View Full Version : Entire Bush Cabinet to resign!
enjolras
11-06-2004, 10:55 PM
Of course this happens with every second-term presidency.. I'm sure he'll reappoint most of them:)
Kaylore
11-07-2004, 10:05 AM
Of course this happens with every second-term presidency.. I'm sure he'll reappoint most of them:)
I'd bet half go and half of the remaining shift to other posts. We'll have to wait and see. It won't happen all at once. Its possible it will shift a few posts at a time taking several months to see a complete change.
errand
11-07-2004, 10:00 PM
Of course this happens with every second-term presidency.. I'm sure he'll reappoint most of them:)
If that's the case, then why even post this crap? you just couldn't help yourself is why....you have a need to try and make it seem as if Bush is bad and that even his own cabinet couldn't stand him.
Get over it dude, your boy lost, deal with it and go back to the drawing board and maybe you'll see what's wrong with your politcal party....we conservatives have been trying to tell you what your problem is, but you won't listen to us.
missingnumber7
11-07-2004, 10:42 PM
Of course this happens with every second-term presidency.. I'm sure he'll reappoint most of them:)
I don't want Rumsfeld back, can anyone help me with that :contract:
Kaylore
11-07-2004, 11:15 PM
I don't want Rumsfeld back, can anyone help me with that :contract:
Ashcroft is gone. Rumors are that Powell and Rumsfeld are gone too. Condoleeza might be nexr Secretary of state since she and Bush are really close. Tom Ridge is gone and so is probably Norman Mineta. There will be a new Democrat on the cabinet to replace Norman. We'll see...
L.A. BRONCOS FAN
11-08-2004, 03:34 AM
Is there any truth to the rumor that Crisco Johnny Ashkkkrosft will resign as Attorney General?
Sounds like BushCo will have to scour Jim Crow country for another neo-fascist to fill his shoes.
There are naked statues to cloak, don't you know?
L.A. BRONCOS FAN
11-08-2004, 03:37 AM
Mixed emotions...glad Bush won the election, but sad that I'll have to read LABF's crap another four years.
Mixed emotions: Sad that the Mad Cowboy stole another election, but glad I'll get the chance to say "I told you so" when the chickens come home to roost.
enjolras
11-08-2004, 08:07 AM
If that's the case, then why even post this crap? you just couldn't help yourself is why....you have a need to try and make it seem as if Bush is bad and that even his own cabinet couldn't stand him.
Get over it dude, your boy lost, deal with it and go back to the drawing board and maybe you'll see what's wrong with your politcal party....we conservatives have been trying to tell you what your problem is, but you won't listen to us.
How damn lame are you?
I was posting this because I always found the tradition of the entire cabinet resigning amusing. It wasn't a attack or anything else really.. lighten up.
patteeu
11-08-2004, 12:37 PM
Personally, I'd like to see a new Secretary of the Treasury who is a strong proponent of serious tax reform.
errand
11-09-2004, 02:36 PM
Mixed emotions: Sad that the Mad Cowboy stole another election, but glad I'll get the chance to say "I told you so" when the chickens come home to roost.
So what your saying is that if things go bad for this great nation (and judging by your anti-Bush crap, you believe they will), you'll be happy because it'll give you a reason to say I told you so?
errand
11-09-2004, 02:41 PM
How damn lame are you?
I was posting this because I always found the tradition of the entire cabinet resigning amusing. It wasn't a attack or anything else really.. lighten up.
The way your thread was titled, what do you think people would think? That Bush's cabinet was to resign in protest against him. Kind of like when TJ posted that one that said Beuerlein was the best Qb in camp....conveniently leaving off that the reporter's storyline was "Beuerlein the best QB in camp on Thursday"
Perhaps the next time you should post it as "Following reelection tradition, Bush cabinet to resign to make room for new appointees"....instead of just a few choice words
L.A. BRONCOS FAN
11-09-2004, 06:52 PM
So what your saying is that if things go bad for this great nation (and judging by your anti-Bush crap, you believe they will), you'll be happy because it'll give you a reason to say I told you so?
Those of us in the reality-based community have been watching 'things go bad for this great nation' since the Illegitimate Idiot stole power the first time around in 2000.
No, saying "I told you so" to the mental midgets and psychopaths who support BushCorp will give me no satisfaction whatsover. Only ousting the illegal bush junta and restoring America to greatness will do it for me.
errand
11-09-2004, 08:23 PM
Those of us in the reality-based community have been watching 'things go bad for this great nation' since the Illegitimate Idiot stole power the first time around in 2000.
