PDA

View Full Version : Just for Bob, our little boob of the Mane


Pages : [1] 2

Northman
11-13-2005, 04:12 PM
Quoted from Bobby a few days ago.

One would think so. But that game was at Arrowhead.

Maybe it's time for you to accept that KC's defense is capable of putting on a better show during a given game than Denver's.

I don't think there's any way you hold Oakland to 263 yards or less.



Your right boob, we didnt hold them to under 263 yds but yet we are kicking the living **** out of them in their place. i dont know? you tell me who's win was more impressive? :welcome: ROFL!

Dagmar
11-13-2005, 04:19 PM
remember bob...



Boy am I in trouble for that one...

heh... maybe a bit too risky

The Big E
11-13-2005, 04:20 PM
And didn't we have 3 sacks to go along with our 3 INT's? How'd TrINT do today, anyway?

Northman
11-13-2005, 04:23 PM
And didn't we have 3 sacks to go along with our 3 INT's? How'd TrINT do today, anyway?


Trent was like the rest of the herd today, eating a lot of grass! ;)

Clockwork Orange
11-13-2005, 04:25 PM
And didn't we have 3 sacks to go along with our 3 INT's? How'd TrINT do today, anyway?

4 sacks to go with the 3 INT's.

Bob's your Information Minister
11-13-2005, 04:32 PM
I heard you guys gave up more yards than we did. How you like them apples?

Our D is ascending. Shut down McGahee today. Jared Allen is the best defensive end in the AFC West.

Clockwork Orange
11-13-2005, 04:33 PM
I heard you guys gave up more yards than we did. How you like them apples?

Our D is ascending. Shut down McGahee today. Jared Allen is the best defensive end in the AFC West.

You LOST to BUFFALO. :laugh:

Dagmar
11-13-2005, 04:34 PM
You LOST to BUFFALO. :laugh:

:welcome: ROFL!

Bob's your Information Minister
11-13-2005, 04:35 PM
You LOST to BUFFALO. :laugh:

Because of the offense. Our defense was awesome.

Like Taco says... "once again, the offense failed the defense."

Rocket 7
11-13-2005, 04:36 PM
I heard you guys gave up more yards than we did. How you like them apples?

I heard we gave up less points and didn't need a last second touchdown

Odysseus
11-13-2005, 04:37 PM
I still think Broncos are beating the Chiefs in K.C.

Mile High Shack
11-13-2005, 04:47 PM
I heard you guys gave up more yards than we did. How you like them apples?

Our D is ascending. Shut down McGahee today. Jared Allen is the best defensive end in the AFC West.

are you freakin' serious?

do you win games by how many points you give up or how many yards you give up you pathetic loser

now go play battletech, spank the monkey with your cat while watching queer as folk and tell your mom to fix me some pie

Mile High Shack
11-13-2005, 04:48 PM
Because of the offense. Our defense was awesome.

Like Taco says... "once again, the offense failed the defense."

have you seen buffalo's offense in action lately?

I think me and rascal and 9 other scrubs on this board could hold them to 21 points :)

Clockwork Orange
11-13-2005, 04:49 PM
Because of the offense. Our defense was awesome.

Like Taco says... "once again, the offense failed the defense."

So you're admitting that your offense has regressed? 'Bout time.

Oh, your _efense also managed to make JP Losman look like an NFL QB. No one else has managed to do that, congrats. :laugh:

TotallyScrewed
11-13-2005, 04:49 PM
Can you say Shell-Shocked?? Bob has completely and totally lost it. Somebody should just shoot him. This is pathetic.

Mile High Shack
11-13-2005, 04:51 PM
Can you say Shell-Shocked?? Bob has completely and totally lost it. Somebody should just shoot him. This is pathetic.

let's just ask him how many games we are up on them now?

and boob, like I said

please keep picking against us, I implore you to keep picking against us

UltimateHoboW/Shotgun
11-13-2005, 04:53 PM
I forget, didn't Bob say something about a bet and we counldn't keep the Faider offense under 300?

Garcia Bronco
11-13-2005, 04:55 PM
Check out bobs early week thread


http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=128614
Homie threw 3 today

watermock
11-13-2005, 04:55 PM
The Chefs scored three points...Ha!

Bob's your Information Minister
11-13-2005, 04:55 PM
I heard we gave up less points and didn't need a last second touchdown

We held them to 17 in Oakland, too.

BRONCCRUSHFAN
11-13-2005, 04:57 PM
I heard you guys gave up more yards than we did. How you like them apples?

Our D is ascending. Shut down McGahee today. Jared Allen is the best defensive end in the AFC West.
When your team is 2 games behind in the division, you have to think of something to find positive in your descending team.

MrPeepers
11-13-2005, 04:58 PM
dude, this is pathetic. spin it any way you want. it's time to just bend over and take whats given to you. your team isn't going anywhere, they play games they should win too close and they lose games they should win. your D is better than your O, and your D ain't that good. your team is subpar, if you want approval go back to your board, but I think their probably harsher than I am on the Chiefs.

bob, time to change your signature from "here we come donkeys" to "excuse me mr. bronco we're just leaving."

UltimateHoboW/Shotgun
11-13-2005, 04:58 PM
Noticed how Bob avoids my post.

GreatBronco16
11-13-2005, 04:59 PM
We held them to 17 in Oakland, too.


So you still think your _efense did a better job against the fade in Oakland than Denver did today?

You really should get your head checked out.

Broncoman13
11-13-2005, 05:01 PM
Boob, it's time for you to realize the Sky is falling. Your team sucks... worse than usual! Anybody that can make JP Losman look like an efficient QB SUCKS! You can hang your hat on your run D. But, at some point you're going to have to realize that giving up 140 and 2 TD's to a back up QB isn't getting it done! 14-3 to a team that's been outplayed all year long. Just so you know, Buffalo lost to New Orleans and Oakland! You guys are going downhill fast!!!!!!!!!!

Jens1893
11-13-2005, 05:04 PM
i hate stat obsessed people ... stats are just numbers and never tell you the whole story. our d was rated top 5 the past few years, but i feel much better about our d this season than i did about our d last season.

Man-Goblin
11-13-2005, 05:08 PM
I've been a lurker for a long time, I just haven't posted much...but someone please fill me in why Bob is such an icon on this board? I understand it's fun to make fun of him, but still....

Northman
11-13-2005, 05:10 PM
I still think Broncos are beating the Chiefs in K.C.

I dont think, i know we are beating them in K.C.

Jens1893
11-13-2005, 05:12 PM
I've been a lurker for a long time, I just haven't posted much...but someone please fill me in why Bob is such an icon on this board? I understand it's fun to make fun of him, but still....

hes a chiefs homer, a troll and a star wars geek

read up on his words of widsom here (http://72.22.74.110/BB/search.php?do=finduser&u=2284)

and i hate kurt warners wife ...

Goobzilla
11-13-2005, 05:13 PM
I'm worried about Boobra. I really think he's off the deep end this time. Get well soon!

UltimateHoboW/Shotgun
11-13-2005, 05:13 PM
I've been a lurker for a long time, I just haven't posted much...but someone please fill me in why Bob is such an icon on this board? I understand it's fun to make fun of him, but still....


Its because he lituarly(sp) asks us to rip into him. And I think he's into S/M because hw likes it when we stomp on him.

Northman
11-13-2005, 05:14 PM
i just hope he keeps betting against us, the more he does the more we win. lmao

Man-Goblin
11-13-2005, 05:15 PM
hes a chiefs homer, a troll and a star wars geek

read up on his words of widsom here (http://72.22.74.110/BB/search.php?do=finduser&u=2284)

and i hate kurt warners wife ...

I understand he's a Chiefs' homer....Don't let Bob be your uncle tho...Go Broncos.

SoCalBronco
11-13-2005, 05:16 PM
Pfft. The Chiefs will have no trouble catching the Broncos in the standings.

Northman
11-13-2005, 05:18 PM
I heard you guys gave up more yards than we did. How you like them apples?

Our D is ascending. Shut down McGahee today. Jared Allen is the best defensive end in the AFC West.

And yet your 5-4 and heading in the wrong direction in the division. have a nice offseason. :~ohyah!:

Jens1893
11-13-2005, 05:19 PM
Pfft. The Chiefs will have no trouble catching the Broncos in the standings.

were doomed ... :dunk:

Bob's your Information Minister
11-13-2005, 05:19 PM
You guys sure are counting your chickens before they hatch. A 2-game lead in the division is nothing to crow about at this point in the season.

Northman
11-13-2005, 05:21 PM
You guys sure are counting your chickens before they hatch. A 2-game lead in the division is nothing to crow about at this point in the season.


Well, actually it is considering you guys arent going to be around to compete for it.

Goobzilla
11-13-2005, 05:21 PM
You guys sure are counting your chickens before they hatch. A 2-game lead in the division is nothing to crow about at this point in the season.

...But being 2 1/2 games in the hole is ???

"But...But...I've got stats!"

Clockwork Orange
11-13-2005, 05:21 PM
You guys sure are counting your chickens before they hatch. A 2-game lead in the division is nothing to crow about at this point in the season.

