Bronco_Beerslug
10-05-2004, 07:53 PM
Since Cheney brought it up tonight.
----------------------------------------------
GAO report says plan is plagued by faulty data
By DIANA JEAN SCHEMO
New York Times
WASHINGTON - A new federal requirement to sharply expand annual testing of students starting next school year faces serious obstacles, including unreliable data and a lack of clear and timely guidance from federal officials, according to a government report
The report, by the Government Accountability Office, the investigative arm of Congress, found wide variation in the rules that states use to measure progress under No Child Left Behind, the education law that has been one of President Bush's major domestic initiatives. The variation makes comparisons between states meaningless, the report suggested.
No Child Left Behind
Under No Child Left Behind, schools face a rigorous timetable of academic challenges in the coming years. Starting with the 2005-2006 school year, they must test students in Grades 3 to 8 annually on reading and math, and in 2007, they must also begin testing in science. By 2014, the law demands that all students become proficient in reading and math. Failure to meet the targets brings severe consequences, including, ultimately, the possible closing of schools.
The GAO report, released late last week, said that more than half the state and school district officials interviewed said they had been "hampered by poor and unreliable student data," with Illinois, for example, reporting data problems in 300 of its 1,055 school districts. About half of 21 state officials interviewed said the law's tight deadlines impeded their ability to carry out the law's promises.
http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/politics/2830996
-------------------------------------------------
'No Child Left Behind' Funding Plan Shortchanges Schools
“The fiscal 2005 education spending bill approved by the House Appropriations Committee today falls far short of what schools need to fully meet the mandates of the so-called ‘No Child Left Behind’ law.
“The bill for all ‘No Child Left Behind’ programs is $9.5 billion less than what was promised when the law passed, and is even below what President Bush has requested. This bill also eliminates programs proven to help students succeed, such as comprehensive school reform, drop-out prevention, parental assistance centers, and history, arts, and foreign language education.
“This lack of sufficient resources comes as cash-strapped school districts are paying for more bureaucracy, standardized testing, transportation, private tutoring, and other costly demands under the ‘No Child Left Behind’ law. Because of last year’s inadequate funding, half of the nation’s 15,000 school districts will have less federal aid for poor children this fall.
“As a recent government memo also made clear, the Administration proposes to cut all federal education funding by $1.5 billion next year and to freeze it at that level for the next three years.
“Thus, America’s public school children face a triple whammy. Half of all school districts will have to do more with less money for disadvantaged students in 2004. Important programs to advance the goals of the ‘No Child Left Behind’ law are underfunded or scheduled for elimination next year. Further, deeper cuts are proposed for fiscal 2006. This is clearly moving us in the wrong direction.
http://www.nea.org/newsreleases/2004/nr040714.html
----------------------------------------------
GAO report says plan is plagued by faulty data
By DIANA JEAN SCHEMO
New York Times
WASHINGTON - A new federal requirement to sharply expand annual testing of students starting next school year faces serious obstacles, including unreliable data and a lack of clear and timely guidance from federal officials, according to a government report
The report, by the Government Accountability Office, the investigative arm of Congress, found wide variation in the rules that states use to measure progress under No Child Left Behind, the education law that has been one of President Bush's major domestic initiatives. The variation makes comparisons between states meaningless, the report suggested.
No Child Left Behind
Under No Child Left Behind, schools face a rigorous timetable of academic challenges in the coming years. Starting with the 2005-2006 school year, they must test students in Grades 3 to 8 annually on reading and math, and in 2007, they must also begin testing in science. By 2014, the law demands that all students become proficient in reading and math. Failure to meet the targets brings severe consequences, including, ultimately, the possible closing of schools.
The GAO report, released late last week, said that more than half the state and school district officials interviewed said they had been "hampered by poor and unreliable student data," with Illinois, for example, reporting data problems in 300 of its 1,055 school districts. About half of 21 state officials interviewed said the law's tight deadlines impeded their ability to carry out the law's promises.
http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/politics/2830996
-------------------------------------------------
'No Child Left Behind' Funding Plan Shortchanges Schools
“The fiscal 2005 education spending bill approved by the House Appropriations Committee today falls far short of what schools need to fully meet the mandates of the so-called ‘No Child Left Behind’ law.
“The bill for all ‘No Child Left Behind’ programs is $9.5 billion less than what was promised when the law passed, and is even below what President Bush has requested. This bill also eliminates programs proven to help students succeed, such as comprehensive school reform, drop-out prevention, parental assistance centers, and history, arts, and foreign language education.
“This lack of sufficient resources comes as cash-strapped school districts are paying for more bureaucracy, standardized testing, transportation, private tutoring, and other costly demands under the ‘No Child Left Behind’ law. Because of last year’s inadequate funding, half of the nation’s 15,000 school districts will have less federal aid for poor children this fall.
“As a recent government memo also made clear, the Administration proposes to cut all federal education funding by $1.5 billion next year and to freeze it at that level for the next three years.
“Thus, America’s public school children face a triple whammy. Half of all school districts will have to do more with less money for disadvantaged students in 2004. Important programs to advance the goals of the ‘No Child Left Behind’ law are underfunded or scheduled for elimination next year. Further, deeper cuts are proposed for fiscal 2006. This is clearly moving us in the wrong direction.
http://www.nea.org/newsreleases/2004/nr040714.html
