PDA

View Full Version : Denver's rookie cap $2.2 million


eddie mac
05-04-2005, 02:32 PM
Niners allocation one of largest in league historyBy Len Pasquarelli
ESPN.com
Archive

They chose early and they chose often and so it is only fitting, it seems, that the San Francisco 49ers would have the highest rookie pool allocation for 2005.

Rookie money
Team Picks Rookie pool
San Francisco 11 $6,168,320
Tampa Bay 12 $6,037,440
Tennessee 11 $5,701,590
Cleveland 8 $5,182,820
Minnesota 7 $5,130,880
Dallas 8 $4,915,540
Philadelphia 11 $4,696,310
Miami 6 $4,613,120
St. Louis 11 $4,604,330
Green Bay 11 $4,483,150
Carolina 10 $4,443,290
Chicago 6 $4,297,580
Arizona 7 $4,274,600
San Diego 7 $4,207,770
Washington 6 $4,037,660
Indianapolis 10 $3,955,360
Seattle 9 $3,904,140
Kansas City 9 $3,695,300
Detroit 6 $3,641,080
New Orleans 7 $3,606,940
Jacksonville 8 $3,554,350
Oakland 7 $3,482,560
Cincinnati 7 $3,461,880
Atlanta 8 $3,376,980
Pittsburgh 8 $3,329,560
Baltimore 7 $3,326,380
New England 7 $2,962,900
N.Y. Jets 8 $2,921,690
Houston 6 $2,876,710
Denver 6 $2,232,750
Buffalo 6 $2,109,800
N.Y. Giants 4 $1,688,850
With the league's second-largest draft class, an 11-player bounty that includes top overall selection Alex Smith, the standout Utah quarterback, San Francisco has been awarded an NFL-high rookie pool of $6.168 million, according to documents obtained by ESPN.com through league sources.

San Francisco's allocation is more than 55 percent higher than the leaguewide average.

The rookie pool is, essentially, a cap within a cap. It represents the maximum amount that a team can spend, in terms of salary-cap room, on its draft choices and undrafted rookies. A franchise's rookie allocation is part of, not in addition to, its overall spending limit.

The formula for deriving each team's rookie pool is regarded as Byzantine even by the most astute team officials and is basically a function of how many choices are exercised by a team and where those selections are slotted in a given round.

It is hardy surprising, then, that the 49ers would be awarded the highest pool. Only one team, Tampa Bay, with 12, made more choices. And San Francisco made the initial pick in five of the seven rounds, including in four of the first five stanzas. That included, of course, the selection of Smith to lead off the lottery. The 49ers had at least one choice in all but the fourth round and multiple picks in three rounds.

While the San Francisco rookie allocation is one of the largest in league history, Tampa Bay was not far behind, with a pool award of $6.037 million. Like the 49ers, the Bucs had a high first-round choice, selecting Auburn tailback Carnell "Cadillac" Williams with the fifth pick overall, along with a surplus of draft slots. Tampa Bay had at least one pick in every round and multiple choices in three stanzas.

In all, there were eight teams which exercised 10 or more choices each and, reflective of that, all eight ranked among the top half of the league in rookie allocations. All four of the teams that had two choices in the first round were in the top half of the league and two of those franchises, Minnesota and Dallas, were among the six highest awards.

Conversely, there were four teams that made picks among the top 10 of the first round -- Chicago, Arizona, Washington and Detroit -- but who did not receive top 10 allocations. The Lions, for instance, had the 10th overall choice in the draft but only the 19th highest rookie allocation.

The New York Giants, with a league-low four choices and no first-round selection, also had the lowest rookie pool, at $1.688 million. The three teams with the lowest rookie pools, and four of the bottom five clubs, are all franchises that did not have a first-round selection this year.

The '05 rookie pool totals $126.92 million, an average of about $3.966 million per team. There are 15 clubs with allocations higher than the league average. The pool represents a five-percent increase over the 2004 rookie limit of $120.76 million. That is significant, since last year's rookie total showed a bump of only two percent from the previous one. Five teams received rookie allocations of $5 million or more this year, an increase of two over 2004. Those five franchises account for $28.2 million in rookie pool funds, or roughly 22 percent of the leaguewide allocation.

Len Pasquarelli is a senior writer for ESPN.com.

I wonder how big it'll be next year when we actually have some decent picks??

Atlas
05-04-2005, 02:38 PM
The rookie cap is so cool. One of the Best things to happen to football. Rookies really have no excuse to holdout.

labronx
05-04-2005, 03:06 PM
The rookie cap is so cool. One of the Best things to happen to football. Rookies really have no excuse to holdout.

agreed

Drek
05-04-2005, 03:29 PM
The rookie cap is so cool. One of the Best things to happen to football. Rookies really have no excuse to holdout. Yet every year a handful of guys do. Doesn't really make a whole lot of sense.

Atlas
05-04-2005, 04:43 PM
Yet every year a handful of guys do. Doesn't really make a whole lot of sense.

Not like the old days in the 80's. It was common back then for rookies to holdout all of the preseason!! Pretty much all rookies these days are signed before the first week of training camp is over.

Rascal
05-04-2005, 07:02 PM
Can someone explain to me what the rookie cap is?

Hercules Rockefeller
05-04-2005, 07:06 PM
The rookie cap is a cap within a cap. It's the maximum amount of cap room that the rookies can take up under the salary cap. The draft picks have their cap numbers completely applied to the rookie cap, only the bonuses of the UDFAs are applied toward the rookie cap.

Rascal
05-04-2005, 07:10 PM
Does it account for part of the total team cap number or is it seperate for the first year of the contract?

SoCalBronco
05-04-2005, 07:17 PM
Yet every year a handful of guys do. Doesn't really make a whole lot of sense.

There are some instances where i think its understandable for a rookie to hold out even where we have a rookie pool. Lets say the team gave fairly healthy increases over last year's percentages for those same slots to the other picks to make sure those deals were done and have one more pick to go. Because of the constraints of the pool, the increase that the final pick gets over last year's same slot is virtually nothing. Here because the team had to give fairly healthy increases to the other players to get the deal done, the team cant do more than give a negligible increase to the final pick. But its not the final pick's fault that the team is in this bind. Ofcourse if the guy is a late day 2 pick, he doesnt have much choice, but if he is a higher pick, he can remain firm.

Hercules Rockefeller
05-05-2005, 07:27 AM
Does it account for part of the total team cap number or is it seperate for the first year of the contract?

It's within the team cap

bendog
05-05-2005, 07:31 AM
It's within the team cap
so if, for example, SF didn't have enough cap room to fit in all of its rookie camp, they would either have to work their vet contracts to free up cap, or sign their picks for less than the total rookie cap? right?

Hercules Rockefeller
05-05-2005, 07:33 AM
Correct, but signing their rookies for less probably isn't going to happen.

bendog
05-05-2005, 07:56 AM
Correct, but signing their rookies for less probably isn't going to happen.
LOL, prolly not. Actually, I was surprised SF didn't trade the no 1 pick just so they didn't have to write the check.