Beats the hell out of being 2 games back.

We are thankful for the Chefs (and specifically TrINT's) help in getting that lead. We couldn't have done it without your putrid showing in Orchard Park today.

GreatBronco16
11-13-2005, 05:22 PM
You guys sure are counting your chickens before they hatch. A 2-game lead in the division is nothing to crow about at this point in the season.


We're not counting our chickens before they hatch. We still have to worry about the Chargers catching us.

Northman
11-13-2005, 05:22 PM
Beats the hell out of being 2 games back.

We are thankful for the Chefs (and specifically TrINT's) help in getting that lead. We couldn't have done it without your putrid showing in Orchard Park today.


Yea, i thought that Trint was such a playmaker? he had his opportunities today and didnt do ****. guess he really is a system Qb. Ha!

SoCalBronco
11-13-2005, 05:23 PM
GoChiefs,
If you guys manage to lose next week at Houston and we beat the Jets, will you then concede that the Division race is over so far as the Chiefs are concerned?

UltimateHoboW/Shotgun
11-13-2005, 05:24 PM
We're not counting our chickens before they hatch. We still have to worry about the Chargers catching us.
:notworthy beat me to the punch.

brncs_fan
11-13-2005, 05:24 PM
You guys sure are counting your chickens before they hatch. A 2-game lead in the division is nothing to crow about at this point in the season.
So you can come on our board when we just win and are 7-2 and tell us to calm down. All this after you guys lost and you say...

I heard you guys gave up more yards than we did. How you like them apples?

Our D is ascending. Shut down McGahee today. Jared Allen is the best defensive end in the AFC West.

How is this not a double standard???

Man-Goblin
11-13-2005, 05:26 PM
You guys sure are counting your chickens before they hatch. A 2-game lead in the division is nothing to crow about at this point in the season.

Ok, I'll bite...ha. A two game lead is prett good at this point. Currently only Indy has a larger lead (thanks to the second easiest sked of all time?) Go Broncos.

TotallyScrewed
11-13-2005, 05:27 PM
You guys sure are counting your chickens before they hatch. A 2-game lead in the division is nothing to crow about at this point in the season.


I think you should consider changing your avatar to "I think we shot our wad!"
or "That'll do!"

Moon§hiner
11-13-2005, 05:28 PM
So you can come on our board when we just win and are 7-2 and tell us to calm down. All this after you guys lost and you say...



How is this not a double standard???

shh, he will proceed to tell us about the Chiefs great record in the 90's if we don't throw him a bone now and then....ummm, Greg Wesley did a fine job of not getting any DUI's today bob...in fact he made a point to not run into anybody

Jetmeck
11-13-2005, 05:28 PM
Because of the offense. Our defense was awesome.

Like Taco says... "once again, the offense failed the defense."


Yes your defense was awesome today, You made Losman who was the backup look like Peyton Manning. Good job.

Northman
11-13-2005, 05:28 PM
I think you should consider changing your avatar to "I think we shot our wad!"
or "That'll do!"


Lmao! or i like " yes sir, may i have another ". ROFL!

Bob's your Information Minister
11-13-2005, 05:28 PM
GoChiefs,
If you guys manage to lose next week at Houston and we beat the Jets, will you then concede that the Division race is over so far as the Chiefs are concerned?

Yeah.

But we're going to kill Houston. KC is undefeated in games I attend. :laugh:

Kaylore
11-13-2005, 05:29 PM
We all like to poke Bob, but I got to give him credit. He's one of the few Chief fans who comes and still represents his team after a Chief loss or a Broncos win.

Bob's your Information Minister
11-13-2005, 05:30 PM
Yes your defense was awesome today, You made Losman who was the backup look like Peyton Manning. Good job.

He had 137 yards.

Our defense played extremely well.

Losman made a couple of undefendable throws...pretty surprising.

The offense was responsible for the loss, that is the truth. It's sad. We have a defense that is good enough and now the O goes in the tank.

WHYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

RedskinBronco
11-13-2005, 05:30 PM
We held them to 17 in Oakland, too.


It's so sad to see how low you have to go Bobby. Man, you lose to Buffalo and JP Losman. Your offense has gone to sh!t. Yet you still look for some "moral" victories. Such is the life of a chef fan Ha!

Kaylore
11-13-2005, 05:30 PM
Yeah.

But we're going to kill Houston. KC is undefeated in games I attend. :laugh:
I fully expect you guys to. If you don't beat Houston your team is one of the bottom-ish teams in the NFL.

Northman
11-13-2005, 05:30 PM
Yes your defense was awesome today, You made Losman who was the backup look like Peyton Manning. Good job.


I would like to also point out that outstanding blocking by Johnson ( not ). i guess he is a good runner but doesnt block for his Qb eh? saw him get burned a number of times out there.

Northman
11-13-2005, 05:33 PM
He had 137 yards.

Our defense played extremely well.

Losman made a couple of undefendable throws...pretty surprising.

The offense was responsible for the loss, that is the truth. It's sad. We have a defense that is good enough and now the O goes in the tank.

WHYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY


Say what? extremely well? the Buffalo offense hasnt hardly put up any points this year, with that outstanding defense of yours you should have shut them out. ROFL!

Jetmeck
11-13-2005, 05:33 PM
You guys sure are counting your chickens before they hatch. A 2-game lead in the division is nothing to crow about at this point in the season.

I gotta like our chances considering the quality of opponents left on our schedule including a bump in the road in Arrowhead.

Northman
11-13-2005, 05:34 PM
We all like to poke Bob, but I got to give him credit. He's one of the few Chief fans who comes and still represents his team after a Chief loss or a Broncos win.


Well, actually im still waiting for him to serve us that crow that we were supposed to eat today. he'll show up here but he dabbles around with excuses all day but thats just like beating a pinata to death.

Hercules Rockefeller
11-13-2005, 05:36 PM
Yeah.

But we're going to kill Houston. KC is undefeated in games I attend. :laugh:

So are you talking about attending a game in person in reality, or D&D-like, where you pretend you're there and smite someone with your battle axe?

Rock Chalk
11-13-2005, 05:36 PM
I heard you guys gave up more yards than we did. How you like them apples?

Our D is ascending. Shut down McGahee today. Jared Allen is the best defensive end in the AFC West.
4 sacks, 3 ints, 1 TD for our defense, oh and a little matter of 17 points allowed.

Pie hole, shut it.

Bob's your Information Minister
11-13-2005, 05:36 PM
I have tickets.

BTW, you guys think you can hold the Jets to 7 points next week? If not, I have crow.

24champ
11-13-2005, 05:37 PM
I hate to say i told you so bob.....

Bob's your Information Minister
11-13-2005, 05:37 PM
4 sacks, 3 ints, 1 TD for our defense, oh and a little matter of 17 points allowed.

Pie hole, shut it.
That sounds similar to what we did to Oakland, except we did it with only one turnover.

I'll give you guys a break and wait until you host Oakland to see if you can hold them under 300 like we did last week.

Hercules Rockefeller
11-13-2005, 05:38 PM
BTW, you guys think you can hold the Jets to 7 points next week? If not, I have crow.

Glad you're to the point of comparing performances to make yourself feel better.

Bob's your Information Minister
11-13-2005, 05:38 PM
I hate to say i told you so bob.....

Except that you didn't. Oakland had well over 300 yards.

SoCalBronco
11-13-2005, 05:38 PM
So are you talking about attending a game in person in reality, or D&D-like, where you pretend you're there and smite someone with your battle axe?

rep

Northman
11-13-2005, 05:38 PM
That sounds similar to what we did to Oakland, except we did it with only one turnover.

I'll give you guys a break and wait until you host Oakland to see if you can hold them under 300 like we did last week.


So 1 turnover is better than 3 now? Ha!

Dagmar
11-13-2005, 05:40 PM
So 1 turnover is better than 3 now? Ha!

I got in trouble for my picture...

Northman
11-13-2005, 05:40 PM
Except that you didn't. Oakland had well over 300 yards.


Yet again, all garbage yards Bobby. guess you struggle with that concept eh? we get our leads and relax a bit and therefore give up some garbage yds. i would much rather force a team to play catchup than rely on a prayer at the end of the game.

Clockwork Orange
11-13-2005, 05:40 PM
I have tickets.

BTW, you guys think you can hold the Jets to 7 points next week? If not, I have crow.

So long as they beat the Jets, I don't give a rip.

It is funny that you've been reduced to grasping at stats. :laugh:

Bob's your Information Minister
11-13-2005, 05:41 PM
So 1 turnover is better than 3 now? Ha!

No. But I'd say a defense that holds a team to fewer yards while forcing fewer turnovers is more impressive than a defense that allows more yards but "survives" by getting turnovers.

Like the 2003 Chiefs, who gave up alot of yards, but "survived" by forcing alot of turnovers.

24champ
11-13-2005, 05:41 PM
Except that you didn't. Oakland had well over 300 yards.
i was referring to the buffalo game where you said it was an easy game considering their horrible defense. When in fact the defense made trint look like the idiot QB he is. :poke:

Clockwork Orange
11-13-2005, 05:41 PM
Except that you didn't. Oakland had well over 300 yards.

