PDA

View Full Version : All Things Dumocrat part duex


lonestar
02-19-2013, 04:09 PM
FOR THOSE FOLKS that want to learn, far left loons do not have to read..

Since the other one was closed, time to reinvent the wheel..

perhaps less juvenile responses and real conversation can evolve..

lonestar
02-19-2013, 04:10 PM
Gas Prices Soar 51 Cents in Just Two Months
Posted on February 19, 2013 by Cowboy Byte



Consumers are taking another huge hit in 2013. First, the two percent Social Security tax hike began the year. Now, gas prices are soaring ever closer to $4 a gallon and have jumped 51 cents a gallon since Dec. 20.

According to the Oil Price Information Service, the national average for a gallon of unleaded was $3.21.9 on Dec. 20, 2012. Today, that price is $3.73.0. While there has been a steady increase, prices shot almost 9 cents just over the weekend.

This President’s Day also marked a full month of rising gas prices every single business day, following a very small early year drop. Gas prices began rising Jan. 18, from $3.29.3-a-gallon, and have soared since. If this increase continues, gas prices could threaten or even top the all-time high price of $4.11, set in 2008.

Read more: http://cowboybyte.com/19082/gas-prices-soar-51-cents-in-just-two-months/#ixzz2LORw55AF

Missouribronc
02-19-2013, 10:31 PM
Kind of dumb to blame any party for gas prices. I think that's been proven over and over again in the last 12+ years.

lonestar
02-20-2013, 12:00 AM
Kind of dumb to blame any party for gas prices. I think that's been proven over and over again in the last 12+ years.

Perhaps it is not blaming just one party.

Yet nobamas stand on anything carbon based is IMO killing the economy. Shutting down the coal industry before they have viable answers in place is doing. Nothing but driving up costs..
Taking a huge part of the food industry out of the food market place and mandating ethanol is driving up costs for beef and chicken.

Not allowing drilling on federal lands, turning coal country into national wide life refuges (cliton)

Wasting time on keystone.

No new refinery being built since God only knows.

Yep all of those things are causing prices to rise.

DenverBrit
02-20-2013, 06:00 AM
http://s3.amazonaws.com/dk-production/images/14706/large/angry_Rush_Limbaugh.jpg?1357595916

DenverBrit
02-20-2013, 06:03 AM
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-8ALohwEeG2A/UONaF5GcXUI/AAAAAAAATlw/qfcFexmLLGI/s1600/angrywhiteguys.jpg

DenverBrit
02-20-2013, 06:05 AM
http://f.kulfoto.com/pic/0001/0014/sKwen13774.jpg

peacepipe
02-20-2013, 07:09 AM
Read more: http://cowboybyte.com/19082/gas-prices-soar-51-cents-in-just-two-months/#ixzz2LORw55AF

You want conversation but use a BS tabloid website as a source.Hilarious!Hilarious!

lonestar
02-20-2013, 08:23 AM
Sheriffs Can 'Inspect' Homes for Gun Storage under Democrat Bill
By Bobby Eberle February 19, 2013 12:31 pm


Is this just the beginning? Not only is Big Brother watching, but if the Democrats in Washington State have their way, sheriffs will have the power to "inspect" homes to make sure people are storing their firearms properly. What's next?

As reported in The Washington Times, the bill "would allow local sheriffs to enter homes of gun owners to ensure their weapons are properly stored."

The bill, pushed by Democrats, allows police to search where and how assault weapons are stored — as well as how safely they are stored, according to its text, listed in the state’s online legislative directory as SB 5737-2013-14.

The bill reads: “In order to continue to possess an assault weapon that was legally possessed on the effective date of this section, the person in possession shall … safely and securely store the assault weapon. The sheriff of the county may, no more than once per year, conduct an inspection to ensure compliance with this subsection.”

Infowars.com notes that the Democrats are now backpedaling from their position because, "if enacted, the law will allow police to search without a court-issued search warrant the homes of owners of legally purchased firearms."

