PDA

View Full Version : Delay's "Dearest Friend" Indicted By Federal Grand Jury


Bronco_Beerslug
08-12-2005, 11:45 AM
Probably not Tom's dearest friend anymore I would suspect.

--------------------------------------------------------
By Curt Anderson
ASSOCIATED PRESS

5:16 p.m. August 11, 2005

MIAMI – A trail of intrigue that has followed an ill-fated gambling boat deal, including a Mafia-style hit and lawsuits over alleged financial irregularities, has now ensnared a man House Majority Leader Tom DeLay once called one of his "dearest friends."

Jack Abramoff, once a powerful Washington lobbyist and major Republican fundraiser, was accused Thursday in a federal grand jury indictment with conspiring with a partner to defraud two lenders out of $60 million in the casino boat deal.

A few months after the September 2000 transaction, the man who was selling the SunCruz Casinos fleet, Greek-born Konstantinos "Gus" Boulis, 51, was shot to death in his luxury car near his Fort Lauderdale office. Police described it as a gangland-style slaying that remains unsolved.

The six-count conspiracy and wire fraud indictment stems from the $147 million purchase of SunCruz by Abramoff and a partner, New York businessman Adam Kidan.

Prosecutors say they concocted a fake $23 million wire transfer to Boulis to make it appear they were putting a cash stake into the transaction.

"That document was counterfeit. The defendants never transferred these funds and never made a cash equity contribution toward the purchase of SunCruz," said U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta of Miami.

Abramoff is also under investigation by a federal grand jury in Washington, D.C., and the U.S. Senate Indian Affairs Committee for deals in which he and an associate received at least $66 million from six Indian tribes to lobby for their casinos and other interests. The tribes question whether the charges were excessive.

Congressional Democrats have also raised questions about Abramoff's ties to DeLay, who is not named in either an earlier SunCruz civil lawsuit filed by the lenders nor the indictment released Thursday.

DeLay has asked the House Ethics Committee to review allegations that Abramoff or his clients paid some of DeLay's overseas travel expenses. DeLay has denied knowing that the expenses were paid by Abramoff, whom he once described as "one of my closest and dearest friends."

Abramoff collected more than $100,000 for President Bush's 2004 re-election campaign and raised thousands of dollars for DeLay and other Republican members of Congress. He also was friends with former Christian Coalition leader Ralph Reed, now a Republican candidate for lieutenant governor in Georgia.

Abramoff denies any wrongdoing in the SunCruz deal and insists that his signature on the wire transfer was obtained under false pretenses, said his Miami defense lawyer, Neal Sonnett.

"He was not involved in an effort to defraud any of the partners or lenders in the SunCruz deal," Sonnett said.

Kidan's attorney in Florida, Martin Jaffe of Hollywood, said his client would surrender voluntarily to federal authorities in Fort Lauderdale on Friday.

"I have cooperated fully with the federal investigation for the past three years because I have nothing to hide," Kidan said in a statement issued by Jaffe's office. "I did nothing wrong and these allegations are totally unfounded."

Abramoff was negotiating his surrender Thursday with the FBI in Los Angeles, bureau spokeswoman Laura Eimiller said.

Abramoff and Kidan each face up to 30 years in prison and thousands of dollars in fines if convicted on all six counts of conspiracy and wire fraud. Prosecutors also plan to seek forfeiture of the $60 million lost by the lenders.

The two lenders who were allegedly defrauded in the SunCruz deal were Foothill Capital Inc., a subsidiary of Wells Fargo, and Citadel Equity Fund Ltd., based in the Cayman Islands, according to court documents.

They had required a $23 million equity contribution from Abramoff and Kidan as a condition of financing the SunCruz deal. The allegedly fake wire transfer on Sept. 21, 2000, indicated that the pair had contributed that amount to Boulis, who is named as an unindicted co-conspirator in court documents.

In addition to the allegedly fake wire transfer, prosecutors say Abramoff and Kidan made a series of false statements on their loan applications to beef up their assets and limit liabilities.