And no one cares but you.

baja
11-13-2005, 05:42 PM
We all like to poke Bob, but I got to give him credit. He's one of the few Chief fans who comes and still represents his team after a Chief loss or a Broncos win.

That's because he likes attention, any kind of attention.

RedskinBronco
11-13-2005, 05:43 PM
So long as they beat the Jets, I don't give a rip.

It is funny that you've been reduced to grasping at stats. :laugh:


Seriously, I mean I find it unbelievable that he doesn't know how stupid he sounds with some of his posts.

Bob's your Information Minister
11-13-2005, 05:43 PM
And no one cares but you.

Someone cares, this thread was started. Erroneously, I might add.

I bet KC and Denver's defensive rankings will be almost identical this week. It's too bad we don't have an offense like yours.

Bob's your Information Minister
11-13-2005, 05:44 PM
Seriously, I mean I find it unbelievable that he doesn't know how stupid he sounds with some of his posts.

Shut up, homer. Most of my posts are well-thought-out and logical. They might be desperate and pathetic, but at least I don't sit there and deflect all day like 24champbailey's dumb ass.

Northman
11-13-2005, 05:44 PM
No. But I'd say a defense that holds a team to fewer yards while forcing fewer turnovers is more impressive than a defense that allows more yards but "survives" by getting turnovers.

Like the 2003 Chiefs, who gave up alot of yards, but "survived" by forcing alot of turnovers.


OMG, now you are grasping at straws. damn, i guess the Ravens defense must of really sucked in 2000 with all the turnovers they got. well, it got them a championship so you go ahead and keep your stats while your team never reaches the Super Bowl bob. your really losing it man. Ha!

Bob's your Information Minister
11-13-2005, 05:45 PM
So you still think your _efense did a better job against the fade in Oakland than Denver did today?

You really should get your head checked out.

You guys gave up more yards, but got away with it because you forced more turnovers. Pretty simple.

It doesn't even begin to compare to what we did to Oakland in KC last week. That was great defense.

Northman
11-13-2005, 05:46 PM
You guys gave up more yards, but got away with it because you forced more turnovers. Pretty simple.

It doesn't even begin to compare to what we did to Oakland in KC last week. That was great defense.



Psstt, 30-10. :Broncos:

Clockwork Orange
11-13-2005, 05:46 PM
No. But I'd say a defense that holds a team to fewer yards while forcing fewer turnovers is more impressive than a defense that allows more yards but "survives" by getting turnovers.

Like the 2003 Chiefs, who gave up alot of yards, but "survived" by forcing alot of turnovers.

4 sacks and 3 turnovers forced today. That's called making plays, something the Broncos defense has struggled to do the last few years. I'm perfectly happy with that, thanks.

Keep trying to hype the Chefs _efense though. Pretty much the equivalent of trying to polish a turd.

Bob's your Information Minister
11-13-2005, 05:47 PM
OMG, now you are grasping at straws. damn, i guess the Ravens defense must of really sucked in 2000 with all the turnovers they got. well, it got them a championship so you go ahead and keep your stats while your team never reaches the Super Bowl bob. your really losing it man. Ha!

I'm not grasping at straws at all.

If you had actually done your research, you'd have known that the Ravens were dominant because they gave up so few yards. The turnovers were a bonus.

Ultimately, the 2003 KC defense was exposed despite the turnovers.

24champ
11-13-2005, 05:48 PM
I heard you guys gave up more yards than we did. How you like them apples?

Our D is ascending. Shut down McGahee today. Jared Allen is the best defensive end in the AFC West.
I just want to say im sorry to the mane that i dont have "well thought out and logic" in my posts....rofl

Northman
11-13-2005, 05:48 PM
I'm not grasping at straws at all.

If you had actually done your research, you'd have known that the Ravens were dominant because they gave up so few yards. The turnovers were a bonus.

Ultimately, the 2003 KC defense was exposed despite the turnovers.

True, they did give up few yards but SURVIVED because of turnovers.

Clockwork Orange
11-13-2005, 05:49 PM
It doesn't even begin to compare to what we did to Oakland in KC last week. That was great defense.

LOL

Whatever helps you sleep better at night.

Gunther will probably be seeing JP Losman in his sleep, as will Burntfield. So much for the great impact getting him back in your lineup was supposed to have.

Northman
11-13-2005, 05:49 PM
4 sacks and 3 turnovers forced today. That's called making plays, something the Broncos defense has struggled to do the last few years. I'm perfectly happy with that, thanks.

Keep trying to hype the Chefs _efense though. Pretty much the equivalent of trying to polish a turd.


Rep

TotallyScrewed
11-13-2005, 05:49 PM
You hear that...defenses only "survive" when they create turnovers. Apparently, the true test and only test is sacks...oh wait...

Bob's your Information Minister
11-13-2005, 05:51 PM
The 2003 KC defense is a great example. It's not my problem if you're blind to the truth.

Rock Chalk
11-13-2005, 05:52 PM
That sounds similar to what we did to Oakland, except we did it with only one turnover.

I'll give you guys a break and wait until you host Oakland to see if you can hold them under 300 like we did last week.
What do I care how many yards they get in garbage time after we have already won the game?

Bob's your Information Minister
11-13-2005, 05:53 PM
Keep trying to hype the Chefs _efense though. Pretty much the equivalent of trying to polish a turd.

You'd be hyping the fvck out of the Broncos defense if they had allowed under 500 yards COMBINED the last two weeks.

Whether you want to admit or not, our defense IS getting better.

RedskinBronco
11-13-2005, 05:53 PM
Shut up, homer. Most of my posts are well-thought-out and logical. They might be desperate and pathetic, but at least I don't sit there and deflect all day like 24champbailey's dumb ass.


It's ok man...don't be bitter. and stop looking for excuses. Did you mention all these stats when your 2003 defense was giving up 800 yds a game? Did you mention that back then or was your 13-3 record the only stat you were obsessed with back then? Justify as much as you want, the Chiefs are old and have been declining for 2 years now. Continue to tell yourself anything that spins it in KC's favor if that helps you get over your mediocre team.

Logical my @$$

RunByDesign
11-13-2005, 05:54 PM
You'd be hyping the fvck out of the Broncos defense if they had allowed under 500 yards COMBINED the last two weeks.

Whether you want to admit or not, our defense IS getting better.

Have they broke the top 20 yet, Boob?

You remember our bet, right?

Northman
11-13-2005, 05:54 PM
The 2003 KC defense is a great example. It's not my problem if you're blind to the truth.


No bob, the 2003 K.C defense was deplorable, same with 2004, 2002, and 2005. seriously? against good offenses you guys cant stop anyone and now after today you cant stop bad offenses.

RedskinBronco
11-13-2005, 05:55 PM
You'd be hyping the fvck out of the Broncos defense if they had allowed under 500 yards COMBINED the last two weeks.

Whether you want to admit or not, our defense IS getting better.


I still got my money on any decent offense scoring on you when it matters.

TotallyScrewed
11-13-2005, 05:56 PM
and against top drawer competition too, home and away....ummmmhmmmm.

MrPeepers
11-13-2005, 05:56 PM
the chiefs are like a 5 year old Kia, it runs kind of, but the wheels are falling off and the inside stinks like ass

RunByDesign
11-13-2005, 05:56 PM
You guys gave up more yards, but got away with it because you forced more turnovers. Pretty simple.

It doesn't even begin to compare to what we did to Oakland in KC last week. That was great defense.

They played catch-up all game.

Garbage yards and garbage points, Boob.

Clockwork Orange
11-13-2005, 05:57 PM
You'd be hyping the fvck out of the Broncos defense if they had allowed under 500 yards COMBINED the last two weeks.

Whether you want to admit or not, our defense IS getting better.

I'll hype the **** out of the Broncos defense because they're making plays.

Perfect example, the Broncos fumbled twice in the 4th quarter and the Fade got the ball in Bronco territory both times with the game still in doubt. The Fade ended up getting a combined 3 points off of those 2 turnovers and Darrent Williams sealed the game with an 80 yard INT return for a TD.

It's called making plays. It's what we've been waiting for this defense to do for a few years now.

Bob's your Information Minister
11-13-2005, 05:57 PM
I still got my money on any decent offense scoring on you when it matters.
Oakland's offense had played well in the two games prior to coming to KC. Then we shut them down pretty good.

KC's D IS improving. There's evidence all over the place.

Again, when the new rankings come out tomorrow and Tuesday, Denver and KC will be close in most categories. The rest is all spin.

If KC's offense hadn't gone to **** this year we'd be right there with you.

Bob's your Information Minister
11-13-2005, 05:59 PM
I'll hype the **** out of the Broncos defense because they're making plays.

Perfect example, the Broncos fumbled twice in the 4th quarter and the Fade got the ball in Bronco territory both times with the game still in doubt. The Fade ended up getting a combined 3 points off of those 2 turnovers and Darrent Williams sealed the game with an 80 yard INT return for a TD.

It's called making plays. It's what we've been waiting for this defense to do for a few years now.