Sen. Adam Kline of Seattle, a Democrat who is described by the Seattle Times as “hyper-attuned to civil-liberties issues,” sponsored the legislation without reading the eight page bill. “I made a mistake,” he told the newspaper. “I frankly should have vetted this more closely.”

The primary sponsor of the bill, Sen. Ed Murray, also a Democrat from Seattle, condemned the bill subsection authorizing police to search homes without a warrant. He said the plan to harass and intimidate legal gun owners is probably unconstitutional.

What are these people thinking? Will they put together any left wing garbage bill as long as there is no uproar? Do we really have to be on guard 24-7 to make sure America is still America? I guess so.

These people have no sense at all. They are violating the freedoms that make us Americans, and even worse, they are doing it all in the name of trying to "solve a problem." Well, here's a message for those on the left, passing bills that make it harder for law-abiding citizens to possess firearms only gives criminals an even bigger advantage.


http://www.gopusa.com/theloft/2013/02/19/sheriffs-can-inspect-homes-for-gun-storage-under-democrat-bill/?subscriber=1

lonestar
02-20-2013, 08:34 AM
You want conversation but use a BS tabloid website as a source.


yet y'all have carte blanc in using sources..

As I said you have the opportunity to come in and have meaningful dialog or NOT.. which means that seeing the title of the thread you DO NOT HAVE TO CLICK ON IT..

If you do not want to read information in it and perhaps get enlightened simply DO NOT ENTER..

not a hard concept..

I use restraint a lot in not going into thread I have ZERO interest in.. try it you will feel much better..

the last time I noticed forums such as this are for meaningful dialog nothing means you have to join in.. :thumbs:

lonestar
02-20-2013, 08:44 AM
NObama Admits: ‘Energy Is Going to Be a Little More Expensive’
Posted on February 20, 2013 by Cowboy Byte



During a Friday Google+ hangout session, President Barack NObama conceded that his policies to address climate change will raise energy costs, a fact that could prove uncomfortable for Democrats in areas reliant on fossil fuel power plants:

I have to tell you that there are some Democrats, for example, who represent states or districts that are heavily reliant on old power plants and are more heavily manufacturing based. And the truth is that if you produce power using old power plants, you’re going to be emitting more carbon, but, to upgrade those plants means energy is going to be a little more expensive, at least on the front end.

This is not the first time Obama has admitted to supporting price-raising energy policies. In 2008, then-candidate Obama said he was fine with soaring energy prices so long as they helped curb green house gas emissions. “Under my plan of a cap and trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket,” he said.

Print Friendly and PDF

Continue Reading on www.breitbart.com

Read more: http://cowboybyte.com/19118/obama-admits-energy-is-going-to-be-a-little-more-expensive/#ixzz2LSU4EnlP

peacepipe
02-20-2013, 08:47 AM
Brietbart?! At least pick a site that hasn't been caught lying on numerous occasions.

W*GS
02-20-2013, 08:51 AM
lonestar doesn't want conversation, he just wants to vomit hard-right bull****.

lonestar
02-20-2013, 08:56 AM
Brietbart?! At least pick a site that hasn't been caught lying on numerous occasions.

what do you not understand you are not required to be here. You have the absolute ability being a thinking ( well maybe) human to make intelligent decisions to open a thread or not..

Just as many posts the the far left loonies make they also have sources that some not tied to the far left loony, might consider less than stellar .

But the facts are dumocrats are indeed passing or attempting to do these things these folks are reporting..

sorry to burst your bubble..

lonestar
02-20-2013, 09:01 AM
Colorado Killing Jobs One Ammunition Magazine Ban at a Time
Posted on February 20, 2013 by Cowboy Byte



Yesterday the Colorado House passed four gun control bills, one of which bans ammunition magazines that hold more than 15 rounds. Magpul Industries, a company that produces some of the highest quality ammunition magazines around, has threatened to leave the state and take hundreds of jobs with it if this legislation is passed by the Senate and signed into law by Governor John Hickenlooper.

Formed in Colorado in 1999 by a former Marine, the successful Colorado company Magpul Industries employees over 200 people and offers over 500 polymer products.

But it’s one of their products that has garnered national attention, and controversy.

