PDA

View Full Version : AFC West, the best in football?


Dagmar
11-06-2005, 07:59 PM
http://www.scorehere.com/ProductImages/riddell/nfl/mini/replica/RINFLMR0084_lg.jpg

AFC WEST W L T PCT PF PA STRK DIV CONF
Denver 6 2 0 .750 201 152 Won 1 2-0 4-1
Kansas City 5 3 0 .625 196 183 Won 1 2-2 4-2
San Diego 5 4 0 .556 252 192 Won 2 2-1 4-2
Oakland 3 5 0 .375 185 185 Lost 1 0-3 2-4

Ok, at the midpoint of the season, with the rest having played 9, we’ve played 8, we sit atop, proud. The AFC West from now? I think we can take it, but it’ll be no cake walk. We have 3 road games to them all and one home. KC and SD will be tough. We’re gonna b****slap Oakland, revenge for last season.
KC can perform, if somewhat sporadically, and SD have LT. San Diego are better than their record suggests (poor coaching? Inability to finish games? Who knows…), whereas KC are not any better than their record suggests.

However, after all the smack earlier, I honestly want to congratulate the Chiefs on a gutsy call to win a hard fought game. Especially to Green, who played brilliantly during what must be a very difficult time. Whoa. That was tough. Anyways, they effectively ended the Faiders season, which is always fun.

The AFC West’s standing in the NFL?

Sometimes it is referred too as the best in football. That may be true, it is certainly the best in the AFC in my opinion. Only the AFC North can compete, but they only have two teams with winning records.

The much derided NFC has the NFC East, where all four teams have a winning record, plus the NFC South, which has 2 teams @ 6-2 and one @ 5-3. The other team is the NO Saints, who cannot blame all their problems on circumstance, but imagine playing the season at Folsom Field instead of INVESCO.

That’s what’s grinding my gears America.

What’s your 2 cents at the midpoint, this is just a random thoughts post, just wondering what everyone else’s take on things are. Next Sunday, we have a game to play. Awesome.

Dagmar
11-06-2005, 08:26 PM
The history of this thread...
I wrote it twice between 6 and 7 (9:22pm here in Co now) and my computer farted out on me. Both times. :garcia: < I swear, I almost did that.

I'm not that insightful (2nd year NFL fan etc.) and appreciate the many seasoned fans on here are, so humor me and give it a read.

Cheers.

Arkie
11-06-2005, 08:26 PM
The NFC East looks tough. It looks like Philly will lose this game to go 4-4 and slide into last place. Three of their wins were against AFC West teams. Interesting.

Bob's your Information Minister
11-06-2005, 08:31 PM
I think our division is certainly the best in the AFC. The NFC East looks pretty strong too. Top to bottom, a bit better than the West IMO. Oakland drags us down. 4321~

Dagmar
11-06-2005, 08:38 PM
I think our division is certainly the best in the AFC. The NFC East looks pretty strong too. Top to bottom, a bit better than the West IMO. Oakland drags us down. 4321~

Dude, Oakland drags us down. They are the dregs of football. No doubt.

Bob's your Information Minister
11-06-2005, 08:38 PM
I tell you one thing...the AFC West has the best running games in football. Even Oakland has found one this year.

ludo21
11-06-2005, 08:41 PM
I tell you one thing...the AFC West has the best running games in football. Even Oakland has found one this year.


Yep, with Moss and Porter strectching the field, Lamont has been pretty good.

Dagmar
11-06-2005, 09:12 PM
This thread didn't work how I'd planned. Cheers to those who did reply. I'm off to the corner to sulk.

RhymesayersDU
11-06-2005, 10:40 PM
I said this in the offseason and was told I was crazy... But it's true, top to bottom, this division (with the NFC East, I agree with Bob) is this best in football. The fact is, we've got a lot of talent on all the teams, and we don't have 1 terrible team to bring down the division. (A houston, cleveland, etc)

24champ
11-06-2005, 10:44 PM
Dagmar is that Portis as your avatar?

Dagmar
11-06-2005, 11:19 PM
How did you recognize him without his glasses?

Bob's your Information Minister
11-06-2005, 11:22 PM
I'm sure this post will be well received...but...

