PDA

View Full Version : Troops Question Rumsfeld


Bronco_Beerslug
12-08-2004, 06:33 PM
The troops are complaining about not having the right equipment and never ending tours. Rumsfelds answer, suck it up. That ought to really get the moral up!

--------------------------------------------------
By ROBERT BURNS, AP Military Writer

CAMP BUEHRING, Kuwait - In a rare public airing of grievances, disgruntled soldiers complained to Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld on Wednesday about long deployments and a lack of armored vehicles and other equipment.

"You go to war with the Army you have," Rumsfeld replied, "not the Army you might want or wish to have."

Spc. Thomas Wilson had asked the defense secretary, "Why do we soldiers have to dig through local landfills for pieces of scrap metal and compromised ballistic glass to up-armor our vehicles?" Shouts of approval and applause arose from the estimated 2,300 soldiers who had assembled to see Rumsfeld.

Rumsfeld hesitated and asked Wilson to repeat his question.

"We do not have proper armored vehicles to carry with us north," Wilson, 31, of Nashville, Tenn., concluded after asking again.

Wilson, an airplane mechanic whose unit, the 278th Regimental Combat Team of the Tennessee Army National Guard, is about to drive north into Iraq (news - web sites) for a one-year tour of duty, put his finger on a problem that has bedeviled the Pentagon (news - web sites) for more than a year. Rarely, though, is it put so bluntly in a public forum.

Rumsfeld said the Army was sparing no expense or effort to acquire as many Humvees and other vehicles with extra armor as it can. What is more, he said, armor is not the savior some think it is.

"You can have all the armor in the world on a tank and a tank can (still) be blown up," he said. The same applies to the much smaller Humvee utility vehicles that, without extra armor, are highly vulnerable to the insurgents' weapon of choice in Iraq, the improvised explosive device that is a roadside threat to Army convoys and patrols.

U.S. soldiers and Marines in Iraq are killed or maimed by roadside bombs almost daily. Adding armor protection to Humvees and other vehicles that normally are not used in direct combat has been a priority for the Army, but manufacturers have not been able to keep up with the demand.

Wilson's ex-wife, Regina, said she was not surprised he challenged Rumsfeld.

"It wouldn't matter if it was Bush himself standing there," she said. "He would have dissed him the same."

Wilson joined the National Guard in June 2003; previously, he had served about four years in the Air Force, beginning in 1994.

Rumsfeld dropped in to Camp Buehring — named for Lt. Col. Charles Buehring, who was killed in a rocket attack on a downtown Baghdad hotel in November 2003 — to thank the troops for their service and to give them a pep talk. Later he flew to New Delhi for meetings Thursday with Indian government officials.

In his prepared remarks in Kuwait, Rumsfeld urged the troops — mostly National Guard and Reserve soldiers — to discount critics of the war and to help "win the test of wills" with the insurgents.

Wilson and others, however, had criticisms of their own — not of the war but of how it was being fought.

During the question-and-answer session, another soldier complained that active-duty Army units seem to get priority over National Guard and Reserve units for the best equipment used in Iraq.

"There's no way I can prove it, but I am told the Army is breaking its neck to see that there is not" discrimination of that kind, Rumsfeld said.



Yet another soldier asked how much longer the Army would continue using its "stop loss" power to prevent soldiers from leaving the service who are otherwise eligible to retire or return to civilian life at the end of their enlistment.

Rumsfeld said this condition was simply a fact of life for soldiers in times of war. Critics, including some in Congress, say it's proof the Army has been stretched too thin by war.

"It's basically a sound principle, it's nothing new, it's been well understood" by soldiers, he said. "My guess is it will continue to be used as little as possible, but that it will continue to be used."

Sen. Christopher Dodd (news, bio, voting record), D-Conn., told Rumsfeld in a letter Wednesday that his response to the question about armored vehicles was "utterly unacceptable" and that it was the duty of the government to provide safety equipment.

"Mr. Secretary, our troops go to war with the Army that our nation's leaders provide," he wrote.

The deputy commanding general of U.S. forces in Kuwait, Maj. Gen. Gary Speer, said in an interview at Camp Buehring that as far as he knew, every vehicle deploying to Iraq from Kuwait had at least "Level 3" armor protection. That means it had locally fabricated armor for its side panels, but not bulletproof windows or reinforced floorboards.

Speer said he was unaware that soldiers were searching landfills for scrap metal and discarded glass.

However, Maj. Gen. Gus L. Hargett, the adjutant general of the Tennessee National Guard, disputed Speer's remarks. "I know that members of his staff were aware and assisted the 278th in obtaining these materials," he said.

At the Pentagon, spokesman Larry Di Rita said production of armored Humvees had increased from 15 to 450 a month since fall 2003, when commanders in Iraq started asking for them because of insurgents' heavy use of roadside explosives.

Overall, there are 19,000 armored Humvees in the Iraqi theater. Some were built with additional armor, others had it added on later. That's, 2,000 short of what commanders are asking for, Di Rita acknowledged.

