What in the Hell is going on at Fox ?

[Spider]

I knew there was a damn good reason I hated fox .........
http://mediamatters.org/ ........

John Gibson and Brian Kilmeade are assholes ........

[RaiderH8r]

I knew there was a damn good reason I hated fox .........
http://mediamatters.org/ ........

John Gibson and Brian Kilmeade are a-holes ........
Mediamatters.org is worthless as lips on a chicken. I saw them trying to imply Rush Limbaugh's statements were "downplaying" the London attack. They quote Limbaugh as saying, " It's like I said -- 40 people dead, 150 seriously wounded, 1,000 wounded, out of over 1 million people in that transit tube. It's not a successful terrorist attack, folks." and imply that he's somehow downplaying the attack. Rather he's saying London did well in their efforts in response and moving people out of harm's way. He also compliments the Mayor and his stoic response that basically said, "yeah you tried but f-you, we're not going anywhere." Limbaugh contrasts that with our country who is crying and hand wringing over what we did to cause such an attack. Good for the Brits, stick it right up their cowardly asses.

And f!ck the French with their incessant poo-pooing and condescending attitude. Yeah, don't wish a terrorist attack on anybody, but the French don't have a clue as to what it's like to deal with jihadist sh!tbags everyday and they have the audacity, after a history of buckling like a cheap belt in the face of armed conflict, to criticise the way we respond to an act of war on our own soil. Right here frenchy....right here http://www.njweedman.com/kissmyas.jpg and it's hairy one to boot. But since you're used to licking boots as your guiding diplomatic policy, a little smooch of hairy ass should be a tasty improvement.

Kilmeade...poorly stated but right idea. Global warming, WTF? So your balls are sweatier this year than last. We don't deal with the jihadists together we'll be picking our collective testicles out of the streets of Anytown, Anywhere.

[Spider]

LOL......

[DBruleU]

bwahahahahah oh man, I was starting to have a bad day, but that just made me laugh. Did you even take a breath while typing that? rofl

[RaiderH8r]

bwahahahahah oh man, I was starting to have a bad day, but that just made me laugh. Did you even take a breath while typing that? rofl
I have my moments. :thumbs:

[Hotrod]

Mediamatters.org is worthless as lips on a chicken. I saw them trying to imply Rush Limbaugh's statements were "downplaying" the London attack. They quote Limbaugh as saying, " It's like I said -- 40 people dead, 150 seriously wounded, 1,000 wounded, out of over 1 million people in that transit tube. It's not a successful terrorist attack, folks." and imply that he's somehow downplaying the attack. Rather he's saying London did well in their efforts in response and moving people out of harm's way. He also compliments the Mayor and his stoic response that basically said, "yeah you tried but f-you, we're not going anywhere." Limbaugh contrasts that with our country who is crying and hand wringing over what we did to cause such an attack. Good for the Brits, stick it right up their cowardly asses.

And f!ck the French with their incessant poo-pooing and condescending attitude. Yeah, don't wish a terrorist attack on anybody, but the French don't have a clue as to what it's like to deal with jihadist sh!tbags everyday and they have the audacity, after a history of buckling like a cheap belt in the face of armed conflict, to criticise the way we respond to an act of war on our own soil. Right here frenchy....right here http://www.njweedman.com/kissmyas.jpg and it's hairy one to boot. But since you're used to licking boots as your guiding diplomatic policy, a little smooch of hairy ass should be a tasty improvement.

Kilmeade...poorly stated but right idea. Global warming, WTF? So your balls are sweatier this year than last. We don't deal with the jihadists together we'll be picking our collective testicles out of the streets of Anytown, Anywhere.

LOL holy crap Ha!

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

Mediamatters.org is worthless as lips on a chicken. I saw them trying to imply Rush Limbaugh's statements were "downplaying" the London attack.

How dare they question the integrity of an upstanding, God-fearing, truth monger like Rehab Rush.

rofl

[Spider]

How dare they question the integrity of an upstanding, God-fearing, truth monger like Rehab Rush.

rofl
Rehab Rush ....... ;D

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

Rehab Rush ....... ;D

Speaking of whom...

Pigboy loses drug challenge

http://www.palmbeachpost.com/localnews/content/local_news/epaper/2005/07/07/s3b_limbaugh_0707.html

:D

[Spider]

hmmm... seems like Rush was busy boy doctor shopping

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

hmmm... seems like Rush was busy boy doctor shopping

Yep.

