PDA

View Full Version : Shanahan for coach of the year


Atlas
10-18-2005, 02:26 PM
Be aggressive


By Rich Eisen
Special to NFL.com
SoCals link:http://www.nfl.com/nflnetwork/story/8979727


(Oct. 18, 2005) -- Mike Shanahan won my vote for the 2005 Coach of the Year on Sunday. Unfortunately for Mike, there are two self-evident matters in play here:

I have no actual vote for the award.
It's still quite early in the season.


Nevertheless, Shanahan gets my admittedly meaningless vote for Coach of the Year because not only does he have his Broncos at a surprising 5-1 atop the AFC West, but he also did something uncommonly seen in this day and age: He played to win, rather than not to lose.

Ah, yes. The dreaded "Prevent Offense."

With Tom Brady and the Patriots in the midst of mounting a major, big time, The-Dynasty-Is-Still-Intact-type comeback Sunday, the Broncos withstood the storm. Two rare New England late fourth-quarter miscues -- a drive-killing intentional grounding call against Brady preceded by an easy first-down reception dropped by David Givens -- returned the ball to the Broncos on their own 23 with 3:36 remaining in regulation.

Now, then.

How many times have we seen a team with this type of lead subsequently roll up into a fetal position and run it three straight times, hoping against hope for a first down? How many times is this team ultimately forced to leave the victory-sealing play in the hands of the defense -- or placekicker setting up just out of range? And, finally, how many times does this strategy backfire? Have no fear, we'll provide the answer: always. It always backfires.


The Broncos did NOT want to give Tom Brady a chance to win it.
In case you're somehow not hip to this scene, the line of thinking involved in this late-game gambit goes a little something like this: Any possible, remote inkling of a notion at being aggressive on offense greatly increases the chance of turning the ball over, and, of course, no one wants to do that. Plus, an incomplete pass could allow the other team to conserve precious timeouts. So, everybody turtle up! Let's run the ball into the line three straight times -- but whatever you do, heaven forbid DON'T FUMBLE -- and maybe get a first down. If not, we'll punt. Who cares if we took only, say, 10 seconds off the clock? Worse comes to worst, the defense can win the game against an opposition now forced to run the hurry-up offense with, most likely, no timeouts left. And everyone knows how difficult that is, except for Brady and Favre and Montana and Elway and yada, yada, yada… Of course, there is an inherent problem in this approach: It is completely counter-intuitive to the widely held and time-tested belief that football is an aggressive game. Why lose your aggressiveness at the end when, most likely, it is that aggressiveness that got you the lead in the first place?

With the chips down and his team in possession of the ball deep in its own end, leading a Patriots team with two timeouts left, all eyes fell on Shanahan Sunday. On the first play, it sure looked like the Prevent Offense had infested the Shanahan playbook, which immediately ran Mike Anderson right up the middle for 3 yards to his 26. Across the field, Bill Belichick countered by sitting tight. (By the way, I'm using every ounce of my being to resist a cardinal sports writer's rule that mandates I refer to this coaching by-play as a "chess match" or "game of cat and mouse.") The modern-day Lombardi didn't budge and let the clock tick down.

Upstairs, in the CBS booth, Phil Simms said of Belichick's maneuver: "Make Denver make the decision here. In other words, put pressure on Mike Shanahan. What's he gonna do? Is he gonna run it and maybe waste a down because it might not gain a lot of yards, or does he take the chance and throw it and if it's incomplete it stops the clock. That's what the Patriots are hoping for."

On his couch, your humble narrator wondered why in the name of Chuck Knox would Shanahan go turtle when all it would inexorably lead to is yet one more chance for Tom Brady to be the hero -- again?

Sure, enough, with 2:56 to go, Shanahan took the initiative. He got aggressive. He put the onus back on Belichick by taking that Phil Simms chance and throwing it. And guess what? An interception? An incompletion? Nope, Jake Plummer found his tight end Jeb Putzier, who made a play for a first down. New England used its second timeout. Next play, another Mike Anderson run to force the Patriots to use their final timeout with 2:20 to go. Suddenly, the Broncos stood one first down away from winning it. Shanahan didn't waste any time.