Military policy is that troops driving into Iraq in Humvees drive only in armored ones, Di Rita said. Some $1.2 billion has been included in the defense budget to pay for armored vehicles, he said.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=514&e=2&u=/ap/20041209/ap_on_re_mi_ea/rumsfeld

RunByDesign
12-08-2004, 07:37 PM
Hey Rumsfeld, while you're busy saving money on armor, you should try to cut active-duty benefits for soldiers families, as well....er....wait a sec...you already did that.

My bad. :kiddingme

RunByDesign
12-08-2004, 07:39 PM
You know, what they could do is give these Goddamn, pork budget programs the damn axe and give our boys the fing armor that they need.

Goddamn asshole politicians.

Green Sunshine
12-08-2004, 07:56 PM
You know, what they could do is give these Goddamn, pork budget programs the damn axe and give our boys the fing armor that they need.

Goddamn asshole politicians.

Rummy stabs someone in the back. What a surprise. Did you forget that he personally met with Saddam in the 1980s to seal a deal to give Saddam massive amounts of weaponry at the same time he was giving the Iranians weapons? He just wanted them to kill each other and be out of the way. He is an evil man. :devil:

missingnumber7
12-08-2004, 08:31 PM
Hey Rumsfeld, while you're busy saving money on armor, you should try to cut active-duty benefits for soldiers families, as well....er....wait a sec...you already did that.

My bad. :kiddingme
Actually they just raised pay by 3.5% and increased benefits to guard soldiers that were deployed. I'm finally gonna get a GI bill worth something in stead of 300 a month it will more than double because I was activated.
The things they are griping about is true stuff that has been complained about since I was there more than a year ago. In fact the lenthening of deployments has been an issue since July 2003. I remember complaining about it myself when we were extended from 6 to 12 months and then 12 to 15.

RunByDesign
12-08-2004, 08:35 PM
Actually they just raised pay by 3.5% and increased benefits to guard soldiers that were deployed. I'm finally gonna get a GI bill worth something in stead of 300 a month it will more than double because I was activated.
The things they are griping about is true stuff that has been complained about since I was there more than a year ago. In fact the lenthening of deployments has been an issue since July 2003. I remember complaining about it myself when we were extended from 6 to 12 months and then 12 to 15.
Well, it sounds like a start. They still need to make the full committment and give the boys everything they need and quit trying to cut corners.

patteeu
12-08-2004, 10:47 PM
Hey Rumsfeld, while you're busy saving money on armor, you should try to cut active-duty benefits for soldiers families, as well....er....wait a sec...you already did that.

My bad. :kiddingme

If you had paid any attention to this story, you'd know that he specifically said it wasn't a cost issue or a desire issue, it was a production issue. In this very article, he said the army is "sparing no expense" to provide the armored humvees. The article points out that manufacturing capacity is unable to keep up with demand. But don't let that get in the way of your fun with spin.

errand
12-09-2004, 12:24 AM
Well, it sounds like a start. They still need to make the full committment and give the boys everything they need and quit trying to cut corners.

Odd, but the only troops griping about equipment, refusing to go on convoy missions and bitching about how long they have to stay are all guard or reservists....the regular guys, career troops aren't griping at all....because they didn't sign up to get a free education or make a few bucks during the summer.It amazes me the number of people who volunteer and then think they don't have to actually fulfill their obligation.

But Rumsfeld was right...you go to war with the army you have...not the one you wish you had. We'd all love the troops to have everything they want, but truth be known it's not feasible to increase the armor on some vehicles without reducing it's effectiveness elsewhere, like it's top speed......take for instance the old British Matilda tank....the Germans had a hard time getting rounds thru this beast of a tank's armored skin....but because it was so well armored...it was slow as hell and was a sitting duck for the Stuka bombers and 88mm guns.

watermock
12-09-2004, 12:57 AM
First going into Iraq the RPG's are Russian, not American. These RPG's can disable but not kill an Abrahms tank. The article says that we delivered 19,000 new humvees and are 2,000 short, and are building 450 armoured a month for fall 2003.

The fact of the matter is we built too many of these jeeps, and not enough APC's. The Stryker is supposed to be better, but even it needs more armor.

Remember when I told you people that money and weapons were being shipped thru Syria and weapons and insurgents were being shipped as such?

All of a sudden once we went into the rat hole I am totally vindicated. Syria has been proven involved.

All of a sudden after I said there was a multi billion dollar scam going on last year with Food for Terrorism, there are calls for Annon's ouster.

I also said that Arafat had built tunnels to Sinai into Gaza and also under the containment fence, and those have been found.

So when I hear that Humvees can't handle RPG's and roadside bombs, it's not surprising. They were never designed for that, all you can do is minimize and kill on sight.

We should have some more Strykers in there that are less vulnerable, but don't blame me for the Army being underfunded. It was a huge mistake by Rummy to assume there wouldn't be an insurgency. I called for his head two years ago, Franks got out as soon as possible, which I considered cowardice, along with a few more Clinton desktop Generals.

