Your kidding me.. loyalty oath to Bush required

[enjolras]

http://www.abqjournal.com/elex/204620elex07-30-04.htm

An article about how your REQUIRED to sign an loyalty oath to Bush/Cheney in order to even see our vice president speak. He's the fricking peoples vice president..

Even the most ardent Bush supporter can't possibly spin this in a positive way. (that may be a little optimistic)

[Blueflame]

As outrageous as that is, it was not the only shocking request made by the Bush/Cheney campaign last weekend.

http://www.azstarnet.com/dailystar/dailystar/32301.php

[watermock]

State Rep. Dan Foley, R-Roswell, speaking on behalf of the Republican Party, said Thursday that a "known Democrat operative group" was intending to try to crash Saturday's campaign rally at Rio Rancho Mid-High School. He added that some people were providing false names and addresses and added that tickets for the limited-seating event should go to loyal Bush backers.

BFD, Cheney told the hecklers to **** off to a limited seating event they planned to crash. And it wasn't an "oath" either, more like a nip in the bud.

Makes good print tho.

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

An article about how your REQUIRED to sign an loyalty oath to Bush/Cheney in order to even see our vice president speak. He's the fricking peoples vice president..

It's downright surreal, isn't it?

So much for the concept of "elected official."

These guys might as well wear swastikas on their sleeves.

It's both scary and painful to watch these slimebags destroy American democracy while the media and their brainless, deluded, knuckle-dragging supporters cheer them on.

Even the most ardent Bush supporter can't possibly spin this in a positive way.

The average bush supporter would find a way to spin video footage of bush and cheney robbing a bank.

To these people, it's not about reason, logic, or what's good for the country.

It's all about "go team GOP"--no matter how much dishonor and shame the court-appointed fraud brings to America and no matter how many crimes he commits in our name.

These cretins who are putting party before country when the stakes are so high are the ultimate traitors, IMO.

These people truly "hate America."

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

http://www.bartcopnation.com/dc/user_files/9492.jpg

[Rohirrim]

Heil Cheney!

[Captain_Poncho]

I saw this bit of information on the Daily Show this morning. Absolutely hilarious. The "Loyalty Form" misspelled "hereby" as "herby."

This is just downright bizarre.

[Rascal]

This reminds me of the new practice of escorting protesters away from areas to secure protest zones about 5 miles away.

Why in the hell are they doing this (bush isn't the only one mind you)? I thought it was a free country and I had the right to protest wherever the hell I want to.

The give the reason as security. WTF?? Do they honestly think that somebody who would attack the individual that is receiving the protest would simply stop their attack because they can't mingle with protestors and can't carry their sign.

That pisses me off.

[Exile_In_SJ]

Gee, some moveon.org inspired people try and infiltrate and disrupt a serious event and the republicans try and prevent it... no problems there.

I seem to recall during some open primaries in 2002 the democratic party tried to have voters sign something that swore they were democrat voters and not republican or independents...I had no problem with that, it's their primary and they can do what they want.

[watermock]

The point is that you never know when a Squeeky Fromme is going into the place. It was a limited seating rally. Got it yet?

Cheney told them to **** off. I think it's funny. And all the posturing by "disenfranchised" wannabe's can probably pick up a copy of the speech.

Why do you think they were there? To cheer Cheney or disrupt his speech? If these freaks would learn how to think, they might just get out more than "Long Live the Manatee"

[Rohirrim]

Well, I guess that's one way to appeal to the "undecideds"; make them sign a loyalty oath! rofl

[watermock]

I was watching "Canadian Bacon" the other night about how a President started a war to prop up his Poll numbers. It's a comedy.

Someone pointed out it was written by Michael Moore around the early 90's.

No wonder. His F9/11 is simply a remake.

[Hogan11]

I was watching "Canadian Bacon" the other night about how a President started a war to prop up his Poll numbers. It's a comedy.

Someone pointed out it was written by Michael Moore around the early 90's.

No wonder. His F9/11 is simply a remake.

That someone was me...has your enjoyment of the film soured somewhat now that you found out Moore was behind it? It shouldn't have, the movie is interesting and worthwhile. That was his first shot witha real budget/studio which sprung from the success of Roger & Me...

Do you think maybe W watched it and found it a worthwhile enough premise to try it out for real? Ha!

[Hogan11]

BTW..I'll never sign a "loyality oath" to anyone.....never.

[watermock]

And what is the point again?

It just showed the general format for 9/11.

The guy is a comedian. Go check it out.