KC made some plays like that today. Trent fumbled and Buffalo ran it back to the 10 yard line. Our D then forced a fumble.

See? Our D is ascending. Accept it. They had to get better sometime.

MrPeepers
11-13-2005, 05:59 PM
Bob the only Category that matters is W-L

and before tomarrows even come out I present to you....

Denver 7-2
San Diego 5-4
Queefs 5-4
Raiders 3-6

Clockwork Orange
11-13-2005, 05:59 PM
Again, when the new rankings come out tomorrow and Tuesday, Denver and KC will be close in most categories. The rest is all spin.

The standings are already out and they show the Broncos up 2 games on the rest of the division. The rest is just stats, but then that's about all you've got to cling to after your team laid an egg against the Bills today.

Winning is all that counts and your boys coughed one up that should have been a gimme today. Hope those stats take the a bit of the sting off of that.

Bob's your Information Minister
11-13-2005, 06:00 PM
The standings are already out and they show the Broncos up 2 games on the rest of the division. The rest is just stats, but then that's about all you've got to cling to after your team laid an egg against the Bills today.

Winning is all that counts and your boys coughed one up that should have been a gimme today.

We're talking about defense. KC lost to the Bills today because of their offense.

MrPeepers
11-13-2005, 06:00 PM
Even if you can't compete with the best in the west, you still have the Raiders to compete with, maybe you can avoid being the worst team in the AFC West

Clockwork Orange
11-13-2005, 06:01 PM
See? Our D is ascending. Accept it. They had to get better sometime.

And your offense is clearly declining.

RedskinBronco
11-13-2005, 06:01 PM
Oakland's offense had played well in the two games prior to coming to KC. Then we shut them down pretty good.

KC's D IS improving. There's evidence all over the place.

Again, when the new rankings come out tomorrow and Tuesday, Denver and KC will be close in most categories. The rest is all spin.

If KC's offense hadn't gone to **** this year we'd be right there with you.


IF, IF, IF, IF

It never changes with chef fans.

Bob's your Information Minister
11-13-2005, 06:01 PM
Even if you can't compete with the best in the west, you still have the Raiders to compete with, maybe you can avoid being the worst team in the AFC West

This division race isn't over by a long shot. You guys will drop your games in San Diego, KC and Dallas.

baja
11-13-2005, 06:02 PM
KC made some plays like that today. Trent fumbled and Buffalo ran it back to the 10 yard line. Our D then forced a fumble.

See? Our D is ascending. Accept it. They had to get better sometime.

OK Bob I accept your 5 and 4 Chiefs D is improving now get lost.

Bob's your Information Minister
11-13-2005, 06:02 PM
And your offense is clearly declining.

Yup. It is very difficult to swallow.

MrPeepers
11-13-2005, 06:03 PM
i am more intimidated by the Raiders team we just beat up in their house than the Chiefs team that lost to the Bills.

RunByDesign
11-13-2005, 06:03 PM
OK Bob I accept your 5 and 4 Chiefs D is improving now get lost.

ROFL!

brncs_fan
11-13-2005, 06:08 PM
Again, when the new rankings come out tomorrow and Tuesday, Denver and KC will be close in most categories. The rest is all spin.


Except for that stat that says you guys have given up 28 more points.

Sassy
11-13-2005, 06:10 PM
Yeah.

But we're going to kill Houston. KC is undefeated in games I attend. :laugh:
Ha! Denver is also undefeated in games Hogan and I attend...Mmmm...The KC game on MNF and we're off to San Diego in December...that leaves KC in Arrowhead and the Fade at Home...I like those odds...

Kaylore
11-13-2005, 06:14 PM
The Chiefs D improving? Hilarious! Please. The Buffs are one of the worst offensive teams in the NFL. They are ahead of only the niners, Jets, and the Texans. Only Bob would look at a game where they gave up 14 points against one of the worst offenses in the NFL and suggest that the Chief's defense is improving. Shame on anyone who conceded it was.

brncs_fan
11-13-2005, 06:14 PM
This division race isn't over by a long shot. You guys will drop your games in San Diego, KC and Dallas.
Maybe, but you guys will drop your games @ NY, @Dallas, San Diego, and Cincy. I am pretty confident in a loss to Denver as well. All this is giving you a win against NE as well.

Enjoy your 2-5 end of the year

Bob's your Information Minister
11-13-2005, 06:17 PM
Maybe, but you guys will drop your games @ NY, @Dallas, San Diego, and Cincy. I am pretty confident in a loss to Denver as well. All this is giving you a win against NE as well.

Enjoy your 2-5 end of the year

Yeah, whatever. We'll lose to NY or Dallas. The rest are wins.

Broncoman13
11-13-2005, 06:22 PM
Yeah, whatever. We'll lose to NY or Dallas. The rest are wins.

So you have us losing 3 more games. 11-5 record.

You have your team losing two more. 10-6 record. :kubiak: Now how is it that you're going to contend for the division???

I know I'm not stating anything new here, but you're a dumbass!

RedskinBronco
11-13-2005, 06:24 PM
Yeah, whatever. We'll lose to NY or Dallas. The rest are wins.


hey booby, is this with the great Willie Roaf or without?

oh who am I kidding....like it matters :loopy:

Bob's your Information Minister
11-13-2005, 06:25 PM
So you have us losing 3 more games. 11-5 record.

You have your team losing two more. 10-6 record. :kubiak: Now how is it that you're going to contend for the division???

I know I'm not stating anything new here, but you're a dumbass!

I have us losing ONE more. And you could very well lose 4, I didn't pass judgement on your entire schedule.

Bob's your Information Minister
11-13-2005, 06:26 PM
The Chiefs D improving? Hilarious! Please. The Buffs are one of the worst offensive teams in the NFL. They are ahead of only the niners, Jets, and the Texans. Only Bob would look at a game where they gave up 14 points against one of the worst offenses in the NFL and suggest that the Chief's defense is improving. Shame on anyone who conceded it was.

We held McGahee to 66 yards. He had 790 coming into the game. That's impressive any way you slice it.

And there is last week's game against Oakland to consider.

sirhcyennek81
11-13-2005, 06:28 PM
So...in holding McGahee to 66 yards...did you win?

MrPeepers
11-13-2005, 06:29 PM
you sound pathetic, just stop, you sound desperate to convince yourself that your team isn't as bad as it looks and were not going ot help you out with that.

RedskinBronco
11-13-2005, 06:29 PM
I have us losing ONE more. And you could very well lose 4, I didn't pass judgement on your entire schedule.


wow just wow. You do know that the Broncos are 7-2 right? 3-4 in the final 7 games is actually a GREAT goal for....THE CHIEFS!!!ROFL!

brncs_fan
11-13-2005, 06:30 PM
We held McGahee to 66 yards. He had 790 coming into the game. That's impressive any way you slice it.

And there is last week's game against Oakland to consider.
pssst: you lost

MrPeepers
11-13-2005, 06:30 PM
Bob, what you need, is a good long Cry fest maybe you'll feel better. If you need a warmup watch some video of your coach.

Bronx33
11-13-2005, 06:31 PM
I heard you guys gave up more yards than we did. How you like them apples?

Our D is ascending. Shut down McGahee today. Jared Allen is the best defensive end in the AFC West.

A small victory in a dismal season bob, how you find the silver lining with every loss is amazing.

brncs_fan
11-13-2005, 06:35 PM
Yeah, whatever. We'll lose to NY or Dallas. The rest are wins.
So you have beaten 1 team with a winning record...yet you are going to take out Denver, New England, Cincy, San Diego, and Dallas or NY?

Bronx33
11-13-2005, 06:36 PM
http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/customavatars/avatar3815_53.gif

Oppps he lost em again!

sirhcyennek81
11-13-2005, 06:37 PM
Bob...when you score less then the other team, you lose. When you score more then the other team, you win. Broncos gave up 350 yards of offense. still scored 31 points, still condemned oakland to the west cellar. You guys lost. giving denver a 2 game cushion. I would think, even to a chief fan, winning would matter more then statistical marks. But hey, then again, i am not a chief fan, and i live in reality...

OrangeForceOne
11-13-2005, 06:37 PM
Bob would you like to go double or nothing on our kc bet? I would. Chiefs suck.........

77

RedskinBronco
11-13-2005, 06:38 PM
So you have beaten 1 team with a winning record...yet you are going to take out Denver, New England, Cincy, San Diego, and Dallas or NY?


woah brncs_fan...wtf are you talking about?! Try to be a little logical here :~ohyah!:

Merlin
11-13-2005, 06:54 PM
Bob,

I know you are not as dumb as you are trying to come across as. You know that all points scored against are not created equal. You have to consider the context; i.e. where the game was played, was it a close game, the officiating, etc.

Denver was killing the Raiders 31-10 with a 7 minutes left. The D allowed the Raiders to gain yards as long as it ate up time. The last TD by the Raiders was scored in garbage time. So you only have 10 points scored in critical time. As to the total yds., remember that they were losing badly and Collins was forced into a passing game (50 passes!).