It’s the 30-round rifle magazine designed for the AR-15 and the military M4 and M16 rifles.

Famously or infamously known as the high capacity magazine.

It accounts for almost half of all sales at Magpul. “It’s the standard that’s used in our military as well as allied militaries. With state, federal and local law enforcement as well as hunters, recreational shooters, competitors and responsible citizens all over the united states,” says Duane Liptak, director of Magpul Dynamics in Erie, Colorado.


Read more: http://cowboybyte.com/19105/colorado-killing-jobs-one-ammunition-magazine-ban-at-a-time/#ixzz2LSXuIGdI


far left loonies strike again..

peacepipe
02-20-2013, 09:20 AM
what do you not understand you are not required to be here. You have the absolute ability being a thinking ( well maybe) human to make intelligent decisions to open a thread or not..

Just as many posts the the far left loonies make they also have sources that some not tied to the far left loony, might consider less than stellar .

But the facts are dumocrats are indeed passing or attempting to do these things these folks are reporting..

sorry to burst your bubble..
But I am required to be here, you are on a spamming spree & someone needs to point it out. People looking into this thread should know the credibility of a source like brietbart.

Archer81
02-20-2013, 09:35 AM
FOR THOSE FOLKS that want to learn, far left loons do not have to read..

Since the other one was closed, time to reinvent the wheel..

perhaps less juvenile responses and real conversation can evolve..


So you start the same thread a mod moved and closed originally.

Why?


:Broncos:

cutthemdown
02-20-2013, 10:14 AM
So you start the same thread a mod moved and closed originally.

Why?


:Broncos:

Because he wants a thread to post misc stories about things he finds amusing or wrong about the democratic party and its members. Is it so hard to figure out?

cutthemdown
02-20-2013, 10:15 AM
Also he was crapped on because people said he started too many threads. So instead of tons of threads he made one and posted numerous stories in it. Just make it how you all want it to be. All liberal propaganda all the time with no other viewpoints allowed. That way you can blame things like sequester on the repubs and keep head firmly buried in sand.

lonestar
02-20-2013, 12:27 PM
So you start the same thread a mod moved and closed originally.

Why?


:Broncos:

It was closed because the far left Loonies were unable to have a reasonable conversation and it deteriorated into spamming by them without legit conversations.

They are welcome to join in or ignore it like many of us that do not get into far left circle jerks.

No one is forcing them to open the thread that is obviously not a circle jerk of their peers.

When they do come in a little restraint or God forbid common courtesies would go a long way.

lonestar
02-20-2013, 12:29 PM
Because he wants a thread to post misc stories about things he finds amusing or wrong about the democratic party and its members. Is it so hard to figure out?

Amen Brother your preaching to the choir.

The Far Left Loonies need not apply.

Just as you, I and many others do not go into their circle jerks.

lonestar
02-20-2013, 12:32 PM
Also he was crapped on because people said he started too many threads. So instead of tons of threads he made one and posted numerous stories in it. Just make it how you all want it to be. All liberal propaganda all the time with no other viewpoints allowed. That way you can blame things like sequester on the repubs and keep head firmly buried in sand.

Precisely they all pissed and moaned about starting threads about various stuff, while doing it themselves. Look at the front page of the area.

One about DUMOCRATs the rest about far left loonies crap.

Just my little way of trying to bring fairness and balance to liberalville.

TonyR
02-20-2013, 12:52 PM
Just make it how you all want it to be. All liberal propaganda all the time with no other viewpoints allowed.

Yes, TJ is well known for his far left wing leanings...

Rigs11
02-20-2013, 12:53 PM
Kind of dumb to blame any party for gas prices. I think that's been proven over and over again in the last 12+ years.

Yep, dipshets like limpstar wont ever get it though.He and his party are constantly screaming for more production here in the US. Drill baby Drill! Yet what happens when the US produces more? OPEC cuts production elsewhere. Oops..

