watermock
07-27-2004, 11:31 PM
"Reason and Ideology"
I find it amusing that Ronnie seems to think that stem cells will be taken at 5 days.
How many women know they are pregnant at 5 days and decide to make stem cell research?
The term "embryonic" is rather amusing. Notice how he says 5 days repeatedly.
IMO, since we can chop babies into pieces under the existing law, so beyond this imaginary "no mind no fingers no conciousnous" assertion was beyond amusing.
How many abortions do you think are done at 5 days?
My guess would be much less than one percent. Which raises another question. You go ahead and create an embryo and insert a clone DNA?
Considering 20 million abortions are performed, why not, but it just makes more rediculous the assumption. Reagan also made incredible assumptions that stem cell research would of prevented his fathers death, who he constantly critiqued as a stone cold liberal.
Here is the point. You have to go back to the fundamental issue why so many abortions are performed.
The convenience of "embryo" is so misleading, because most abortions are well, well beyond that threshold. It was totally disengenuous.
He is asserting an egg is fertilized and can be taken out and redone with different DNA. I know it can be done. It allready has been.
He doesn't bring much else to the table. They can grow organs. They can't grow brains.
Fact of the matter is that it does raise ethical standards, even if its an embryo.
What he fails to mention is it's not 5 days.
at 30 days, it's a different matter isn't it!
So whatever.
All he is doing is placing some sort of acceptable random determination of life.
I heard him.
"It doesn't have any fingers, it doesn't feel any pain..."
The reason he's anxious is because by the first month the heartbeat is there.
So I tell you this you moron.
Dont call it Embyro studies.
I have allready told you to freeze your childs birth cord.
That gives stem cells and DNA.
I'm must going to bottle my head with Terri Garr.
I find it amusing that Ronnie seems to think that stem cells will be taken at 5 days.
How many women know they are pregnant at 5 days and decide to make stem cell research?
The term "embryonic" is rather amusing. Notice how he says 5 days repeatedly.
IMO, since we can chop babies into pieces under the existing law, so beyond this imaginary "no mind no fingers no conciousnous" assertion was beyond amusing.
How many abortions do you think are done at 5 days?
My guess would be much less than one percent. Which raises another question. You go ahead and create an embryo and insert a clone DNA?
Considering 20 million abortions are performed, why not, but it just makes more rediculous the assumption. Reagan also made incredible assumptions that stem cell research would of prevented his fathers death, who he constantly critiqued as a stone cold liberal.
Here is the point. You have to go back to the fundamental issue why so many abortions are performed.
The convenience of "embryo" is so misleading, because most abortions are well, well beyond that threshold. It was totally disengenuous.
He is asserting an egg is fertilized and can be taken out and redone with different DNA. I know it can be done. It allready has been.
He doesn't bring much else to the table. They can grow organs. They can't grow brains.
Fact of the matter is that it does raise ethical standards, even if its an embryo.
What he fails to mention is it's not 5 days.
at 30 days, it's a different matter isn't it!
So whatever.
All he is doing is placing some sort of acceptable random determination of life.
I heard him.
"It doesn't have any fingers, it doesn't feel any pain..."
The reason he's anxious is because by the first month the heartbeat is there.
So I tell you this you moron.
Dont call it Embyro studies.
I have allready told you to freeze your childs birth cord.
That gives stem cells and DNA.
I'm must going to bottle my head with Terri Garr.