Conversely, your mediocre team not only gave up 17 points with the game on the line, but you guys needed a blown call on Moss to win the game (without the blown call they score 24 and win). So even though the refs blunder is irrelevant to the W column, it is relevant to your team's performance.

Lastly, to compare this D with KC's D of 2003 is incredibly ignorant. They only thing they share in common is the turnovers. Even though this D gives up yds. it does mostly at garbage time. Your 2003 D could never dominate for 2 to 3 qtrs. That D was totally dependent on the O for wins. This D has won games for Denver, and will continue to do so.

PS How many turnovers did KC’s D create at critical times to preserve wins in 2003 (or this year for that matter)? In at least half the wins this year the D has made a critical turnover to ensure the win. In the loss to the Giants they also made a critical TO, but the O did not helped them by getting a couple of downs to finish the game.

RedskinBronco
11-13-2005, 06:58 PM
Bob,

I know you are not as dumb as you are trying to come across as. You know that all points scored against are not created equal. You have to consider the context; i.e. where the game was played, was it a close game, the officiating, etc.

Denver was killing the Raiders 31-10 with a 7 minutes left. The D allowed the Raiders to gain yards as long as it ate up time. The last TD by the Raiders was scored in garbage time. So you only have 10 points scored in critical time. As to the total yds., remember that they were losing badly and Collins was forced into a passing game (50 passes!).

Conversely, your mediocre team not only gave up 17 points with the game on the line, but you guys needed a blown call on Moss to win the game (without the blown call they score 24 and win). So even though the refs blunder is irrelevant to the W column, it is relevant to your team's performance.

Lastly, to compare this D with KC's D of 2003 is incredibly ignorant. They only thing they share in common is the turnovers. Even though this D gives up yds. it does mostly at garbage time. Your 2003 D could never dominate for 2 to 3 qtrs. That D was totally dependent on the O for wins. This D has won games for Denver, and will continue to do so.

PS How many turnovers did KC’s D create at critical times to preserve wins in 2003 (or this year for that matter)? In at least half the wins this year the D has made a critical turnover to ensure the win. In the loss to the Giants they also made a critical TO, but the O did not helped them by getting a couple of downs to finish the game.

One other note on that humorous comparison between this Denver D and KC's 2003 D....LOOK AT THE ROSTERS! Denver has defensive players that that KC team could only dream of. Stop trying to pass that junk as something legit.

clean
11-13-2005, 07:13 PM
Yeah, whatever. We'll lose to NY or Dallas. The rest are wins.

You would of said the same thing this morning, before today's game started.

Atlas
11-13-2005, 07:18 PM
I think you should consider changing your avatar to "I think we shot our wad!"
or "That'll do!"

Don't worry. Bob has a bet with me and he will lose all his avatar privialiges forever if Bailey gets more Ints than Surtain. As of right now Bailey is winning 4-1

Atlas
11-13-2005, 07:26 PM
I have tickets.

BTW, you guys think you can hold the Jets to 7 points next week? If not, I have crow.

Who cares Bob? Your a nitwit!!! If Denver wins 13-10 that still means they are 8-2!!! Losers obsess on stats because stats can be manipulated to make your team look better than it is. I'm sure you could find hundreds of stats that will point to the "fact" that the Chefs are better than the Colts so knock yourself out. You can figure out and tell us how great KC is even though they didn't make the playoffs......(again) that should be an interesting read.... not

baja
11-13-2005, 07:29 PM
Statistically speaking the Chiefs should draft high this year

Atlas
11-13-2005, 07:46 PM
Bob... I would think, even to a chief fan, winning would matter more then statistical marks. But hey, then again, i am not a chief fan, and i live in reality...

Didn't you get the memo?? If the chefs give up fewer yards this year than the Broncos they will automatically win the AFC West... It's been in all the papers.

OrangeShadow
11-13-2005, 07:54 PM
you lost to buffalo

4 simple words says so much

No1BroncoFan
11-13-2005, 07:56 PM
I have tickets.

BTW, you guys think you can hold the Jets to 7 points next week? If not, I have crow.
Since when did margin of victory ever mean sh*t to anyone but a pathetic stat geek? You're pathetic Bob. A sad, sad little man who believes stats are more important than wins. Do you really believe that your defense is improving when Buffalo is able to take you down? Really? Fvcking amazing! Talk about totally delusional...

Ben

Sassy
11-13-2005, 07:57 PM
BOB...YOUR TEAM LOST!
Get over it! LOL!

No1BroncoFan
11-13-2005, 07:58 PM
So long as they beat the Jets, I don't give a rip.

It is funny that you've been reduced to grasping at stats. :laugh:
No sh*t. 21-20 or 210-3, I don't give a sh*t as long as it's a win.

Ben

No1BroncoFan
11-13-2005, 08:01 PM
Shut up, homer. Most of my posts are well-thought-out and logical.
ROFL! rofl LOL Hilarious!

Bob = :dummy:

Ben

Bronx33
11-13-2005, 08:08 PM
Man bob! can't you just feel the love! where else could a closet broncos fan go and get this kinda love? (no where bob):yep:

GreatBronco16
11-13-2005, 08:38 PM
Someone seriously just ban boob. It was fun for a while, but now his act is just getting really old.

Just wait, come Wednesday, he will be kissing TJs butt on some topic such as the front page or something.

Gochiefs, go back to your hole in the ground at the planet and stay there.

Mile High Shack
11-13-2005, 09:22 PM
Yup. It is very difficult to swallow.

something you never had a problem with before

Mile High Shack
11-13-2005, 09:24 PM
Bob,

I know you are not as dumb as you are trying to come across as. You know that all points scored against are not created equal. You have to consider the context; i.e. where the game was played, was it a close game, the officiating, etc.

Denver was killing the Raiders 31-10 with a 7 minutes left. The D allowed the Raiders to gain yards as long as it ate up time. The last TD by the Raiders was scored in garbage time. So you only have 10 points scored in critical time. As to the total yds., remember that they were losing badly and Collins was forced into a passing game (50 passes!).

Conversely, your mediocre team not only gave up 17 points with the game on the line, but you guys needed a blown call on Moss to win the game (without the blown call they score 24 and win). So even though the refs blunder is irrelevant to the W column, it is relevant to your team's performance.

Lastly, to compare this D with KC's D of 2003 is incredibly ignorant. They only thing they share in common is the turnovers. Even though this D gives up yds. it does mostly at garbage time. Your 2003 D could never dominate for 2 to 3 qtrs. That D was totally dependent on the O for wins. This D has won games for Denver, and will continue to do so.

PS How many turnovers did KC’s D create at critical times to preserve wins in 2003 (or this year for that matter)? In at least half the wins this year the D has made a critical turnover to ensure the win. In the loss to the Giants they also made a critical TO, but the O did not helped them by getting a couple of downs to finish the game.


thank you for pointing this out

oakland got garbage yards on us when we were up 31-10, I mean c'mon, the team was playing prevent on that last drive oakland had, sure we "let" them score but the game was already over

how many points did we allow in crunch time? 10 points.......I'd like to add, b/c of some stupid turnovers...that allowed Oakland good field position

I can't believe he'd compare our D to the 2003 chiefs D, does this jackass....and I do mean JACKASS even watch football?

RunByDesign
11-13-2005, 09:35 PM
Too bad for the Chef defense they couldn't contain the dynamic duo of J.P. Losman and Lee Evans.

Swallow that one, Boob.

RunByDesign
11-13-2005, 09:37 PM
...and I do mean JACKASS even watch football?

I believe he does...he just lets his imagination run wild. ROFL!

GreatBronco16
11-13-2005, 11:26 PM
I have tickets.

BTW, you guys think you can hold the Jets to 7 points next week? If not, I have crow.


How bout this bet. The bet that Denver will score more than 3 points against the Bills?

Atlas
11-13-2005, 11:28 PM
How bout this bet. The bet that Denver will score more than 3 points against the Bills?

I don't think Boob will take that one.

GreatBronco16
11-13-2005, 11:30 PM
I don't think Boob will take that one.


Wonder if he will take a bet on Plummer will have fewer INTs than TrINT this year?

24champ
11-13-2005, 11:36 PM
Wonder if he will take a bet on Plummer will have fewer INTs than TrINT this year?
Trint has 6 TDs and 6 int i believe.....keep it up trint!

Atlas
11-13-2005, 11:37 PM
Wonder if he will take a bet on Plummer will have fewer INTs than TrINT this year?

I doubt it. I remember him spewing all his Sh=t before the season started. Talking out his Ass. Remember his thread about the magical punter that no team in the NFL would be able to catch his punts?? What a tool. He deserves a team like the Chefs.
They are made for each other.

DomCasual
11-13-2005, 11:39 PM
I doubt it. I remember him spewing all his Sh=t before the season started. Talking out his Ass. Remember his thread about the magical punter that no team in the NFL would be able to catch his punts?? What a tool. He deserves a team like the Chefs.
They are made for each other.
The magical punter. Classic!

Does anyone keep stats on muffed punts? I'd love to see if Chiefs opponents have had even one.

The magical punter! Well put, Atlas.

