View Full Version : A Hotrod Must read
Hotrod
11-02-2005, 09:05 AM
Ha!
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=47174
Absolutely preposterous! "Babbz" would do no such thing!! Ha! rofl
Montaq
11-02-2005, 10:54 AM
Nice find. Now I won't vote for Michael Moore.
Hotrod
11-02-2005, 10:57 AM
Nice find. Now I won't vote for Michael Moore.
Or the people he backs right ;D
Montaq
11-02-2005, 11:02 AM
Or the people he backs right ;D
I don't care who backs who, just who I do. ;D
Hotrod
11-02-2005, 11:06 AM
I don't care who backs who, just who I do. ;D
LOL
bendog
11-02-2005, 12:06 PM
I vote goper (or used to) even though I think pat robertson's a hypocritical homophope crook, so what's the diff between montaq voting dem if he likes the dem?
bendog
11-02-2005, 12:07 PM
btw, I never liked Moore after I learned that his "Roger and Me" film was ... less than the whole truth. Roger Smith was a goof, but parts of Flynt are still nice to live in ,and GM's inability to build a car wasn't all his fault.
enjolras
11-02-2005, 12:13 PM
This is the biggest jump in logic possibly ever:
This is not just a book of "gotcha" journalism, explains Schweizer. He says the dozens and dozens of examples of "liberal hypocrisy" he cites in his book "are of central importance in evaluating the validity and usefulness of liberal ideas."
There is no relevance between the actions of a few liberals to the validity of liberal methodoly. That's like saying we should look at the popes of centuries past to examine the validity of Christian ideals (I'll give you a hint, it wouldn't look good for Christianity).
Hotrod
11-02-2005, 01:24 PM
This is the biggest jump in logic possibly ever:
There is no relevance between the actions of a few liberals to the validity of liberal methodoly. That's like saying we should look at the popes of centuries past to examine the validity of Christian ideals (I'll give you a hint, it wouldn't look good for Christianity).
So are you saying your "aint gonna read that rubbish" Hilarious!