The problem is when you run from Kuwiat to Bagdad over and over, your doing the same thing we did two years ago, but when we brought the tanks up, they ran away. When they see support vehicles, they attack. Crap, if I knew this was going to happen, how come out intelligence couldn't figure it out? After Gulf War one, did you really expect that bunch of idiots to stand up mano mano?

RunByDesign
12-09-2004, 05:46 AM
If you had paid any attention to this story, you'd know that he specifically said it wasn't a cost issue or a desire issue, it was a production issue. In this very article, he said the army is "sparing no expense" to provide the armored humvees. The article points out that manufacturing capacity is unable to keep up with demand. But don't let that get in the way of your fun with spin.


"What is more, he said, armor is not the savior some think it is."

Now they don't even need armor? Don't worry son, that armor stuff is over-rated...you don't need it....what an asshole. ::) (Rumsfeld)

"You can have all the armor in the world on a tank and a tank can (still) be blown up," he said.

Well, no ****. You think that these boys don't know first hand how easy it is to get thier ass blown to kingdom come? You think that they haven't been getting thier **** blown up this whole time? 1,200 + of 'em, you damn jerkoff? That doesn't justify the fact that they are short of armor that can save thier life from small arms fire. Asshole. (Rumsfeld)

If YOU (patteeu) had paid any attention to this story, you'd know that the spin was already on. But don't let that get in the way of your fun with ignorance.

RunByDesign
12-09-2004, 05:51 AM
Furthermore, I'm sure that the boys and girls who are making the armor are doing everything THEY can to supply our boys and keep up with demand. It is these asshole politicians with thier damn pork-barrel budgets who are to blame.

Halliburton over-charges millions but our boys can't get enough armor? Pork budgets fly through legislation, but someone is shot to hell because they don't have enough armor when the money IS OUT THERE?

I mean, this has been an issue for a long time. Not just recently, when the insurgency intensified and demand went up.

The money is obviously out there. They need to quit pissing it away and give our boys what they need.

patteeu
12-09-2004, 06:16 AM
Furthermore, I'm sure that the boys and girls who are making the armor are doing everything THEY can to supply our boys and keep up with demand. It is these asshole politicians with thier damn pork-barrel budgets who are to blame.

Halliburton over-charges millions but our boys can't get enough armor? Pork budgets fly through legislation, but someone is shot to hell because they don't have enough armor when the money IS OUT THERE?

I mean, this has been an issue for a long time. Not just recently, when the insurgency intensified and demand went up.

The money is obviously out there. They need to quit pissing it away and give our boys what they need.

It isn't a money issue or a desire issue or a pork issue, it's a production issue. That's not pissing money away (although I'm sure they are paying top dollar if they are maxing out the production capability). They've been working this issue for a long time. That's why they've already delivered 19,000 of the 21,000 armored Humvees that have been requested by the field commanders.

Look on the brightside RBD. With fewer armored Humvees, you get to celebrate a few more casualties. I don't believe for a minute that you want to "give our boys what they need." You just want an issue to use to attack the administration.

patteeu
12-09-2004, 06:21 AM
Prediction: In a few weeks or months, there will be a story about how the Pentagon was paying an incredibly high amount to armor each Humvee. Kind of like the expensive hammers and toilet seats of days gone by.

Secondary Prediction: When that story breaks, Beerslug and RunByDesign will be all over it complaining about the wastefullness of the Pentagon and how Rumsfield should be fired for mismanaging money so badly.

RunByDesign
12-09-2004, 06:26 AM
It isn't a money issue or a desire issue or a pork issue, it's a production issue. That's not pissing money away (although I'm sure they are paying top dollar if they are maxing out the production capability). They've been working this issue for a long time. That's why they've already delivered 19,000 of the 21,000 armored Humvees that have been requested by the field commanders.

Look on the brightside RBD. With fewer armored Humvees, you get to celebrate a few more casualties. I don't believe for a minute that you want to "give our boys what they need." You just want an issue to use to attack the administration.

Celebrate a few more casualties? F*ck you, you punk. I have never celebrated casualties. I have stuck up for our boys and called for the necessary supplies from day one. Just because I don't support the bloodbath, doesn't mean I want our boys to go out there and get shot all to hell. In fact, I want the exact opposite: a short, functional end to this war. If they are there, give them the stuff that's gonna let them get the job done and get the f*ck out.

And you can lap up whatever lie and spin that the old crusty liar spews forth. It shows that you really have no critical thought process.

Believe whatever you want to. Look where it has got you: nowhere.

You are a classless, blatantly dishonest POS.

RunByDesign
12-09-2004, 06:26 AM
Prediction: In a few weeks or months, there will be a story about how the Pentagon was paying an incredibly high amount to armor each Humvee. Kind of like the expensive hammers and toilet seats of days gone by.

Secondary Prediction: When that story breaks, Beerslug and RunByDesign will be all over it complaining about the wastefullness of the Pentagon and how Rumsfield should be fired for mismanaging money so badly.

Prediction: pattycake will still be a blind, lying and blatantly dishonest scumbag.

L.A. BRONCOS FAN
01-02-2005, 07:11 AM
http://www.bartcop.com/tom-spin.jpg