Denver put the game in Jake Plummer's hands ... and he delivered.
As for other coaches, how many would just run it one more time, take it down to the two-minute warning and put the pressure on his quarterback to make a play on third down? Not Shanahan. Very next snap (on second down to capitalize on the element of surprise) Plummer hit the old reliable Rod Smith and the man with the most catches, receiving yards and receiving touchdowns of any undrafted player in NFL history sealed the deal with a simple 8-yard gain. One more run and two Plummer knees took it to the final gun, with Brady standing harmlessly on the sideline

orangenblue2
10-18-2005, 02:31 PM
Gotta love that...

Odysseus
10-18-2005, 02:32 PM
Geez. He's gushing. He makes this stuff seem easy. He makes Shanny seem so shiny and new. Ah geez. The Bandwagon's got newbies in it again. Ah Crap. We just got that thing all cleaned up from the last time!

bendog
10-18-2005, 02:35 PM
Shanny sucks, fire him. Eisen too. The only guy on nfl who doesn't suck is Woodson.

Billy Clyde Puckett
10-18-2005, 02:36 PM
Come March Eisen andhis cronies will be chanting the "Shanahan can't make good personnel decisions" mantra again.
:tearhair:

Ballhawk
10-18-2005, 02:37 PM
There is a very real chance Shanny does get the honor, because of the very low expectations the medis had for us in preseason. We were predicted to go 6-10 or so by a lot of so called experts. The Fade were everyones darling comeback team.

Marvin Lewis in Cinn would most likely get the nod though, as he will get the "turned the Bungles franchise around vote"

OrangeShadow
10-18-2005, 03:07 PM
You know its nice to get respect from all around the league but i like being the underdog more

NFLBRONCO
10-18-2005, 03:17 PM
I think everyone should wait on praise til Jan. I'm happy how we've looked so far. We still have 10 games left. Our next goal is play this way ALL season not just part of a season. I do feel we are different this year but, we still need to prove we can play at a high level all year.

Hercules Rockefeller
10-18-2005, 03:29 PM
He played to win, rather than not to lose.

Ah, yes. The dreaded "Prevent Offense."

With Tom Brady and the Patriots in the midst of mounting a major, big time, The-Dynasty-Is-Still-Intact-type comeback Sunday, the Broncos withstood the storm. Two rare New England late fourth-quarter miscues -- a drive-killing intentional grounding call against Brady preceded by an easy first-down reception dropped by David Givens -- returned the ball to the Broncos on their own 23 with 3:36 remaining in regulation.

Now, then.

How many times have we seen a team with this type of lead subsequently roll up into a fetal position and run it three straight times, hoping against hope for a first down?

Rich must not have watched the Broncos offense in the drives between their last TD and that game-ending drive, because Mike was definitely playing to run out the clock.

shakenbake
10-18-2005, 03:37 PM
This is nothing new. Shanny has always been a bit of a gambler with the game on the line. Ive seen it go both ways. Sometimes it works out sometimes it doesn't. There have been a few situations (miami like 3 years ago on sunday night) where if he would have just run the ball 3 times we would have had a better chance of winning that game.

DomCasual
10-18-2005, 04:00 PM
The throw to Rod Smith that he is referring to was actually an audible by Jake Plummer. The DB was playing off, so Plummer audibled for a quick pass to Rod.

Good column, though.

Odysseus
10-18-2005, 04:00 PM
Rich must not have watched the Broncos offense in the drives between their last TD and that game-ending drive, because Mike was definitely playing to run out the clock.

It sounds so dirty when you say it like that. You'd be a lousy journalist. You keep breaking it down to simple terms. Where is the syrup? Where is the zing? How are you going to reverse yourself on this plainly direct statement? Hilarious!

Circle Orange
10-18-2005, 04:24 PM
Hmm, very suspicious...

Too much, too soon. We're barely past the quarterpole, and all kinds of weird twists can happen. Look at the serious injuries around the league this week alone. And contrary to popular belief, everyone isn't awestruck when Brady leads a thirty yard drive for a Venetari field goal. It isn't like a touchdown with seconds ticking off the clock (hmm, who does that sound like???)

gunns
10-18-2005, 04:38 PM
I like the SI article that says Bronco fans are cautiously optimistic. I like not being able to decide if the Broncos will win or not. It has made the victories so much sweeter. I think a lot of us are still waiting for the floor to come out from under this team. We also have this nagging feeling that there really is a difference to this team but we're afraid of that other feeling of "over hoping" for what might be at the end of the season. I'm enjoying this season more than any since the SB's. Even at 5-1 last year I didn't feel this way....OOPS....think I was expressing to much optimism.