The SunCruz fleet of 11 ships had 2,300 slot machines and 175 gaming tables and sailed from nine Florida ports and Myrtle Beach, S.C., to international waters. The company continues to operate gambling cruises under new ownership after emerging from bankruptcy.

Boulis, who also founded the Miami Subs restaurant chain, was shot to death on Feb. 6, 2001. According to police records, Boulis' car was blocked in front and behind by two other cars on a quiet street near his office. A third car pulled alongside and its driver shot Boulis three times.

Kidan, who had owned a Dial-a-Mattress franchise in Washington, once obtained a restraining order against Boulis claiming that Boulis beat, kicked and threatened to kill him during a November meeting over the gambling ship deal.
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/nation/20050811-1716-lobbyist-fraud.html

Bronco_Beerslug
08-12-2005, 11:47 AM
Delay's web of corruption mapped out...
http://tinyurl.com/6nhan

L.A. BRONCOS FAN
08-12-2005, 03:03 PM
Hot Tub Tom is another beneficiary of 9/11 and the resulting GOP trifecta (were it not for which he would be sharing a cell with Tyrone about now.)

W*GS
08-12-2005, 03:21 PM
Wait a sec - I thought the Bush cabal had everything all rigged so that none of their cronies would ever get in any kind of trouble.

Either they screwed up and forgot to protect this dork, or else LABF is full of crap about the power of the Bushies.

clarker
08-12-2005, 03:27 PM
Looks like he was pretty good friends of some high ranking Dems as well.

By Jeffrey H. Birnbaum and Derek Willis

Updated: 11:47 p.m. ET June 2, 2005
Lobbyist Jack Abramoff and an associate famously collected $82 million in lobbying and public relations fees from six Indian tribes and devoted a lot of their time to trying to persuade Republican lawmakers to act on their clients' behalf.

But Abramoff didn't work just with Republicans. He oversaw a team of two dozen lobbyists at the law firm Greenberg Traurig that included many Democrats. Moreover, the campaign contributions that Abramoff directed from the tribes went to Democratic as well as Republican legislators.

Among the biggest beneficiaries were Capitol Hill's most powerful Democrats, including Thomas A. Daschle (S.D.) and Harry M. Reid (Nev.), the top two Senate Democrats at the time, Richard A. Gephardt (Mo.), then-leader of the House Democrats, and the two lawmakers in charge of raising funds for their Democratic colleagues in both chambers, according to a Washington Post study. Reid succeeded Daschle as Democratic leader after Daschle lost his Senate seat last November.

Democrats are hoping to gain political advantage from federal and Senate investigations of Abramoff's activities and from the embattled lobbyist's former ties to House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Tex.). Yet, many Democratic lawmakers also benefited from Abramoff's political operation, a fact that could hinder the Democrats' efforts to turn the lobbyist's troubles into a winning partisan issue.

Rep. Patrick J. Kennedy (D-R.I.) ran second, with $128,000 in the same period. From 1999 to 2001, Kennedy chaired the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, which solicited campaign donations for House candidates.

The Indians' largess flowed to higher-ranking Democrats as well. Senate Democratic leaders Reid and Daschle each received more than $40,000 from the tribes and from lobbyists on Abramoff's team during the period. Gephardt got $32,500.

Here is the whole story.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8079308/

clarker
08-12-2005, 03:28 PM
You Dems should make sure your party is in the clear before you make little smart a** titled threads.

Merlin
08-12-2005, 03:33 PM
You Dems should make sure your party is in the clear before you make little smart a** titled threads.
These corrupt individuals are usually smart enough to support both sides of the isle. The differences usually relate to the level of support. Those that are more right wing will give more money to the right, and those that are more left will give money to the left. For the truly apolitical all that matters is who is in power and they donate strongly to them (regardless of affiliation).

Merlin

clarker
08-12-2005, 03:46 PM
These corrupt individuals are usually smart enough to support both sides of the isle. The differences usually relate to the level of support. Those that are more right wing will give more money to the right, and those that are more left will give money to the left. For the truly apolitical all that matters is who is in power and they donate strongly to them (regardless of affiliation).