The whole movie is not only a comedy, but a trasposition of his docudrama!

WTF are your trying to represent? That Canadian Bacon was not a comedy or how it closely resembled 9/11 ?

It's almost incredible. If anyone cared to really tear apart this crapazoid it will be my pleasure.

Do you really want me to?

[Hogan11]

And what is the point again?

It just showed the general format for 9/11.

The guy is a comedian. Go check it out.

The whole movie is not only a comedy, but a trasposition of his docudrama!

WTF are your trying to represent? That Canadian Bacon was not a comedy or how it closely resembled 9/11 ?

It's almost incredible. If anyone cared to really tear apart this crapazoid it will be my pleasure.

Do you really want me to?

I'm mildly surprised you haven't done it yet...........

[watermock]

It's been done. Canadian Bacon was the same thing. It's so obvious.

[Captain_Poncho]

BTW..I'll never sign a "loyality oath" to anyone.....never.

I have. To Mrs. Captain.

Great oath.

[Taco John]

I saw this bit of information on the Daily Show this morning. Absolutely hilarious. The "Loyalty Form" misspelled "hereby" as "herby."

This is just downright bizarre.



The Daily Show rocks... It's making this election season a lot more bearable.

[Mile High Shack]

The Daily Show rocks... It's making this election season a lot more bearable.

if your a GW hater

I like the daily show, but it's pretty obvious which side they lean towards......they tend to really rip on the reps and kinda barely rip the dems.

[Northman]

if your a GW hater

I like the daily show, but it's pretty obvious which side they lean towards......they tend to really rip on the reps and kinda barely rip the dems.


hmmm, sounds like O'Reilly..ooops, i forgot he is fair and balanced. ;)

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

Loyalty oath is further evidence that "uniter not a divider" = BS

It is a sad day when the President of the United States uses campaign rallies as invitation-only events, exclusively for those who support him. It is a tacit admission that no dialogue will be allowed. Mr. Bush doesn't even seem to feel the need to pretend that there is any reason he should put up with it.

By NOT putting up with it, however, isn't the great "Uniter not a Divider" admitting his inability to reach across the political divide and bring Americans together? He doesn't even make the effort. If you're not with him, you're against him. And you will not be tolerated.

http://www.buzzflash.com/contributors/04/08/con04326.html

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

Even Nixon tolerated hecklers, as in his vice-Presidential trip to Venezuela. It is abundantly clear that Dubya cannot rise to the level of Nixon's wing tips.

But all this careful staging is for naught. One day, protesters will figure out the chinks in the armor, and provide him with a MAJOR embarrassment.

[watermock]

First, Bush wasn't there, Cheney was. And it was a Republican fund raiser/rally, not an open air affair. Try again dimwit.

Imagine the Blues Brothers at the Shay Pau.

[Cito Pelon]

I'm watching a documentary about the Kent State shooting of students during a Vietnam War protest (History Channel).

There's no protests now like those back then. What has changed? One thing that has changed is people are more afraid of the power of the Federal Governmant. The chances of you being marked for surveillance and punishment - if you disagree with the powers that be - have gone way up since then (1970). The current message is "just agree and you'll be fine."

And it's all over a relatively minor threat. Without oil money, the Islamic threat is really pretty minor. We should be concentrating on eliminating the over-whelming importance of oil. A lot of positive things will fall into place if we accomplish that.

[watermock]

I'm watching a documentary about the Kent State shooting of students during a Vietnam War protest (History Channel).

There's no protests now like those back then. What has changed? One thing that has changed is people are more afraid of the power of the Federal Governmant. The chances of you being marked for surveillance and punishment - if you disagree with the powers that be - have gone way up since then (1970). The current message is "just agree and you'll be fine."

And Without oil money, the Islamic threat is really pretty minor. We should be concentrating on eliminating the over-whelming importance of oil. A lot of positive things will fall into place if we accomplish that.

Now how do you propose to accomplish that feat? Second, there are plenty of protests, the fact of the matter is you son't have to accept protests in a closed venue. The fact you might be marked for survelience has gone up across the board, probabably to an extent when we pretty much know who the bastards are.

it's all over a relatively minor threat.

Really?

This is classic Osterich Posture. You see no threat, just inconvenience. But if a big terrorist attack happens, you will be the first to run around like Chicken Little.

The window of Dissent hasn't changed whatsoever, just your perception of it.

What I am hearing is a lot of whining from the Democratic Party about the perfectly legal Swiftboat.Org.

So don't go there. I suggest you looks at Moveon.org and find out where that money is coming from.