As far as Shanahan, if this team keeps it's winning ways, he deserves coach of the year for all the crap that was said by many about the Brown acquistions.

Tw0mey
10-18-2005, 04:43 PM
Shanahan could very well be Coach of the Year. Everyone was expecting for him to give the ball to Jake, and letting him pass the ball 25-40 times a game, but he finally changed his game plan to what we do best, run. Our thunder and lightning, Anderson and Bell, are playing on top of their games and as long as we keep using them, we'll keep winning. Keep it up Shanny!

Northman
10-18-2005, 04:48 PM
Shanny needs to win another playoff game before i vote him coach of the year.

watermock
10-18-2005, 04:50 PM
http://www.orangemane.com/BB/image.php?u=1851&dateline=1129677578

Where do you go with that? So your trying to kill me?

Good Lord...

Odysseus
10-18-2005, 05:01 PM
Marvin Lewis in Cinn would most likely get the nod though, as he will get the "turned the Bungles franchise around vote"

I hope Marvin gets the award right after we kick the crap out of this team in the playoffs. Deltha O'Neal burned like a 10 year old kid hitting on the baby sitter. Carson Palmer?....um...let me get back to you on this one.

http://www.nfl.com/players/playerpage/396173/splits/2005

Broncos4tw
10-18-2005, 05:16 PM
He made an awesome move by bringing the Cleveland guys in. What he saw in them others didn't is a mystery, but I'm glad he did. He gets huge kudos right there for any coach of the year awards from me.

On the other hand, this article is a tad off. What it fails to mention is that we got conservative on the prior 3 possessions, to get into the nasty prediciment to begin with. If we had shown that trust in Plummer and our offense on the previous possessions, the game would have never come to this. Even up 25, you are not going to run the clock out with two entire quarters left.

So while we did finally make the right decision, I'm confused why they didn't do this the entire game. Hopefully with all the chatter on the radio regarding the flimsy offensive outings, and how we "let up" (which we certainly did), they won't make this mistake again.

orange crusher
10-18-2005, 05:29 PM
They've made a lot of gutsy calls at crucial times this season. The flip to Dayne on 4th down in an earlier game was another example. The team is executing well and it's making Mike look like a genius. If they don't executive, everyone would want to stone him for the play calls. I don't mean to take anything away from the job that Shanny is doing because I think he is doing a hell of a good job with playcalling, I just think it's interesting because you're either an idiot or genius in this business depending on how your team executes.

Bronco_Beerslug
10-18-2005, 05:39 PM
Way too early to be writing this kind of stuff.

baja
10-18-2005, 05:41 PM
Way too early to be writing this kind of stuff.

Not!

Rock Chalk
10-18-2005, 05:48 PM
Come March Eisen andhis cronies will be chanting the "Shanahan can't make good personnel decisions" mantra again.
:tearhair:
I never really notice and undeserved criticism on NFL Network. They seem to give it straight.

Garcia Bronco
10-18-2005, 05:49 PM
Way too early to be writing this kind of stuff.

Yep

Rock Chalk
10-18-2005, 05:50 PM
Way too early to be writing this kind of stuff.
That's probably why he quantified by stating its way too early in the season still.

Don't union workers know how to read?

watermock
10-18-2005, 05:56 PM
Don't union workers know how to read?

Union workers trust leaders like Daley, Gotti and Hoffa. They don't need no readin' stuff.

Billy Clyde Puckett
10-18-2005, 06:19 PM
He made an awesome move by bringing the Cleveland guys in. What he saw in them others didn't is a mystery, but I'm glad he did. He gets huge kudos right there for any coach of the year awards from me.

On the other hand, this article is a tad off. What it fails to mention is that we got conservative on the prior 3 possessions, to get into the nasty prediciment to begin with. If we had shown that trust in Plummer and our offense on the previous possessions, the game would have never come to this. Even up 25, you are not going to run the clock out with two entire quarters left.

So while we did finally make the right decision, I'm confused why they didn't do this the entire game. Hopefully with all the chatter on the radio regarding the flimsy offensive outings, and how we "let up" (which we certainly did), they won't make this mistake again.

Welcome to the Mane, but don't ever expect Shanahan and crew to listen to the radio and take it seriously.