The most recent price hikes have come from a combination of factors, including rising crude oil prices, production cuts and refinery closings. OPEC – an intergovernmental agency of 12 petroleum-exporting countries – is believed to have made huge cuts in oil production over the past few months, according to CNNMoney. The decision to reduce production by as many as 1 million barrels a day was partly in response to increased production worldwide, including a rise in production in the United States.

http://www.hlntv.com/article/2013/02/18/gas-prices-crude-oil-prices-aaa

TonyR
02-20-2013, 12:58 PM
The word is spelled "deux" you stupid f***.

TonyR
02-20-2013, 01:01 PM
FOR THOSE FOLKS that want to learn...

LOL :rofl: LOL :rofl: LOL

Says the guy who can't spell and gets all of his info from right wing propaganda sites.

alkemical
02-20-2013, 01:01 PM
http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k82/amesj523/underweardoves1dsfs.jpg

Rigs11
02-20-2013, 01:04 PM
The word is spelled "deux" you stupid ****.

http://shii.org/mediawiki/images/1/1e/Boeing54kueuvg.jpg

alkemical
02-20-2013, 01:04 PM
http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k82/amesj523/jacksonlittlepeople1dfg.jpg

ghwk
02-20-2013, 01:04 PM
So you start the same thread a mod moved and closed originally.

Why?


:Broncos:

So he can thumb his nose at the mods, there really isn't any other reason. Might as well open the other thread back up.

alkemical
02-20-2013, 01:05 PM
http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k82/amesj523/4581537728_b931d1286c_z.jpg

alkemical
02-20-2013, 01:05 PM
http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k82/amesj523/Jackass.jpg

alkemical
02-20-2013, 01:06 PM
http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k82/amesj523/terrorismsurvivalguidegirlwithbarbi.jpg

alkemical
02-20-2013, 01:07 PM
http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k82/amesj523/monopolyblowjob.jpg

TonyR
02-20-2013, 01:27 PM
That way you can blame things like sequester on the repubs and keep head firmly buried in sand.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/02/20/the-powerpoint-that-proves-it-s-not-obama-s-sequester-after-all.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+thedailybeast%2Farticles+%28T he+Daily+Beast+-+Latest+Articles%29

http://washingtonexaminer.com/the-gops-astonishingly-bad-message-on-sequester-cuts/article/2522040

Rohirrim
02-20-2013, 02:32 PM
http://themetapicture.com/media/funny-gif-DJ-girl-pancakes.gif

DenverBrit
02-20-2013, 05:14 PM
Since the other one was closed, time to reinvent the wheel..



Hilarious!

Loonstar, thinks posting the same propaganda from the same blogger is reinventing the wheel??

http://umaitech.com/photos/warning.jpg

cutthemdown
02-20-2013, 05:58 PM
Yes, TJ is well known for his far left wing leanings...

TJ could care less he only wants clicks and traffic. We are talking about the behavoir of people who frequent the WPR forum nothing more.

TonyR
02-20-2013, 07:25 PM
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/02/20/the-powerpoint-that-proves-it-s-not-obama-s-sequester-after-all.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+thedailybeast%2Farticles+%28T he+Daily+Beast+-+Latest+Articles%29

http://washingtonexaminer.com/the-gops-astonishingly-bad-message-on-sequester-cuts/article/2522040

I notice cut is avoiding this in two threads.

cutthemdown
02-20-2013, 07:36 PM
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/02/20/the-powerpoint-that-proves-it-s-not-obama-s-sequester-after-all.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+thedailybeast%2Farticles+%28T he+Daily+Beast+-+Latest+Articles%29

http://washingtonexaminer.com/the-gops-astonishingly-bad-message-on-sequester-cuts/article/2522040

I have no doubt you believe that BS. The sequester was Lews idea and Boehner liked it because it at some point would force cuts to be made.

Obama got his tax raise but he won't cut without even more tax increases. This is all on Obama now because he isn;t playing straight.

did obama get taxes raised = yes
did obama get debt limit raised = yes
has obama agreed to any cuts= no

He's saying same thing he has always said not without new revenue. Which is BS because he hasn't come through on any reductions to spending yet.

Even liberals should be fed up with this BS by now.

Missouribronc
02-20-2013, 08:07 PM
Perhaps it is not blaming just one party.