Ruben Droughns has 646 yards rushing this year.

More than any Denver back!

Dagmar
11-06-2005, 11:26 PM
I'm sure this post will be well received...but...

Ruben Droughns has 646 yards rushing this year.

More than any Denver back!

Riiight, and how many do Anderson and Bell have combined Sir? :poke:

GreatBronco16
11-06-2005, 11:37 PM
I'm sure this post will be well received...but...

Ruben Droughns has 646 yards rushing this year.

More than any Denver back!


And how many TDs does Droughns have?

24champ
11-06-2005, 11:40 PM
How did you recognize him without his glasses?

It was harder to recognize him without his bling bling, but the head bobbing tipped me off.

GreatBronco16
11-06-2005, 11:44 PM
Clevland also only has 645 yards as a team, while Denver has 1366 which is more than double the yards. Droughns and Portis together still don't have a many yards as Denver or just Anderson and Bell, and they don't even come close to as many TDs.

Now please try to educate us some more.

GreatBronco16
11-06-2005, 11:52 PM
I'm sure this post will be well received...but...

Ruben Droughns has 646 yards rushing this year.

More than any Denver back!

Funny, that's more than any of your RBs too. Funny how you felt like leaving that fact out.

Bob's your Information Minister
11-07-2005, 12:03 AM
Funny, that's more than any of your RBs too. Funny how you felt like leaving that fact out.

Sure...I just thought it was interesting, not trying to mean anything by it.

24champ
11-07-2005, 12:05 AM
Sure...I just thought it was interesting, not trying to mean anything by it.
while we are on stats "boob- kinda like herpes", what is Trints and Plummer stats so far in the season? You dodged this in another thread.

GreatBronco16
11-07-2005, 12:07 AM
What's interesting is that you would post something like that knowing that Denver is ranked #2 in total rushing in the NFL using a two back system this season.

It must suck knowing that your so called high powered offense can't do the same thing with your two great RBs.

GreatBronco16
11-07-2005, 12:08 AM
while we are on stats "boob- kinda like herpes", what is Trints and Plummer stats so far in the season? You dodged this in another thread.

He'll dodge it again or blame it on Greens dad dying or Dicky boy crying to much and getting the balls too wet before the game.

Bob's your Information Minister
11-07-2005, 12:09 AM
while we are on stats "boob- kinda like herpes", what is Trints and Plummer stats so far in the season? You dodged this in another thread.

I didn't dodge ****. I admitted Plummer was doing some things better than Trent this year...namely his red zone production.

Bob's your Information Minister
11-07-2005, 12:10 AM
What's interesting is that you would post something like that knowing that Denver is ranked #2 in total rushing in the NFL using a two back system this season.

It must suck knowing that your so called high powered offense can't do the same thing with your two great RBs.

I've said I was jealous in another thread.

That doesn't mean we suck.

Dagmar
11-07-2005, 12:13 AM
He'll dodge it again or blame it on Greens dad dying or Dicky boy crying to much and getting the balls too wet before the game.

Dude, lay up a tad. Not so cool.

24champ
11-07-2005, 12:13 AM
I didn't dodge ****. I admitted Plummer was doing some things better than Trent this year...namely his red zone production.
Not some things better, plummer is doing everything better.

GreatBronco16
11-07-2005, 12:14 AM
I didn't dodge ****. I admitted Plummer was doing some things better than Trent this year...namely his red zone production.


Some things? He is pretty much doing everything better than Green this year.

GreatBronco16
11-07-2005, 12:15 AM
Dude, lay up a tad. Not so cool.


What is not so cool about it? The fact I figured boob would use Greens dads as an excuse? I'm sorry, I'm not bashing Green or his father, I just wouldn't put it past boobs stupid ass to use it as an excuse.

24champ
11-07-2005, 12:17 AM
Some things? He is pretty much doing everything better than Green this year.
twice as many TDs than Trint, :laugh:

GreatBronco16
11-07-2005, 12:18 AM
twice as many TDs than Trint, :laugh:

But, But, But...................

Dagmar
11-07-2005, 12:22 AM
What is not so cool about it? The fact I figured boob would use Greens dads as an excuse? I'm sorry, I'm not bashing Green or his father, I just wouldn't put it past boobs stupid ass to use it as an excuse.

