Two straight games now.....

[Gcver2ver3]

With no sacks and no INT's.......(just 1 lucky fumble)



does this concern you?

[Rocket 7]

Five straight games with a win

[DivineLegion]

How many did we have?


Then no it dosent concern me.

[Clockwork Orange]

So long as the offense continues to keep from turning the ball over, no.

They're still +6 in turnover differential.

[RhymesayersDU]

No sacks -- Somewhat. But we did get pressure, and we did hit Brady a couple times as he was throwing. Drew an intentional grounding too. So although we didn't drop him for a loss, we were in the backfield.

No INTs -- Not really. They'll come.

[ludo21]

With no sacks and no INT's.......(just 1 lucky fumble)



does this concern you?


That goes to show how mcuh no holding calls there have been. The D line has had constant pressure but that second they hold takes away that step that would have been the sack.

When the calls start coming i think we will see more sacks. Also 2 straight games where the QB has been spot on his throws. Picks will come.

[Kaylore]

Well we know about the sacks. As for expecting to get an interception against Tom Brady, you might want to re-think your expectations.

[epicSocialism4tw]

That goes to show how mcuh no holding calls there have been. The D line has had constant pressure but that second they hold takes away that step that would have been the sack.

When the calls start coming i think we will see more sacks. Also 2 straight games where the QB has been spot on his throws. Picks will come.

Good points.

I dont see us getting any calls until after the bye week. The league loves both the Giants and Philly, so I wouldnt expect a fair shake any time soon.

[Gcver2ver3]

Very good answers....

I feel the same way...but I was wondering if anyone else was concerned about it....

I like the fact that we blitz a lot.....The front four does look tired in the second halves of games though....

Hey but I'm really thrilled we are 5-1!!!

[epicSocialism4tw]

Very good answers....

I feel the same way...but I was wondering if anyone else was concerned about it....

I like the fact that we blitz a lot.....The front four does look tired in the second halves of games though....

Hey but I'm really thrilled we are 5-1!!!

The holding has to be addressed. I hope that Shanny fires away at the league office this week.

[gunns]

My big concern is the let down in the 2nd half for the second week. I didn't get to see most of the 2nd half and was shocked with the score when I got back. What happened? Was the offense doing it's quick 3 and outs and the D was getting tired?

[epicSocialism4tw]

My big concern is the let down in the 2nd half for the second week. I didn't get to see most of the 2nd half and was shocked with the score when I got back. What happened? Was the offense doing it's quick 3 and outs and the D was getting tired?

You nailed it.

[listopencil]

With no sacks and no INT's.......(just 1 lucky fumble)



does this concern you?



I'm more concerned with what your user name means.

[NFLBRONCO]

Nice win today it sure helps for or qwest for Division and 1 home playoff game. This is a game the last few years we would have lost at the end.

Since we didn't put them away and with CD TB RS not playing today while I think we are improved this year I do not feel we are in Colts Pats level yet. We need to keep getting better and staying healthy.

[Gcver2ver3]

I'm more concerned with what your user name means.






LOL.......

it is a long story not worth talking about...i use it mostly because NO ONE has it......ver stands for verifier....by the way..

[DBroncos4life]

Lets not forget that Bailey hasn't played much in the last three games either.

[BigPlayShay]

With no sacks and no INT's.......(just 1 lucky fumble)



does this concern you?


No sacks or picks against 2 of the smartest veteran QB's in the league. No, not concerned. The pressure was still there and it did make a difference.

[Crushaholic]

No sacks or picks against 2 of the smartest veteran QB's in the league. No, not concerned. The pressure was still there and it did make a difference.

You're right. Brunell and Brady know what to do to avoid INTs. Let's go out and make up for it against young Manning... !Booya!

[Rock Chalk]

I think the lack of ints is a result of Coyer playing the secondary ten yards off the receivers. No chance to really disrupt the routes or jump them if they are short out or curl routes.

[Play2win]

Everybody sees the same gold, some see the Blemishes, some see the sparkle...

[wabbit]

I think the lack of ints is a result of Coyer playing the secondary ten yards off the receivers. No chance to really disrupt the routes or jump them if they are short out or curl routes.

One thing that really bothered me today was that Denver not only didn't force any turn-overs...although the D-line tried it's damndest, no-one that I could see was ever even close to intercepting Brady.

Perhaps, as Alex says, the coverage 'scheme' was to blame, but you'd think SOMEONE at some point would get a hand on a ball...criminy, the guy winged it nearly three dozen times.

Troubling.

[yavoon]

meh it does. but I'm satiated by all the wins. fat and happy.