View Full Version : Sean Salsbury's "tool of the game"
watermock
09-18-2005, 11:56 PM
Why is ESPN yanking on Moss' tool tonight when they lost?
Do you realize this idiot has hit on about 30 percent of games STRAIGHT UP?
When was the last time they reviewed this clowns picks for anything remotely resembling accuracy?
I'm 3-3-1 for the year and not happy, AGAINST THE SPREAD, Salisbury can't even pick right straight up! .500 isn't that bad to start this year.
I think he picked Arizona again. Not as many straight up upsets this week, but plenty of non covers.
Does ESPN actually realize that Collins was missing Moss all night? It's totally ignored.
Atlas
09-19-2005, 02:50 AM
Why is ESPN yanking on Moss' tool tonight when they lost?
Do you realize this idiot has hit on about 30 percent of games STRAIGHT UP?
When was the last time they reviewed this clowns picks for anything remotely resembling accuracy?
I'm 3-3-1 for the year and not happy, AGAINST THE SPREAD, Salisbury can't even pick right straight up! .500 isn't that bad to start this year.
I think he picked Arizona again. Not as many straight up upsets this week, but plenty of non covers.
Does ESPN actually realize that Collins was missing Moss all night? It's totally ignored.
After the Saints cover tomorrow night I will be 4-0. Mock gimme a PM and I'll help you with your picks! LOL LOL
bendog
09-19-2005, 08:10 AM
Yah, I keep thinking maybe the 'aints will be flat, and they prolly will, and their linebackers are thin and suspect, so Eli may have some short to mid open throws, but even so, the aint's would seem to have too much for the crappy giants team.
watermock
09-19-2005, 08:20 AM
I went 2-1 and am 3-3-1. That's probably better than 70 percent of "the experts", and you should know better to call a 4-0 week before the game is played on the road. I jumped off the HornHead trainwreck fast. At least I'm not retarded like Sean who has picked loser after loser that would put the late Jimmy the Greek to shame. Jimmy couldn't pick a winner against the spread to spare his life...and it didn't. Sean has picked Arizona two weeks in a row. You might get sympathy calls for New Orleans from the refs, but they are notorious for laying eggs. I never make predictions on the Saints. It's like Voodoo.
freak6
09-19-2005, 08:20 AM
Who didn't take the eagles?
NaptownChief
09-19-2005, 08:22 AM
Speaking of prognostication......How bout those really cute sleeper picks of the Lions and Cardinals that nearly every expert was raving about just two weeks ago....not looking so good now eh?
watermock
09-19-2005, 08:24 AM
I benched McNabb because I thought he might go back down but still scored 131 in FF. I would of scored 165 or so. Nope, I don't know anything.
One team I seriously missed on is Detroit. WTF is wrong with that team? These dome teams suck outdoors. I think the Hornheads and Detroit are some insane like 6-50 outdoors straight up.
BMF Bronco
09-19-2005, 08:25 AM
Speaking of prognostication......How bout those really cute sleeper picks of the Lions and Cardinals that nearly every expert was raving about just two weeks ago....not looking so good now eh?
Not to mention how quickly everyone jumped off the 'fins wagon as well.
bendog
09-19-2005, 08:46 AM
I'm still on the sushi wagon. They held NY to less than 3yds per rush and about 250 offensive yds on the road. They cannot make the playoffs though with that division. NE and Buff will win 3-4, and the best they can get with the Jets is a split now. But they could do some damage in another division.
ScottXray
09-19-2005, 08:58 AM
I'm still on the sushi wagon. They held NY to less than 3yds per rush and about 250 offensive yds on the road. They cannot make the playoffs though with that division. NE and Buff will win 3-4, and the best they can get with the Jets is a split now. But they could do some damage in another division.
Well, lets hope they DO do damage..to the rest of the AFC West, like they did to us.
In a way they did us a favor....humbled us at the start of the season to lay a wake up call.
:blowhorn:
bronco militia
09-19-2005, 08:59 AM
I'm still on the sushi wagon. They held NY to less than 3yds per rush and about 250 offensive yds on the road. They cannot make the playoffs though with that division. NE and Buff will win 3-4, and the best they can get with the Jets is a split now. But they could do some damage in another division.
why is are the Bills better than the Dolphins?
RhymesayersDU
09-19-2005, 09:01 AM
Speaking of prognostication......How bout those really cute sleeper picks of the Lions and Cardinals that nearly every expert was raving about just two weeks ago....not looking so good now eh?
I still like the Cards to make a little noise. They're not winning their division like some people said they would, but with those WR's and that Rook RB, they could win a few games... More than they did last year at least.
They should have had a chance to win yesterday, terrible clock management at the end.
Popps
09-19-2005, 09:35 AM
Speaking of prognostication......How bout those really cute sleeper picks of the Lions and Cardinals that nearly every expert was raving about just two weeks ago....not looking so good now eh?
I called bull**** on both of those before the season started. The Jags were the other team I thought was over-hyped, but it appears that it may have been justified. Thus far, they're a very strong team.
NaptownChief
09-19-2005, 09:52 AM
I still like the Cards to make a little noise. They're not winning their division like some people said they would, but with those WR's and that Rook RB, they could win a few games... More than they did last year at least.
They should have had a chance to win yesterday, terrible clock management at the end.
I like their chances a little better now that M.Shipp is healthy...JJ Arrington has looked horrible in preseason and last week. With Shipp they have enough offense to have some impressive weeks but they are still the Cardinals.