Ok, I get that, mentioning the whole thing seems a bit in poor taste, but I get you weren't being offensive.

I actually posted this thread as an anti-smack kinda thing, to see where all the AFC West teams were at in folks opinion. The smack all went down in the hahahah thread etc.

We have to be pleased to not only be in one of the top divisions in the league, but to be leading having played a game less than the rest.

RedDread
11-07-2005, 12:24 AM
What is not so cool about it? The fact I figured boob would use Greens dads as an excuse? I'm sorry, I'm not bashing Green or his father, I just wouldn't put it past boobs stupid ass to use it as an excuse.


I hear Psychic Friends is hiring.

GreatBronco16
11-07-2005, 12:30 AM
I hear Psychic Friends is hiring.

Too bad they fired you. I hear you can get money by sending your pubs to boob.

ZachKC
11-07-2005, 12:34 AM
This whole place revolves around Bob...pretty funny actually...

He posts you guys run around in circles...

Bob's your Information Minister
11-07-2005, 12:37 AM
Some things? He is pretty much doing everything better than Green this year.

Really? Green has more yards and a better completion percentage.

The only thing Plummer has on Green right now is TD passes, and from what I have seen, that is mostly due to redzone production. Plummer has made the most of his opportunities and Green has not.

Bob's your Information Minister
11-07-2005, 12:38 AM
What is not so cool about it? The fact I figured boob would use Greens dads as an excuse? I'm sorry, I'm not bashing Green or his father, I just wouldn't put it past boobs stupid ass to use it as an excuse.

I haven't used anything as an excuse. Green's played fairly well lately.

ZachKC
11-07-2005, 12:39 AM
Really? Green has more yards and a better completion percentage.

The only thing Plummer has on Green right now is TD passes, and from what I have seen, that is mostly due to redzone production. Plummer has made the most of his opportunities and Green has not.
When given the time Green has done very very good things.

Dagmar
11-07-2005, 12:41 AM
This whole place revolves around Bob...pretty funny actually...

He posts you guys run around in circles...

That's because we realise he is sitting on the edge...soon the mullet and the 400 pound wife in the gingham dress will be gone and he will join us in the land of class.

24champ
11-07-2005, 12:47 AM
Really? Green has more yards and a better completion percentage.

The only thing Plummer has on Green right now is TD passes, and from what I have seen, that is mostly due to redzone production. Plummer has made the most of his opportunities and Green has not.
more wins also.:stupid:

boltaneer
11-07-2005, 12:48 AM
Really? Green has more yards and a better completion percentage.

The only thing Plummer has on Green right now is TD passes, and from what I have seen, that is mostly due to redzone production. Plummer has made the most of his opportunities and Green has not.

More yards and completion percentage means little compared to the most important thing, which is red zone production/touchdowns.

IMO, all three of the other AFC West quarterbacks are outplaying Green at this point.

24champ
11-07-2005, 12:50 AM
This whole place revolves around Bob...pretty funny actually...

He posts you guys run around in circles...
careful if you kiss boobs ass you might get herpes. LOL

GreatBronco16
11-07-2005, 12:53 AM
Really? Green has more yards and a better completion percentage.

The only thing Plummer has on Green right now is TD passes, and from what I have seen, that is mostly due to redzone production. Plummer has made the most of his opportunities and Green has not.

Only TD passes? How bout more rushing yards, more rushing TDs, fewer sacks, a better passer rating(which is always a great stat for KC fans) and fewer fumbles lost.

ZachKC
11-07-2005, 12:53 AM
careful if you kiss boobs ass you might get herpes. LOL
Hey man its all good. If I were you I wouldn't talk football either. The best analysis you can come up with why a football team is better than the other is the "anger" factor.

At least you know where you are in the fold...

Sit down and throw out useless middle school tripe. It suits you.

GreatBronco16
11-07-2005, 12:54 AM
careful if you kiss boobs ass you might get herpes. LOL

Don't forget boob will enjoy it too much.

Bob's your Information Minister
11-07-2005, 12:56 AM
I am so shocked the Chiefs won today. Trent Green wasn't feeling all that "angry" after his dad died I bet.