Yet nobamas stand on anything carbon based is IMO killing the economy. Shutting down the coal industry before they have viable answers in place is doing. Nothing but driving up costs..
Taking a huge part of the food industry out of the food market place and mandating ethanol is driving up costs for beef and chicken.

Not allowing drilling on federal lands, turning coal country into national wide life refuges (cliton)

Wasting time on keystone.

No new refinery being built since God only knows.

Yep all of those things are causing prices to rise.

This is bull.

The prices have fluctuated wildly despite policies and whose in power. Within less than a month I've paid less than 3 bucks for gas and today I paid $3.79.

To blame it on the President is idiotic.

His energy policies are, in fact, wildly stupid based on infrastructure and impact, but to say that directly causes gas prices is also inaccurate.

Pony Boy
02-20-2013, 08:28 PM
This is bull.

The prices have fluctuated wildly despite policies and whose in power. Within less than a month I've paid less than 3 bucks for gas and today I paid $3.79.

To blame it on the President is idiotic.

His energy policies are, in fact, wildly stupid based on infrastructure and impact, but to say that directly causes gas prices is also inaccurate.

What I have a problem with is Obama's lack of support for the Keystone pipeline. The Keystone pipeline would create jobs and boost the economy in the U.S. and Canada our closest ally.

He prefers to buy oil from Venezuela and the Muslim countries that hate our guts…… go figure

Missouribronc
02-20-2013, 08:30 PM
What I have a problem with is Obama's lack of support for the Keystone pipeline. The Keystone pipeline would create jobs and boost the economy in the U.S. and Canada our closest ally.

He prefers to buy oil from Venezuela and the Muslim countries that hate our guts…… go figure

I agree.

But it has little to do with gas prices.

cutthemdown
02-20-2013, 08:36 PM
No one policy has a huge impact. But when you add up all of Obamas anti energy policies you can see how that has an impact on energy prices. Not just gas but electricity is also through the roof.

Pony Boy
02-20-2013, 09:03 PM
I agree.

But it has little to do with gas prices.

The Keystone pipeline would be a major in step in stabilizing the price of gas in the U.S., we would eliminate the yoyo effect caused by the political unrest in the Middle East.

It seems like the environmentalist that have a problem with pipeline would see the advantage of not sending 10 to 15 empty super tankers to the Middle East on a daily basis.

houghtam
02-20-2013, 09:22 PM
The Keystone pipeline would be a major in step in stabilizing the price of gas in the U.S., we would eliminate the yoyo effect caused by the political unrest in the Middle East.

It seems like the environmentalist that have a problem with pipeline would see the advantage of not sending 10 to 15 empty super tankers to the Middle East on a daily basis.

It would also transport tar sands oil through the US, which, if it spills, is about a million times harder to clean up than traditional.

There was a tar sands spill in 2010 in Kalamazoo, MI on the Kalamazoo River. They still haven't been able to clean it up.

No thanks, I don't want that **** in my country.

lonestar
02-20-2013, 09:32 PM
This is bull.

The prices have fluctuated wildly despite policies and whose in power. Within less than a month I've paid less than 3 bucks for gas and today I paid $3.79.

To blame it on the President is idiotic.

His energy policies are, in fact, wildly stupid based on infrastructure and impact, but to say that directly causes gas prices is also inaccurate.

so you are saying that if millions of acres of federally owned land were available for drilling, the keystone pipeline were up and running Anwar as well as EPA restrictions could be lifted, that Refineries could be built and last but not least the redistribution of farm products, that it would have zero effect on prices of gasoline, diesel and natural gas?


oh throw in his war on coal and the power plants that have been shut down, which means billions of cubic feet of natural gas have been diverted to run, would also have zero effect on our cost of living?


I doubt you can say with a straight face that any or all of these measures that the dumocrats have put into place over the past couple of decades really have done nothing but raise prices..

MO it is supply and demand, if there is more locally produced product we do not have to but it elsewhere, there is lower transportation costs and more jobs in the USA, all of which would HELP to keep the costs down..

lonestar
02-20-2013, 09:35 PM
It would also transport tar sands oil through the US, which, if it spills, is about a million times harder to clean up than traditional.