Man-Goblin
11-13-2005, 11:39 PM
Again, I admit I'm a lurker, but wasn't Bob claiming the season was over after the loss to Phily? How could he not find anything positive out of that debacle, yet find something positive out of puting 3 points up on the Bills? Note to Bob: if you win, it's because of your OFFENSE. It has been that way since, i dunno, the early 80's for Dickie V? Okay, I'm done ripping on Bob. I swear. Go Broncos.

24champ
11-13-2005, 11:43 PM
I think bob likes your avatar Jones....chicks with dixs turns him on might want to change it....just a thought.

Man-Goblin
11-13-2005, 11:45 PM
I think bob likes your avatar Jones....chicks with dixs turns him on might want to change it....just a thought.

Are you talking about Kurt Warner or his wife?

SoCalBronco
11-13-2005, 11:46 PM
Its true. Bob likes chicks with dicks. My sig line at the Planet bears the infamous quote.

24champ
11-13-2005, 11:53 PM
Are you talking about Kurt Warner or his wife?
the wife that looks like a dude.

MrPeepers
11-14-2005, 12:01 AM
seriously my eyes, take her off the screen. that banshee is eating my soul.

Atlas
11-14-2005, 12:05 AM
seriously my eyes, take her off the screen. that banshee is eating my soul.

She has some big boobs

MrPeepers
11-14-2005, 12:17 AM
not her, warners wife, she'd make ships sail into hurricanes to escape her wrath.

Atlas
11-14-2005, 12:22 AM
not her, warners wife, she'd make ships sail into hurricanes to escape her wrath.

Yeah she is fugly but she does have big boobs. I stared at them constantly during the Lambs S.B. run. They are nice. Must be implants. I suspect she was cute about 50 years ago when she was a teenager!!!

Northman
11-14-2005, 02:12 AM
Bob...when you score less then the other team, you lose. When you score more then the other team, you win. Broncos gave up 350 yards of offense. still scored 31 points, still condemned oakland to the west cellar. You guys lost. giving denver a 2 game cushion. I would think, even to a chief fan, winning would matter more then statistical marks. But hey, then again, i am not a chief fan, and i live in reality...

Well, Bob is on the Vermeil 10 year plan. they hope to make the playoffs in about 10 more years so that they can be content again without making it to the Super Bowl. :laugh:

ol number 7
11-14-2005, 05:35 AM
Yeah.

But we're going to kill Houston. KC is undefeated in games I attend. :laugh:

I see you saved enough beer cans to buy a ticket. Good job Bob !! If you have a car just park in front of a bar and someone may leave tickets on your windshield wiper. Tag; your it !!! Now you are stuck with the Chiefs tickets and have to get rid of them. Go for the BBQ. Not bad.

ol number 7
11-14-2005, 05:46 AM
This division race isn't over by a long shot. You guys will drop your games in San Diego, KC and Dallas.

That adds up to 11-5. I'll see you at Invesco for the playoffs. ^5

bloodsunday
11-14-2005, 06:06 AM
Beats the hell out of being 2 games back.

We are thankful for the Chefs (and specifically TrINT's) help in getting that lead. We couldn't have done it without your putrid showing in Orchard Park today.
TrINT threw as many picks today as Plummer all season (WFT?). How would have thought that?

Bob's your Information Minister
11-14-2005, 07:21 AM
The magical punter. Classic!

Does anyone keep stats on muffed punts? I'd love to see if Chiefs opponents have had even one.

The magical punter! Well put, Atlas.

Actually Colquitt has done pretty much what I anticipated. Opponents have dropped 4 of his punts. He's an amazing punter.

Mile High Shack
11-14-2005, 07:27 AM
Actually Colquitt has done pretty much what I anticipated. Opponents have dropped 4 of his punts. He's an amazing punter.

you know your season just took a turn for the worst when you have to give it up to your rookie "amazing" punter

DBroncos4life
11-14-2005, 07:29 AM
bob you still suck, just like the Queefs

Paladin
11-14-2005, 07:29 AM
Too bad he's on a lousy team.

Bob's your Information Minister
11-14-2005, 07:31 AM
you know your season just took a turn for the worst when you have to give it up to your rookie "amazing" punter

I am just answering the question. I am not going to sit here while people spout lies.

Mile High Shack
11-14-2005, 07:38 AM
I am just answering the question. I am not going to sit here while people spout lies.

Like I told you before

you'll sit there and take it and like it and ask for more

b/c we told you to

Bob's your Information Minister
11-14-2005, 07:54 AM
Like I told you before

you'll sit there and take it and like it and ask for more

b/c we told you to

It's going to be sweet when KC wins the division and I shove this back in your faces!

Smiling Assassin27
11-14-2005, 08:02 AM
The Chiefs have ingested the Kool-Aid--the delusions are in full display! We know who the pretenders and the contenders are, Boob, no need to spin so hard.

Mile High Shack
11-14-2005, 08:05 AM
It's going to be sweet when KC wins the division and I shove this back in your faces!

so what you are saying is

KC is going to win out and Denver is going 4-3 the rest of the way eh?

Smiling Assassin27
11-14-2005, 08:13 AM
It's going to be sweeter when the Chiefs limp to an 8-8 record, Vermeil retires to the wine country, Priest calls it a career, Carl Peterson breaks up yet another failure of a team, and Boob promises another SuperBowl title in the offseason.

TotallyScrewed
11-14-2005, 08:18 AM
Notice Bob didn't say "this" year. He'll throw this year back in "our" collective faces sometime in the future...say in 5, 10, 20 years. And then we'll be in BIG trouble! You just wait!!!

RedskinBronco
11-14-2005, 08:48 AM
It's going to be sweeter when the Chiefs limp to an 8-8 record, Vermeil retires to the wine country, Priest calls it a career, Carl Peterson breaks up yet another failure of a team, and Boob promises another SuperBowl title in the offseason.

LOL...it's always great to see that everyone outside that place they call "KC" sees it like it is....the more things change the more they stay the same :contract:

Bronx33
11-14-2005, 10:01 AM
It's going to be sweet when KC wins the division and I shove this back in your faces!



Iam going to frame this....

24champ
11-14-2005, 10:43 AM
It's going to be sweeter when the Chiefs limp to an 8-8 record, Vermeil retires to the wine country, Priest calls it a career, Carl Peterson breaks up yet another failure of a team, and Boob promises another SuperBowl title in the offseason.
Chiefs are imploding, Vermeil is confused and dazed....GOTTA LOVE IT!:laugh:

bronco militia
11-14-2005, 10:55 AM
Chiefs new uniforms for 2006:

http://pic16.picturetrail.com/VOL637/2498345/6660043/118786912.jpg

bendog
11-14-2005, 11:07 AM
TrINT ... fumbles

Bronx33
11-14-2005, 11:15 AM
TrinT throws an INT.

No1BroncoFan
11-15-2005, 11:28 AM
Actually Colquitt has done pretty much what I anticipated. Opponents have dropped 4 of his punts. He's an amazing punter.
Does anyone on this board even give a sh*t how many of sourbread's punts have been dropped by our opponents?

You see, Bob, when you're winning, and winning convincingly, and leading the division, you just don't give a sh*t about stupid stat geek sh*t!

Why, oh why did your mom ever buy you a computer for your basement room?

Ben

Bob's your Information Minister
11-15-2005, 11:35 AM
Does anyone on this board even give a sh*t how many of sourbread's punts have been dropped by our opponents?


Yes. I was responding to someone's post about our punter. They were attempting to disparage him.

Go fvck yourself.

maven
11-15-2005, 11:38 AM
Yes. I was responding to someone's post about our punter. They were attempting to disparage him.

Go fvck yourself.

Chef fans relegated to punter talk.Hilarious!

Xbox 360 t-minus 7 days!

:blowhorn:

Bob's your Information Minister
11-15-2005, 11:47 AM
Chef fans relegated to punter talk.Hilarious!


No. I wouldn't have said a word about Colquitt if a BRONCOS fan hadn't mentioned him first.

GreatBronco16
11-15-2005, 11:59 AM
Yes. I was responding to someone's post about our punter. They were attempting to disparage him.

Go fvck yourself.


Boob is an expert of fvcking himself.

DarkHorse30
11-15-2005, 12:11 PM
Caption this pic:

http://espn-i.starwave.com/media/apphoto/NYDD70611132204.jpg

Warfield.....the 2.8 million dollar chief....prefers ballet over football

ICON
11-15-2005, 12:12 PM
Hilarious! It's going to be sweet when KC wins the division and I shove this back in your faces!

brncs_fan
11-15-2005, 12:39 PM
[QUOTE=DarkHorse30]Caption this pic:

http://espn-i.starwave.com/media/apphoto/NYDD70611132204.jpg

"No, the ball still sits like this on top of the Lombardi Trophy. They havn't changed it in 30 years."

Odysseus
11-15-2005, 12:41 PM
seriously my eyes, take her off the screen. that banshee is eating my soul.

Hilarious! Holy stick in the eye!

Odysseus
11-15-2005, 12:53 PM
Boob is an expert of fvcking himself.

