PDA

View Full Version : Bush Shows No Remorse for Fake Newscasts


L.A. BRONCOS FAN
03-31-2005, 03:53 AM
NEW YORK -- Despite a rising chorus of condemnation from journalists and media critics, the George W. Bush administration shows no signs of abandoning its distribution of taxpayer-funded "news" to U.S. newspapers, radio and television stations.

Free press advocates are up in arms about what they say is the covert dissemination of propaganda by government agencies.

In one case, the administration -- seeking to build support among black families for its education reform plans -- paid a prominent African American pundit, Armstrong Williams, 240,000 dollars to promote the ”No Child Left Behind” law on his nationally syndicated television show and through his newspaper column, and to urge other black journalists to do the same.

Two other nationally known journalists, Maggie Gallagher and Michael McManus, have also admitted accepting thousands of dollars to endorse government programs.

Since 2001, the Army and Air Force Hometown News Service has fielded 40 reporters, producers and public affairs specialists to create ”good military news” to be beamed to home audiences via local news stations. The service's ”good news” segments have reportedly reached 41 million Americans via local newscasts -- in most cases, without the station acknowledging their source.

More than 20 different federal agencies used taxpayer funds to produce television news segments promoting Bush administration policies. These ”video news releases,” or VNRs, were broadcast on hundreds of local news programs. without disclosing their source.

And the military's TV outlet the Pentagon Channel, which formerly targeted the armed forces, is now available to U.S. citizens via every satellite and cable operator.

Regarding the VNRs, Pres. Bush said the government's practice of sending ”packaged news stories” to local television stations was legal and he has no plans to cease it.

His defense of the packages, which are designed to look like television news segments, came after the Government Accountability Office (GAO), a Congressional watchdog agency, called them a form of covert propaganda.

The administration responded that, ”Executive Branch agencies are not bound by GAO's legal advice” but should be guided by the views of the Department of Justice's Office of Legal Counsel, part of the executive branch.

GAO said that publications that are ”misleading as to their origin and reasonably constitute 'propaganda' within the common understanding of that term.” Its definition of propaganda includes ”covert attempts to mold opinion through the undisclosed use of third parties.”

full story here... (http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0329-12.htm)

L.A. BRONCOS FAN
03-31-2005, 05:02 AM
http://www.freepress.org/images/cartoons/93big.jpg

RaiderH8r
03-31-2005, 07:35 AM
NEW YORK -- Despite a rising chorus of condemnation from journalists and media critics, the George W. Bush administration shows no signs of abandoning its distribution of taxpayer-funded "news" to U.S. newspapers, radio and television stations.

Free press advocates are up in arms about what they say is the covert dissemination of propaganda by government agencies.

In one case, the administration -- seeking to build support among black families for its education reform plans -- paid a prominent African American pundit, Armstrong Williams, 240,000 dollars to promote the ”No Child Left Behind” law on his nationally syndicated television show and through his newspaper column, and to urge other black journalists to do the same.

Two other nationally known journalists, Maggie Gallagher and Michael McManus, have also admitted accepting thousands of dollars to endorse government programs.

Since 2001, the Army and Air Force Hometown News Service has fielded 40 reporters, producers and public affairs specialists to create ”good military news” to be beamed to home audiences via local news stations. The service's ”good news” segments have reportedly reached 41 million Americans via local newscasts -- in most cases, without the station acknowledging their source.

More than 20 different federal agencies used taxpayer funds to produce television news segments promoting Bush administration policies. These ”video news releases,” or VNRs, were broadcast on hundreds of local news programs. without disclosing their source.

And the military's TV outlet the Pentagon Channel, which formerly targeted the armed forces, is now available to U.S. citizens via every satellite and cable operator.

Regarding the VNRs, Pres. Bush said the government's practice of sending ”packaged news stories” to local television stations was legal and he has no plans to cease it.

His defense of the packages, which are designed to look like television news segments, came after the Government Accountability Office (GAO), a Congressional watchdog agency, called them a form of covert propaganda.

The administration responded that, ”Executive Branch agencies are not bound by GAO's legal advice” but should be guided by the views of the Department of Justice's Office of Legal Counsel, part of the executive branch.

GAO said that publications that are ”misleading as to their origin and reasonably constitute 'propaganda' within the common understanding of that term.” Its definition of propaganda includes ”covert attempts to mold opinion through the undisclosed use of third parties.”

full story here... (http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0329-12.htm)
From Common Dreams no less. Well...excuse me while I don't trip over myself to bite into this big steaming bullsh!t burger. Always good for a laugh. "News and Views for the Progressive Community" Do you think they might be trying to appeal to their base? Hmmmm? Good God. Consider for a moment why you dismiss op-ed pieces from Rush Limbaugh and then you might understand why this tripe you're peddling out there doesn't get a first glance by thinking folks.

Rigs11
03-31-2005, 10:03 AM
From Common Dreams no less. Well...excuse me while I don't trip over myself to bite into this big steaming bullsh!t burger. Always good for a laugh. "News and Views for the Progressive Community" Do you think they might be trying to appeal to their base? Hmmmm? Good God. Consider for a moment why you dismiss op-ed pieces from Rush Limbaugh and then you might understand why this tripe you're peddling out there doesn't get a first glance by thinking folks.

You're missing the point here. Do our tax dollars pay for Limbaugh to spew out his garbage?

Hotrod
03-31-2005, 10:45 AM
You're missing the point here. Do our tax dollars pay for Limbaugh to spew out his garbage?

Our tax dollars do pay for NPR which leans just to the right of LABF.

Spider
03-31-2005, 11:25 AM
i think we all understand the goverment Props up alot of these media outlets , that doesnt bother me if Rush gets $ , or if NPR gets $ . But what does bother me is when the White house hocks the tax money to promote propaganda , it doesnt matter if you are left or right , this should scare the hell out of you ...... Think Saddam did the same Propaganda tactic ..... This is stepping into Dangerous ground !!!!!!!!

L.A. BRONCOS FAN
03-31-2005, 06:56 PM
You're missing the point here. Do our tax dollars pay for Limbaugh to spew out his garbage?

Why do the bush monkeys keep trying the same invalid argument, i.e., that public-funded media presenting programs with an (alleged) liberal slant is the same thing as journalists taking payola from the WH to pimp WH policies?

Talk about grasping at any straw - no matter how feeble - to prop up a corrupt WH and a corrupt "leader."