ZachKC
11-07-2005, 12:57 AM
The Chiefs have not won a single game this season. Every game was "given" to them. Oakland output the fewest amount of yards on offense this season because they felt like it.

Crushaholic
11-07-2005, 01:00 AM
I'm sure this post will be well received...but...

Ruben Droughns has 646 yards rushing this year.

More than any Denver back!

What? You mean it may NOT be "the system"? Droughns might ACTUALLY be talented?Nyah!

At any rate, I'm perfectly happy sitting here as a fan of a 6-2 team...

24champ
11-07-2005, 01:01 AM
Hey man its all good. If I were you I wouldn't talk football either. The best analysis you can come up with why a football team is better than the other is the "anger" factor.

At least you know where you are in the fold...

Sit down and throw out useless middle school tripe. It suits you.
:stupid: yeah i know its all good, broncos sitting atop in the afc west, kicked the crap out of the chiefs 30-10, cheifs at home isnt intimidating since they let teams back in the game against the eagles and fade.

ZachKC
11-07-2005, 01:02 AM
:stupid: yeah i know its all good, broncos sitting atop in the afc west, kicked the crap out of the chiefs 30-10, cheifs at home isnt intimidating since they let teams back in the game against the eagles and fade.
Let me get this straight, you are talking smack about letting teams back in games?

Amazing.

Dagmar
11-07-2005, 01:03 AM
What? You mean it may NOT be "the system"? Droughns might ACTUALLY be talented?Nyah!

At any rate, I'm perfectly happy sitting here as a fan of a 6-2 team...

OOOOOOOOOOOOh snap!

Good call Crush.

Dagmar
11-07-2005, 01:04 AM
:stupid: yeah i know its all good, broncos sitting atop in the afc west, kicked the crap out of the chiefs 30-10, cheifs at home isnt intimidating since they let teams back in the game against the eagles and fade.

ouch, yeh, we're throwing a pot and kettle type analogy thing here...

24champ
11-07-2005, 01:07 AM
Let me get this straight, you are talking smack about letting teams back in games?

Amazing.
6-2 and your record is....Hilarious!

Bob's your Information Minister
11-07-2005, 01:19 AM
6-2 and your record is....rofl2.gif" border="0" alt="" title="ROFL2" smilieid="110" class="inlineimg" />
You see, 24chump, this is what we call a deflection. When you don't address your opposing debater's post, you are only weakening your response.

Dagmar
11-07-2005, 01:21 AM
I really worked on this thread, the smack was done earlier! The AFC west,= awesome, just wanted legit opinions of how things are, how things are panning out. didn't work out so well...

24champ
11-07-2005, 01:22 AM
You see, 24chump, this is what we call a deflection. When you don't address your opposing debater's post, you are only weaking your response.
go blow a shemale you sick bastard. _i_O_i_

Bob's your Information Minister
11-07-2005, 01:24 AM
I really worked on this thread, the smack was done earlier! The AFC west,= awesome, just wanted legit opinions of how things are, how things are panning out. didn't work out so well...

You can thank your fellow Bronco fans.

RhymesayersDU
11-07-2005, 01:26 AM
This place makes my head hurt sometimes.

Crushaholic
11-07-2005, 01:28 AM
I really worked on this thread, the smack was done earlier! The AFC west,= awesome, just wanted legit opinions of how things are, how things are panning out. didn't work out so well...

A lot of threads veer off course. I think everyone with a brain can agree with the fact that the West is the best division in the AFC this year. With that established, smack is the next logical step...!Booya!

Dagmar
11-07-2005, 01:29 AM
You can thank your fellow Bronco fans.

Thought the smack was done. It was the 11am game For ****s sake! Really hoped for some mid-season discussion before the Oakland smack started instead of this ****.

Rock Chalk
11-07-2005, 07:09 AM
This whole place revolves around Bob...pretty funny actually...

He posts you guys run around in circles...
Once again, you post and it is irrelevant and ignored.

bendog
11-07-2005, 07:51 AM
Another thread hijacked by the chorf losers. sad.

I'd pick the AFC North over the AFC West. And, though their in the NFC which is weaker, the NFC South sports 3 solid teams, though with SOB going down, TB is in for a rough road.