No, saying "I told you so" to the mental midgets and psychopaths who support BushCorp will give me no satisfaction whatsover. Only ousting the illegal bush junta and restoring America to greatness will do it for me.
Now let's see if you can outline your plan to restoring America to greatness....without bad mouthing Bush. Just tell us what the Dems would do differently and why.
enjolras
11-09-2004, 10:04 PM
Perhaps the next time you should post it as "Following reelection tradition, Bush cabinet to resign to make room for new appointees"....instead of just a few choice words
Because that wouldn't have the same effect.. the title was meant to be shocking, but your just being far to sensitive about it. Seriously... I think your mistaking me for LABF or something.
L.A. BRONCOS FAN
11-10-2004, 01:16 AM
the title was meant to be shocking, but your just being far to sensitive about it.
Interesting.
"Too sensitive" isn't exactly the attitude you would expect from people who genuinely believe their candidiate won an election by legitimate means, has a legitimate mandate, etc., is it?
L.A. BRONCOS FAN
11-10-2004, 01:22 AM
Now let's see if you can outline your plan to restoring America to greatness....without bad mouthing Bush. Just tell us what the Dems would do differently and why.
Why bother?
Every effort to do such a thing has been invariably lost on you.
People like you will always categorically dismiss any Democratic vision for America.
Christ himself could descend on a cloud with a burning scroll outlining such a plan, and you and your kind would simply piss on it before seeing word one.
Those of us in the reality-based community have been watching 'things go bad for this great nation' since the Illegitimate Idiot stole power the first time around in 2000.
...when you turned 20.
Part of your problem (and there are a great great many problems that you have) is that you think things started to go bad in 2000. Many others, far more well-read and wise and you, can make a case for 1980. Or 1964. Or 1932. Or 1913. Or 1865. Or even 1794.
Why do you suppose that is?
I know that's asking a silly question, because you can never give a straight answer - and 'bartcop' won't help you either.
Why bother?
Every effort to do such a thing has been invariably lost on you.
People like you will always categorically dismiss any Democratic vision for America.
Christ himself could descend on a cloud with a burning scroll outlining such a plan, and you and your kind would simply piss on it before seeing word one.
In short, LABF has no plan of any kind - his whole existence is defined by opposition and reaction. Saying "Bush is evil" is easy. Coming up with a vision of how this nation should be requires work, and it's clear you have neither the intelligence, the stamina, or the desire to do work.
You just want to bitch.
You're a pathetic excuse for an American, LABF.
L.A. BRONCOS FAN
11-10-2004, 11:52 PM
...when you turned 20.
Part of your problem (and there are a great great many problems that you have) is that you think things started to go bad in 2000. Many others, far more well-read and wise and you, can make a case for 1980. Or 1964. Or 1932. Or 1913. Or 1865. Or even 1794.
Why do you suppose that is?
Once again, W*GS the fascist brownie hound has it bass-ackwards.
Your problem is that you refuse to engage in an honest evaluation of the last four years under the Smirking Moron. You prefer to deflect by making the 2004 election a referendum on FDR or Jimmy Carter or Clinton. Anything to avoid holding the Smirking Sociopath accountable for his decisions and actions of the past four years. For W*GS, the buck always stops on past Democratic presidents' desks where Bush is concerned.
In short, LABF has no plan of any kind - his whole existence is defined by opposition and reaction.
Another staggering pot/kettle/blackism from a silly clown who's only "plan" is to display funny little anti-Clinton avatars and to declare himself a "liberal's worst nightmare," while running interference for the bush crime family at every opportunity.
W*GS has learned Rove's projection techniques well: Accuse your opponent of doing exactly what you are doing.
Coming up with a vision of how this nation should be requires work, and it's clear you have neither the intelligence, the stamina, or the desire to do work.
More shameless hypocrisy and the usual grandiose sense of self-righteousness from W*GS.
The only "vision" offered by W*GS on this forum is one in which the bush crime familly is not challenged, questioned, or held accountable for its actions while all liberals are demonized and ostricized. In short, W*GS' "vision" is indistinguishable from Ann Coulter's "vision."
You're a pathetic excuse for an American, LABF.
You're a total waste of human DNA who shouldn't have the right to suck up the air the rest of the species breathes.