There was a tar sands spill in 2010 in Kalamazoo, MI on the Kalamazoo River. They still haven't been able to clean it up.

No thanks, I don't want that **** in my country.

just curious do you live in any of those states?

Just how many oil spills how there been in the US in the past couple of decades?

houghtam
02-20-2013, 10:03 PM
just curious do you live in any of those states?

Just how many oil spills how there been in the US in the past couple of decades?

No I do not, but I also don't live in Florida, and I still don't believe we should drain the Everglades and put up condos there.

And according to Wikipedia, there have been 31 oil spills in the past 20 years, including the spill in the Kalamazoo River, which was tar sands oil (just like the Keystone Pipeline is supposed to carry), which, when spilled, sinks to the bottom, and cannot be cleaned up by conventional means.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_oil_spills

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talmadge_Creek_oil_spill

lonestar
02-20-2013, 10:09 PM
No I do not, but I also don't live in Florida, and I still don't believe we should drain the Everglades and put up condos there.

And according to Wikipedia, there have been 31 oil spills in the past 20 years, including the spill in the Kalamazoo River, which was tar sands oil (just like the Keystone Pipeline is supposed to carry), which, when spilled, sinks to the bottom, and cannot be cleaned up by conventional means.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_oil_spills

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talmadge_Creek_oil_spill

thanks for your candor..

I still want to see the keystone pipe line built and us get the use of the products..

I'm tired of giving our money to muslims that hate us and chinese that are trying to take over the world..

lonestar
02-20-2013, 10:26 PM
Blacks Point Out Obvious to Obama - Amnesty Means Fewer Jobs, Lower Wages
By Joe Guzzardi February 20, 2013 12:27 pm


If Barack Obama gets his wish for an illegal alien amnesty, he will have set African-American causes back further than any president in recent memory. During a period when black unemployment is brutally high, either legal residency or a full blown amnesty that includes citizenship would authorize an additional 11 million workers to compete with blacks for scarce jobs.

The Census Bureau's American Community Survey's latest data found the following U-6 unemployment statistics for U.S.-born blacks: young adults 18-29 with a high school diploma, 41.8 percent; high school drop outs age 18-65, 61.0 percent and teens age 16-17, 53.6 percent. The federal government's U-6 unemployment rate includes not only people actively looking for employment who cannot find any kind of job but also counts "discouraged workers" who stopped looking and those who want a full-time job but have been forced to settle for a part-time position.

Obama's apparent disregard for blacks' plights dates back to his administration's first days and continues today. In 2009 Obama supporter Danny Glover charged the president with not doing enough for blacks. Obama retaliated on the American Urban Radio Networks that he cannot pass legislation that favors one demographic over another but could pass "laws that help all people especially those who are most vulnerable and most in need."

But the fact that passing amnesty would devastate blacks as well as other unemployed Hispanics and poor Americans is beyond argument. Anyone who can do simple math can figure out that adding 11 million potential workers seriously hurts the job chances of the 20 million unemployed or under-employed Americans.


much more at
http://www.gopusa.com/commentary/2013/02/20/guzzardi-blacks-point-out-obvious-to-obama-amnesty-means-fewer-jobs-lower-wages/?subscriber=1

Meck77
02-21-2013, 06:03 AM
Democrats want to tax bikes in seatle. Friggen bikes!

http://seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2020393904_transpopackagexml.html

cutthemdown
02-21-2013, 10:25 AM
Democrats want to tax bikes in seatle. Friggen bikes!

http://seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2020393904_transpopackagexml.html

Oh yeah! Whats happening is as the govt through taxes forces people onto public transportation, bikes, electric cars they will lose revenue from gas tax.

So what they will do is raise the tax on gas, tax electricity more, raise registrtation for cars, raise bus prices.

It's funny how liberals just love this stuff. They tax us to use green, then they will tax the green baby. Is there anything the liberals don't want to raise tax on? just wondering.

cutthemdown
02-21-2013, 10:27 AM
Did you guys here how they figured out how to release enegry from coal without burning it? I will try and find the story again and post the link.

lonestar
02-21-2013, 10:48 AM
Oh yeah! Whats happening is as the govt through taxes forces people onto public transportation, bikes, electric cars they will lose revenue from gas tax.