One script for Hillbilly Heroin wasn't enough, apparently. :D

http://www.bartcop.com/rush-oxycontin2.jpg

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

Sick Fox News anchor's "first thought" at the bombing: Time to buy futures

http://mediamatters.org/items/200507070007

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

Fox News Channel talkmeister Bill O’Reilly had to cancel his planned boat cruise, “Battle for American Values,” for lack of interest. Now it seems the mighty ship that has been Fox News Channel might be springing a few leaks—and viewers. FNC’s heavy hitters—O’Reilly, Sean Hannity, and Shepard Smith—all dropped in the coveted 25-to-54 age demographic, according to ratings figures for June and the second quarter of 2005. 7/9

http://www.washingtonian.com/inwashington/buzz/2005/0708.html

[RaiderH8r]

How dare they question the integrity of an upstanding, God-fearing, truth monger like Rehab Rush.

rofl
I don't care if they question Rush's integrity, he got himself into his situation he can get himself out. What bothers me is when they have the audacity to question someone's integrity while perpetrating a fraud in the process. They took his comments out of context. They toss around half assed innuendo and soundbytes. Why don't they ask Rush to clarify his position? It's easy. Rush, what did you mean when you said.....? But mediamatters.org is more interested in the same ill informed or misleading inflammatory rhetoric their mission statement suggests they are out to expose. So they can line up next to the frenchies.

[Spider]

I don't care if they question Rush's integrity, he got himself into his situation he can get himself out. What bothers me is when they have the audacity to question someone's integrity while perpetrating a fraud in the process. They took his comments out of context. They toss around half assed innuendo and soundbytes. Why don't they ask Rush to clarify his position? It's easy. Rush, what did you mean when you said.....? But mediamatters.org is more interested in the same ill informed or misleading inflammatory rhetoric their mission statement suggests they are out to expose. So they can line up next to the frenchies.
And Rush has never took anything out of Context ? ............
Isnt so funny when the right has it done to them is it

[RaiderH8r]

And Rush has never took anything out of Context ? ............
Isnt so funny when the right has it done to them is it
I don't care who does it. It's the banner under which it is done. They don't even reflect their own mission statement. We all know what Rush is, he makes no bones about it. We all know what Al Franken is, he makes no bones about it. We all know what Michael Moore is, he makes no bones about it. But mediamatters is, supposedly, dedicated to sifting wheat from chaff and they are as guilty of perpetration of inflammatory rhetoric, misleading information, and gross mischaracterizations as all those mentioned above. I just add them to the list of sh!t I have neither the time nor the inclination to pay attention to.

[Spider]

I don't care who does it. It's the banner under which it is done. They don't even reflect their own mission statement. We all know what Rush is, he makes no bones about it. We all know what Al Franken is, he makes no bones about it. We all know what Michael Moore is, he makes no bones about it. But mediamatters is, supposedly, dedicated to sifting wheat from chaff and they are as guilty of perpetration of inflammatory rhetoric, misleading information, and gross mischaracterizations as all those mentioned above. I just add them to the list of sh!t I don't have the time nor the inclination to pay attention to.
oh you mean fox news ......

[RaiderH8r]

oh you mean fox news ......
or CNN. They all blow sh!t way out of proportion to move ad time. I prefer Fox because they tend to go a little more in depth. But I also watch CNN from time to time. I also have a long list of daily newspapers that I read through as well as reading transcripts of Congressional hearings.

[Spider]

or CNN. They all blow sh!t way out of proportion to move ad time. I prefer Fox because they tend to go a little more in depth. But I also watch CNN from time to time. I also have a long list of daily newspapers that I read through as well as reading transcripts of Congressional hearings.
you just made my Argument about Cable news . Though I cant stand fox , I watch alot of MSNBC , Cspan , and read several News papers on line .......

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

But mediamatters is, supposedly, dedicated to sifting wheat from chaff and they are as guilty of perpetration of inflammatory rhetoric, misleading information, and gross mischaracterizations as all those mentioned above.

rofl

To people like you, "inflamatory rhetoric" = "any presentation of facts that exposes BushCo incompetence, impropriety, or criminality."