pick up the slack. My only question/concern is the nickel back till darrent gets back.

Bob's your Information Minister
12-15-2005, 12:53 PM
Bailey wasn't covering Hall on that TD boob

Fergy messed up the 2 deep coverage assignment

Yes I know. You guys are so sensitive!

Bronco LB 59
12-15-2005, 01:34 PM
Yes I know. You guys are so sensitive!

Thanks to Atlas, you're going to lose your Bailey-Surtain bet!

Jetmeck
12-15-2005, 02:34 PM
Thanks to Atlas, you're going to lose your Bailey-Surtain bet!

What, Surtain is overated and can't catch. Went right threw his fingers and probably would have saved the Dallas game for you Bob.????

azbroncfan
12-15-2005, 02:52 PM
What, Surtain is overated and can't catch. Went right threw his fingers and probably would have saved the Dallas game for you Bob.????
Yeah and warfield or someone dropped a sure TD pick to that would of iced the game.

Sassy
12-15-2005, 03:49 PM
Yes I know. You guys are so sensitive!
...and our team is 10-3 ;D

watermock
12-15-2005, 04:11 PM
Bailey dropped coverage in zone, and Fergy way way across the field...

Just let Bailey cover mano mano and let Fergy help Foxy...

Denver doesn't play zone that well...

No1BroncoFan
12-15-2005, 05:19 PM
Yes I know. You guys are so sensitive!
No, we're just getting fed up with your stupidity.

Fvck off, Bob. Really, just fvck off.

Ben

DBroncos4life
12-15-2005, 05:55 PM
I'm starting to understand whats going on here. The Dline isn't getting to the QB because they just want to get enough pressure to force the QB to throw up a bad pass. Our DBs stand 10 yards off the WR to force the QB to try and hit them early so giving our DBs a good chance at jumping the route. Come playoff time our DLine is going to start crushing teams. Just wait.

Broncoman13
12-15-2005, 06:32 PM
I'm starting to understand whats going on here. The Dline isn't getting to the QB because they just want to get enough pressure to force the QB to throw up a bad pass. Our DBs stand 10 yards off the WR to force the QB to try and hit them early so giving our DBs a good chance at jumping the route. Come playoff time our DLine is going to start crushing teams. Just wait.


That's the ticket!!!

Broncoman13
12-15-2005, 06:33 PM
Somebody needs a name change to bring more sacks. Oskie is bringing the TO's, now we need the sacks!

Rascal
12-15-2005, 06:38 PM
Sackoskie?

I don't know.

Bob's your Information Minister
12-15-2005, 06:39 PM
Somebody needs a name change to bring more sacks. Oskie is bringing the TO's, now we need the sacks!
If you get greedy it might destroy the karma. Karma is a delicate balance of bullshiat and mojo.

DBroncos4life
12-15-2005, 06:49 PM
didn't they call sacks something else before it became a stat?

Kaylore
12-15-2005, 07:16 PM
Scrotum?

Bronco Vixen
12-15-2005, 08:01 PM
Scrotum?
i guess i technically should be offended but i have to give you a smiley for that one ricardo :)

Kaylore
12-15-2005, 10:16 PM
i guess i technically should be offended but i have to give you a smiley for that one ricardo :)
Just brainstorming, my dear. ;)

OrangeShadow
12-16-2005, 06:20 AM
im sick of hearong about that TO td. champ was injured on the play.

Mile High Shack
12-16-2005, 06:22 AM
Sackoskie?

I don't know.

rascal's sack?

Chupacabra
12-16-2005, 10:54 AM
im sick of hearong about that TO td. champ was injured on the play.

Even if he wasn't injured.. TO is one of the most physical WRs to play the game & should make plays like that. IMO Either of Champ's INT for TDs negate the blown play on TO.

Billy Clyde Puckett
12-16-2005, 12:21 PM
Even if he wasn't injured.. TO is one of the most physical WRs to play the game & should make plays like that. IMO Either of Champ's INT for TDs negate the blown play on TO.

Broncs gambled on that play. They had philly inside the 10 and McNabb had been unable to make that throw 3 times earlier in the game due to the pressure. Broncs gambled and lost that one plain and simple.

orange 4 life
12-16-2005, 02:09 PM
No, we're just getting fed up with your stupidity.

Fvck off, Bob. Really, just fvck off.

Ben

well done.

that sure says it all. :)