The absolute master of sit and spin. The prognasticator hot wired into a defibulator. The philosophical wing nut who remains metaphysically challenged yet somehow wrinkle free. The complicator or supreme dumbfuggery. The castrated Sultan of the XBox. The ultimate predictor of absolutely nothing. The embodiment of one calorie of evil.

Let's have a round of applause for Mr Diet Evil......Boob!

(Notice it's just one boob. Two would be tits. Apparently there was a mastectomy....or something.)

Ha!

missingnumber7
11-15-2005, 12:57 PM
Amazing how the Texans will put an interesting end to the Chiefs consideration of a season. AGAIN

Odysseus
11-15-2005, 01:05 PM
Its true. Bob likes chicks with dicks. My sig line at the Planet bears the infamous quote.

Oh great! I was just getting over the nightmares. :sickortir :'( ~Popps~ ugh!~ :pity:

Bob's your Information Minister
11-15-2005, 01:09 PM
Amazing how the Texans will put an interesting end to the Chiefs consideration of a season. AGAIN

What a load of crap. We're going to stomp a mudhole in Houston. I'm personally attending and KC is undefeated in such instances.

Odysseus
11-15-2005, 01:17 PM
What a load of crap. We're going to stomp a mudhole in Houston. I'm personally attending and KC is undefeated in such instances.

Hilarious! They are DOOOOOOOOOMED! :giggle:

ICON
11-15-2005, 01:22 PM
http://img477.imageshack.us/img477/2356/dw2cs.jpg
Hilarious! Hilarious! Hilarious!


i lov this pic!!!!I THINK K.C LOSES BY 3 Hilarious! Hilarious!

Hilarious!
Hilarious!

Hilarious! Hilarious!

Bronx33
11-15-2005, 01:31 PM
What a load of crap. We're going to stomp a mudhole in Houston. I'm personally attending and KC is undefeated in such instances.


You were suppose to stomp a mud hole in buffalo and failed to score a TD with you high powered O.

Bob's your Information Minister
11-15-2005, 01:47 PM
You were suppose to stomp a mud hole in buffalo and failed to score a TD with you high powered O.

Yeah, well Houston is the worst team in the league.

Bronx33
11-15-2005, 01:56 PM
Yeah, well Houston is the worst team in the league.

What's you point?

ICON
11-15-2005, 01:58 PM
patheticLOL :hitself: Nnyah!

Hotrod
11-15-2005, 02:03 PM
It's going to be sweet when KC wins the division and I shove this back in your faces!

LOL I mean Wow Ha!

Atlas
11-15-2005, 02:08 PM
Actually Colquitt has done pretty much what I anticipated. Opponents have dropped 4 of his punts. He's an amazing punter.


Here we go again.


Rank Player Team Pnt Yds GAvg NAvg LG TB BLK In 20 Ret RetAvg RetTD
1 Josh Bidwell TB 51 2402 47.1 38.7 61 7 0 11 31 9.3 0
2 Shane Lechler OAK 44 2052 46.6 39.6 59 3 0 14 25 10.0 0
3 Josh Miller NE 48 2228 46.4 39.6 59 2 0 17 26 9.6 0
4 Chris Kluwe MIN 43 1991 46.3 38.5 62 4 0 9 24 10.7 0
5 Brian Moorman BUF 41 1886 46.0 38.6 63 5 0 13 26 7.9 0
6 Mike Scifres SD 39 1787 45.8 39.2 60 5 0 9 16 9.9 0
7 Todd Sauerbrun DEN 43 1951 45.4 38.0 66 5 0 15 23 7.8 0
8 Scott Player ARI 43 1949 45.3 37.9 60 4 0 7 28 8.6 1
9 Donnie Jones MIA 48 2125 44.3 40.9 60 4 0 15 22 3.8 0
10 Ben Graham NYJ 45 1978 44.0 38.6 58 3 0 10 23 7.9 0
11 Dave Zastudil BAL 47 2064 43.9 36.5 60 2 0 5 31 8.8 0
12 Jeff Feagles NYG 40 1756 43.9 38.3 56 1 0 15 22 9.2 1
13 Hunter Smith IND 26 1134 43.6 36.9 56 1 0 12 15 10.3 0
14 Mat McBriar DAL 43 1873 43.6 36.3 62 5 0 13 21 10.0 0
15 Nick Harris DET 49 2137 43.6 38.1 60 1 0 20 29 8.6 1
16 Chris Hanson JAC 50 2174 43.5 36.5 58 6 0 22 19 10.2 1
17 Jason Baker CAR 39 1685 43.2 38.3 59 3 0 10 17 7.7 0
18 Kyle Larson CIN 38 1623 42.7 35.4 75 5 0 8 19 7.4 0
19 Mitch Berger NO 39 1665 42.7 39.8 56 1 0 18 15 6.1 0
20 Andy Lee SF 59 2504 42.4 37.8 58 0 0 11 36 7.6 0
21 B.J. Sander GB 34 1437 42.3 38.1 53 1 0 8 27 4.4 0
22 Michael Koenen ATL 44 1857 42.2 37.3 67 5 0 13 20 5.8 0
23 Derrick Frost WAS 31 1298 41.9 37.8 55 3 0 11 13 5.0 0
24 Craig Hentrich TEN 42 1756 41.8 37.2 56 7 0 13 16 3.4 0
25 Chris Gardocki PIT 31 1284 41.4 34.1 65 3 0 7 17 9.8 0
26 Dirk Johnson PHI 39 1615 41.4 38.4 59 0 0 11 25 4.8 0
27 Kyle Richardson CLE 42 1735 41.3 34.3 61 5 0 13 15 13.1 0
28 Brad Maynard CHI 52 2114 40.7 37.3 59 4 0 14 20 4.6 0
29 Dustin Colquitt KC 39 1584 40.6 35.9 62 3 0 17 15 8.2 0
30 Tom Rouen SEA 23 919 40.0 36.0 59 2 0 7 13 3.8 0

Bob he is 29th in gross punting and 26th in net either way you look at it he has sucked.

You say that 4 of his punts were muffed?? HAHA that's hardly him being uncatchable now is it? Out of those 4 muffed punts how many did the chefs recover?? You see Bob you have turned into a statman, the chefs suck so bad you over look the obvious facts that stare right at you and you dig for stats that somehow support your lame opinions. Go take a break you have deserved it.

GreatBronco16
11-15-2005, 02:13 PM
Wow, talk about getting the foot up the ass.

BTW, has boob even proved that he has had 4 muffed punts?

Bronx33
11-15-2005, 02:16 PM
Wow, talk about getting the foot up the ass.

BTW, has boob even proved that he has had 4 muffed punts?

Nope but he can prove numerous posts have been muffed...

Smiling Assassin27
11-15-2005, 02:17 PM
When names like Gardocki, Baker, Hentrich and Feagles are above you, you know you're one punt away from the CFL...Nice job of doing the homework, Atlas.

Atlas
11-15-2005, 02:18 PM
Wow, talk about getting the foot up the ass.

BTW, has boob even proved that he has had 4 muffed punts?

Of course not. I was going to ask him for a link but why bother.

Hotrod
11-15-2005, 02:18 PM
Ok Ok Boob is correct their punter sends a punt that has a reverse spin on it. Actually many returners have had trouble catching the punts cleanly. That being said his attempt at "punter smack" Ha! is funny in itself.

Smiling Assassin27
11-15-2005, 02:19 PM
http://img477.imageshack.us/img477/2356/dw2cs.jpg
Hilarious! Hilarious! Hilarious!


i lov this pic!!!!I THINK K.C LOSES BY 3 Hilarious! Hilarious!

Hilarious!
Hilarious!

Hilarious! Hilarious!

The dejection on that little girl's face in the lower left corner is priceless. A lesson in being a Raider fan early on in life...

Bronx33
11-15-2005, 02:20 PM
The dejection on that little girl's face in the lower left corner is priceless. A lesson in being a Raider fan early on in life...

It's more of a punishment if you ask me...

Pezman
11-15-2005, 02:21 PM
Jeebus... a thorough pasting of the Fade this weekend, and yet there is a 6 page thread dedicated to Gochiefs? Man oh man, do we need some fresh meat in here

Bronx33
11-15-2005, 02:25 PM
Jeebus... a thorough pasting of the Fade this weekend, and yet there is a 6 page thread dedicated to Gochiefs? Man oh man, do we need some fresh meat in here


Question is where is it going to come from?:Broncos:

Hotrod
11-15-2005, 02:30 PM
Question is where is it going to come from?:Broncos:

Thats the problem heck we invited some Jets fans in here but their so shell shocked they wont say much more then Denvers gonna kill them this week so wheres the fun in that.

Pezman
11-15-2005, 02:32 PM
Question is where is it going to come from?:Broncos:

Didnt you hear? Us Socal'ers have already traded in our Raider gear for whatever is trendy at the moment. Its all about USC or the Chargers. So I'm sure you'll hear from them soon.

God I hate this plastic town

BRONCCRUSHFAN
11-15-2005, 02:32 PM
The dejection on that little girl's face in the lower left corner is priceless. A lesson in being a Raider fan early on in life...
The Bad thing about it is she looks like she is already a refugee from Juvie

Smiling Assassin27
11-15-2005, 02:36 PM
Don't cry, little girl...Daddy drinks because you cry...

