PDA

View Full Version : QB Camp Update


orange crusher
05-17-2005, 04:05 PM
Tuesday, May 17, 2005

Seeing Red

'Almost Half' of QB Camp Practices Devoted to Curing Red-Zone Ills
By Andrew Mason
DenverBroncos.com

ENGLEWOOD, Colo. -- In the past decade, no one in the AFC has been as efficient at moving the football up and down the field as the Broncos.

Denver has averaged 6,058.9 yards per season -- a figure bettered only by the Minnesota Vikings in that time frame. Last year, the team amassed 6,332 yards -- the second-highest total in team history and the best since 2000.

So the yardage was there. The scoring, however, was not.

"We had 381 (points) last year," wide receiver Rod Smith said. "We should have high 400s."

In two of Denver's three best seasons in terms of total yardage, the Broncos did just that, averaging over 30 points per game while working at clips of 31.3 and 30.3 points a game in 1998 and 2000, respectively. Last year was the other season among the three highest yardage totals, and Denver averaged just 23.8 points per game for a 381-point tally.

The discrepancy between points and yardage can be summarized in three words -- red zone inefficiency. Reparing and restoring the team's efforts inside the opposition's 20-yard-line is arguably the highest single priority of the ongoing quarterback-camp practices.

"We're spending part of the day -- almost half of it -- in the red zone, working plays," quarterback Jake Plummer said. "The only way to get better is to continue to get down there."

Added Smith: "That's the main thing. Our red zone to me, honestly, was horrible and that caused us to have a lot fewer points."

Overall, the Broncos' red-zone scoring average -- calculated by the number of drives that end in some kind of score -- was 85.7 percent last year, following figures of 87.5 percent in 2003 and 88.1 percent in 2002.

But the alarming statistic of last season was touchdown percentage, as the Broncos found the end zone on only 49.0 percent of their possessions that broke inside the opposing 20-yard-line. In 2003, that percentage was 55.4; in 2002 it was 57.6.

"Last year, we didn't produce like we should down there," Plummer said. "We moved the ball as well as almost any team that's been here. We gained a lot of yards; we did a lot of good things, but we didn't finish those drives. We've just got to work on that, and that's why we're out here right now."

Practice is beneficial in terms of learning where to go, but Smith believes if the Broncos are to reverse that red-zone decline of the past three years, it will have to be through a change in mindset.

"We didn't execute," he said. "It's always a combination of things, but it comes down to guys individually making plays when they're in position they have good coverage and we've got to find a way to salvage that play and get three yards. If you can do that, two or three yards in the red zone is huge. Somehow, someway, we found a way to not make those plays and not stay on the field."

Extra work in practice and working on the mental response to red-zone challenges both offer potential solutions. On the other hand, wholesale personnel changes were disdained.

Of the 11 offensive starters in the AFC wild-card playoff loss at Indianapolis, only Reuben Droughns does not return, and with Tatum Bell, Quentin Griffin and Mike Anderson, the Broncos boast three backs who have substantial experience in the system. Each has at least one 100-yard day to his name, although Anderson hasn't hit the century mark since 2001, his last full season at tailback before his two-year stay at fullback.

So even where there's change, there's familiarity. Plummer maintains that the Broncos' success from 20-yard-line to 20-yard-line means that major alterations in order to be more productive in the red zone are not necessary.

"We've got everybody back from the second most prolific offensive in Broncos history yardage-wise," he said. "I don't see why we have to go out and bring in some new guy."

It only takes the returning players doing just a smidgen better.

"We got down there a lot of times at the goal line and didn't produce a touchdown when we were down inside the 5, and we have to," Plummer said. "If we'd had four or five of those become touchdowns, our red-zone percentage goes way up; it's not as glaring a problem."

Odysseus
05-17-2005, 04:30 PM
Some of the changes they are making this year makes me wonder if The Broncos haven't been in a coma these past few years.

You mean you didn't know your red zone production sucked for four years? You didn't know Special Teams was a key part of winning football games for the past five years? You mean that you didn't know having quality depth under center is critical to your long term success? What do you know. Getting turnovers is important?

I like the fact they are working hard at fixing a lot of long standing issues. This is why I like Mike Shanahan because a lesser coach wouldn't snap out of it. I don't know where they are going next year record wise but they are on the right track and that in itself is a really big deal.

It's going to be hard to be a Jake homer if they don't start scoring in the red zone.

bpc
05-17-2005, 04:35 PM
"We got down there a lot of times at the goal line and didn't produce a touchdown when we were down inside the 5, and we have to," Plummer said. "If we'd had four or five of those become touchdowns, our red-zone percentage goes way up; it's not as glaring a problem."

Although I like Plummer this is just a stupid statement. IF you had four or five more of those become touchdowns, its not such a problem? Who cares about percentages, if you get four or five more touchdowns we win three more games and probably have a 13-3 record and homefiedl advantage in the 1st round instead of having to go back to the fast tracks of Indy again. The thinking is all screwed up here.

Jax 6-7 loss
Oakland 24-25 loss
SD 17-20 loss

All losses can be attributed to red zone futility. Until Plummer understands WHY we need to score those four or five more TD's, this will continue to haunt us like it has the past few years.

GreatBronco16
05-17-2005, 04:38 PM
Pos Rep Given.

Rock Chalk
05-17-2005, 05:03 PM
"We got down there a lot of times at the goal line and didn't produce a touchdown when we were down inside the 5, and we have to," Plummer said. "If we'd had four or five of those become touchdowns, our red-zone percentage goes way up; it's not as glaring a problem."

Although I like Plummer this is just a stupid statement. IF you had four or five more of those become touchdowns, its not such a problem? Who cares about percentages, if you get four or five more touchdowns we win three more games and probably have a 13-3 record and homefiedl advantage in the 1st round instead of having to go back to the fast tracks of Indy again. The thinking is all screwed up here.

Jax 6-7 loss
Oakland 24-25 loss
SD 17-20 loss

All losses can be attributed to red zone futility. Until Plummer understands WHY we need to score those four or five more TD's, this will continue to haunt us like it has the past few years.

I dont know, the fact that he knows it is a problem, whether he believes it to be substantial or not is irrelevant. There is a problem, and I am absolutely convinced that he understands that 4 or 5 more TDs is at least 3 more games. and homefield.

OOH Its space day on Science Channel. F*cking tight my favorite day.

Sorry for the interjection. Anyway, I agree with quiettiger. Im not sure where we are going to stand this year, adn I have no high expectations, but I do see things at least trying to go in the right direction. The issues I have been most concered about were addressed, D-line and ST. Now whether they work out for us or not, I dont know, but they were addressed as priorities and now Red ZOne efficiency is a target of concern at QB camps and that pleases me too.

All in all, Im just generally excited about this year, though not expectant of anything. And I swear to God if Taco says we are going to the Superbowl again in week five I really am going to get a lifetime ban for the things I will say to him.