Merlin
In this case it seems like they gave the most money to those who had the most power to help them . First was this republican....

Because of the makeup of his team and the composition of Congress, the Abramoff lobbyists channeled most of their clients' giving to GOP legislators, according to a review of public records. Sen. Conrad Burns (R-Mont.), chairman of an Appropriations subcommittee that frequently deals with Indian matters, received the largest amount from the tribes as well as from the Greenberg Traurig lobbyists who helped direct those donations: $141,590 from 1999 to 2004, the study showed
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kennedy came in second.

But Rep. Patrick J. Kennedy (D-R.I.) ran second, with $128,000 in the same period. From 1999 to 2001, Kennedy chaired the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, which solicited campaign donations for House candidates.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

My point of this is not to say that the Republicans didn't take money from this guy, but show that the Dems did as well. They guy who started this thread implied with his smart a** title that the Dems were on the clear. That it was only Delay who took money from him. Not the case.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8079308/

L.A. BRONCOS FAN
08-12-2005, 03:48 PM
Abramoff and DeLay are best buds who go back a long, long way.

Bronco_Beerslug
08-12-2005, 03:51 PM
My point of this is not to say that the Republicans didn't take money from this guy, but show that the Dems did as well. They guy who started this thread implied with his smart a** title that the Dems were on the clear. That it was only Delay who took money from him. Not the case.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8079308/
The guy that started this thread was showing only ONE of the problems Delay is facing. Also, the guy that started this thread didn't make ANY reference to democrats one way or the other in the post.

But it does appear the guy that posted the erroneous quote above didn't read the original post.

clarker
08-12-2005, 04:07 PM
The guy that started this thread was showing only ONE of the problems Delay is facing. Also, the guy that started this thread didn't make ANY reference to democrats one way or the other in the post.

But it does appear the guy that posted the erroneous quote above didn't read the original post.No of course you didn't bring up the Dems in this because they are just as guilty of taking money from this clown as Delay.

Perhaps you didn't know about that. I'm sorry if that is the case. But now you know.

Bronco_Beerslug
08-12-2005, 04:21 PM
No of course you didn't bring up the Dems in this because they are just as guilty of taking money from this clown as Delay.

Perhaps you didn't know about that. I'm sorry if that is the case. But now you know.
Oh but I do (did) know about Abramoff and his sub dudes channeling money to (both parties) politicians for a long time now. If you spend any time here you would know that. You would also know I'm not a democrat. The point of this thread is Delay called him his dearest friend. If you can find any links to other politicians calling him their dearest friend then by all means post them.

L.A. BRONCOS FAN
08-12-2005, 04:27 PM
The point of this thread is Delay called him his dearest friend. If you can find any links to other politicians calling him their dearest friend then by all means post them.

Exactly.

Clarker needs to study up on DeLay's relationship w/ Abramoff before he tries to make comparisons.

clarker
08-12-2005, 04:30 PM
Exactly.

Clarker needs to study up on DeLay's relationship w/ Abramoff before he tries to make comparisons.
What does Delay's relationship with him have to do with the Dems taking money from this guy. I am assuming that this has been invastigated for a long time now if this guy is being charged. So to me that shows the Dems are just as guilty as the Republicans on this.

W*GS
08-12-2005, 04:32 PM
I just wonder when the outrage over Abramoff is going to be consistently applied to Soros.

The liberals here have one-sided vision, most certainly.

L.A. BRONCOS FAN
08-13-2005, 12:11 AM
What does Delay's relationship with him have to do with the Dems taking money from this guy. I am assuming that this has been invastigated for a long time now if this guy is being charged. So to me that shows the Dems are just as guilty as the Republicans on this.

If you are laboring under the impression that taking money from Abramoff is all DeLay has done, then you are WAY more uninformed than I thought.

http://www.bartcop.com/delaywatchdog050219.gif