DarkHorse30
11-15-2005, 02:43 PM
What a load of crap. We're going to stomp a mudhole in Houston....

Hmmmm, Bob....please translate. Does "stomping a mudhole in Houston" have something to do with your trailer park sewage system? ....or is the "load of crap" unrelated to "mudhole stomping"?

Also, does Trent Green know that he has thrown 3 picks and zero TDs since he became your avatar?

GreatBronco16
11-15-2005, 02:45 PM
Hmmmm, Bob....please translate. Does "stomping a mudhole in Houston" have something to do with your trailer park sewage system? ....or is the "load of crap" unrelated to "mudhole stomping"?

Also, does Trent Green know that he has thrown 3 picks and zero TDs since he became your avatar?
ROFL!

Smiling Assassin27
11-15-2005, 02:46 PM
Hmmmm, Bob....please translate. Does "stomping a mudhole in Houston" have something to do with your trailer park sewage system? ....or is the "load of crap" unrelated to "mudhole stomping"?

Also, does Trent Green know that he has thrown 3 picks and zero TDs since he became your avatar?

Mudhole stomping in KC is akin to fudge packing in Oakland and sword swallowing in San Diego...

Bronx33
11-15-2005, 03:02 PM
Hmmmm, Bob....please translate. Does "stomping a mudhole in Houston" have something to do with your trailer park sewage system? ....or is the "load of crap" unrelated to "mudhole stomping"?

Also, does Trent Green know that he has thrown 3 picks and zero TDs since he became your avatar?

Wow! it's almost creepy.ugh!~

Bob's your Information Minister
11-15-2005, 03:21 PM
It's not punter smack, you morons. I didn't bring it up.

Before the season I predicted that punt returners would drop five of his punts. So far he's on pace to shatter that.

As for his stats, who cares? If you watched a KC game you would know how good he is. His hangtime is out of this world. He's punted quite a bit from midfield so his averages aren't great.

He's among the league leaders in punts inside the 20. He's tied for first in punts returned, meaning that most of his kicks are unreturnable. That's what I call a good punter.

Clockwork Orange
11-15-2005, 03:31 PM
We're going to stomp a mudhole in Houston.

Gee Bob, I seem to remember you saying last week that the Chefs would only lose one more game and that would be at the Giants or Cowboys.

Water's wet, sky's blue and Bob's wrong. World keeps on turning.

Hotrod
11-15-2005, 03:40 PM
It's not punter smack, you morons. I didn't bring it up.

Before the season I predicted that punt returners would drop five of his punts. So far he's on pace to shatter that.

As for his stats, who cares? If you watched a KC game you would know how good he is. His hangtime is out of this world. He's punted quite a bit from midfield so his averages aren't great.

He's among the league leaders in punts inside the 20. He's tied for first in punts returned, meaning that most of his kicks are unreturnable. That's what I call a good punter.

LOL sounds like punter smack right there boob.

Bob's your Information Minister
11-15-2005, 03:42 PM
LOL sounds like punter smack right there boob.

Nope. I am countering the people that are disparaging Colquitt. Do you expect me to sit idly by while people spout lies about Chief players?

Northman
11-15-2005, 03:44 PM
Nope. I am countering the people that are disparaging Colquitt. Do you expect me to sit idly by while people spout lies about Chief players?


You spout lies all the time, whats the difference?

Bob's your Information Minister
11-15-2005, 03:47 PM
You spout lies all the time, whats the difference?

Do not. I might spout opinions that get proven wrong, but I always admit it.

Northman
11-15-2005, 03:49 PM
Do not. I might spout opinions that get proven wrong, but I always admit it.



no you dont. you give excuses but at least you show up. ill give you that much.

Bronx33
11-15-2005, 03:50 PM
Word is on the texans board they are going to stomp a mud hole in KC..:militia:

Clockwork Orange
11-15-2005, 03:51 PM
Do not. I might spout opinions that get proven wrong, but I always admit it.

Ready to admit you were wrong about Jake Plummer yet?

Bob's your Information Minister
11-15-2005, 03:53 PM
Ready to admit you were wrong about Jake Plummer yet?

When he doesn't suck ass in the playoffs, I will admit I was wrong.

Hotrod
11-15-2005, 03:53 PM
Nope. I am countering the people that are disparaging Colquitt. Do you expect me to sit idly by while people spout lies about Chief players?

Boob this is football nobody is "disparaging" anyone they were what we call bitch slapping him.

Hotrod
11-15-2005, 03:53 PM
When he doesn't suck ass in the playoffs, I will admit I was wrong.

I thought you were still winning the division :laugh:

Bronx33
11-15-2005, 03:55 PM
When he doesn't suck ass in the playoffs, I will admit I was wrong.

Your a hard arse bob, but from this logic trint sucks right? since well he hasen't faired to well in the playoffs either.

Clockwork Orange
11-15-2005, 03:56 PM
When he doesn't suck ass in the playoffs, I will admit I was wrong.

Yet you still hold on to the delusion that TrINT is something more than a pretty average QB who has been the beneficiary of a great O-line. I'd have thought that seeing the way he's pissed down his leg without Willie Roaf this season might have wised you up a bit. Silly me.

And in case you forgot, Plummer has won a playoff game, TrINT hasn't.

Hotrod
11-15-2005, 03:56 PM
Your a hard arse bob, but from this logic trint sucks right? since well he hasen't faired to well in the playoffs either.

Oh be careful boob gets all pissed off if you try to explain to him how trINT choked in the chefs last home playoff loss.

Bob's your Information Minister
11-15-2005, 04:13 PM
I thought you were still winning the division :laugh:

We are. Plummer may get back to the playoffs someday. ;D

Bob's your Information Minister
11-15-2005, 04:14 PM
Your a hard arse bob, but from this logic trint sucks right? since well he hasen't faired to well in the playoffs either.

Green played very well in the playoffs. His team didn't punt. The Chiefs would have scored a touchdown on every drive if it hadn't been for the mistakes of others.

Bronx33
11-15-2005, 04:14 PM
We are. Plummer may get back to the playoffs someday. ;D

Buy lots of lotion bob...

Bob's your Information Minister
11-15-2005, 04:15 PM
Yet you still hold on to the delusion that TrINT is something more than a pretty average QB who has been the beneficiary of a great O-line. I'd have thought that seeing the way he's pissed down his leg without Willie Roaf this season might have wised you up a bit. Silly me.

And in case you forgot, Plummer has won a playoff game, TrINT hasn't.

Well, first of all, this is classic deflection. No need to bring up Trent Green yet you did.

Second of all, he hasn't pissed down his leg at all this year, despite horrible protection. He's been hit more than any other QB in the league, yet only has 6 interceptions in 9 games. Hardly "TrINT."

Bronx33
11-15-2005, 04:15 PM
Green played very well in the playoffs. His team didn't punt. The Chiefs would have scored a touchdown on every drive if it hadn't been for the mistakes of others.

Woulda shoulda coulda....4321~

Bronx33
11-15-2005, 04:17 PM
Well, first of all, this is classic deflection. No need to bring up Trent Green yet you did.

Second of all, he hasn't pissed down his leg at all this year, despite horrible protection. He's been hit more than any other QB in the league, yet only has 6 interceptions in 9 games. Hardly "TrINT."

Great QBs overcome horrible protection bob......thus making trint slow and average.

Clockwork Orange
11-15-2005, 04:39 PM
Well, first of all, this is classic deflection. No need to bring up Trent Green yet you did.

Second of all, he hasn't pissed down his leg at all this year, despite horrible protection. He's been hit more than any other QB in the league, yet only has 6 interceptions in 9 games. Hardly "TrINT."

I'm bringing up TrINT because you're contradicting yourself. Your criteria for slobbing TrINT's knob has always been his TD to INT ratio, yet now the criteria for Plummer is his playoff performances. How convenient that you make that change when Plummer is at better than a 4-1 TD to INT ratio and TrINT is barely over 1-1 in the same category. Very convenient.

You see, this is what happens when someone can't back up their argument. They change the criteria and hope that no one notices.

And I'd bring up TrINT's playoff performances, but that's a pretty small sample size seeing as he's only been good enough to get his team there once in his entire career.

I don't have to deflect anything. Plummer has won a playoff game, TrINT hasn't.

Clockwork Orange
11-15-2005, 04:50 PM
I almost forgot, thank you for illustrating my point about TrINT being nothing special at all without an All-Pro O-line in front of him.

Bronx33
11-15-2005, 04:52 PM
I almost forgot, thank you for illustrating my point about TrINT being nothing special at all without an All-Pro O-line in front of him.

Or just willie roaf for without him trint just can't function.

Bob's your Information Minister
11-15-2005, 05:11 PM
I almost forgot, thank you for illustrating my point about TrINT being nothing special at all without an All-Pro O-line in front of him.

Not true...

Bob's your Information Minister
11-15-2005, 05:12 PM
I tire of this act, donkeys.

From now on, if you deflect, I will not respond. I refuse to get involved in these retarded circle jerks.