So what they will do is raise the tax on gas, tax electricity more, raise registrtation for cars, raise bus prices.

It's funny how liberals just love this stuff. They tax us to use green, then they will tax the green baby. Is there anything the liberals don't want to raise tax on? just wondering.

until it effects the left loonies HARD in their OWN pockets they will continue to spend everyone else's money..

Instead of looking at WHY they think they need to do it, understand why they should not, it will continue..

TonyR
02-21-2013, 11:06 AM
Regarding Breitbart, particularly its recent "Friends of Hamas" garbage:

Do pundits and politicians learn to be highly skeptical of the news source and, if it doesn’t clean itself up, eventually shun it — or do they continue to cite it as if it’s totally legitimate? The answers to date suggest that the GOP is perfectly happy to welcome into the tent an organization that is happy to fabricate “news” that supports conservative story lines. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2013/02/20/after-the-friends-of-hamas-debacle-will-conservatives-finally-learn-the-obvious-lesson/

lonestar
02-21-2013, 11:53 AM
Regarding Breitbart, particularly its recent "Friends of Hamas" garbage:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2013/02/20/after-the-friends-of-hamas-debacle-will-conservatives-finally-learn-the-obvious-lesson/

So using a left leaning Washington post BLOG validates your premise.

Most of the stories carried by cowboy byte are not based on brietbart. In fact just a few months ago one of your comrades lauded brietbart for their evenness in the reporting of events.

But Tony you go ahead and keep the far left loony faith and I'll tend to beleive what I read from various other sources. I'm ok with that.

lonestar
02-21-2013, 01:17 PM
Nobama’s Response to 2% Cut: Let Criminals Free, End Food Safety Inspections
Posted on February 21, 2013

untitled

Here’s the 3 by 5 index card version of what the GOP’s message on sequestration ought to be:


Our current level of spending is unsustainable. Spending must go down. Period.

This is a 2 percent cut.


Sure, if we in the Republican Party had complete control of the government, we would be implementing the cuts differently. But we don’t.

Congress can only appropriate funds; it doesn’t run the departments and agencies that spend the money. That’s the power and responsibility of the executive branch.

If the Obama administration’s response to a 2 percent cut is really to let all the criminals out of the jails and end food safety inspections, then it is no longer disputable that he’s a Stuttering Cluster-you-know-what of a Miserable Failure.

I’m not exaggerating on Obama’s doomsday talk:

President Obama on Tuesday painted a dire picture of federal government operations across the United States should automatic budget cuts hit on March 1: F.B.I. agents furloughed, criminals released, flights delayed, teachers and police officers laid off and parents frantic to find a place for children locked out of day care centers.

“Federal prosecutors will have to close cases and let criminals go,” Mr. Obama said, flanked by law enforcement officers at the White House. “Tens of thousands of parents will have to scramble to find child care for their kids.”

While the effects may ultimately be significant, many are unlikely to be felt immediately, officials said Tuesday after the president’s remarks. Rather, they will ripple gradually across the federal government as agencies come to grips in the months ahead with across-the-board cuts to all their programs.

…But officials conceded that day care centers are almost certainly not going to be padlocked on March 1. Border patrols will be staffed throughout that day and the days to come. Federal agents will continue to conduct investigations, and criminals will not immediately be “let go,” as Mr. Obama suggested.

Read more: http://conservativebyte.com/2013/02/obamas-response-to-a-2-cut-is-to-let-criminals-out-of-jails-and-end-food-safety-inspections/#ixzz2LYonGb5n


what the FLL forget is this was this morons idea back in the fall.. so congress went along.. back on NOV 21 he made a speech about vetoing any idea that had spending cuts in it..

now that this morons idea is coming to fruition he is squealing like a pig that is about to get relieved of his gonads..

Blart
02-21-2013, 01:23 PM
I've been lol'in all day @ breitbart's "friends of hamas"